logo
‘ActionSA betrayed us and overstated its importance,' says ANC, as Joburg Speaker is removed

‘ActionSA betrayed us and overstated its importance,' says ANC, as Joburg Speaker is removed

News244 days ago

Johannesburg Speaker Nobuhle Mthembu has been removed by a council vote backed by the ANC, EFF, DA and Al Jama-ah.
The ANC says ActionSA 'betrayed' the coalition and overstated its importance in council, prompting Mthembu's ousting.
Mthembu says she holds no grudge, defends her record and blames 'cheap politics' for sidelining service delivery.
Tensions in the Johannesburg council came to a head on Thursday as councillors voted on three pivotal motions, resulting in the removal of Speaker Nobuhle Mthembu, while Mayor Dada Morero and ANC Chief Whip Sithembiso Zungu survived their respective no-confidence votes.
The motion to remove Morero failed with 75 votes in favour, 144 against and 43 abstentions, falling short of the required 136-vote majority in the 270-seat council. Zungu also survived, with 179 councillors voting against his removal, 69 in favour, and six abstaining.
However, Mthembu was ousted after 212 councillors voted in favour of her removal and 48 against, with no abstentions. The motion — tabled by Al Jama-ah — was supported by the ANC, EFF and DA, and a temporary replacement will serve as Speaker until a new appointment is made.
Tensions within the coalition erupt
The vote marks the culmination of weeks of tension between the ANC and ActionSA, whose alliance in Johannesburg has steadily deteriorated.
Although the DA submitted motions of no confidence in all three officials following Morero's State of the City address last month, only the motions against Morero and Zungu were accepted. The motion against Mthembu initially was not — prompting Al Jama-ah to bring its own, which later succeeded.
Speaking to City Press, ANC Joburg Regional Task Team coordinator Sasabone Manganye said ActionSA had proven to be an unreliable coalition partner and had ultimately 'betrayed' the ANC.
'We engaged with ActionSA last year... They wanted to be in the legislature to have the Speaker on their side, and we agreed that they would join the coalition,' Manganye told City Press.
'But this year, they started voting against us — including on the budget adjustment and the appointment of the acting city manager, which they agreed to in meetings but did not support in council. We saw the betrayal coming.'
To an extent, Michael [Beaumont] even made a statement that they are not in a coalition with us, and that's when we started to re-engage them because we were concerned about how we could have a speaker who is not in a coalition with us.
Sasabone Manganye
ActionSA abstains as Morero survives
City Press understands that the ANC chose to support the motion against Mthembu after ActionSA declined to defend Morero, indicating it would abstain from the vote on his removal.
In a media briefing prior to the vote, Beaumont, who is ActionSA's national chairperson, said the party would not back the mayor, citing a lack of service delivery.
'Service delivery in Johannesburg has collapsed. Traffic lights are not working, streets are falling apart, and electricity and water outages are more than ever before,' Beaumont said.
We informed the ANC we would not support the mayor.
Michael Beaumont
The DA, which brought the original motion, echoed similar concerns. DA caucus leader Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku told the media that under Morero's leadership, the city was in crisis.
'As far as the DA is concerned, the mayor has shown by writing to the Presidential Working Group to ask for intervention and by appointing a bomb squad without council approval that he has gone rogue and is incapable of running Johannesburg.'
READ: Joburg mayor's turnaround plan: billions allocated for infrastructure and 'bomb squad' for city's woes
ActionSA was warned ahead of the vote.
Manganye said the ANC's provincial leadership had instructed its councillors to vote against all the motions — including those targeting Mthembu — to preserve ongoing coalition talks and avoid politicising them.
'Our provincial leadership was very clear. Because we were still having talks with ActionSA to resolve our contradictions, it would be fair that we vote against all the motions so that our discussions are not clouded by these motions,' he said.
The ANC never raised any motion against anyone, but ActionSA refused. They said, 'No, we are going to abstain on the motion against the mayor.' So, it means, according to them, the mayor can be removed.
Manganye
He said this refusal solidified the ANC's decision to support Mthembu's removal, as ActionSA had already signalled its unwillingness to protect the coalition.
'We then told them in advance to advise the Speaker to resign. If the Speaker does not resign, we will vote against her. Unfortunately, they did not — and she is out now.'
He added that the ANC initially brought ActionSA into the fold not out of necessity, but to stabilise the coalition.
'We did not bring them in because we needed numbers. We brought them in in the interest of the residents and to stabilise governance. But they became a source of instability.'
'Speaker continuously out of line'
Manganye further pointed to Mthembu's conduct as Speaker, including her decision to adjourn a council meeting during a critical budget adjustment session, as a sign of her misalignment with coalition objectives.
'She adjourned council just because of a small commotion, instead of calling for a short adjournment and continuing. We had to get permission from the MEC to pass the budget.'
He added that ActionSA's refusal to acknowledge the coalition agreement, despite participating in its structures, made them an untrustworthy partner.
'They overrate their importance, not realising we did not necessarily need them. They were dishonest and misled us.'
READ: 'I'll do anything to save this city' – Helen Zille considers DA mayoral run in Joburg
'ActionSA did not let me down'
Reacting to her removal, Mthembu said she holds no resentment toward her party and stands by her legacy in office.
'Look, I cannot feel let down by my political party. ActionSA is the party that gave me the platform to one day be the Speaker of Johannesburg,' she said.
'The Speaker fulfilled her mandate. Today, the Johannesburg Museum has money allocated to it because of the pressure we applied to the executive. The Lilian Ngoyi Phase One project will be completed by August — again, because of that pressure.'
Asked about the breakdown in the ANC–ActionSA relationship, she pointed to political deceit and blamed both the ANC and DA.
This is politics, and it's unfortunate that residents are not being put first. As much as you can blame the ANC, don't forget the DA — they sponsored the motion in an effort to bring back Kabelo Gwamanda,' she said.
Nobuhle Mthembu
'Council cannot continue. Reports that affect service delivery won't be tabled — because the DA wants to play cheap politics to position Helen Zille's candidate for 2026.'
Mthembu defended the legislative arm of the city, saying it had been functional, inclusive, and responsive.
'Legislature was working. We ran successful IDP sessions. DA councillors didn't even attend. Residents were complaining. So, who are they really serving?'
On her political future, Mthembu said her removal wouldn't stop her work.
'I didn't join ActionSA to be Speaker of Johannesburg. I joined because I wanted to serve.'
Looking ahead
Manganye confirmed the ANC is still open to talks with ActionSA — but only under clear terms.
'We are open to working with anyone who wants to stabilise governance. But unless ActionSA recommits to being part of the coalition and abides by its rules, we don't think it's worth it.'
Despite the fallout, he emphasised that the ANC's provincial leadership is still engaging with ActionSA.
'Our engagements are still open, not closed. But we did not remove a Speaker from a party we had a relationship with — we removed a Speaker from a party that misled us.'
According to council rules, a new Speaker must be elected within 14 days.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

