India's first compliance-based carbon market set to take shape with draft notification
This market, structured under the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) of 2023, seeks to drive industrial adoption of low-carbon technologies and support the country's broader climate goals.
The draft notification outlines Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity (GEI) Targets for 2025, applying to sectors such as aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, and pulp and paper. These targets include specific reduction goals for the financial years 2025-26 and 2026-27, aimed at enabling year-wise sectoral decarbonisation.
The government had introduced the CCTS in June 2023 to establish a regulatory framework for carbon credit trading and to facilitate emission reductions in line with India's commitments under international climate agreements.
A total of over 290 entities operating in traditionally high-emission sectors are covered under the draft. A uniform formula has been proposed to calculate and verify emissions, alongside sectoral benchmarking applicable to both integrated operations and standalone units.
The aluminium sector includes companies such as Vedanta, Hindalco, and NALCO, covering sub-sectors like smelters and refineries. In the cement industry, the notification lists UltraTech, ACC, Ambuja, Dalmia, and JSW Cement, producing ordinary Portland and white cement. The pulp and paper industry has also been included, with emphasis on agro-based, integrated, and recycled fibre-based plants.
The chlor-alkali industry, which involves the electrolysis of saltwater to produce chlorine and sodium hydroxide for industrial uses, is also addressed under the draft.
Industry associations have lauded the move, calling it a long-awaited step toward a formal carbon market in the country.
'For the first time, India will have a domestic framework that quantifies emissions across sectors that matter,' said Manish Dabkara, President of the Carbon Markets Association of India and Chairman at EKI Energy Services. 'The notification not only allows for trading credits but also enables companies to reduce in-house emissions, creating space for strategic planning beyond mere compliance,' he added.
The MoEFCC has invited public comments on the draft over a two-month consultation period.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Businesses must adopt internal carbon pricing before they're forced to
Indian firms are approaching a crucial juncture in their climate journey. For far too long, the cost of carbon has remained an invisible ledger entry, an externality conveniently overlooked in balance sheets and investment decisions. This era of carbon apathy is drawing to a close, as staying in business could soon pivot on internal carbon pricing (ICP), or the practice of assigning a monetary value to greenhouse gas emissions within an organization. A handful of progressive firms, including industrial giants like Tata Steel and Mahindra, alongside IT major Infosys and the consumer products company ITC, have begun incorporating ICP to shape their strategic investments and risk assessments. Also read: India to set up a carbon trading, green bond regulator These prices range from ₹500 to ₹4,000 ($6–$48) per tonne of carbon, which is low compared to global standards, but still represents a forward-looking shift. This foresight is commendable, but for most of India Inc, carbon remains an unacknowledged liability. Globally, ICP is turning into a standard corporate practice. Tech behemoths like Microsoft impose a global carbon fee across their operations, while energy giants such as Shell use a robust price of $100 per tonne in their capital planning. These MNCs understand that the financial repercussions of carbon emissions are no longer hypothetical. They have become pressing risks. In India, the absence of a formal carbon market or mandatory pricing mechanisms has largely kept ICP on the periphery. This is about to change, driven by domestic policy shifts and rising international pressures. The proposed Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, if robustly implemented, will set out emission costs for specific industrial sectors. Through this framework, the government will prod a shift from merely striving for energy efficiency to explicitly valuing greenhouse gas equivalents, thus embedding carbon into the operational fabric of business costs. External forces have made ICP imperative too. The EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), set to be fully operational by January 2026, presents a formidable challenge to Indian exporters. Carbon-intensive sectors in India, particularly steel, aluminium and cement, which have significant trade with the EU, will be directly impacted. CBAM would require detailed reporting on both direct and indirect emissions, coupled with transparency on carbon pricing methodologies, posing substantial compliance hurdles, according to EY India. The financial implications are stark. An ICRA analysis suggests that CBAM could reduce profits from Indian steel exports to the EU by $65-160 per tonne between 2026 and 2036. For local companies, especially exporters, ICP is no longer a strategic choice but an essential tool to mitigate such trade barriers. The benefits of ICP extend beyond compliance. A carbon price, even if used as a shadow figure in financial modelling, serves as a powerful diagnostic tool. It compels firms to uncover systemic inefficiencies and drive innovation towards cleaner processes and resource optimization. Also read: A pragmatic approach to carbon pricing may help against climate barriers More importantly, it future-proofs investments by directing capital towards low-carbon technologies and sustainable infrastructure, reducing long-term exposure to climate-related risks and potential carbon levies. The adoption of ICP sends a clear signal to investors that a company is earnest about managing climate risk. As environmentally sensitive funding gains momentum globally and climate-aligned procurement becomes a standard expectation, Indian businesses that fail to adopt ICP risk being left behind. Only 42 out of 122 Indian companies that disclose emissions were using ICP, according to a 2022 report by the Carbon Disclosure Project; this number needs to rise significantly. The ICP imperative is not confined to large corporate entities. Small and medium enterprises also stand to gain. Simplified forms of ICP, facilitated by pooled accounting tools, digital platforms and guidance from larger companies they deal with, can aid ICP adoption. This transition will take collective effort. The government, financial institutions and industry bodies must champion ICP adoption through clear disclosure norms, targeted fiscal incentives and technical support. Just as the GST became near-universal through digital enablement and compliance incentives, ICP adoption can follow a similar trajectory if we get it right. The financial sector is already taking steps. Over 4,000 MNCs and investors support carbon pricing as part of climate risk management, according to the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Financial institutions such as HDFC Bank and State Bank of India have begun incorporating climate factors into loan assessments, but much more needs to be done to integrate ICP with corporate creditworthiness. Indian firms should not wait for regulation. In a future defined by carbon constraints, pricing emissions internally is not a regulatory burden but a source of competitive advantage. Markets, investors and global buyers are increasingly expecting— and even demanding—this level of environmental accountability. Also read: Why climate policies have been unable to reduce the world's carbon emissions Now that climate risk is fast translating into financial risk, Indian firms cannot afford to be reactive. ICP may seem like a voluntary exercise today, but it will not stay that way for long. The carbon cost of doing business will come to bite, whether through regulation, trade policy or investor demand. The question is whether Indian companies will wait for the bill or start pricing it in today. The author is an independent expert based in New Delhi, Kolkata and Odisha. X: @scurve Instagram: @
