logo
Revenge of the Sith is the most underrated Star Wars movie, even by those who have come to appreciate it

Revenge of the Sith is the most underrated Star Wars movie, even by those who have come to appreciate it

Digital Trends19-05-2025
The past five years have been a firm reminder of the power of nostalgia. Following the disappointing reception of the Star Wars sequel trilogy, some individuals began to view the prequels with greater fondness. Suddenly, movies that were mostly about failed trade negotiations and how terrible the Jedi actually were at their jobs started looking better and better.
That was especially true for Revenge of the Sith, the Star Wars movie that was received most warmly upon its release. In the 20 years since its release, though, Revenge of the Sith, and specifically that movie's politics, has only become more relevant. It's a movie about what it's like to watch an entire political order fall and how much easier it is to let that happen than it might seem. Here are three reasons Revenge of the Sith continues to resonate today.
Recommended Videos
It's the most overtly political Star Wars movie
Star Wars has always been political, but those politics are often more suggestions than anything concrete. The Rebels are the Vietcong, and the Empire is America, but none of that is stated explicitly.
That is not the case in Revenge of the Sith, a movie that, if anything, is too blunt about its worldview. This is a film where disinformation leads to the destruction of the Galactic Republic and its replacement with a Galactic Empire. It's one in which Natalie Portman's Padme Amidala explicitly points out that democracy has died, and the response is 'thunderous applause.' Anakin Skywalker says, 'If you're not with me, you're my enemy.'
Revenge of the Sith is operatic and blunt, but it's a movie about democracy so decadent and self-absorbed that it becomes subject to the whims of a master manipulator.
Hayden Christensen is better in it than you remember
The backlash against Hayden Christensen's Anakin Skywalker was swift and severe, but much of the stuff you remember comes from Attack of the Clones. In this installment, Christiansen seems to understand Anakin's desperation to save Padme and how torn he eventually becomes as he becomes disillusioned with the Jedi. It's a performance that definitely goes big in moments, but crucially, one that also lands many of the movie's biggest scenes.
When Anakin is alone on a balcony in Coruscant, and you watch a single tear drift down his cheek, you come to understand just how much the events of the movie are tearing him apart. Christensen is playing a hero who becomes a villain, and he acquits himself better than you might remember.
John Williams goes on an absolute tear
Perhaps the most important reason for the success of Revenge of the Sith and of Star Wars generally is the continued greatness of John Williams. Although he's just adding to his most iconic themes in Revenge of the Sith, he manages to write one piece of new music that feels genuinely elegiac. Anakin vs. Obi-Wan, which plays over the final confrontation between these former friends, is sweeping, sad, and beautiful in a way that the best Star Wars songs always are.
Just as importantly, Williams does some of his more unsettling work on this soundtrack, reminding us explicitly of Anakin's journey into darkness. Revenge of the Sith is a movie about succumbing to the darkness, and Williams knows exactly how to meet that musical moment.
Stream Revenge of the Sith on Disney+.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House sends stablecoin bill to Trump's desk, capping string of 'crypto week' victories
House sends stablecoin bill to Trump's desk, capping string of 'crypto week' victories

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House sends stablecoin bill to Trump's desk, capping string of 'crypto week' victories

