logo
Top NOAA officials placed on leave. One said he clashed with Trump appointees.

Top NOAA officials placed on leave. One said he clashed with Trump appointees.

Washington Post2 days ago
Two high-ranking officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration were placed on leave this week, including one official who said he had recently clashed with officials over the Trump administration's proposals for the agency.
Former agency officials said both Steve Volz, assistant administrator in the agency's satellite division, and Jeff Dillen, deputy NOAA general counsel, held positions that allowed them to push back against Trump's NOAA appointees. While the pair had only occasionally worked together while at NOAA, they also led the investigation into the 'Sharpiegate' scandal during the first Trump administration.
Volz was not given an explicit reason why he was placed on administrative leave but said tensions between him and Trump's appointees had been rising. For one, Volz said he had recently pushed back during discussions of commercializing satellite operations.
'The question that I would ask is, why now?' Volz said in an interview. 'Maybe the desire here is to get anybody who might slow down their ability to execute their plan out of the way. I think I'm one of those people.'
During Trump's first term, Volz and Dillen served as the senior executive and senior council during an investigation that found NOAA's leadership violated its scientific integrity policy. The agency had released a statement backing Trump's hand-drawn version of a forecast for 2019's Hurricane Dorian, which showed the storm threatening Alabama.
Neil Jacobs, Trump's pick to head NOAA who is on the path to confirmation, was the acting NOAA administrator at the time.
For his part, Volz said he thought it was a coincidence that both he and Dillen had been placed on leave, and that he had not received any indication it was related.
In a statement, a spokeswoman for NOAA said there is no connection between the two officials being put on leave.
'Mr. Dillen was placed on administrative leave by the department's senior career attorney pending a review of performance issues over the past several weeks,' NOAA spokeswoman Kim Doster said in an email. 'Separately, Dr. Volz was placed on administrative leave on an unrelated matter.'
Volz is the longest serving assistant administrator of the National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, working in the role for 11 years across both Republican and Democratic administrations. He works alongside Trump's NOAA appointees in his capacity as Assistant Secretary for Environmental Observation and Protection.
The Trump administration has not publicly endorsed privatizing satellite or weather operations. A conservative blueprint for this second term outlined proposals to privatize some of the National Weather Service work while breaking up NOAA.
Monica Medina, who served as deputy administrator of NOAA during the Obama administration, said debates about privatization have occurred under many past presidents, but that rebuking those who oppose commercialization would be a concerning move.
'Career civil servants have a historical understanding of the agency, of the work, of how to run the operation,' Medina said. 'What you want is to have them feel like they can speak up and tell you when you when you might not see around a blind corner or have that crucial experience that they've had in other difficult situations.'
Dillen, who has served as deputy general counsel for NOAA since 2016, could not be reached for comment. Former NOAA Chief Scientist Craig McLean who has worked with Dillen in the past said he would not be surprised if he was also active in critiquing the Trump administration from a legal perspective.
'I could easily imagine how Jeff would be the conscience of law to tell the Trump administration where and why they are wrong and unlawful in certain pursuits they might be engaging in,' McLean said.
CNN first reported earlier Friday that Volz and Dillen had been placed on leave.
A NOAA official familiar with the matter said that if confirmed, Jacobs intends to work closely with Irene Parker, currently the deputy assistant administrator for systems.
'[Jacobs] and Irene [Parker] are both wholehearted proponents of commercializing the federal weather satellite operation, Steve [Volz] has been in their minds an obstacle to that,' the official wrote to the Post on the condition of anonymity. '[Volz's] view has been there should always be a federal backbone of satellites operating because the work we do is so sensitive and critical, the calibration needs to be so precise. But what Irene [Parker] wants is just a full commercialization of the entire process.'
McLean said placing Volz on leave is legally dubious.
'Steve Volz is a career senior executive,' McLean said. 'There are rights that senior executives have, though the Trump administration has stepped on them. And to the people whose rights have been stepped on, that awaits formal adjudication and a determination.'
The letter Volz received informing him of his leave, reviewed by The Post, said there would be an investigation into his 'recent conduct.'
'Conduct is very conspicuous,' McLean said. 'Conduct is one of the few reasons that somebody could be dealt with in a prejudicial manner.'
The removal of the two officials comes at a time when NOAA has faced deep cuts that include hundreds of scientists and meteorologists that have left through firings, buyouts and retirements.
In his confirmation hearing earlier this month, Jacobs expressed concern about cuts to Weather Service staffing.
'If confirmed, I will ensure that staffing the Weather Service offices is a top priority,' he said. 'It's really important for the people to be there, because they have relationships with the people in the local community.'
And there have been even more recent resignations, including a swath of senior NOAA employees like Jeff Thomas who directs NOAA's Acquisition and Grants Office. The agency has a more than $6 billion budget, but Trump has proposed cutting it by more than one-fourth.
'We're losing experienced people,' Medina said, 'not only because they're good at what they do, in terms of taking the weather data and creating local forecasts on a timely basis every day without fail, but also because they also have the connections in communities where they are.'
Volz said amid increasingly devastating natural disasters and a challenging environmental landscape, he is most concerned about experienced officials being pushed out of their positions.
'I have been through three administrations and transitions,' Volz said. 'I don't think that the execution of the mission will be directly impacted. I do think this sends a message, a very clear one, to people who take adverse opinions to what they're directed to do.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class

There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información

New poll finds 96% Idaho voters say public lands should remain in public hands
New poll finds 96% Idaho voters say public lands should remain in public hands

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New poll finds 96% Idaho voters say public lands should remain in public hands