Indian Express
13 hours ago
- Indian Express
The reform India's power sector needed
In 2015, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change notified SO2 norms for coal-based thermal power plants. The establishment of flue gas desulphurisation (FGD system) for all 600-odd power plants in the country was made compulsory. The schedule for the implementation of this system was challenging. Most professionals associated with the power sector, technical experts, researchers and policymakers raised valid concerns. Since Indian coal has a low sulphur content, these experts argued that an FGD system was not necessary for most of these plants. The implementation of the system was, however, initiated in several plants. It was estimated that the capital expenditure on FGD in the old and the new plants would tax finance resources and lead to a tariff burden in the order of Rs 0.25 – 0.30 per KWhr. Power generators were worried, but more concerned were the distribution companies and consumers of power, who would have to finally bear the burden of the additional tariff. Apart from the commercial implication in terms of heavy capital expenditure and the financial burden on consumers, the issue in question was also about the technical necessity of the system in view of the very low sulphur content of Indian coal. This needed more research. A study initiated by the Ministry of Power and carried out by IIT Delhi concluded that there was a need for more comprehensive analysis of SO2 emissions and whether FGDs are necessary for all thermal power plants in the country. Niti Aayog initiated a comprehensive study, carried out by NEERI. The researchers studied all aspects of Indian coal and the extent of SO2 emissions vis-à-vis the norm. They prepared a comprehensive report and made recommendations. Their analysis suggests that 'ambient SO2 concentration in all the monitoring stations is well below the prescribed Norms of 80 micrograms per cubic meter. This is even though most of the thermal power plants have not installed FGDs'. They also recommended that, 'there is a need to revisit the stack emission norms for SO2… with the consideration of India's latitudinal position, (being) close to the equator compared to European countries, the US… who have given guidelines for SO2 emission control. India has higher and stronger solar insolation leading to high ground level heating, vertical convection, high mixing height, high ventilation.' The FGD system utilises limestone and water as its main input materials. The mining and transport of limestone to power plants leave a large carbon footprint. The atmospheric lifetime of CO2 is significantly longer than that of SO2. The revised notification does not mandate a complete withdrawal of FGD. It is now based on sound scientific studies and analysis, which have enabled 600-odd power plants of the country to be classified into three categories — those which are close to very large cities, the ones in heavily polluted areas, and others. An analysis of data collected reveals that about 78 per cent of the power plants do not require an FGD system. This means a saving of large capital expenditure, which can now be deployed for creating more power-generation capacities, primarily through the renewable route. The notification has also allayed fears of tariff burden on power consumers. In India's long-term energy transition plan, renewables will play a big role. However, the transition will need to respect energy security considerations. Domestic coal will, therefore, continue to play a meaningful role in the coming few decades. The notification not only provides relief for consumers at large, but also provides clarity on how to plan for domestic coal-based power. The writer is former power secretary, Government of India and president, India Energy Forum
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Parliamentary proceedings: Only one in five cities have achieved NCAP targets
Only about one in five of India's most polluted cities funded under the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) have reduced their particulate matter levels to targeted levels, according to data shared by the Minister of State for Environment, Kirti Vardhan Singh, in the Lok Sabha on Monday (July 212, 2025). The NCAP, which was launched in 2019, originally aimed for a 20%-30% reduction in PM2.5 and PM10 levels by 2024, on the 2017 baseline levels. However, in 2022, the target was revised to achieve up to a 40% reduction in PM10 levels, with no targets for PM 2.5, or to meet national standards (60 µg/m³) by 2025-26. Out of 130 cities, 48 million-plus cities/urban agglomerations (population greater than a million) are funded under the 15th Finance Commission Million Plus City Challenge Fund as an air quality performance grant, and the remaining 82 cities are funded under Control of Pollution Scheme of Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Performance-linked grant of ₹13,036.52 crore was provided to 130 cities for critical gap funding. With the deadline for achieving targets set for March 2026, data shared by the Environment Ministry shows that with reference to the 2017-18 baseline, only 25 of the 130 cities have achieved a minimum 40% reduction in PM10 as of 2024-25. On the other hand, there are also 25 cities that have reported an increase in PM10 levels when compared with 2017-18. The four cities with the sharpest improvement (reduction) in particulate matter levels are Bareilly (76%), Varanasi (74.3%), and Firozabad (59.5%) in Uttar Pradesh, and Dehradun (57.2%) in Uttarakhand. 'There has been notable improvement in PM10 levels in major Indian cities,' Mr. Vardhan said in his response in the Lok Sabha. 'Mumbai has shown improvement in PM10 levels with a 44% reduction in 2024-25 compared to FY2017-18, followed by Kolkata (37%), Delhi (15%), and Chennai (12%). PM10 data in respect of 2017-18 and 2024-25 and per cent improvement in PM10 concentrations of Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi and Chennai in FY 2024-25 w.r.t. FY 2017-18. These improvements reflect the positive impact of various air quality improvement measures implemented under NCAP,' the Minister said. In all, 103 cities had shown a reduction in PM10 concentration in 2024-25 with respect to 2017-18, and 22 had achieved the 40% target as well as kept annual concentrations below 60 µg/m³, the statement said.
