SDC votes unanimously to keep water services in-house
A southern council has opted to keep its water services in-house following strong community feedback.
Southland district councillors yesterday voted unanimously to run with an "adjusted status quo model" for Three Waters services which allows it to retain responsibility while meeting new requirements.
It comes at a time when councils all over the country are responding to government reform on how they want to deliver drinking water, wastewater and stormwater.
More than 97% of Southland respondents preferred an adjusted status quo option instead of a standalone council-controlled organisation (CCO).
Reasons for the overwhelming vote included local control, accountability, affordability, cost efficiency and a feeling of "reform fatigue".
If the council had opted to go down the CCO route, estimated costs of $750,000 would have been required for setup in addition to about $625,000 a year for operating.
Mayor Rob Scott attended several meetings during consultation.
"It was really good engagement everywhere we went, even with the smaller numbers," he said.
The adjusted status quo model will form part of the council's water services delivery plan, as required under legislation.
That plan needs to show how the council will be compliant in delivering a satisfactory and financially sustainable service by mid-2028, and must be submitted to the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) by September 3.
The council was also involved in a DIA case study looking at how new standards would impact rural councils.
Results from the study were received yesterday, but the staff report had already been prepared for the meeting.
Community consultation in Southland ran from April 3 to May 21.
In May, the Invercargill City Council also voted to keep its delivery in-house.
Consultation has just ended on a proposal in which Gore would join forces with Clutha, Central Otago and Waitaki.
• LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
25 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
‘Scary' 30% rates rise on cards
Councillors hear an update on Local Water Done Well proposals at a workshop this week. PHOTOS: ANDREW ASHTON Ratepayers could face a "scary" 30% rates rise in just two years if the Waitaki District Council's plans for an in-house water services unit are accepted. That was the stark reality laid out for councillors at a workshop this week to plan how to move forward from a decision two weeks ago to opt out of a joint water entity with three other Otago councils. Mayor Gary Kircher said he and the rest of the council were committed to making the best of that decision, which now involved sending a draft plan to the government by the end of July, before a full water services delivery plan (WSDP) was presented to the Department of Internal Affairs in September as required by the government's Local Water Done Well legislation. "We have to make sure that we do set up our in-house option as best as possible and I won't tolerate anyone undermining that." However, the size and cost of that was put into perspective by two Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) representatives at the workshop. They reiterated their points from a previous meeting that the in-house model would have to meet the government's financial stability rules for a period of 10 years, even if the plan involved a joint venture with other authorities before then. The in-house model would have to stand on its own merits for a 10-year period for assessment purposes. If those rules were not quite met, a facilitator could be appointed to work alongside the council to help the plan meet the targets. Department of Internal Affairs representatives Marlon Bridge (left) and Warren Ulusele at the workshop. The other, "more intrusive" option was to send in "the specialist", DIA representative Warren Ulusele said. "That person is appointed in the council, they make decisions on behalf of the council. They can look up across the council finances, potentially look to redirect funding from other purposes and redirect it back into Three Waters investment. "They can look at the revenue streams and determine that they need to go up. So I point that out, not in a threatening way, but just to be absolutely clear about this conversation around control and that's concern, again, not just this council, consultation across the country and it's understandable. "That person is appointed by the minister with one objective and that is to develop a financially sustainable plan. They will look to do that as quickly as possible and their focus is meeting growth. So they're not looking across the range of responsibilities you have, the range of considerations you have." WDC chief financial officer Amanda Nicholls then laid out the council's finances saying they would look "scary" at this stage of the process, pointing out external debt per rateable property would significantly exceed the benchmark of $4000, while debt continued to grow over the years. However, it would require a rate rise of about 25.61 % in the 2028 LTP year to fund the in-house unit, and then rate rises of about 4% for each of the following years. All those rises and the 2028 rise could also increase by a further 5% if the council, as was likely, was required to fund depreciation of water assets. When it came to council debt, the workshop heard the WDC would breach its debt cap in 2035 and every year thereafter, potentially requiring further rate rises to lower it. Two weeks ago, Waitaki district councillors voted to exit the Southern Water Done Well partnership with Clutha, Central Otago and Gore in favour of an in-house water services delivery unit. The joint arrangement was previously the council's preferred option before it was put to public consultation. Public consultation across the four councils drew in over 1000 submission with the in-house business unit model the preferred option in Waitaki (54%) and Clutha, while only 26.7% supported the joint entity, most popular in Gore and Central Otago. Prior to that the Department of Internal Affairs said joining a four-way, multi-district water company was the "only viable option" for the district. The DIA representatives this week said they had heard nothing to allay their "concerns" over the council's chosen path, saying they could not see a pathway for the council to develop a plan that was credible. "Hopefully, it'll come to light as you uncover more of what information discloses as you put more of the facts into the equation." The council intends to hold weekly public workshops, videos of which will be posted on its website, every Tuesday this month to keep people up to date with progress. A recording of this week's meeting, with chapter points for each section, the presentation given by the council's finance team, and the letter from the DIA are all available on the council website. "Council encourages the community to watch the videos, read the presentation and the letter from the DIA to be fully informed about the development of the WSDP," a council statement said.
