Thai EC announces investigation into alleged Senate election fraud, 229 individuals facing charges
The committee has recommended legal action against 229 individuals, including 138 senators and 91 executives from the Bhumjaithai Party and its affiliates.
The committee found credible evidence suggesting that these individuals were involved in securing Senate positions through fraudulent and unjust practices, violating the Organic Law on Senatorial Elections (2018), particularly Articles 70, 36, 62, 76, and 77(1).
The investigation revealed that the actions of the accused were in direct contravention of the Constitution, specifically Article 113, which mandates that senators must not be biased or influenced by any political party.
If the EC agrees with the findings, the matter could be referred to the Constitutional Court, which may result in the dissolution of the implicated political party.
The next step in the process will see the case moved to the second phase, where the EC Secretary-General will provide a recommendation.
It has been reported that the Secretary-General plans to delegate this task to the Deputy Secretary-General, as the Secretary-General himself is involved in overseeing national Senate elections, thus having a vested interest in the matter.
The Organic Law on Senatorial Elections, particularly Article 76, prohibits executives of political parties, sitting MPs, and other political figures from engaging in activities that assist a candidate's election to the Senate.
Those found guilty of such actions could face prison sentences ranging from 1 to 10 years, fines from 20,000 to 200,000 baht, and the court may order the disqualification of the accused from future elections. - The Nation/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Lithuania urges respect for Russian speakers amid language debate
VILNIUS, July 25 (Xinhua) -- Lithuania's Department of National Minorities has called for a balanced approach to the growing public debate over Russian language use, urging respect for ethnic minorities while promoting Lithuanian learning. According to the Baltic News Service (BNS), Dainius Babilas, the department's director, emphasized that Russian is spoken by both recent arrivals and long-standing Russian minorities, including Old Believers. He warned against letting efforts to promote the national language fuel division or hatred. While supporting Lithuanian language learning for long-term residents, Babilas called on public figures and media to communicate responsibly. Lithuania's Constitution and minority laws protect language and cultural rights. Recent legal amendments require service providers to speak basic Lithuanian by 2026, though Ukrainian refugees are temporarily exempt. The Education Ministry noted challenges in language instruction for foreigners.
New Straits Times
15 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Auditor General's appointment adheres to law, says A-GC
KUALA LUMPUR: There's no requirement for Datuk Seri Wan Suraya Wan Mohd Radzi to retire, as her appointment as Auditor General (AG) was made in accordance with the law, says the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC). In a statement, the A-GC said that based on Article 105 of the Federal Constitution and subparagraph 1(1) of the First Schedule to the Audit Act 1957, the AG may be appointed from among members of the public service. "Referring to Clause (2) of Article 105 of the Federal Constitution, when Wan Suraya was appointed as Auditor-General effective June 13, 2023, she no longer held any other positions in the Federal service and therefore ceased to be a member of the Administrative and Diplomatic Service scheme," it said. "However, although she is no longer part of the Administrative and Diplomatic Service, she remains a member of the general public service under Section 3 of the Audit Act 1957. "Given that her appointment as AG complies with legal provisions, there is no need for her to be retired in the interest of the nation," it added. Earlier this week in the Dewan Rakyat, Bersatu Chief Whip Datuk Seri Ronald Kiandee said the AG, appointed under the Federal Constitution, must be an independent individual with no ties to the executive branch and should not be part of the country's administrative structure. He claimed that Wan Suraya was still a member of the Administrative and Diplomatic Service scheme and urged the government to clarify whether the appointment fulfilled the requirement of separation from the executive. Meanwhile, opposition lawmaker Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan also questioned the legitimacy of Wan Suraya's appointment and whether it complied with the Constitution. Following that, Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) M. Kulasegaran said her appointment is legitimate and in line with the Federal Constitution and Audit Act 1957. During the ministry's winding-up session on the AG Report 2/2025, Kulasegaran said there was no issue regarding Wan Suraya's appointment and that legal provisions governing the appointment process were clear. Earlier today, unity government spokesman Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said the appointment of Wan Suraya is constitutional. He said this was confirmed by the Chief Secretary to the Government, Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar, during today's Cabinet meeting.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
South Korean ex-PM Han Duck-soo's house raided over suspected role in Yoon's martial law decree
The special counsel team led by special prosecutor Cho Eun-suk raids former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo's residence in Jongno-gu, central Seoul, on July 24, 2025. - Yonhap via The Korea Herald/ANN SEOUL: A special counsel team on July 24 carried out a search and seizure operation at the residence of former South Korean prime minister Han Duck-soo, accused of involvement in impeached former President Yoon Suk Yeol's attempt to impose martial law. The team led by special prosecutor Cho Eun-suk, formed to investigate the Dec 3 martial law debacle, sent investigators to raid Han's residence in Jongno-gu, central Seoul, in the morning. Han is accused of adding his signature to the martial law decree, drafted by then-presidential secretary Kang Eui-gu, after martial law had already been declared to add legitimacy to the former president's actions. The special counsel claimed that Han then ordered the destruction of the document, which was allegedly hastily drafted after Yoon's surprise declaration. Han allegedly had the document destroyed to avoid 'additional controversy' if it were discovered that the document was drafted after the declaration. Article 82 of the Constitution states that 'acts of the President under law shall be executed in writing, and such documents shall be countersigned by the Prime Minister and the members of the State Council concerned.' It adds that 'the same shall apply to military affairs'. Han is also accused of lying in his testimony to the Constitutional Court and the National Assembly about his prior knowledge of Yoon's martial law decree. Han said that he was unaware of the existence of Yoon's martial law declaration – the version announced in Yoon's address to the nation – until after the decree was lifted. He said he only discovered a copy in his pocket later and that he openly opposed Yoon's plans to impose martial law at the time. In contrast to Han's claims, the special counsel team secured surveillance footage showing Han leaving the Cabinet meeting room at the presidential office, after Yoon presided over a legally irregular Cabinet meeting, with copies of the decree. The special counsel plans to analyse the seized documents and files before summoning Han again. 'Today's search and seizure operation was carried out due to criminal allegations against former prime minister Han, so there will be another summoning (of Han) based on the evidence collected,' assistant special prosecutor Park Ji-young told an afternoon briefing. Former presidential secretary Kang's residence was also raided in the morning by investigators from the same special prosecutor team, for allegedly playing a part in Yoon's attempt to impose martial law. The raid took place 22 days after Han was summoned and questioned by the special counsel team on July 2. Han was questioned for some 14 hours at the Seoul High Prosecutor's Office in Seocho-gu, southern Seoul. - The Korea Herald/ANN
