Is off-price Burlington the retail we need as the economy wavers?
That's good news for Burlington Stores, the nationwide off-price retailer founded in South Jersey. Burlington opened 100 new locations in 2024 and plans to continue that pace of expansion this year and beyond.
"It's a dynamic time right now, and off-price is a good place to be in retail because consumers want the best value," Chris Miller, group senior vice president of marketing and strategy, said earlier this month at the Burlington corporate campus in Burlington Township.
At around 20,000 square feet, new stores in places like Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania, will be about one-third the size of a typical Burlington location of a decade ago. The company has been steadily downsizing the square footage of its new stores since 2017.
The company is expanding into underserved markets, including urban downtowns. A Burlington store opened last year on Broad Street in the heart of Newark, New Jersey.
Meanwhile, the layouts and other features of some existing stores, like the one anchoring the eastern end of the Fashion District in Philadelphia, are being "refreshed," according to company officials.
"We don't have an e-commerce presence. We're strictly bricks and mortar," said Miller, 51, who joined Burlington in 2017. He previously served in marketing and brand development capacities at the Fresh Market and Target chains.
With net sales of $10.6 billion in 2024, the Fortune 500 firm has 1,108 stores in 46 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, including 39 in the Philadelphia region.
"Our primary focus has always been on our physical stores," Miller said. "With e-commerce, when you fully account for the cost of merchandising, processing, shipping, and accepting returns, it's very difficult to manage … the price points in the businesses that we compete in."
About 4,700 people work at the corporate campus and warehouses in Burlington County, New Jersey, and another 2,100 are employed in the Philly area stores.
He noted that Burlington's peers, including Ross and TJ Maxx, are significantly larger, with 1,847 and 1,327 stores, respectively.
But size isn't everything. Miller said Burlington "has evolved … to offer brands people recognize at prices that really amaze them."
Knowing the customers
Burlington's smaller-format approach continues to center the treasure-seeking, bargain-hunting shopping experience strongly identified with off-price retailing.
The compact stores and shorter aisles, along with the refreshes, aim to provide shoppers with clearer, faster routes to their preferred brands.
"We love that our customers love the experience of coming in to the store and looking for treasure," said Lyndsay Parker, 35, a local district manager who joined Burlington as a seasonal, part-time sales associate in 2012.
"They need to see the merchandise, touch it, and try it on," she said. "And they're very value-conscious. They don't want to break the bank."
Pete Fader, a professor of marketing at the Wharton School, said a deep knowledge of its customers seems to be guiding the company's approach.
"The experiential treasure hunt aspect is real, and the smaller stores may be a good move," he said. "Experiential shopping is like looking for a needle in a haystack, and offering smaller haystacks could be more appealing to more people."
Philly-area store managers "are really good at getting to know the community," Parker said. "They know the brands and the trends and the need to pull that merchandise forward."
The deep roots of off-price
The anticipation of discovering high-quality items at lower-than-prevailing prices was born in the major department store "bargain basements" of the late 19th century. Wholesalers like Burlington's predecessor firm, which was established in 1924 to sell women's clothing direct to the public, later found success as well.
But off-price really took off during the inflationary 1970s and '80s, when enormous "warehouse stores" and "factory outlets" beckoned Philly-area bargain hunters to board buses for Reading, Pennsylvania, which began calling itself the Outlet Capital of the World.
What is now Burlington Stores was very much a part of that boom; the first Burlington Coat Factory opened on Route 130 in Burlington Township in 1972, and dozens more quickly followed.
By 1993, the opening of a 130,000-square-foot Burlington store at the outlet-focused Franklin Mills (now Philadelphia Mills) Mall in far Northeast Philly featured "20,000 coats," according to a story in The Inquirer.
The way forward
The original Burlington Coat Factory store on Route 130 closed in 2008. The company went public in 2013 and in the last decade shed the "coat factory" portion of its name.
"Certainly we still carry coats," Miller said. "But we're leaning more into styles and trends."
The company also is continuing its community partnerships locally as well as across the country.