The House passed bills that establish the first federal framework for dollar-backed stablecoins and outline how other digital assets will be regulated, major victories for an industry that has pushed for more favorable oversight in Washington, D.C. The stablecoin legislation known as the GENIUS Act will go directly the desk of President Trump, who pushed for that law as part of his wider aim to help make the US "the crypto capital of the planet." It passed 308-122. Two other bills passed by the House known as the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act and CLARITY Act will now go to the Senate, where where their ultimate fates are still unknown. They prohibit the creation of central bank digital currencies and assign oversight over all digital assets except stablecoins to either the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The passage of all three bills came after a series of roadblocks and delays as GOP leaders struggled to bring some Republican holdouts in line during a week dubbed "Crypto Week' by backers of the legislation. Trump is deepening his own financial involvement in cryptocurrencies with several separate ventures. They include World Liberty Financial, a new crypto startup backed by Trump and his sons that has already launched its own US-dollar-pegged stablecoin (USD1) in partnership with BitGo. Stocks with crypto ties have been surging recently as investors anticipated the moves in the nation's capital, notably Coinbase (COIN), Robinhood (HOOD), and newly public stablecoin issuer Circle (CRCL). The GENIUS act passed by the House Thursday outlines how US companies can issue and manage dollar-backed stablecoins for payments, giving those digital assets a massive stamp of approval that is expected to encourage wider adoption. It bans members of Congress and their families from earning profits from stablecoins but not Trump and his family, an omission that irked some Democrats and slowed progress on the legislation earlier this spring. What the legislation is expected to unleash is a wave of new stablecoin entrants as traditional companies ranging from banks to mega retailers consider whether to issue their own coins. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon and Citigroup (C) CEO Jane Fraser both said Tuesday they are going to get involved in stablecoins, the latest evidence of how Wall Street is pivoting to embrace digital assets. Big banks have convened to explore prospects for launching a collaborative stablecoin network. Dimon, a longtime skeptic of cryptocurrencies, said the bank needs to embrace stablecoins as a way to keep pace with payment rivals. Last month, JPMorgan announced plans to launch a so-called deposit token called JPMD that is somewhat like a stablecoin but available only to JPMorgan's institutional clients. "We're going to be involved in both JPMorgan deposit coin and stablecoins to understand it, to be good at it," Dimon said. The Wall Street Journal has separately reported that Amazon (AMZN) and Walmart (WMT) are exploring stablecoin opportunities. The new wave of competition could upend the traditional payment system, especially if merchants seek to use stablecoins as a way to get around conventional card-based networks such as Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA). The legislation also would empower the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to oversee stablecoin issuers that hold $10 billion or more in assets, while smaller issuers would be under the purview of state regulators. All issuers would be required to hold reserves in cash or US Treasurys, undergo regular audits, and publicly disclose their holdings and redemption processes. Like money market funds, the tokens must aim to be redeemable at face value. But unlike money market funds, stablecoins under this bill cannot pay interest. There's an ongoing debate about how widespread the usage of these digital assets will ultimately be. Stablecoins proponents tout these assets as a haven from crypto's wild volatility and a safer place for traders to store their gains because they can be pegged to non-crypto assets like the dollar. Their near-instant settlement and programmability also carry advantages proponents believe could enhance cross-border transactions and wider access to the US dollar. But there are still concerns among detractors that there could be risks with stablecoins, including the possibility of panic runs among investors. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Final 'Squid Game' season lifts Netflix above earnings forecasts
Final 'Squid Game' season lifts Netflix above earnings forecasts

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Final 'Squid Game' season lifts Netflix above earnings forecasts

By Lisa Richwine and Dawn Chmielewski LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -The final season of global phenomenon "Squid Game" helped Netflix top Wall Street earnings targets for the second quarter, the streaming service said on Thursday as it raised revenue guidance for the year. Netflix posted diluted earnings per share of $7.19 for April through June. That topped the $7.08 consensus estimate of analysts polled by LSEG. The company raised revenue guidance for 2025 to $44.8 billion to $45.2 billion, citing the weakening of the U.S. dollar plus "healthy member growth and ad sales." Its previous guidance was up to $44.5 billion. For the just-ended quarter, net income came in at $3.1 billion, edging forecasts of $3.06 billion. Revenue totalled $11.08 billion, above the $11.07 billion analyst projection. Netflix released the third and final season of dystopian Korean drama "Squid Game" a few days before the second quarter ended in June. The show is the most popular non-English Netflix show in the streaming service's history. Season three racked up 122 million views, Netflix said. Other releases during the quarter included "Sirens," "The Four Seasons" and a third season of "Ginny & Georgia." The streaming video pioneer stopped disclosing quarterly subscriber numbers this year, instead urging investors to focus on profit as a measure of its success. It said member growth was ahead of its forecast but occurred late in the quarter, which limited the impact on second-quarter revenue. Netflix has been building an ad-supported service to increase revenue and reel in price-sensitive viewers. It also has added live events such as WWE wrestling to draw advertisers and viewers. Looking ahead, Netflix forecast revenue of $11.5 billion and net income of nearly $3 billion. Analysts had projected $11.3 billion and $2.9 billion. The company also has new seasons of two of its biggest shows coming later this year. "Wednesday" returns in August, and the final episodes of "Stranger Things" will be released in November and December. Netflix previously said it does not expect advertising to be a primary driver of revenue growth in 2025.

