A Complicated Legacy
Three significant transformations happened in the '70s. The first in the political system; the second one in her mode of politics— I have used the term Caesarism—
and the third one, in the economic system. During Indira Gandhi's period, a shift occurred in India's economic policies and framework from the 'Nehruvian' period. It's incorrect to say that Indira Gandhi brought about those transformations, but she was an important player in the story that led to those transformations. And that is why I say that it's Indira Gandhi and the years that transformed India.
QWhat is Caesarism in Indira Gandhi's context?
When a powerful and charismatic leader can short-circuit the machinery of parliamentary politics and directly appeal to the people—that's Caesarism, because it is seen as a form of rule where the ruler maintains power not only through the representative structure but also by popular acclaim. It is a mode of politics by mass appeal with the electorate connecting with her charisma. Congress' abysmal performance in the 1967 election in which many of the Congress stalwarts lost and the party was weakened in many states, plus the economic challenges, contributed to this Caesarism.
QIs it true that Mrs Gandhi was initially disinterested in sending the Indian Army to assist in Bangladesh's Liberation War but it was the then-President of the Soviet Union Leonid Brezhnev who convinced her?
Yes, Indira Gandhi was hesitant to send the Army to Pakistan. However, the latter point that the Soviets convinced her of is wrong. Gandhi hesitated because of geopolitics. The Yahya Khan regime was supported by the US, and the latter was also opening up to China. So, India was up against the Pakistan-US-China axis. Secondly, despite the massive refugee crisis, international powers remained not very sympathetic to India. And third, some prominent Bangladeshi politicians who were part of the liberation struggle had pro-US sentiments. However, she later got rid of those dilemmas and decided to send the army. Once the decision was taken, the Indian government knew what to do and how to.
QAlthough this book is not on the Emergency, according to you what triggered Gandhi to take such a step?
The Allahabad High Court judgment of June 12, 1975 found her guilty of electoral malpractices and disqualified her from holding any elected office for six years. This judgment gave a boost to opposition parties who were on the streets agitating against her continuation in office. To preserve her position as the Prime Minister and neutralise her opponents, she decided to declare the Emergency. This was the proximate trigger for the Emergency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Rahul Gandhi questions govt silence on ‘manipulation' by Jane Street
Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Monday accused the Central government of making the rich richer and pushing ordinary investors to the brink of ruin by being silent on 'manipulation' by big players in the futures and options (F&O) market. Gandhi said he had predicted the loopholes in the F&O market. 'I clearly said in 2024 — the F&O market has become a playground for 'big players', and small investors' pockets are continuously being drained,' he said. 'Now SEBI itself is admitting that Jane Street manipulated thousands of crores. Why did SEBI remain silent for so long? At whose behest was the Modi government sitting with its eyes closed? And how many more big sharks are still shorting retail investors? In every case, it's clear — the Modi government is making the rich richer and pushing ordinary investors to the brink of ruin,' Gandhi said in a post on X. He tagged a September 24, 2024 post in which he had said: 'Uncontrolled F&O trading has grown 45x in 5 years. 90% of small investors have lost Rs 1.8 lakh crore in three years.' 'SEBI must reveal the names of the so-called 'Big Players' making a killing at their expense,' he said. Reacting to Gandhi's post, the BJP accused the Congress MP of 'peddling fear and misinformation' about the stock market. BJP IT department head Amit Malviya said the very action of SEBI banning a global entity, 'which Gandhi is trying to sensationalise', is clear evidence that strong regulatory action is being taken to protect small investors. If SEBI were silent, as Gandhi claims, then there would be no investigation, no ban, and no headline; his entire allegation collapses right there, Malviya said. Congress media and publicity chief Pawan Khera alleged corruption in the market and said SEBI has to answer a lot of questions. On Thursday, SEBI ordered the impounding of `4,843.57 crore in alleged unlawful gains made by Jane Street through manipulative trading. The market regulator also prohibited the firm from engaging in any securities transactions until the recovery of the alleged illegal gains is completed.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
In action against Bhupinder Hooda's former principal secretary, ED attaches 9 houses, bank accounts worth Rs 14cr
Chandigarh: The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on Monday provisionally attached nine houses and apartments, and bank accounts with balances worth Rs 14.06 crore, linked to former CM Bhupinder Singh Hooda's former principal secretary Murari Lal Tayal, his wife, and family members. The move comes even as the trial against Tayal, known as a confidant of Hooda, is yet to start. The attachment orders are based on investigations carried out by ED in a case linked to corruption and amassing assets disproportionate to known sources of income during Tayal's service as a bureaucrat in Haryana. The provisional attachments have been carried out under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 by ED's Chandigarh zone office. The nine immovable properties include two houses and seven apartments in Chandigarh, New Delhi, and Gurgaon. An FIR registered by the anti-corruption bureau (ACB) wing of CBI alleged that former IAS officer Tayal and his family members amassed assets disproportionate to his income from Jan 2006 to Dec 31, 2014. Tayal served as principal secretary to the then chief minister of Haryana from March 6, 2005, to Oct 31, 2009, and as a member of the Competition Commission of India from Nov 30, 2009, to Dec 31, 2014. Pursuant to this, ED investigated the financial affairs, income tax records, and stock market dealings of Tayal and his wife, Savita Tayal, who also served as a member of HPSC during the Congress govt, and their son, Kartik Tayal. The ED investigation revealed that from Jan 1, 2006, to Dec 31, 2014, the accused acquired disproportionate assets worth Rs 14.06 crore while using the proceeds of crime (PoC) generated through illegal gratification. Last year, CBI filed a voluminous chargesheet against the accused, and the trial could not be advanced as the agency did not get permission for prosecution of the officer from the depart of personnel and training, as well as the govt of Haryana. During the Bhupinder Hooda-led Congress govt, Tayal enjoyed plum postings in Haryana as well as the Centre.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC transfers Malinga assault case from Dholpur to Jaipur
1 2 Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court Monday ordered the transfer of a high-profile assault case involving former MLA Girraj Singh Malinga from Dholpur to Jaipur, citing concerns over witness safety and the accused's influential status in the region. The single-judge bench of Justice Umashankar Vyas issued the transfer order while hearing a criminal transfer petition filed by assistant engineer Harshadhipati, the victim in the case. The case stems from an alleged assault on Harshadhipati and junior engineer Nitin Gulati at the Bari discom office in Dholpur on March 28, 2022. Malinga, who is currently out on bail, has faced multiple charges of assault on public servants. He was a Congress MLA from Bari but switched over to BJP prior to assembly elections in 2023. He, however, lost the election. "We told court that victim and witnesses face life threats in Dholpur as the accused is a strongman," said Akhil Simlote, counsel for the petitioner. The court noted that a procession organised by Malinga's supporters following his bail release demonstrated his significant influence in the area. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The case will now be heard at the SC-ST Court in Jaipur district, with Justice Vyas directing for a timely completion of the trial. The high court has directed the Jaipur Police Commissioner to implement robust security measures during the case hearings. "The high court has directed appointment of one SI and two ASIs under the Case Officers Scheme in the matter to assist the lower court and the prosecution," Simlote said. Malinga's bail history has been contentious. Initially granted in May 2022 due to Covid-19, the bail was cancelled by the high court on July 5, 2024, because of the celebratory procession organised by his supporters. Though he again surrendered and was jailed on the high court's directions, the Supreme Court stayed the bail cancellation on Dec 13, 2024.