Among the company's national partners is the nonprofit Adopt a Classroom, through which Burlington recently made a $20,000 donation for purchase of school supplies at Fountain Woods Elementary School in Burlington Township.
The company also has had a long-standing relationship with the Burlington Township Food Pantry.
After the nonprofit lost its lease in 2017, it was given space, rent-free, in a Burlington warehouse near the corporate campus.
And in 2022, Burlington donated and helped renovate the building as the pantry's permanent home.
"When we rebranded Burlington Coat Factory, we made a conscious decision to make the B in [the new Burlington logo] a heart," said Miller. "The heart conveys our culture, how we treat our customers and our associates, and how we want to give back."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In his 20s, the boss of this 4,100-employee Fortune 500 company tried to refuse a promotion to CEO—his advice to new grads is stay ‘humble'
EXCLUSIVE: Tony Cheng rose up the corporate ladder at Reinsurance Group of America by embracing challenging roles early and credits his steady, decades-long career growth to continual learning, humility, and a willingness to take on responsibility. His leadership helped expand RGA's presence in Asia and beyond, encouraging individuals looking to lead companies to always be open to continued growth. It's rare to be offered a big promotion and turn it down, but it's even rarer to warn superiors you don't feel prepared for the role and be appointed anyway. Yet that's precisely what happened to Reinsurance Group of America boss, Tony Cheng, in his early years with the business. Cheng has worked his way up the ranks of RGA over the past three decades, helping grow the company to its current position of $3.9 trillion of reinsurance covering active policyholders. In 2025, RGA announced a landmark $1.5 billion deal with Equitable to reinsure $32 billion worth of life insurance policies, securing its place as an industry leader and expected to boost earnings for quarters come. Sitting down for an exclusive interview with Fortune this summer, Cheng reflected on that all-important promotion to CEO, and the value of staying humble even in the C-suite. The following has been condensed and edited for clarity. Tony, in an era where job-hopping is often seen as the fast track to career growth, you've chosen a different tactic—working up through RGA since 1997. Where did your work ethic come from, and what's inspired your long-standing commitment to the company? I was born in Hong Kong, and my parents—both teachers—felt for the future of their four kids (of which I was the youngest) Australia would provide the Western education they wanted. So I grew up in Australia from nine months to the age of 20 and didn't travel overseas much. My parents worked incredibly hard. Mom looked after the four kids and Dad unfortunately had to give up his love for teaching because it just wouldn't pay the bills. Eventually they opened up small businesses and then we, the four kids, on the weekend would go work there—12 hour days—and didn't think otherwise. That really bred in the sacrifice of the parents, the hard work, all things I'd wish to pass onto my kids. Growing up as many of us in a Western country but very Asian family do, I think I went to Asia once in my life, so [I took] an opportunity to join RGA in 1997 in Malaysia. Between 1999 and 2002 you returned to the States to earn an MBA while working for RGA, before leaving to head up the Hong Kong office. When you arrived, you had a team of 10. The Asia Pacific region now has more than 1,000 employees and revenues of $4 billion. Are there untapped career opportunities in emerging markets as opposed to progressing in established regions? We had a very small operation, but we were actually covering about 500 million people. It was Hong Kong and Southeast Asia so Malaysia, Thailand, all those countries. I went there as the actuary, and a year and a half later they promoted me to be the CEO of that business. It was daunting, right? The first time I was asked to take it by my boss, I sort of said, 'No, I'm too young.' At the time I was 29. He ignored that. The equation in my mind was I've probably got a 10% chance of success—and that would be great—or a 90% chance of failure, but hey, I'm gonna learn a hell of a lot. I had no mortgage, no kids, so just wanted to learn. Maybe that instinct, that desire and drive to keep learning was from my parents being teachers. In its latest financial results RGA reported revenues of $22.1 billion. How has the start-up mentality you learned in Asia helped grow the business globally? We built that business up with incredible hard work. I'd joke internally that once every month or so pest control would come in, and that meant we could go home at 5 o'clock because what else were we going to do with ourselves? That was the spirit. In the early days, you solve problems. I'd say to the team: 'Let's just try. We know it's really hard, but let's just try.' In the U.S., people usually