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
In-fighting and claims of bullying at Southland licensing trust
The Mataura Licensing Trust has its office in Gore and services an extended area within Southland. Photo: Supplied / LDR / Wikicommons The president of a southern licensing trust said he will not accept his deputy's apology following a fiery meeting this week. Gore-based Mataura Licensing Trust operates a range of alcohol-related businesses in Southland with a mandate for redistributing profits within the community. On Thursday, tempers flared at one of its meetings after president Horace McAuley accused deputy Vince Aynsley of bullying in his president's report. The situation centred on an incident at the New Zealand Licensing Trusts Association conference in Invercargill on 19 July, where McAuley alleged Aynsley asked him how he would feel when he was no longer president next term. The Otago Daily Times was at Thursday's meeting and said Aynsley could not recall the exchange but would apologise for whatever he hypothetically said. An argument then began between president McAuley and board member Jeannine Cunningham over an employment issue - but not before she alleged the president had blown up at a previous meeting and was guilty of bullying himself. Cunningham claimed she was approached by multiple people at the Invercargill conference asking: "when are you getting rid of Horace?" Despite the in-fighting, McAuley shut down any suggestion that the licensing trust was dysfunctional. "Never in your life. Never, ever, ever," McAuley told Local Democracy Reporting . Mataura Licensing Trust president Horace McAuley, left, deputy president Vince Aynsley, and board member Jeannine Cunningham. Photo: Supplied / Local Democracy Reporting The issues had not dissuaded him from wanting to stay on at the trust, and he noted he had been elected president unopposed since 2010. "We're a busy trust, and as their president, I have an awful lot to do. And so I'm not focusing on this," he said. "To be fair to both myself and the Mataura Licensing Trust, it's a distraction, and the person responsible for the distraction is the person who should answer the questions. "That's Vince Aynsley." McAuley said he "received" Aynsley's apology, which was different to "accepting" it. Aynsley did not wish to comment on the situation but said he had asked McAuley how he would feel "hypothetically" if he wasn't president next year. "I'm in no rush to talk or bring down Horace or say anything in public at this stage." The president's dig at his deputy was not the only criticism Aynsley faced at the meeting. Another member, Bryan Burgess, claimed Aynsley underhandedly took his deputy role three years ago, which Aynsley accepted. Licensing trust elections run at the same time as local body elections, with the president selected by members. The next election is set for 11 October. Mataura Licensing Trust controls a total of 12 liquor outlets, bars, restaurants and accommodation providers from Tapanui in the north to Tokonui in the south. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Government Must Not Neglect Speech Rights When Addressing Terrorism Laws
The Government must not let terrorism law reform inadvertently silence legitimate speech. Incitement to violence is already illegal; we should not ban the ability for individuals to freely advertise what they think, says Jillaine Heather, Free Speech Union Council Member. 'Recent reports of proposals to make it a criminal offence to publicly express support for designated groups or causes raise serious red flags. Peaceful protest, political commentary, or particular symbols could fall within the law's scope if definitions are not tightly drawn. We should not open the door to prosecuting Kiwis for expressing controversial or unpopular views. 'If certain opinions and discourse are banned, it will simply drive the conversation and ideologies underground to crop up in more dramatic ways. Censorship is a natural impulse to opinions we detest, but the wider picture must be considered. We're actually better off when we let individuals advertise their views. 'It's also concerning that these reforms are being developed behind closed doors, without public consultation. Transparency and accountability are key if we're to trust the Government's actions. 'New Zealand has already rejected 'hate speech' laws and the Department of Internal Affairs' proposed online content regime. Why would we open the door to this now? Banning speech is always a bad idea, no matter the good intentions."
