&w=3840&q=100)
India enters top 100 in global SDG rankings of nations for first time
According to the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network's 10th and latest Sustainable Development Report (SDR), India ranks 99th on the 2025 SDG Index with a score of 67
Press Trust of India New Delhi
India has for the first time secured a place among the top 100 out of 193 countries ranked for their progress in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), according to a report published on Tuesday.
According to the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network's 10th and latest Sustainable Development Report (SDR), India ranks 99th on the 2025 SDG Index with a score of 67, while China ranks 49th with 74.4 and the US 44th with 75.2 points.
Among India's neighbours, Bhutan takes 74th place with 70.5 points, Nepal ranks 85th with 68.6, Bangladesh 114th with 63.9 and Pakistan 140th with 57 points.
India's maritime neighbours, Maldives and Sri Lanka, stood at 53rd and 93rd places, respectively.
The report's authors said that SDG progress has stalled at the global level, with only 17 per cent of the 17 targets adopted by the UN member countries in 2015 projected to be achieved by 2030.
"Conflicts, structural vulnerabilities and limited fiscal space impede SDG progress in many parts of the world," the report, with world-renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs as its lead author, said.
European countries, especially the Nordic nations, continue to top the SDG Index, with Finland ranking first, Sweden second and Denmark third.
A total of 19 out of the top 20 countries are in Europe.
Yet even these countries face significant challenges in achieving at least two goals, including those related to climate and biodiversity, largely due to unsustainable consumption, the authors said.
East and South Asia have outperformed all other global regions in terms of SDG progress since 2015 largely due to rapid socioeconomic development.
The countries in East and South Asia that have demonstrated the fastest progress since 2015 (in points) include Nepal (+11.1), Cambodia (+10), the Philippines (+8.6), Bangladesh (+8.3) and Mongolia (+7.7).
The other countries showing rapid progress among their peers include Benin (+14.5), Peru (+8.7), the United Arab Emirates (+9.9), Uzbekistan (+12.1), Costa Rica (+7) and Saudi Arabia (+8.1).
Though only 17 per cent of the targets are on track to be achieved worldwide, most UN member states have made strong progress on targets related to access to basic services and infrastructure, including mobile broadband use (SDG 9), access to electricity (SDG 7), internet use (SDG 9), under-five mortality rate (SDG 3) and neonatal mortality (SDG 3).
Five targets show significant reversals in progress since 2015. These are obesity rate (SDG 2), press freedom (SDG 16), sustainable nitrogen management (SDG 2), the Red List Index (SDG 15) and the Corruption Perceptions Index (SDG 16).
The report said the top three countries most committed to the UN multilateralism are Barbados (1), Jamaica (2) and Trinidad and Tobago (3).
Among G20 nations, Brazil (25) ranks highest, while Chile (7) leads among OECD countries.
The United States, which recently withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization (WHO) and formally declared its opposition to the SDGs and the 2030 Agenda, ranks last (193rd) for the second year in a row.
The report, which comes ahead of the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD4) in Seville, Spain, (June 30-July 3) noted the global financial architecture (GFA) is broken.
"Money flows readily to rich countries and not to the emerging and developing economies (EMDEs) that offer higher growth potential and rates of return. At the top of the agenda at FfD4 is the need to reform the GFA so that capital flows in far larger sums to the EMDEs," it said.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Sudan civil war overwhelms border town in Chad as refugees find little help
Fatima Omas Abdullah wakes up every morning with aches and pains from sleeping on bare ground for almost two years. She did not expect Sudan's civil war to displace her for so long into neighbouring Chad. There is nothing here, she said, crying and shaking the straw door of her makeshift home. Since April 2023, she has been in the Adre transit camp a few hundred metres from the Sudanese border, along with almost a quarter-million others fleeing the fighting. Now the US- backed aid system that kept hundreds of thousands like Abdullah alive on the edge of one of the world's most devastating wars is fraying. Under the Trump administration, key foreign aid has been slashed and funding withdrawn from United Nations programmes that feed, treat and shelter refugees. In 2024, the US contributed USD 39.3 million to the emergency response in Chad. So far this year, it has contributed about USD 6.8 million, the UN says. Overall, only 13 per cent of the requested money to support refugees in Chad this year has come in from all donors, according to UN data. In Adre, humanitarian services were already limited as refugees are meant to move to more established camps deeper inside Chad. Many Sudanese, however, choose to stay. Some are heartened by the military's recent successes against rival paramilitary forces in the capital, Khartoum. They have swelled the population of this remote, arid community that was never meant to hold so many. Prices have shot up. Competition over water is growing. Adre isn't alone. As the fighting inside Sudan's remote Darfur region shifts, the stream of refugees has created a new, more isolated transit camp called Tine. Since late April, 46,000 people have arrived. With the aid cuts, there is even less to offer them there. 