A ferocious advertising campaign is underway with passage of President Donald Trump's landmark policy bill hanging in the balance, as political groups and business interests spent at least $35 million just this month to try to sway key members of Congress and their constituents. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina was facing the pressure from both sides before he announced Sunday that he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Americans for Prosperity, an arm of the conservative megadonor Charles Koch's political network, spent nearly $2 million this month in key media markets such as Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham. 'Trump's tax cuts put money back in my pocket, and they're helping young families save for their first homes,' says a woman featured in one of the ads from AFP. 'Congress needs to save our tax cuts and protect prosperity.' At the same time, the Democratic-aligned group Unrig Our Economy spent nearly $1 million hammering Tillis over Medicaid cuts in the bill. 'Sen. Thom Tillis could vote to take away our health care and give tax breaks to billionaires,' an ad from the group warns. Other Republicans in swing districts face the same dynamic heading into a midterm campaign in which they will need to reach at least some voters who don't back Trump without angering the president or his core supporters. In Tillis' case, he announced he wouldn't seek reelection hours after Trump called for him to face a primary challenge because he didn't support a procedural vote on the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We so often hear of members concerned about their general reelection efforts, but that is all for naught if you can't get through a primary,' said John Thomas, a Republican strategist and ad maker. 'To add even more pressure, the GOP base is extremely supportive of President Trump, much more than their individual federal representative. Break rank with Trump and there is a price to pay.' Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from a battleground district who last week announced plans to retire, commented Friday on the advertising blitz surrounding the legislation. 'I think the other guys, look, they put $500,000 on me this week saying 'Don Bacon's cutting Medicaid,'' he told CNN's Manu Raju. 'There's a lot of goodness here, but we gotta talk about it and show the voters.' In June alone, according to data from the ad-tracking firm AdImpact, a sprawling collection of large PACs and interest groups spent more than $35 million on dozens of ads about the bill, which contains a range of Trump administration policy priorities on taxes, spending and immigration. Republicans account for about half of that spending, while Democrats account for about a quarter and independent and business PACs for another quarter. Hundreds of thousands of dollars more have been spent on ads not explicitly mentioning the sweeping legislation but referencing looming policy changes and parochial interests, backed by other business and lobbying groups. Late Saturday night, after intense negotiations, the sweeping bill narrowly cleared a major procedural hurdle in the Senate by a 51-49 vote, backed by several key swing votes — among those buffeted by ad campaigns — in the spotlight, such as Maine Sen. Susan Collins, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley. Major challenges for the giant tax and spending bill remain, however, as it still faces amendments and a final vote in the Senate. The House will have to vote to accept a significantly changed piece of legislation from the Senate after only narrowly approving its own version of the bill weeks ago. A group aligned with Trump's political network, 'Securing American Greatness,' has spent more than $7.7 million on ads in June, leading all advertisers with a broad campaign, much of it aimed at shoring up support among House members. 'Mariannette Miller-Meeks just voted for President Trump's working family tax cuts that mean higher wages and lower taxes for working families,' says an ad from the group targeting the key battleground representative from Iowa who won her last reelection by 798 votes. At the same time, the pro-Trump group is hammering congressional Democrats in competitive districts for their opposition to the bill, raising the prospect of higher taxes if an extension of 2017 tax cuts, included in the legislation, fails to pass. 'It's Washington's game, taxing us to bankroll their liberal waste,' says an ad from the group targeting California Democratic Rep. Josh Harder, reelected in 2024 by a margin of about 9,000 votes. 'Tell Josh Harder we can't afford his tax hikes.' With the key procedural hurdle cleared on Saturday, Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer underscored the political challenges would get easier once the bill was passed. 'Well, it doesn't get easier,' the North Dakota senator said. 'I just think, at some point, you just have to take what you know — all the data, all the analysis, all the discussion, all the hearings — and apply them to a vote. Pass the bill. And the sooner we do that, the sooner all the good things will kick in, and that will alleviate, I think, people's concerns.'

Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

A ferocious advertising campaign is underway with passage of President Donald Trump's landmark policy bill hanging in the balance, as political groups and business interests spent at least $35 million just this month to try to sway key members of Congress and their constituents. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina was facing the pressure from both sides before he announced Sunday that he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Americans for Prosperity, an arm of the conservative megadonor Charles Koch's political network, spent nearly $2 million this month in key media markets such as Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham. 'Trump's tax cuts put money back in my pocket, and they're helping young families save for their first homes,' says a woman featured in one of the ads from AFP. 'Congress needs to save our tax cuts and protect prosperity.' At the same time, the Democratic-aligned group Unrig Our Economy spent nearly $1 million hammering Tillis over Medicaid cuts in the bill. 'Sen. Thom Tillis could vote to take away our health care and give tax breaks to billionaires,' an ad from the group warns. Other Republicans in swing districts face the same dynamic heading into a midterm campaign in which they will need to reach at least some voters who don't back Trump without angering the president or his core supporters. In Tillis' case, he announced he wouldn't seek reelection hours after Trump called for him to face a primary challenge because he didn't support a procedural vote on the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We so often hear of members concerned about their general reelection efforts, but that is all for naught if you can't get through a primary,' said John Thomas, a Republican strategist and ad maker. 'To add even more pressure, the GOP base is extremely supportive of President Trump, much more than their individual federal representative. Break rank with Trump and there is a price to pay.' Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from a battleground district who last week announced plans to retire, commented Friday on the advertising blitz surrounding the legislation. 'I think the other guys, look, they put $500,000 on me this week saying 'Don Bacon's cutting Medicaid,'' he told CNN's Manu Raju. 'There's a lot of goodness here, but we gotta talk about it and show the voters.' In June alone, according to data from the ad-tracking firm AdImpact, a sprawling collection of large PACs and interest groups spent more than $35 million on dozens of ads about the bill, which contains a range of Trump administration policy priorities on taxes, spending and immigration. Republicans account for about half of that spending, while Democrats account for about a quarter and independent and business PACs for another quarter. Hundreds of thousands of dollars more have been spent on ads not explicitly mentioning the sweeping legislation but referencing looming policy changes and parochial interests, backed by other business and lobbying groups. Late Saturday night, after intense negotiations, the sweeping bill narrowly cleared a major procedural hurdle in the Senate by a 51-49 vote, backed by several key swing votes — among those buffeted by ad campaigns — in the spotlight, such as Maine Sen. Susan Collins, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley. Major challenges for the giant tax and spending bill remain, however, as it still faces amendments and a final vote in the Senate. The House will have to vote to accept a significantly changed piece of legislation from the Senate after only narrowly approving its own version of the bill weeks ago. A group aligned with Trump's political network, 'Securing American Greatness,' has spent more than $7.7 million on ads in June, leading all advertisers with a broad campaign, much of it aimed at shoring up support among House members. 'Mariannette Miller-Meeks just voted for President Trump's working family tax cuts that mean higher wages and lower taxes for working families,' says an ad from the group targeting the key battleground representative from Iowa who won her last reelection by 798 votes. At the same time, the pro-Trump group is hammering congressional Democrats in competitive districts for their opposition to the bill, raising the prospect of higher taxes if an extension of 2017 tax cuts, included in the legislation, fails to pass. 'It's Washington's game, taxing us to bankroll their liberal waste,' says an ad from the group targeting California Democratic Rep. Josh Harder, reelected in 2024 by a margin of about 9,000 votes. 'Tell Josh Harder we can't afford his tax hikes.' With the key procedural hurdle cleared on Saturday, Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer underscored the political challenges would get easier once the bill was passed. 'Well, it doesn't get easier,' the North Dakota senator said. 'I just think, at some point, you just have to take what you know — all the data, all the analysis, all the discussion, all the hearings — and apply them to a vote. Pass the bill. And the sooner we do that, the sooner all the good things will kick in, and that will alleviate, I think, people's concerns.'

