logo
Philips Air Purifier 900 Series review: A small but powerful device for removing allergens and dust

Philips Air Purifier 900 Series review: A small but powerful device for removing allergens and dust

Telegraph21 hours ago
What is the Philips PureProtect Mini 900 Series Air Purifier?
The Philips Air Purifier 900 Series AC0920 is a compact model at approximately 36cm high by 22cm wide, suitable for spaces up to 65 square metres. This makes it an ideal air purifier for a bedroom or larger living space.
At just £129.99 at the time of writing, it is excellent value, with filters costing only £34.99 annually. It's not the cheapest – some (like this Midea) retail for under £100 – but it's more affordable than premium brands like Dyson and Molekule.
It is not a smart air purifier, so you can't connect it to your phone. But it is easy to operate and has a child lock, a colour changing light to indicate air quality and filter warning lights showing when it needs cleaning and replacing.
It was extremely efficient at cleaning air in our real-world tests, earning the title of Best Value buy in our guide to the best air purifiers.
JUMP TO:
How we test air purifiers
We independently test air purifiers in real homes, reflecting daily use. We set the device up from the box and run it for one hour on its medium or auto setting. We assess and score the following:
Air quality testing: Using an air quality monitor, we measure the rate of small particulate matter (known as PM 2.5 and PM 10, referring to its size in microns), airborne chemicals called Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde in the room before and after testing and record changes in the overall air quality indicator (AQI) score.
Noise levels: We use a decibel monitor app to check the noise of the air purifier against ambient sound in the room. We record the loudest and the quietest settings.
Value for money: We judge the initial cost, the price of replacement filters and how frequently they need replacing, as well as its energy use per kWh, measured using a smart plug.
The Philips Air Purifier 900 Series was tested in a bedroom following the use of common aerosols, including deodorant and hair spray, as well as during everyday use in a living area.
For more on at home air care, read our guides to the best fan, best dehumidifier and best humidifier.
Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended
Our thorough, real-world tests will always help you find the best product. No manufacturer ever sees Telegraph Recommended reviews before publication and we don't accept payment in exchange for favourable reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles.
All opinions are based on independent expert opinion and our hands-on testing. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more.
Air quality
Score: 9/10
In our tests, the Philips 900 Series performed better at improving air quality than some models more than twice the price. In just an hour, it reduced levels of PM 2.5 particles (small pollutants like dust and soot which can trigger allergies) in a large bedroom by 98 per cent.
During the tests, the overall AQI score for the room improved by 96 per cent, dropping from an unhealthy 156 to just six (anything below 30 is good).
It is also easy to tell what the current air quality is, since the air purifier has a coloured indicator light and a digital display on the top, showing PM 2.5 levels. But it doesn't tackle chemicals in the air like some others can, meaning it did not reduce levels of formaldehyde or VOCs.
Ease of use
The Philips 900 Series is easy to use with simple set-up instructions, although you must turn it upside down to remove the filter's protective cover before first use.
After that it's self-explanatory, with straightforward controls to switch between its four modes: auto, fan speed one, fan speed two and night mode. A button dims the lights, which you can also hold to turn on the child lock. It beeps loudly so you know you've pressed the right button.
We liked the warning light showing when the filter needs cleaning with a vacuum, as this could help extend its life. If cleaned regularly, the £34.99 filters last up to a year.
Confusingly, although there is an on-box QR code for downloading the Philips app, this air purifier is not Wi-Fi-enabled and does not connect to it, so it can't be controlled remotely.
Design
As one of the best Philips air purifiers, this model is small but feels sturdy and durable. The HEPA filter, which can capture airborne particles like pollen and mould, is particularly robust and seems to be of a higher build quality than many other air purifiers with a HEPA filter for allergies.
The display is clear to read, with the PM 2.5 levels shown as a number and as a light that changes colour to reflect their presence in the air (from a positive blue through to red for bad). This can be turned off for night time while a child-lock option is ideal for stopping tiny fingers from changing the settings.
Controls are accessibly positioned, but frustratingly, you can't turn off the buttons' loud beeping noise. While helpful during the day, at night this is the one downside about the overall design.
Operating noise
Score: 7/10
The Philips 900 Series device was one of the quieter models we tested, running at just 30 dB on the quietest night mode setting (compared to an ambient sound in the home of 28 dB), making it a quiet air purifier for bedrooms.
With the fan on top speed, noise was 62 dB, which is comparable with other air purifiers, including our Best Buy the Blueair Blue Max 3250i.
We deducted a couple of points here because of the aforementioned loud beeps, which sound whenever you press any button on the device. This is intrusive if you are quietly trying to change the settings at night.
Value
Score: 9/10
At just £130, this air purifier performed significantly better than other budget options and pricier models. The filters are also reasonably priced, at £34.99 each, and this is made even more wallet-friendly by the fact they need replacing as infrequently as once a year. Many other air purifiers require a filter change at least every six months.
In an hour, the Philips 900 Series used 0.007 kWh of energy, according to our tests, which works out as around 5p for every 24 hours of continuous use.
Overall, this was a high-quality air purifier at a reasonable price, with low running costs too.
Technical specifications
We compared the Philips 900 Series with the premium Dyson Cool PC1 Air Purifier on performance, noise and value.
Should you buy the Philips Air Purifier 900 Series?
For clean air at a budget-friendly price, the Philips 900 Series performs even better than some larger, more expensive air purifiers. But this is a simple model, so you won't be able to track air quality or control the device remotely using an app.
Yes, if:
You want an efficient, compact air purifier
You're looking for an air purifier with an air quality sensor
You need a budget device with low running costs
You want an air purifier with an auto mode
No, if:
You want Wi-Fi-connectivity or smart features
You need a device that operates silently
Philips Air Purifier 900 Series FAQs
What size room is the Philips 900 Series suitable for?
Up to 65 sq metres.
Is it good for allergens and pollutants?
Yes. It effectively removes PM 2.5 particles – those measuring 2.5 microns across – which can trigger allergies, and significantly improved air quality in our tests.
How does the air quality sensor work?
The sensor assesses the amount of PM 2.5 particles in the air passing through the device. It displays the level as a number, as well as showing a colour-coded light for air quality, from blue (good), through purple and pink to red (unhealthy).
Is the Philips 900 Series noisy at night?
No, the night mode is quiet at 30 dB – just over ambient noise (28 dB in our tests). But it beeps if you change any of the settings.
Can I control the Philips 900 Series with my phone?
No, there is no app control with this model.
How often should I replace the filter in the Philips 900 Series?
At least once a year. The device will let you know when it needs changing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hancock: Discharging patients into care homes was ‘least-worst' Covid decision
Hancock: Discharging patients into care homes was ‘least-worst' Covid decision

