
Halifax Cycling Coalition to hold rally against motion to stop bike lane construction
The rally will be held at City Hall at 8 a.m. on Tuesday.
The motion calls for a pause on awarding any contracts for new bike lane designs or construction capital projects.
The pause would continue until a staff report assessing the 'feasibility of alternative network solutions' that could reach active transportation goals while maintaining or improving the flow of traffic is complete.
'This motion is not about stopping progress,' said Fillmore in an open letter. 'It's about sequencing progress properly. Right now, we're seeing road space reduced before alternatives like reliable transit or safe, connected bike routes are in place.'
The Halifax Cycling Coalition called Fillmore's motion 'politically motivated, not good transportation policy' in its post about the upcoming rally.
'Halifax enjoys the second highest rate of people cycling and walking of all Canadian cities,' the post reads. 'Do we want to jeopardize that?
'Cycling and walking make for a healthier population, reducing pressure on the healthcare system. At the same time we reduce greenhouse gases, particulate emissions, noise, and road violence.'
Council will vote on the motion at their meeting on Tuesday.
More to come…
Halifax Bike Lane
A green bike lane marker is pictured in Halifax, N.S.
For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
Amid new infrastructure bills, First Nations are concerned about the environment and their rights
Social Sharing A lawyer in British Columbia says three recent bills that aim to fast-track infrastructure and energy projects are deeply flawed and could face legal challenges. B.C.'s Bill 15, the Infrastructure Projects Act, is aimed at fast-tracking public sector projects like schools and hospitals, as well as private projects, such as critical mineral mines, that are deemed provincially significant. Bill 14, the Renewable Energy Projects (Streamlined Permitting) Act, aims to speed up clean energy projects across the province. The federal Bill C-5 aims to remove interprovincial trade barriers while another, more controversial, part of the law aims to speed up projects of national interest, including energy development projects, by allowing special "designated projects" to bypass some federal laws. "My prediction is that eventually we are going to find all three pieces of legislation in the courts," said Hugh Braker, a B.C. lawyer who sits on the First Nations Summit's political executive. He said First Nations in B.C. are particularly concerned about mining and pipeline developments being pushed through their territories without consent. "First Nations people don't have the money for these court cases, but neither do they have the luxury of sitting back and not doing anything about it," he said. He said that First Nations oppose the power to pursue infrastructure and energy projects without proper consultation or environmental assessments. The controversial bills are now law despite pushback from environmental groups and several First Nations. Braker said the Supreme Court of Canada, through numerous court cases, has affirmed that First Nations have a right to be consulted, and proper consultation with nations on the bills did not take place. WATCH | Carney on controversial Bill C-5 Carney says Indigenous rights are central to Bill C-5 13 days ago Duration 2:01 Bowinn Ma, the Minister of Infrastructure in B.C., said in an email to CBC News that the provincial government is fully committed to its obligations under the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA), which mandates the province to align laws with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). "I acknowledge that our engagement process for the Infrastructure Projects Act [Bill 15] was shorter than we would have liked," Ma said. "But I want to be very clear, the Act can't be used to shortcut Indigenous participation or reduce environmental standards." Bill C-5 grants the Carney government and future governments the authority to exempt pipelines, mines and other infrastructure projects from government regulation. Near the end of the 18-page bill, it states that cabinet can exempt national-interest projects from environmental laws. WATCH | B.C. NDP government faces backlash over Bill 15 Eby's mining announcement overshadowed by backlash to controversial Bill 15 1 month ago Duration 2:07 FPIC amendment to Bill C-5 turned down The 2019 passing of DRIPA made B.C. the first province or territory in Canada to enshrine UNDRIP into law. The Canadian Museum for Human Rights describes UNDRIP as an international human rights instrument that sets out the rights of Indigenous peoples globally. The Canadian government followed suit in 2021, signing onto the United Nations Declaration Act (UNDA), as federal law on June 21, National Indigenous Peoples Day. Under UNDA federally, and DRIPA provincially in B.C., all levels of government have a duty to consult with Indigenous peoples and obtain their free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) before pursuing projects in their territories. Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak, the national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, said in a statement that her office was given one week to review Bill C-5. "Seven days for us is not very much time at all," said Woodhouse Nepinak. "It's tough, I feel for First Nations and Canadians, ramming a bill that big through. They should have taken the summer to do it properly," she said, noting that many First Nations have been dealing with wildfires and were unable to review the bill before it passed in Parliament. She said the creation of an Indigenous advisory council to advise the Carney government on Bill C-5 should not impact consultation with First Nations. "You can't be using some body somewhere that's picked by the government to say that that's enough consultation for the Government of Canada with First Nations, that's insufficient," she said. A statement from her office thanked Paul Prosper, a Mi'kmaw senator from Nova Scotia, who proposed an amendment to have FPIC included in Bill C-5, though it was voted down. The Assembly of First Nations said in a statement that they are hosting a virtual forum with chiefs on July 10 to discuss amendments made to Bill C-5, ahead of the prime minister's planned meeting with First Nations on July 17. "It's disheartening that First Nations were not invited to committees, I think that was a major oversight. I think the government should speak to the chiefs about that on the 17th of July," said Woodhouse Nepinak. Ahead of the meeting, Braker said "the fire [has] already started, I don't know if [Carney] is going to be able to put it out."