Senate Republican says he won't run for reelection after clash with Trump
Senate Republican says he won't run for reelection after clash with Trump

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republican says he won't run for reelection after clash with Trump

WASHINGTON — North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection next year just one day after President Donald Trump threatened to primary the incumbent for his objection to Trump's massive tax package. Tillis revealed his decision in a lengthy statement on Sunday, acknowledging that he has been weighing whether to retire over the last year — even joking with his colleagues that he wasn't 'excited' about the prospect of campaigning for another six-year term. Ultimately, Tillis said it 'was not a hard choice' to opt for retirement and spend time with his family over 'navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington.' 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,' Tillis said in a statement. 'Democrats recently lost two such leaders who were dedicated to making the Senate more of a functional and productive legislative body. They got things done. But they were shunned after they courageously refused to cave to their party bosses to nuke the filibuster for the sake of political expediency.' Tillis was likely referring to former Democratic-turned-independent Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin. 'It underscores the greatest form of hypocrisy in American politics. When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer. But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them.' Tillis' exit makes him the latest senator to leave Congress citing frustrations with the difficulty of bipartisanship, particularly during the Trump era. Former Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah noted similar disappointment with the current political arena, telling reporters in September 2023 that the Republican Party is 'in the shadow of Donald Trump,' who he acknowledged was the 'leader of the greatest portion of the Republican Party.' In his farewell address, Romney lamented 'the scourge of partisan politics (that has) frustrated repeated efforts to stabilize our national debt' — a message eerily similar to Tillis' current fight with members of his own party in recent weeks. Tillis has long been a holdout on the GOP-led tax package, citing concerns with proposed cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts at the end of this year. As a result, the North Carolina senator voted against advancing Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in a late-night vote on Saturday, angering the president who quickly called for primary challengers against Tillis. While Tillis did not name Trump in his decision to retire, he hinted at a lack of debate in his party without fear of retribution. 'I look forward to having the pure freedom to call the balls and strikes as I see fit and representing the great people of North Carolina to the best of my ability,' Tillis said. Tillis' retirement sets the stage for what is likely to be one of the most competitive and expensive races of the 2026 cycle. Tillis' seat was already considered to be one of the most vulnerable next year, so his absence from the ticket gives Democrats an opening to flip a coveted seat as they seek to regain control of the upper chamber. 'Thom Tillis' decision not to run for reelection is another blow to Republicans' chances as they face a midterm backlash that puts their majority at risk,' Maeve Coyle, a spokesperson for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said in a statement. 'Even Tillis admits the GOP plan to slash Medicaid and spike costs for families is toxic – and in 2026, Democrats will flip North Carolina's Senate seat.' Meanwhile, in a statement by South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, he didn't mention Tillis. 'President Trump has won North Carolina three times, and the state's been represented by two Republican Senators for over a decade. That streak will continue in 2026 when North Carolinians elect a conservative leader committed to advancing an agenda of opportunity, prosperity, and security,' Scott said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store