235,000 Sudanese in a border town Adre has become a fragile frontline for an estimated 235,000 Sudanese. They are among the 1.2 million who have fled into eastern Chad. Before the civil war, Adre was a town of about 40,000. As Sudanese began to arrive, sympathetic residents with longtime cross-border ties offered them land. Now there is a sea of markets and shelters, along with signs of Sudanese intending to stay. Some refugees are constructing multi-story buildings. Sudanese-run businesses form one of Adre's largest markets. Locals and refugees barter in Sudanese pounds for everything from produce to watches. There is respect between the communities, said resident Asadiq Hamid Abdullah, who runs a donkey cart. But everyone is complaining that the food is more expensive. Chad is one of the world's poorest countries, with almost 50 per cent of the population living below the poverty line. Locals say the price of water has quadrupled since the start of Sudan's civil war as demand rises. Sudanese women told The Associated Press that fights had broken out at the few water pumps for them, installed by the International Committee of the Red Cross and Doctors Without Borders. Even food aid could run out shortly. The UN World Food Programme says funding to support Sudanese refugees in Adre is guaranteed only until July, as the US aid cuts force a 30 per cent reduction in staff worldwide. The UN refugee agency has seen 30 per cent of its funding cut for this area, eastern Chad. Samia Ahmed, who cradled her 3-year-old and was pregnant with her second child, said she has found work cleaning and doing laundry because the WFP rations don't last the month. I see a gloomy future, she said. Sudanese try to fill aid gaps Sudanese are trying to fill gaps in aid, running private schools and their own humanitarian area with a health clinic and women's centre. Local and UN authorities, however, are increasing the pressure on them to leave Adre. There are too many people here, they say. A vast city, said Hamit Hadjer Abdullai with Chad's National Commission for the Reception and Reintegration of Refugees. He said crime was increasing. Police warn of the Colombians, a Sudanese gang. Locals said it operates with impunity, though Abdullai claimed that seven leaders have been jailed. People must move, said Benoit Kayembe Mukendi, the UN refugee agency's local representative. For security reasons and for their protection. As the Chadian population begins to demand their land back, Mukendi warned of a bigger security issue ahead. But most Sudanese won't go. The AP spoke to dozens who said they had been relocated to camps and returned to Adre to be closer to their homeland and the transit camp's economic opportunities. There are risks. Zohal Abdullah Hamad was relocated but returned to run a coffee stand. One day, a nearby argument escalated and gunfire broke out. Hamad was shot in the gut. I became cold. I was immobile, she said, crying as she recalled the pain. She said she has closed her business. The latest Sudanese arrivals to Adre have no chance to establish themselves. On the order of local authorities, they are moved immediately to other camps. The UN said it is transporting 2,000 of them a day. In Tine, arriving Sudanese find nothing The new and rapidly growing camp of Tine, around 180 kilometres north of Adre, has seen 46,000 refugees arrive since late April from Northern Darfur. Their sheer numbers caused a UN refugee representative to gasp. Thousands jostle for meagre portions of food distributed by community kitchens. They sleep on the ground in the open desert, shaded by branches and strips of fabric. They bring witness accounts of attacks in Zamzam and El-Fasher: rape, robbery, relatives shot before their eyes. With the US aid cuts, the UN and partners cannot respond as before, when people began to pour into Adre after the start of the war, UN representative Jean Paul Habamungu Samvura said. If we have another Adre here it will be a nightmare.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir Issues Threats Against India, Repeats Kashmir Rhetoric After Pahalgam Terror Attack
Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir has once again threatened India and repeated his calls for a 'Free Kashmir' after his 'jugular vein' remark. He also backed terror and termed it a 'legitimate struggle.' read more With Munir's 'promotion', Pakistan now has two illegitimate power centres in military and civil domains. Image: X/ @NotCMShehbaz Pakistan's Army Chief and the self-proclaimed Field Marshal, Asim Munir, has once again issued threats against India and repeated his 'Free Kashmir' rhetoric following his full of hate 'jugular vein' remark. Speaking at the Pakistan Naval Academy in Karachi on Saturday, Munir blamed India — without offering any evidence — for the recent rise in tensions following the 22 April terror attack in Pahalgam. However, it is a blatant truth that Pakistan, through its proxy groups, continues its policy of terrorism against India. Whenever India retaliates in self-defence, Islamabad shifts the blame onto India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Munir described Pakistan as a 'net regional stabiliser' and claimed that Islamabad had firmly responded to what he called 'unprovoked' Indian military actions. 'Despite provocations, Pakistan has shown restraint and maturity, reaffirming its commitment to regional peace,' he said. He accused India of deliberately stoking tensions in the region, especially as Pakistan claims it is close to eliminating terrorism. Fresh Kashmir rhetoric after 'Jugular Vein' remark In his speech, Munir once again raised the Kashmir issue, urging Pakistanis to remember the 'sacrifices of our Kashmiri brothers struggling against India's illegal occupation.' 'Pakistan strongly supports a fair resolution of the Kashmir dispute in line with UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people,' he said. A few days before the Pakistan-backed terror attack in Pahalgam, Munir had stirred tensions by declaring Kashmir as Pakistan's 'jugular vein.' 