don't create new products or create new things because the market's so big, a lot of it's already played out and it's been created. Any good idea has been thought of, and that's truly okay. It's actually more connecting the dots in the U.S., but with a drive to not just settle on: 'Hey, here's the market, we want a share of it' it's a drive to create new things or a new combination of things so that we [can] increase the pie and share in that greater value creation. That's always been in the company spirit, it was just really about bringing that out again to the forefront. Like a lot of other Fortune 500 CEOs we speak to, you clearly have a love for learning. In a world where AI is expected to disrupt the labor market, what are the skills you're looking for in new talent? I can only think of what I advise my son, who's in his second year of college. As the younger generation already knows, AI is gonna accelerate, and therefore number one they've absolutely got to be able to use it and partner with it. Ultimately AI, one would think, is gonna replace whatever is mathematically easier to replace. Had a conversation at one of the town halls with some risk professionals in the U.S. last week and I said all those soft skills really matter, you've still got to learn the hard skills, you've got to understand your subject matter expertise regardless of technology, but increasingly all those abilities to interact, to communicate, to join the dots, to be able to understand information, communicate it, and just put those dots together is the stuff that's gonna be obviously harder for AI to replicate. Maybe it will one day, but then you've just got to keep elevating yourself. So, what is that a lesson of? It is a lesson of continually adapting, continually learning, a bit like a sports person. When they've lost their passion to play and fight, it's time to retire. For me, when I've lost that passion to learn and grow, you're probably not gonna give it your full go, hence maybe the learning really just keeps me going. It's not like I ever said, 'Hey, I want to be the CEO of the company.' I was so far away, I just wanted to be treated right and enjoy the journey and the growth, So the lesson to individuals is you've just got to keep learning, you've got to be humble. If you're not humble, you're not gonna listen to yourself or your failings, you're gonna blame them on something else as opposed to, 'Well, what was my role in that?' so I can learn. This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


The Hill
21 hours ago
- The Hill
Arizona woman sentenced over North Korea tech-worker fraud scheme
An Arizona woman was sentenced to more than eight years in prison on Thursday after she pleaded guilty to helping North Korean tech workers secure remote jobs with hundreds of U.S. firms using false identities. Christina Marie Chapman, 50, of Litchfield Park, Ariz., helped North Korean workers gain IT positions at 309 U.S. businesses as part of a scheme that reaped in more than $17 million, mostly for Pyongyang, according to a Justice Department statement. The department said much of the income was falsely reported to the IRS and Social Security Administration using the names of actual U.S. citizens, who had their identities stolen or borrowed. The scheme created false tax liabilities for 68 Americans whose identities were compromised, according to the DOJ. 'The impacted companies included a top-five major television network, a Silicon Valley technology company, an aerospace manufacturer, an American car maker, a luxury retail store, and a U.S media and entertainment company,' the DOJ said in its release. In the wake of the scheme, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro urged companies to be more vigilant when vetting remote workers. 'North Korea is not just a threat to the homeland from afar. It is an enemy within. It is perpetrating fraud on American citizens, American companies and American banks. It is a threat to Main Street in every sense of the word,' Pirro said in a statement. 'The call is coming from inside the house. If this happened to these big banks, to these Fortune 500, brand name, quintessential American companies, it can or is happening at your company. Corporations failing to verify virtual employees pose a security risk for all. You are the first line of defense against the North Korean threat,' she added. Last year, the Justice Department made multiple arrests in connection to foreign remote workers who gained U.S. employment with stolen identities. In response to the latest scheme, U.S. District Court Judge Randolph D. Moss ordered Chapman to serve three years of supervised release in addition to the 102-month prison sentence. She will also be required to forfeit nearly $285,000 that was to be paid to the North Koreans and pay a judgement of more than $175,000. Chapman pleaded guilty on Feb. 11 in the District of Columbia to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, aggravated identity theft and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, the DOJ said.


