logo
Will Singapore avoid Trump's tariffs but face US-China trade war ‘crossfire'?

Will Singapore avoid Trump's tariffs but face US-China trade war ‘crossfire'?

While Singapore appears unlikely to face direct tariffs from the United States, its small and open economy could be 'caught in the crossfire' of a trade war between the superpowers, analysts have warned.
Those who spoke to This Week in Asia agreed with Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan's assessment in Parliament on Tuesday that while Singapore was unlikely to be on the US tariff 'hit list' due to Washington's trade surplus with the city state, it would still be indirectly affected.
'Even if you assume that there are no direct tariffs against the export of Singapore products and services, the fact that we are a small, open economy, and trade constitutes more than three times our GDP, means if there is any friction, degradation of economic integration, global supply chains, and world trade, we will be impacted indirectly,' Balakrishnan said.
Urging parliamentarians to remain calm, he added: 'I do need to prepare Singaporeans that it will be a turbulent ride in the months or years to come.'
Two-way trade between Singapore and the US totalled US$131 billion in 2023, with the world's largest economy recording a surplus of US$26.7 billion, according to the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore.
Alvin Liew, senior economist at United Overseas Bank, warned that escalating trade tensions and tariffs could hurt economic growth in the US, China and Asean. He said Singapore was vulnerable to downturns in these economies, as well as in the European Union.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mission impossible? Indo-Pacific energy security cooperation
Mission impossible? Indo-Pacific energy security cooperation