'Kashmir is our jugular vein; it will remain our jugular vein; we will not forget it,' he told members of the Pakistani diaspora abroad. Though the reality is that Pakistan has long been facing insurgency in Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and PoK after mass disappearances, human rights violations, and depriving people there of basic amenities. Less than a week after Munir's 'jugular vein' statement, Pakistan-backed terrorists killed over two dozen male tourists in Kashmir's scenic Pahalgam region. In response, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, dealing a significant blow to Pakistan. It also launched Operation Sindoor, targeting and destroying terror launchpads deep inside Pakistani territory. Following this, India and Pakistan exchanged cross-border fire for four days. During the clashes, India carried out strikes on several Pakistani air bases, weakened the Pakistan Army's capabilities, and successfully defended itself against missile and drone attacks. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pakistan and its backed terror groups continue to launch attacks in India, killing innocent people. India has suffered greatly from Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, from the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai to the latest Pahalgam attack. Pakistan, and its de facto ruler, the deep-state army, cannot defeat India in a direct war, so they remain engaged in a proxy conflict, following the policy of 'bleeding India with a thousand cuts.' Since then, India has established a new normal of responding to Pakistan and terrorism with force. This has been evident since the Uri attack, after which surgical strikes were carried out. Notably, India also conducted air strikes inside Pakistan in Balakot following the Pulwama attack. The military actions and standoffs were visible to the world after the Pahalgam attack.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
'Can't undo knowledge, capacity': IAEA chief claims Iran could restart uranium enrichment 'in months'; says it didn't have nuclear weapons
Rafael Grossi (left), and excavators at tunnel entrances at the Fordo facility in Iran on Friday, June 27, 2025 (right) The head of the UN nuclear watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, has said Iran may be able to resume producing enriched uranium within months, despite recent airstrikes by the US and Israel on its nuclear sites. "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi, the director general of the IAEA said Friday, according to a transcript of his interview released Saturday by CBS News Grossi said Iran's capabilities and expertise in nuclear technology remain intact despite damage to several facilities. "Iran had a very vast ambitious program, and part of it may still be there, and if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there. The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, as is obvious," he said. "So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have, or the capacities that you have. It's a huge country, isn't it? So I think this should be the incentive that we all must have to understand that military operations or not, you are not going to solve this in a definitive way militarily. You are going to have an agreement. You are going to have an inspection system that will give everybody… the assurances that we can definitely turn the page," he added. While Iran's nuclear capabilities remain a concern for several countries, Grossi made clear that Iran does not possess nuclear weapons. "Let me be clear here… they have all these capabilities, but for the agency, first of all, they didn't have nuclear weapons. Okay? This needs to be said," he said. He added that the IAEA had found unexplained traces of uranium at undeclared sites in Iran. "We had found traces of uranium in some places in Iran, which were not the normal declared facilities. And we were asking for years, why did we find these traces of enriched uranium in place x, y or z? And we were simply not getting credible answers. If there was material, where is this material? So there could be even more. We don't know,' he said. 'This is why… I think we need to go back.' He also said that the IAEA does not know the current location of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium. "We don't know where this material could be," Grossi told CBS News. "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification." Grossi added, "We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened." Iran has rejected Grossi's request to visit the damaged sites, including the Fordoo facility, and its lawmakers have voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA. Israel carried out a bombing campaign on June 13 targeting Iranian nuclear and military facilities, saying the strikes were to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, a claim Iran denies. The United States later struck three major sites linked to Iran's atomic program. US President Donald Trump said the attacks had set back Iran's nuclear capabilities "decades." Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi acknowledged the damage was "serious," though full details are still unknown. A major concern is whether Iran managed to move its stockpile of enriched uranium before the attacks. The country is estimated to have had about 408.6 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent. This is higher than levels used for civilian purposes but below weapons-grade. If further enriched, this amount could be used to produce over nine nuclear weapons. In an interview with Fox News, Trump said he did not believe the uranium stockpile had been moved. "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice," he said. "They didn't move anything."