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Former Hydro boss paid $880K for working 1½ months in 2024 until her ouster
Social Sharing The former boss of Manitoba Hydro was paid nearly $900,000 in compensation in 2024, despite only working 1½ months before her dismissal from the Crown corporation. The high pay earned by Jay Grewal, revealed to be $881,177.94 according to Hydro's annual compensation disclosures this week, suggests the utility bought out the remainder of her contract, according to a University of Manitoba business instructor who teaches a compensation course. Grewal's pay in 2024 — more than doubling the compensation of any other Hydro employee — is a 61 per cent increase from the $546,698.12 she earned in 2023 for a full year as president and chief executive officer. "My speculation is that she got every cent owed on the contract," Sean MacDonald said. For senior managers, specifically those running major energy companies, "the market dictates that if you want someone of considerable ability," the compensation must reflect that. MacDonald said he understands the high pay of departed taxpayer-funded executives can spark public outrage, but it is a necessary price to pay that accounts for their risk in assuming a job they could lose at the government's whim instead of matters related to conduct or performance. Public must pay for top CEOs "The public really needs to understand that to attract and retain quality people, to ensure our institutions and our major organizations funded by the taxpayer are well-managed, you're going to have to pay a lot for it." Hefty buyouts are part of that equation, he said. "There's nothing scandalous here." Manitoba Hydro dismissed Grewal on Feb. 13, 2024, two weeks after the NDP cabinet minister in charge of the corporation slammed her desire to purchase wind power from private sources. At the time, Hydro's board chair used the term "parting ways" to describe Grewal's departure. A former executive with Capstone Mining, B.C. Hydro and CIBC World Markets, Grewal took over Manitoba Hydro in February 2019 after a national hiring search. The NDP government was elected in the fall of 2023. There were no signs of rancour between the government and Grewal until Jan. 30, 2024, when she said in a speech that Hydro may need new sources of power by 2029 — and repeated the corporation's plans, first made in 2023 under the former PC government, to buy that electricity from private wind-energy companies. Nonetheless, Adrien Sala, the NDP government's minister responsible for Hydro, criticized Grewal's statements in the days that followed and rejected the notion Hydro would purchase power from private sources. He later disputed that this disagreement resulted in the termination of Grewal's contract. Since then, Allan Danroth has been tapped as Hydro's new CEO, and the province has announced plans to build new wind farms — but with Indigenous partners rather than private ones. Danroth started his position in August 2024. The utility's compensation report says he pocketed $192,454.60 for the year. Under Manitoba's Public Sector Compensation Disclosure Act, government entities must each year disclose the salary of every public sector employee making more than $85,000. The total pay includes overtime, retirement/severance pay, lump sum payments, vacation payouts and benefits. Hydro didn't provide a breakdown of Grewal's compensation or reveal the duration of her contract, but said she was "paid out in accordance with the terms of the contract she had signed with the board at that time." She didn't receive any severance, Hydro spokesperson Peter Chura added. Grewal didn't respond to a request for comment Tuesday through LinkedIn. Troy Craig, the head of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2034, the union representing Hydro's electrical workers, said in a text message he suspects the payout terms of Grewal's contract would be similar to previous executives. He added he's happy with the working relationship he currently has with Danroth and Hydro's chief operating officer, Hal Turner, who served as interim CEO after Grewal's departure. MacDonald said the compensation for Manitoba Hydro's CEO is significantly less than what the head of a major privately-run energy company would earn. They'd likely make "millions and millions" of dollars annually, alongside a suite of benefits ranging from bonuses to stocks and retirement options. Ex-Hydro CEO made $880k for 1½ months in 2024 4 minutes ago Duration 1:37 Former Manitoba Hydro CEO Jay Grewal was dismissed early in 2024, yet she still earned more than $880,000 in pay. A University of Manitoba business instructor says her contract was likely bought out.


National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Lisa Sygutek: Canadians have the power to fight back against Big Tech
Recently, I was a panellist at the Canadian Association of Journalists conference in Calgary. The session was titled, 'Local Journalism in the Age of Cutbacks.' A great headline, sure, but that's not why I was there. I was there to talk about our $8-billion class-action lawsuit against digital advertising giants Google and Facebook. Article content Alongside Sotos LLP, I launched a national class-action lawsuit in 2022. I'm the representative plaintiff in a case filed in the Federal Court of Canada on behalf of all Canadian newspaper publishers, big and small, independent and chain owned. We allege that Google and Facebook have engaged in anti-competitive practices in digital advertising and siphoned billions in ad revenue from Canadian journalism. Article content Article content If we really want to talk about cutbacks, then let's talk about what's causing them. The bleed of advertising dollars away from Canadian newsrooms and straight into the pockets of two unregulated tech giants is the reason we are all hurting. We can't stop the drain without getting to the root of the problem. That's what this lawsuit is about. Article content Article content Our case is one of the first of its kind in the world. Countries like Australia, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands have also picked up the cause, some with their own legal action, others with groundbreaking legislation forcing Big Tech to pay for journalism. Article content On that panel in Calgary, I listened to a lot of 'woe is me.' Stories of shrinking newsrooms. Struggles to retain talent. Frustrations over government ad policy. It was the same old tune. The media in this country has become far too comfortable living with a victim mentality. Well, I am nobody's victim. I'm a fighter. And it's time our industry remembered how to fight, too. What I didn't hear on that stage was resolve. What I didn't hear was fire. We've become so used to decline that we've forgotten how to push back and stand tall. Article content Article content We forgot that newspapers aren't just businesses. We're institutions. We are the watchdogs. The check and balance. The public record. And somewhere along the way, we let Silicon Valley billionaires convince us we didn't matter anymore. Article content Article content Well, I haven't forgotten. And I haven't given up.