AllAfrica

time29-07-2025

  • AllAfrica

Mission impossible? Indo-Pacific energy security cooperation

This article first appeared on Pacific Forum and is republished with permission. Read the original here. The recent attacks by Israel and the United States on Iran's clandestine nuclear facilities have had a detrimental effect on the economic and energy security of the Indo-Pacific region. The Iranian Parliament recommended to the Supreme National Security Council, chaired by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, to close the Strait of Hormuz, a limited passageway that is responsible for 20% of global oil shipments. The dependence of major Indo-Pacific economies on oil trade that traverses the Strait of Hormuz is not trivial. In 2025, approximately 80% of Japan's, 60% of South Korea's, 37% of India's, and 38% of China's oil imports are sourced from the Persian Gulf, which is traversed by the Strait of Hormuz. Recent statistics indicate that 84% of crude oil shipments and 83% of natural gas trade passing through the Strait of Hormuz are directed towards Asian markets. Israel and the US' attacks positioned global and regional actors in a precarious state. While the closure of the Strait may not align with Iran's interests, alternative asymmetric warfare strategies could pose a considerable threat to the interests of major economies in the Indo-Pacific region, and Iran could use this as a bargaining chip. Navigation is subject to electronic interference through GPS jamming, which can significantly disrupt maritime trade. During the 12 days of conflict, significant jamming originated from the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, affecting not only the Strait of Hormuz but also ports throughout the Gulf, including those in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. The situation led to atypical navigation patterns among cargo vessels in the narrow passage of the Strait of Hormuz, prompting ships to execute U-turns due to disorientation. Two vessels collided near the coast of Khor Fakkan port in the UAE. Jamming may lead to vessels intruding into Iran's territorial waters, which Tehran could exploit as leverage. Alternative measures include the seizure of vessels, a practice that occurred frequently prior to the 12-day war between Iran and Israel. In November 2024, Iranian authorities confiscated the Marshall Islands-based oil tanker St. Nikolas. Iran viewed it as a retaliatory action against the US for the prior appropriation of Iranian oil. Despite the end of the direct conflict between Israel and Iran, oil shipment through the primary maritime chokepoint in the Strait of Hormuz remains vulnerable. Trade between Europe and the Indo-Pacific has suffered significant losses as well since October 2023 due to the activities of Ansar Allah, the military wing of the Houthi movement, which has prevented freedom of navigation in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. Another negative consequence of any disruption of oil shipments could be the sudden price increase, which can slow down the GDP growth as well as create inflation. According to one estimate, if the oil price were to spike to around $120 or $130, this would mean a 0.6% loss in the predicted GDP for Japan in 2026. Indo-Pacific states have distinct stances on the potential for mitigating security risks and dependency on the Strait of Hormuz. Any approach may incorporate a combination of the following policy elements First, enhancing maritime governance and increasing naval military presence and deployment in the Strait of Hormuz: India has engaged in anti-piracy activities for several years in the Horn of Africa; however, its multi-alignment strategy has hindered its participation in any military actions in the Persian Gulf. South Korea and Japan have consistently engaged in naval operations in and around the Strait of Hormuz to safeguard their commercial fleets. China has significantly invested in ports such as Duqm in Oman and Khalifa Port in the UAE, and the country also engages in cooperative multinational naval exercises in the area. Second, deeper engagement and active diplomacy with regional entities, particularly the Gulf Cooperation Council and Iran. Beijing has created the China-GCC framework as a forum to tackle shared concerns and formalized a comprehensive strategic cooperation with Iran for a duration of 25 years in 2021. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged Chinese leaders to advise Iran against closing the Strait of Hormuz. It presupposes that China possesses a dominant position in matters concerning Iran, likely overstating its current influence. Regarding India, the India-Middle East Economic Corridor is a potential alternative for enhanced interaction with the Gulf States; nevertheless, investment in this corridor necessitates political stability. Third, reducing the proportion of fossil fuels in the energy mix and enhancing reliance on renewable sources. Japan, being the most susceptible regarding fossil fuel imports, must expedite its investments in solar, wind, and other forms of renewable energy, which commenced following the Fukushima disaster in 2011. Fourth, identify alternate sources of fossil fuels and/or invest in other energy corridors. India may augment its dependence on Russia and/or the United States, while nations might invest in other oil pipelines; yet critical chokepoints remain interchangeable. Collectively, none of the above approaches could offer immediate benefits; they require further time and money to mitigate the dangers. The immediate remedy is to resume the stalled nuclear negotiations between the US and Iran and to achieve an agreement, which may also provide further advantages to regional economies. Indo-Pacific countries can engage in mediation and conflict management, which helps to consolidate the situation however this is no magical bullet to inculcate stability into their economies and maximize their economic security. As part of this engagement, the Indo-Pacific region must deploy economic and diplomatic tools to prevent cascading energy insecurity from destabilizing the global economy. It must inclusive, requiring the cooperation of US, Japan, South Korea, India, ASEAN and China. China possesses the most significant stabilization capacity through its Strategic Petroleum Reserve of approximately 531 million barrels. Beijing's immediate release of 100-150 million barrels could dampen price spikes while demonstrating responsible stakeholder behavior. China's existing energy relationships with Russia and Central Asia provide alternative supply routes via overland pipelines, reducing reliance on maritime chokepoints. However, Beijing must balance energy security imperatives against its Iranian diplomatic relationships. Japan, in contrast, can leverage its sophisticated LNG infrastructure and 90-to-145-day strategic reserve to maintain regional stability. Tokyo should immediately activate swap agreements with Australia and Qatar while accelerating renewable energy deployment. Japan's advanced refining capacity could process heavier crude grades from alternative suppliers, providing regional flexibility. India's current government SPR sites (Visakhapatnam, Mangaluru, Padur) offer a combined capacity of 5.33 million metric tons (MMT), equal to about 9–10 days of domestic crude demand. Delhi must immediately pursue rupee-denominated arrangements with Russia and the UAE while leveraging the International North-South Transport Corridor for Iranian-independent energy flows. India's refining overcapacity could serve regional markets if crude supplies are secured. ASEAN nations should collectively activate the ASEAN Petroleum Security Agreement, pooling strategic reserves and coordinating demand reduction measures. Singapore's refining hub and Indonesia's domestic production provide limited regional buffers. Thailand and the Philippines must accelerate renewable transitions to reduce medium-term vulnerability. South Korea can deploy its 95-to-106-day strategic reserve while leveraging advanced petrochemical facilities to maximize efficiency. Seoul should coordinate with Tokyo on joint procurement strategies and explore expanded Canadian and US LNG imports. Lastly, the US could immediately release SPR volumes while accelerating export permits for LNG and crude to Indo-Pacific allies. Reactivation of mothballed shale production could offset Iranian supply within 90-120 days. Washington should provide naval escorts for tanker traffic through alternative routes. A coordinated response framework could be established as an emergency energy coordination mechanism. This initiative could synchronize SPR releases to coordinated drawdowns preventing competitive hoarding. Joint procurement initiatives could be leveraged for collective bargaining with alternative suppliers. Shipping route diversification could secure corridors via the Cape of Good Hope and expanded pipeline capacity to avoid the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, where proxies of Iran could be active. Demand management protocols could stagger industrial shutdowns and consumption reduction targets and financial stabilization tools: such as currency swap expansions preventing balance-of-payment crises. While not without difficulty given the current state of US-China strategic competition, several strategic recommendations may stabilize energy security in the region. These may include but are not exclusive to, first establishing a temporary or semi-permanent Energy Security Board with real-time coordination capabilities; second, creating a regional strategic reserve sharing agreements with pre-negotiated release triggers; third, accelerating renewable energy investments reducing long-term Middle East dependence; fourth, developing alternative payment mechanisms circumventing potential SWIFT restrictions; fifth, strengthening naval cooperation securing Indian Ocean sea lanes. László Csicsmann ( is a senior research fellow at the Hungarian Institute of International Affairs and a full professor at the Corvinus Institute for Advanced Studies (CIAS) of the Corvinus University of Budapest. Stephen R Nagy (nagy@ is a professor of politics and international studies at the International Christian University in Tokyo and concurrently a visiting fellow for the Hungarian Institute of International Affairs (HIIA) and a Distinguished Fellow at the Corvinus Institute for Advanced Studies (CIAS).