More than 60% of the land in Idaho is public land, including this high altitude lake at the base of Thompson Peak in the Sawtooth Wilderness. (Photo by Clark Corbin/Idaho Capital Sun) Ninety-six percent of all registered voters in Idaho believe that public lands should remain in public hands, according to a new poll paid for by Conservation Voters for Idaho. The poll was conducted in the aftermath of a federal proposal from U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to make millions of acres of public land in the U.S., including in Idaho, available to be sold off. The poll specifically asked Idaho voters questions about Idaho public lands and who they support in Idaho's 2026 U.S. Senate race. Alexis Pickering, executive director of Conservation Voters for Idaho, said she has never in her career seen Idahoans from all sides of the political spectrum unite behind a single issue like they have behind public lands this year. 'It really is clear that voters are unified in keeping public lands in public hands,' Pickering said in a phone interview Wednesday. 'It demonstrates that Idaho voters are very cognizant of this fight right now,' Pickering said. 'They are very engaged, and they are not going to sit this out.' More than 60% of the land in Idaho is public land of some form. The polling firm Change Research conducted the poll among 1,027 registered Idaho voters from July 15-17. The margin of error was 3.2%, according to Change Research. One poll question asked voters, 'Did you support or oppose the amendment to sell off over 3 million acres of public land across 11 Western states, including Idaho?' – with 87% of respondents saying they opposed it. Battles over public lands loom even after sell-off proposal fails Another poll question asked voters which statement came closest to their opinion: Public lands in Idaho, where people enjoy outdoor activities such as fishing, hunting, hiking, camping, and biking, should remain public and be protected so that everyone can keep enjoying them. Public lands in Idaho, where people enjoy outdoor activities such as fishing, hunting, hiking, camping, and biking, should be made available for purchase and private ownership. Ninety-six percent of Idaho registered voters said public lands should remain public, including 97% of registered Democrats and 95% of registered Republicans, the poll found. Lee withdrew his amendment to sell public lands after a public backlash and three of Idaho's four members of Congress provided public opposition from within the Republican Party to selling public lands. Even though the public lands amendment was withdrawn, Pickering said the issue isn't going away. She said Conservation Voters for Idaho plans to highlight public lands as a central issue and continue to hold elected officials accountable for keeping public lands public. Pickering also said the public is deeply invested in the issue and knows Lee could file another proposal to sell public lands. She compared the proposal to sell public lands to waking a sleeping bear. 'Now that they have woken the bear, it will be really hard to get that bear back in hibernation mode,' Pickering said. Three of Idaho's four members of Congress, U.S. Sens. Jim Risch and Mike Crapo and U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, all R-Idaho, provided public Republican opposition to the proposal to sell off public lands, the Sun previously reported. On June 20, Risch and Crapo, both announced they were opposed to the provision in the budget reconciliation process to sell off public lands. Simpson co-sponsored the Public Lands in Public Hands Act. Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. Russ Fulcher, R-Idaho, opposed the Public Lands in Public Hands Act, the Utah News Dispatch reported. In a phone interview with the Idaho Capital Sun earlier this month, Fulcher said, 'public land should remain public, but the control, management should be local stakeholders, not the federal government.' Polling data shows that Risch received a 10% bump in support among all registered voters after they learned Risch provided opposition to the proposal to sell off public lands, up from 41% to 51%. Among registered Republican voters only, Risch's support increased from 60% to 72% after voters learned Risch provided opposition to the proposal to sell off public lands. The poll only asked voters about Risch's upcoming U.S. Senate race, where he faces re-election in 2026. The poll did not ask about Crapo, Simpson or Fulcher, Pickering said. Idaho Capital Sun is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Idaho Capital Sun maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Christina Lords for questions: info@ Solve the daily Crossword

Van Hollen: ‘A big lie' that UN aid for Gaza has been ‘systematically' stolen by Hamas
Van Hollen: ‘A big lie' that UN aid for Gaza has been ‘systematically' stolen by Hamas

The Hill

time9 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Van Hollen: ‘A big lie' that UN aid for Gaza has been ‘systematically' stolen by Hamas

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Sunday there is no truth to claims that United Nations aid for Palestinians in Gaza has been 'systematically' stolen by Hamas. 'This is a big lie, the claim that when the U.N. organizations were delivering food to Palestinians, civilians, that it was being systematically diverted to Hamas,' Van Hollen told CBS News's Margaret Brennan on 'Face the Nation.' 'I want to say loudly and clearly, this is a big lie,' the Maryland senator added. On Sunday, Trump said Hamas is stealing food that was meant for people in Gaza, saying to reporters on multiple occasions that goods are being stolen as he was pressed on the hunger crisis in the region. Trump, alongside President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry, Scotland, was questioned about his response to the images of starving children in Gaza. 'When I see the children and when I see, especially over the last couple of weeks people are stealing the food, they're stealing the money, they're stealing the money for the food. They're stealing weapons, they're stealing everything,' the president said. 'It's a mess, that whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know it was given many years ago so they could have peace. That didn't work out too well,' Trump continued. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed Trump on Sunday's 'Meet the Press' on NBC News. 'This is important to note: Israel, since this war began, has supplied over 94,000 truckloads full of food. It's enough food to feed 2 million people for two years trying to get that into Gaza. But Hamas has stolen the food, a huge amount,' Johnson said. He also criticized 'the system,' calling it 'broken,' adding that beginning tomorrow, the Israeli military will open 'new channels of distribution to get it [food] to those people who are desperately in need.' Former President Obama said on Sunday that 'aid must be permitted to reach people in Gaza.' 'There is no justification for keeping food and water away from civilian families,' the former president added in a post on the social platform X on Sunday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store