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Hancock: Discharging patients into care homes was ‘least-worst' Covid decision

Matt Hancock has insisted that discharging patients from hospitals to care homes in the early stages of the pandemic was 'the least-worst decision' at the time. The former health secretary admitted that forming a protective ring around care homes was 'impossible' as he doubled down on the policy, which was among the most controversial decisions of the pandemic. The Covid Inquiry previously heard there were more than 43,000 deaths involving the virus in care homes across the UK between March 2020 and July 2022. Alasdair Donaldson, a senior civil servant, was quoted earlier this week describing the toll as a ' generational slaughter within care homes '. On Wednesday, Mr Hancock acknowledged the discharge policy was an ' incredibly contentious issue ' but told the inquiry that 'nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives'. When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested beforehand, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid symptoms being able to spread the virus. NHS 'insisted' on policy Mr Hancock, who resigned from the government in 2021 after admitting to breaking social distancing guidance while having an affair with a colleague, has now appeared at the inquiry seven times. Returning for a full-day session to face questions specifically about the care sector, Mr Hancock said the hospital discharge policy had been 'driven' by the then NHS chief executive Sir Simon Stevens, now Lord Stevens. Mr Hancock said: 'It was formally a government decision. It was signed off by the prime minister. It was really driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS, but it was widely discussed.'

Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'
Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'

The Princess of Wales openly discussed her 'life changing' cancer journey and 'rollercoaster' recovery on a visit to an Essex hospital. Speaking at Colchester Hospital, Kate Middleton revealed the toll cancer takes on family and friends. 'It is a life-changing experience both for the individual patient but also for the families as well and actually it sometimes goes unrecognised, you don't necessarily, particularly when it's the first time, you don't appreciate how much impact it is going to have,' the princess told a group of users, volunteers and staff at the Cancer Wellbeing Centre. The princess was diagnosed with an unknown form of cancer in March last year, in the same year as the King was also diagnosed with cancer. On her visit to the hospital, she praised the centre's 'holistic' approach to the support it offers patients, relatives and carers, which includes counselling and dietary advice. 'There is this whole phase when you finish your treatment that you, yourself, everybody expects you, right you've finished your time, go, you're better, and that's not the case at all,' she added. 'You have to find your new normal and that takes time.' After visiting the centre, the princess planted several coral-pink Catherine's Rose plants in the hospital's Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) wellbeing garden, which offers a restorative space for staff, patients and visitors.

The first 10 minutes: why breaking your morning routine can ruin your day
The first 10 minutes: why breaking your morning routine can ruin your day

The Guardian

time44 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The first 10 minutes: why breaking your morning routine can ruin your day

Name: The first 10 minutes. Duration: 10 minutes. Appearance: The surest sign that you're about to have a terrible day. Ten minutes doesn't seem very long. Apparently that's all it takes. A new study has concluded that 37% of us can work out whether we're going to have a good day or a bad day, based on what happens during the first 10 minutes after we wake up. Really? But isn't everyone too busy journalling, meditating and sipping room temperature lemon water? God, you're annoying sometimes. Still, you can't determine anything in 10 minutes. I disagree. This morning I slept through my alarm, realised too late that I'd run out of toilet roll and then pulled the handle off my kitchen drawer. On purpose? No, of course not, but it does explain why I'm having such a terrible day. How so? It takes us about 25 minutes to properly wake up, which is why we usually have a set sequence of events we like to follow. The disruption of that sequence – maybe forgetting to brush your teeth or make coffee or exercise – can have a knock-on effect that reverberates throughout the rest of the day. Wait, everyone has a routine? Almost everyone, yes. Yours might be pretty simple – go to the toilet, make a drink, do some stretching – but other people have slightly more elaborate ones. Such as? Well, Anna Wintour famously likes to have played an hour of tennis before her 6am blow-dry. Mark Wahlberg wakes up at 3.30am and then spends time praying. More recently, the influencer Ashton Hall shared that he wakes up at 3.52am and immediately starts plunging his face into various ice baths. Yes, me too. Oh really? Either way, these people use their routines to set the foundation of their day. I'm sure that if you sneaked into Ashton Hall's house and stole his ice baths, he'd have a terrible day. I'm not getting up that early. Fine then, do what Cindy Crawford does instead. Which is what? She likes to watch the sunrise from the hot tub of her Malibu mansion every morning. Relatable. Even so, an easily repeatable morning routine is the best way to ensure a good day. It helps to streamline it, too. If your first 10 minutes involve making a cup of coffee, you'll have a better day if you make sure that all your mugs are clean before you go to bed. If they involve going to the toilet, make sure you've got plenty of toilet paper, so you won't end up stuck there until someone kindly brings you some. Was that one just for you? No, let's pretend it happens to everyone. Do say: 'For a better life, start your day with a routine.' Don't say: 'Can that routine involve waking up, panicking for half an hour, then doomscrolling until you're running late for work?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store