Does Chinese privilege exist in Singapore? Study finds views differ by age and race
Does Chinese privilege exist in Singapore? Study finds views differ by age and race

South China Morning Post

time29-07-2025

  • South China Morning Post

Does Chinese privilege exist in Singapore? Study finds views differ by age and race

Das still remembers an offhand remark from a former colleague who, upon seeing his hairy legs, said that they resembled a monkey's. Advertisement For the 30-year-old ethnic Indian Singaporean postgraduate student, who spoke to This Week in Asia under a pseudonym, the comment reflected a kind of casual insensitivity he said he had encountered as a racial minority in Singapore. 'I would ascribe the confidence of saying such things without having to endure a blowback or to blow it off as a joke to Chinese privilege,' he said, when asked about moments when he felt the majority Chinese population held an unspoken advantage. His experience aligns with sentiments expressed by some respondents in a new study by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, which sheds light on how Singaporeans of different ages and ethnicities perceive racial inequality – and the very idea of 'Chinese privilege' – in the multiracial city state. Released on Friday, the study surveyed 4,000 residents and found that while only 44.7 per cent of respondents overall said they believed Chinese privilege exists, younger Singaporeans were far more likely to hold the view. Among those aged 18 to 35, seven in 10 said it existed, compared with less than three in 10 of older respondents above 65 years of age, according to the study conducted between April and August last year. Advertisement Furthermore, six in 10 Malays and Indians said they believed Chinese Singaporeans enjoy certain advantages, while just four in 10 Chinese respondents held the view.

Syria to hold parliamentary elections in September, first since Assad's fall
Syria to hold parliamentary elections in September, first since Assad's fall

South China Morning Post

time27-07-2025

  • South China Morning Post

Syria to hold parliamentary elections in September, first since Assad's fall

Syria will hold parliamentary elections in September, the head of a body tasked with organising the election process told state media on Sunday. Advertisement Mohammed Taha al-Ahmad, chairman of the Higher Committee for People's Assembly Elections, told state news agency SANA that elections will take place between September 15 and 20. They will be the first to take place under the country's new authorities after the fall of former president Bashar al-Assad in a lightning rebel offensive in December. One third of the 210 seats will be appointed by interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa, with the rest to be elected. In a recent interview with the Erem News site, another member of the elections committee, Hassan al-Daghim, said an electoral college will be set up in each of Syria's provinces to vote for the elected seats. Advertisement A temporary constitution signed by al-Sharaa in March called for a People's Committee to be set up to serve as an interim parliament until a permanent constitution is adopted and general elections held, a process that could take years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store