Auto theft sees sharp drop in first half of 2025, industry association says
Équité Association said in a report released Monday that the number of vehicles reported stolen nationally dropped 19.1 per cent in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
Just over 23,000 vehicles were reported stolen in the first six months of the year in Canada, the report said.
The decline is particularly stark in Ontario and Quebec, which saw annual drops of 25.9 per cent and 22.2 per cent, respectively.
The year-over-year drops are more modest in Atlantic Canada and Western Canada at roughly nine per cent. Alberta saw a decline of 12.5 per cent.
Bryan Gast, national vice-president of investigative services at Équité Association, credits greater public awareness of the threat and efforts by various levels of government and law enforcement agencies to collectively tackle the problem.
'It's really definitely a collaborative effort,' he said.
Gast said law enforcement agencies in Ontario and Quebec in particular have stepped up enforcement with police units dedicated to vehicle theft.
So far this year, residents of Ontario and Quebec have reported 9,600 and 3,889 vehicle thefts respectively — high numbers that Gast attributed to the provinces' larger populations and proximity to the Port of Montreal.
With 4,411 vehicles reported stolen over the first half of 2025, Gast said Alberta continues to lead the country in auto theft on a per-capita basis.
Statistics Canada data released earlier this week confirms national progress on the file. The agency reported a 17 per cent annual drop in the rate of police-reported motor vehicle thefts, down to 239 incidents per 100,000 people last year.
In 2023, the number of auto thefts had increased 40 per cent over the historic low recorded in 2020, StatCan said.
That trend came to a head last year when the federal government convened a summit in February to address car thefts.
Ottawa followed up by giving the Canada Border Services Agency millions of dollars in new funding to track vehicles leaving through the country's ports, after having given Ontario $121 million in January of that year to tackle gang crime and auto thefts.
Gast said some of the progress can likely be attributed to Canadians' heightened awareness of the issue.
'Now I think you can talk to anybody and, if their car hasn't been stolen, they know somebody's car that has been stolen,' he said.
'I think they are taking those precautions and some of those steps to make their vehicle less of a target.'
Vehicle recovery rates also rose 3.4 percentage points year over year to 56.5 per cent in the first half of 2025, Équité Association said. The organization said that was nearing the 'pre-crisis' level of 57.2 per cent recorded in 2021.
Despite progress on vehicle theft, the Insurance Bureau of Canada warned it's still a 'significant concern' and 'far from the only factor contributing to rising auto insurance costs.'
'A combination of inflation, tariffs, rising repair and vehicle replacement costs, legal pressures, and regulatory challenges are driving rates up across the country,' the bureau said in a media statement.
Tariffs on vehicle parts are driving up the costs of repairs and replacement cars, the bureau noted.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
Gast said that while it's not clear yet, tariffs might be playing a role in the increase Équité Association is seeing in domestic chop shops and vehicle parts being sent overseas.
He said that whenever there's a disruption to supply chains — like the one that made semiconductor inputs a hot commodity during the COVID-19 pandemic — the criminal element tends to adapt to meet that demand.
While he's encouraged by the progress Canada has posted to date in tamping down auto theft, he said now is not the time to let up.
'Don't consider the problem solved,' he said. 'To keep it manageable and the numbers trending in the right direction, I think we still need to focus on it.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
3 days ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Everything you need to know about Ontario's bike-lane ruling
Article content The Ontario Superior Court has ruled that the provincial government's law mandating the removal of bike lanes on key Toronto streets violates Canadians' constitutional rights to life, liberty and security of the person. Article content This decision marks a significant victory for bike-lane advocates and raises questions about similar policies across the country that seek the removal of bike lanes. Article content Article content On Wednesday, Justice Paul Schabus of the Ontario Superior Court found that the Ontario government's decision to remove bike lanes was made without proper considerations, and breached S. 7 of the Charter. Article content Article content Here's more on what the court said, and what it might mean for cities across Canada. Article content After going over evidence provided by Ontario's government and by the cyclists and advocates who had sued the Ontario government, Schabas decided that the applicants were successful in showing the plan to remove three bike lanes was unconstitutional. Article content Schabas found the evidence shows that removing the already existing bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street. and University Avenue to restore it to a motor vehicle lane will create greater risk to cyclists and others in the roads. Article content Article content With the evidence provided, Schabas concluded that the removal of the target bike lanes would lead to more collisions and injuries involving cyclists. For him, the benefit of saving drivers some travel time is disproportionate to the negative impact to the cyclists' safety. Article content Article content 'It is reasonable to conclude that people who cycle will be injured and killed when lanes for motor vehicles are installed and protected bike lanes are removed,' said Schabas. Article content A month after being introduced, the bill was amended. The new amendment sought the removal of bike lanes on Bloor Street, University Avenue and Yonge Street. in Toronto to restore lanes for vehicle traffic. The amendments also sought to make the government immune to claims for damages that could arise from collisions, injuries or deaths that occur as a result of removing the target bike lanes.