Factbox-The Fed building renovations at the center of Trump's fight with Powell: Five things to know
Factbox-The Fed building renovations at the center of Trump's fight with Powell: Five things to know

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Factbox-The Fed building renovations at the center of Trump's fight with Powell: Five things to know

By Ann Saphir (Reuters) -The spiraling cost of the Federal Reserve's years-long renovation of two historic buildings in Washington, D.C., has become the latest flashpoint in the Trump administration's escalating pressure campaign on Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whom Trump wants out of the central bank because he hasn't delivered the interest-rate cuts he wants. The Powell Fed has held rates steady since December on concern Trump's tariffs could reignite broad-based increases in prices, still top-of-mind for Americans bruised from a recent bout of 40-year-high inflation. The situation has the potential to plunge the U.S. central bank into crisis and test one of the underpinnings of the global financial system: the Fed's monetary policy independence from political meddling. A recent Supreme Court opinion reinforced a longstanding interpretation that the law shields Fed governors from dismissal over interest-rate decisions. The law does allow for removal "for cause." White House officials have accused the Fed of loose oversight of its renovation project, mismanagement of public funds and even fraud. The Fed counters that the higher costs are a function of a complex attempt to turn large old buildings into energy-efficient, functional spaces that also retain their historic look. Here are five things to know about the renovation: What are the buildings the Fed is renovating that have drawn Trump's scrutiny? They are the Eccles Building, constructed between 1935 and 1937 as the Fed's headquarters, and the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building, completed in 1932 for the U.S. Public Health Service and used over the years for various purposes, including in World War II to house the Combined Chiefs of Staff. By 2018, it was transferred by the first Trump administration to the Fed to allow a renovation that would put "a vacant building back in productive use, allow the Federal Reserve Board to consolidate several leases and result in savings for taxpayers.' The 1951 Constitution Avenue Building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. How much are they over budget? Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, says the cost overrun is "$700 million and counting." The Fed's budget shows the project's current estimated cost at $2.46 billion up from $1.88 billion in 2024, a difference of about $580 million. The document also shows that the Fed eliminated the planned renovation of a third building, cutting about $510 million in costs. Why are they over budget? It comes down to three things: higher-than-estimated labor and materials costs, design changes to preserve the historic buildings and their appearance, and unforeseen problems including lead contamination in the ground and higher-than-anticipated amounts of asbestos. Do they include lavish elements? Built nearly a century ago and never renovated, the buildings required new plumbing, electrical, heating, water, and other infrastructure, as well as updating to allow access for people with disabilities, a basement for one of the buildings and an addition for the other to make enough room for existing staff currently occupying other leased offices. There is no Governors-only elevator or VIP dining room, the Fed says, and a new water feature in the original plans for the 1951 Constitution renovation was eliminated. There are no "rooftop terrace gardens" as Vought asserts. One building has a ground-level front lawn that doubles as the roof of an underground parking structure that planning documents referred to as a "garden terrace." Plans also refer to "vegetated roofs" used to help with stormwater runoff and building efficiency. What about oversight of the project? The Fed by law has authority to determine its spending on capital projects. Its Office of Inspector General receives monthly reports on the project, conducted a review in 2021, and is now charged with conducting a fresh review. The Fed consulted a number of planning bodies, including the Fine Arts Commission and the National Capital Planning Commission, on the design and development of the project. The Fed says it made some changes to the original plans to save money, but the changes were not substantial. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store