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Why Technology Alone Can't Fix Healthcare
Vivek Jetley, president and head of Insurance, Healthcare and Life Sciences at EXL, a global data and AI company serving Fortune 500 firms. According to the AMA, "healthcare spending in the U.S. increased by 7.5% in 2023 to $4.9 trillion," putting us well on track for healthcare to account for some 20% of the U.S. GDP by 2032. Meanwhile, about 25% of that spending is estimated to be the result of waste. From administrative complexity and billing errors to outright fraud and abuse, the entire healthcare payments cycle is rife with opportunities to fix broken workflows and decrease patient, provider and health insurer frustrations. For the last decade or so, technology has been touted as the panacea to this problem. First, through predictive analytics and machine learning, and more recently through generative AI (GenAI) and agentic AI models that have promised to spot anomalies and red flags before erroneous claims are even paid, each technological evolution brings new promises to fix healthcare. Yet, wasteful healthcare spending just keeps rising. Where's the disconnect? Enterprise AI Initiatives Stuck On First Base One answer can be found in a recent survey my firm conducted of C-suite executives from the banking and finance, insurance, retail, utilities and healthcare payer industries. Seeking deeper insight into how large businesses are using AI and where they're encountering hurdles, we found that 60% of enterprise AI initiatives are still stuck in the pilot phase. Among the biggest barriers keeping them from progressing were talent shortages and data quality. These findings should resonate for anyone who has ever tried to deploy an off-the-shelf AI model to improve health insurance claims processing or monitor payment integrity. Although, the best large language models (LLMs) can ingest reams of data and immediately spot red flags and surface important insights, the whole thing falls apart once a generic model is set loose in a complex claims processing workflow that involves dozens of handoffs and incredibly specialized knowledge of health insurance, medical billing and claims data. It's why even a supercomputer like IBM's Watson failed (paywall) when it tried to tackle healthcare. That doesn't mean, however, that there's no place for AI in healthcare—quite the opposite. When deployed properly, AI is already transforming the way health insurers and providers manage payments. But it takes much more than off-the-shelf technology alone to make it work. The real key to extracting value from AI in healthcare comes from embedding specialized technology at critical points in the claims review and processing workflow and carefully choreographing all the parts. But it isn't something that can be done through technology alone. It also requires deep industry expertise and the ability to harness data from several different systems, many of which haven't historically talked to one another. Transforming Payment Integrity Let's look at the world of payment integrity, for example. This is the process health insurance companies and healthcare providers go through to ensure that the fees billed for healthcare services are aligned with the services rendered and the fee schedules outlined in the insurance policy. This isn't easy. Research suggests that about $266 billion is wasted every year due to administrative complexity. This complexity can cause miscoding or the inaccurate interpretation of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines and fee schedules, resulting in errors. The old way of screening for these types of errors was to deploy teams of registered nurses and medical coders to manually review all claims against existing policy details to search for inconsistencies. More recently, GenAI has been introduced to cover more ground much faster and more accurately than a human could ever do. However, simply being able to spot data anomalies with technology isn't enough. For these systems to truly add value, they must be constantly updated to reflect changes in fee schedules, standards of care and coverage policy details. Additionally, they must accurately distinguish between true errors and false positives, efficiently routing this information to the appropriate human reviewers for in-depth analysis. AI Isn't A Shortcut What, on the surface, may sound like a simple scenario in which an AI model is fed a bunch of rules and asked to find instances where those rules are being broken is actually an incredibly nuanced process that requires specialized technology and people who understand the workflow. To put this in context, if a specialized AI model processes 4 billion claims annually and 1% of those are flagged as errors that require further investigation, that 1% could translate to several million dollars in erroneous payments. But the AI is only valuable in that scenario if it's surfacing incredibly precise results. More often, companies that deploy off-the-shelf models to do this type of work end up with thousands of false positives and inaccurate interpretations that end up putting them back to square one, with manual reviewers scouring reports and a lot of money wasted on technology they don't trust. Like everything else in business, there are no shortcuts or replacements for deep industry expertise. The most powerful AI models may promise to save time, money and create seamless processes, but without the ability to embed those models deep into the fabric of an enterprise workflow, the model will be useless. Fortunately, many firms are finding that by developing highly specialized models and working with industry experts to deploy them, real breakthroughs aren't only possible, they're happening today. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?