Edmonton Journal
4 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Lorne Gunter: Province should butt out of decision-making on bike lanes
I get it. Bike lanes can be a gigantic pain in the saddle, not to mention an expensive, pretentious sop to cycle commuters and environmentalists. Article content But the province should butt out of cities' decisions to build them, in the same vein they insist they feds should butt out of provincial matters. Article content Article content First, a clarification. Bike lanes are carved out of existing vehicle lanes or, in residential neighbourhoods, by taking away on-street parking for residents. They are not, in most cases, separate bike trails. Article content Article content I have no quibble with bike trails or bike paths, except in those instances (such as Edmonton's 132 Avenue) where traffic lanes are being removed and roadways narrowed to make way for parallel bike paths. Where bike trails are stealing capacity from an existing roadway nearby, they are the same irritant as bike lanes on those streets themselves. Article content Article content Cycle-commuting groups insist that far from adding to congestion, bike lanes are easing traffic by creating safe cycling zones that encourage more 'active transportation.' Article content That's the theory, but in practice it's not working. The latest from Statistics Canada, released in June, shows that just six per cent of Canadian adults walk or ride bikes to work or school. And that is split to about four per cent walkers and about two per cent cyclists. Article content Article content In most of Canada, there is a significant drop off in cycling numbers during winter months. Article content Article content The biking-est cities in the country are Victoria (18.7 per cent) and Halifax (12.3 per cent), which StatsCan attributes to those two being 'smaller in size and with milder climates.' Article content But in big, sprawling cities originally built for cars — like Edmonton and Calgary — councillors can dream all they want and approve bike lanes until they're blue in the face (along with the hundreds of millions of tax dollars needed to set them apart) and the needle barely moves. Article content Edmonton's overall cycle commuting statistics have barely increased in 10 years. Certainly, they've not increased enough to reduce congestion on the roads even though bike-lane advocates in city administration keep insisting 'active transportation' is reducing vehicle traffic. (The opposite it true — the percentage of Edmontonians driving to work or school in personal vehicles has actually increased since before the pandemic.)
Winnipeg Free Press
4 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Hockey Canada needs to step up its game
Opinion The London, Ont. Hockey Canada junior hockey players' trial mesmerized and disturbed Canadians. In an unprecedented move, the CBC reported on it live with a warning that the graphic content of their reports might be upsetting for anyone affected by sexual abuse. The players and the complainant 'EM' who testified presented conflicting versions of what transpired in the room at the Delta Armouries Hotel, their memories compromised by alcohol intoxication, the passage of time and possibly the code of silence. We will never know for sure exactly what took place that night as we were not there. What we do know is that the five accused Hockey Canada junior ice hockey players were found not guilty of sexual assault and being party to an offence. And it was not the first time that multiple members of a junior hockey team have faced allegations of sexual assault against a single female victim. It had happened before in Swift Current, 1989, Saskatoon and Windsor, 1995 and Barrie, 2000. None of these players was convicted of sexual assault. THE CANADIAN PRESS A composite image of five photographs shows former members of Canada's 2018 World Juniors hockey team, left to right, Alex Formenton, Cal Foote, Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube and Carter Hart as they individually arrived to court in London, Ont. on April 22. All five men were acquitted. The issue here seemed to revolve around consent. Justice Maria Carroccia concluded that EM consented to and initiated various sexual acts with these players. As such this ruling is a huge setback for the #MeToo movement. It confirms the patriarchal belief that women are second-class citizens who can be treated as sexual objects, used, abused and then discarded. This decision will have a chilling effect on women who want to proceed with sexual assault charges. It may also function to suppress efforts to change a junior hockey culture that many believe perpetuates male entitlement and misogynistic attitudes towards women. What will happen to efforts to challenge the toxic masculinity that is bred into these players from an early age? In this culture manliness is defined as bravado, swagger, sexual conquest, risk taking, bullying and invulnerability. What role can Hockey Canada play in effecting cultural change in our great sport of hockey? Can we even trust Hockey Canada to ensure its junior hockey player representatives conduct themselves in an acceptable manner? In 2018 the five accused players and their coaches would have signed Hockey Canada's code of conduct. No. 1 on its list of responsibilities is that players and coaches 'adhere to the highest standard of behaviour and at all times refrain from any behaviour that could reflect poorly on Hockey Canada.' Among other items the code also outlines the requirement to demonstrate 'respect toward all people through actions and words.' Refraining from excessive alcohol consumption is also mentioned in the Code as is the importance of 'refraining from the use of power to coerce another person to engage in inappropriate activities.' With this Hockey Canada code of conduct in place, it is important to note that a criminal investigation into the conduct of its players was initiated in June of 2018. It took six years for Hockey Canada to act against any of its players related to this investigation. What is even more appalling is that the team coaches were never sanctioned for their role in what happened. Indeed, the assistant coach, Tim Hunter, was promoted to be the team's head coach for the following year. Clearly the players, and coaches who should have been supervising the players, violated their responsibilities regarding this code of conduct as it pertained to the treatment of EM. An apology to EM should be forthcoming regardless of the not guilty finding. It is unlikely, however, that EM will see an apology from any of these individuals as an apology is antithetical to a culture that pays lip service to its code of conduct. Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. Undoubtedly as soon as the appeal period has expired, we will see attempts by these five players to return to the NHL. Contrary to what the NHLPA says, NHL teams are not obligated to sign them. Teams, like our Winnipeg Jets, who are community-minded and character driven, would not consider antagonizing their fan base by signing any one of these players. Cale Makar, who was suspended from representing Hockey Canada even though he was not there when these allegations arose, made a crucial point in a 2024 interview. He said 'at the end of the day actions have consequences … regardless of the situation.' He might have added 'and we have a responsibility to learn from these actions.' Hockey Canada has a new CEO who, on July 25, 2025, outlined numerous steps that they have taken to 'transform the culture and safety of hockey.' What have they learned? Time will tell; we will be watching. Mac Horsburgh writes from Winnipeg where he was a course conductor in Hockey Canada's 'Speak Out' program.
