
Unfair fight: how lefty nonprofits — and taxpayer money — lifted Mamdani's campaign
Just the opposite is true: The CFB is actually doling out obscene amounts of our money to tilt the scales for left-wing candidates, including Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani.
If November's election is anything like 2021's, taxpayers will shell out more than $100 per vote cast — while the board kneecaps Mamdani's moderate rivals.
Advertisement
The CFB, an independent city agency, was formed in 1988 to give political newbies a fair shot against established pols.
The idea was to match small private contributions dollar-for-dollar with taxpayer funds.
Since then, the match has increased sharply: Now it's a staggering 8-to-1 in the primary, and another 8-to-1 in the general election.
Advertisement
The CFB paid out nearly $63 million in taxpayer money to candidates in last week's primary, and its general-election expenditures will likely double that figure.
It's a gold mine for political operatives, campaign professionals and candidates in the CFB's good graces. As Zohran Mamdani apparently appears to be.
But not everyone is.
Last December, the CFB declared incumbent Mayor Eric Adams ineligible for public financing, alluding to federal allegations that have since been withdrawn.
Advertisement
It was straight-up election meddling — the old 'guilty until proven innocent' trick.
It's not the first time.
In 2013 the CFB denied matching funds to then-Comptroller John Liu in his race for the mayoralty, citing unproven allegations.
That let communist-loving dimwit Bill de Blasio win the primary — a disaster for the city.
Advertisement
This time around, the CFB is turning a blind eye to abuses that violate at least the spirit, and possibly the letter, of the public campaign-finance system.
When Mamdani in May urged his followers to help the floundering campaign of City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, some 370 of them did so, making her eligible for nearly $15,000 in public funding.
That sent taxpayer money to a candidate who didn't have the grassroots support to qualify.
Not a word from the CFB, even after Adams then instructed her supporters to add Mamdani to their ranked-choice ballots.
Wink-wink, a publicly financed quid pro quo.
CFB also chose to ignore Mamdani's biggest in-kind contributor: the Democratic Socialists of America.
On Monday, a DSA Zoom call boasted of its work on Mamdani's behalf: 1.6 million door knocks, 2.3 million phone dials and 30,000 volunteers, who canvassed in at least 60 neighborhoods.
Businesses face severe restrictions on such donations, and candidates have to report every penny of the in-kind resources they receive.
Advertisement
But the DSA poured millions of dollars' worth of expertise and sweat equity into Mamdani's hostile takeover of the Democratic Party — and the CFB was mum.
Mamdani was also backed by a broad network of leftist nonprofits that receive taxpayer funding courtesy of Democratic legislators and supply the expertise, manpower and connections to win political races.
These nonprofits are outstripping the unions in impact and influence.
Advertisement
A close look at Mamdani's fund-raising illustrates how taxpayers are getting fleeced by this nonprofit advocacy-industrial complex.
Mamdani raised $1,708,494 in individual contributions, which the CFB matched 8-to-1, giving him $7,050,417 in taxpayer funds.
That's a whopping $8.75 million, just for the primary race.
But according to CFB filings, 94% of Mamdani's small-dollar haul was 'bundled' by one person, Jerrod MacFarlane.
Advertisement
Bundling is a technical term for gathering donations from multiple givers, and MacFarlane is a professional fund-raiser with Action Lab, a left-of-center group.
The bundling suggests that Mamdani's campaign was less a groundswell of spontaneous support — and more an organized effort by powerful leftist groups with long fund-raising lists at their disposal.
It may not violate the law, but it is contrary to the principle behind the taxpayer-funded matching program.
The CFB did not respond to my questions regarding MacFarlane's bundling — and his name then disappeared from its list of fundraising 'intermediaries.'
Advertisement
Action Lab is headquartered in Brooklyn, thanks to a 'community projects' grant sponsored by Rep. Nydia Velazquez that paid for the building.
There's a pattern here: In a city and state dominated by the left, lawmakers are using taxpayer money to boost the nonprofit radical advocacy-industrial complex, which in turn helps orchestrate their re-election.
The CFB pretends not to see, and lavishly doles out tax dollars to fund the rigged system.
CFB also puts a thumb on the scale through its own aggressive voter 'education and engagement' operation — frequently collaborating with leftist groups like the Legal Defense Fund.
The goal isn't maximum turnout, but to turn out specific groups, including former felons, new immigrants and the youth vote.
That is, likely Democratic voters.
CFB even provides provide food, paid transportation and paid childcare — all courtesy of the taxpayers — to engage those targeted audiences.
Sounds almost illegal.
It's past time to eliminate the CFB, let taxpayers off the hook — and ask whether Mamdani actually won the Democratic primary in a fair fight.
Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and co-founder of the Committee to Save Our City.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
Inside Hakeem Jeffries' decision to filibuster Trump's big bill
The overwhelming consensus on Capitol Hill was that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) would only delay President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" by about an hour. As noon approached on Thursday, that expectation was shattered. Why it matters: For months, the Democratic base has been demanding their party's leaders " fight harder" and use every tool at their disposal to stymie the GOP agenda. In the eyes of many lawmakers, this is Jeffries delivering. Jeffries blasted the GOP's marquee tax and spending bill as an "immoral document," vowing to "stand up and push back against it with everything we have on behalf of the American people." As of late Thursday morning, Jeffries was on track to surpass then-Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) record-breaking, 8-and-a-half hour speech to delay the Build Back Better vote in 2021. If Jeffries keeps speaking until 1:23pm ET, he will have set a new record. What we're hearing: One of Jeffries' central motivations, numerous Democratic sources told Axios, was to ensure that Republicans were forced to pass the bill during daylight hours and not in the dead of night. Jeffries said in his speech: "I ask the question, if Republicans were so proud of this one big, ugly bill, why did debate begin at 3:28am in the morning?" "This is about fighting for the American people ... forcing it into the daylight and telling some stories about the real impacts," House Democratic caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told Axios. Zoom in: Jeffries spoke with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) ahead of the speech to warn him about his plans, two sources familiar with the discussion told Axios on the condition of anonymity to share details of a private conversation. The House Democratic leader communicated that he was "just going to do an hour," one of the sources said, but that it "may be longer now." Another source said Jeffries made that decision "when he learned [Johnson] was going to stay all night until he got the votes." What he's saying: "Budgets are moral documents, and in our view ... budgets should be designed to lift people up," Jeffries said in his speech. "This reckless Republican budget that we are debating right now on the floor on the House of Representatives tears people down ... and every should vote 'no' against it," he said. Jeffries was consistently surrounded by dozens of House Democratic colleagues, who raucously applauded him throughout his speech. Yes, but: The Democratic leader did face a bit of frustration from his caucus for leaving even his inner circle in the dark about his plans. "No one is upset Hakeem wanted to do this, but to not tell members, 'be prepared, book multiple flights, be flexible,'" one House Democrat vented, grumbling that it is particularly hard to rebook flights around the July 4 holiday. Another House Democrat fumed that a "heads up would have been nice." Between the lines: Jeffries' marathon speech comes after Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) delivered a 25-hour filibuster in April that earned him plaudits from the Democrats' grassroots as a resistance hero. Later that month, Jeffries and Booker held a day-long sit-in on the Capitol steps in protest of Republicans' fiscal plans. The bottom line:"The base wants to see certain things and we have to show them those things, otherwise they don't believe we're fighting hard enough," another House Democrat told Axios of Jeffries' speech.


USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
Jeffries uses ‘magic minute' as part of resistance plan against Trump tax bill
On the eve of America's 250th birthday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, is doing all he can to delay what looks to be the inevitable passage of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill. Jeffries, stymied with legislative options to block Trump's signature "big beautiful bill", has now taken his efforts to the court of public opinion, seizing the microphone on the House floor in a marathon speech. The Democratic leader started his protest speech shortly before 5 a.m. on July 3 as House Republicans continue to hammer out the proposal that would extend the 2017 tax cuts, boost military and border security spending and make an estimated $1 trillion cut to Medicaid and other programs meant to help the poor and working-class. "I rise today in strong opposition to Donald Trump's disgusting abomination… that guts Medicaid, rips food from the mouths of children, seniors and veterans, and rewards billionaires with massive tax breaks," Jeffries said. There are stacks of binders next to Jeffries at the podium, which indicates he plans to extend this marathon debate further but the Trump administration and congressional Republicans believe they have enough votes to cross the finish line. Here are some key things to think about in the final hours of the bill's debate. Jeffries using 'magic minute' is part of Democratic resistance plan As the party out of power in every part of the federal government, Democrats don't have many options in terms of stopping Trump's bulldozer in Washington. Instead of defeating the bill, Jeffries appears to be looking to rally national outrage over Trump's measure -- which 55% of registered voters oppose, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released June 26 -- by using a procedural tactic known as the "magic minute" that gives the House leaders unlimited speaking time on the floor. "People will die," Jeffries said. "I'm sad. I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying this is a crime scene. And House Democrats want no part of it." The marathon speech is similar to the one Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., did in April that lasted for 25 hours and 5 minutes and broke the Senate record. It is unclear if Jeffries' talk-a-thon is getting the same level of attention online as Booker's speech did, but he's using to it pick apart the mega-bill and other parts of Trump's agenda including the focus on illegal immigration. Jeffries said at one point that Democrats support fixing the country's "broken" immigration system and booting those who commit crimes out of the U.S., but that his party opposes targeting law-abiding immigrant families, such as a 2-year-old girl born to two undocumented immigrants in Florida who was deported to Brazil by the administration earlier this year. 'Take my sweet time': How long will Jeffries speak? Democrats aren't saying how long Jeffries plans to speak, but from the binders and other materials joining the 54-year-old congressman at the podium he appears to be ready to take up as much time as he can physically muster. "I'm still here to take my sweet time," Jeffries said at one point. The House Democratic leader is about halfway to breaking the all-time record for the longest House floor speech set by former Rep. Kevin McCarthy, who as the GOP leader in 2021 spoke against a Democratic spending measure. For much of this year Democrats and their progressive allies have been searching for different ways to regain voters' confidence and stop Trump's winning streak, whether by using congressional procedures or crashing press conferences held by administration officials. For most of the speech, Jeffries has been reading the testimonials of average Americans who will be impacted by spending cuts in what the president has dubbed his "one, big beautiful bill." But he has also been condemning other parts of the Trump agenda, including the massive effort to remove undocumented immigrants from the country. Vance scoffs at delay tactic as White House reschedules signing ceremony Republicans don't seem too deterred by Jeffries' protest speech, even as the White House is reportedly having to change plans on what day and time Trump will hold a ceremonial signing of the mega-bill. Vice President JD Vance took to X, formerly known as Twitter, suggesting the Democratic leader's speech is having the opposite effect. "GOP Congressman just texted me: 'I was undecided on the bill but then I watched Hakeem Jeffries performance and now I'm a firm yes.'" Other White House aides are mocking the marathon speech, too. Dan Scavino, a longtime Trump adviser and deputy chief of staff, posted a portion of Jeffries talking about stripping parts of the Affordable Care Act featuring the president playing an off-tune version of "My Heart Will Go On" on a flute. Contributing: Savannah Kuchar, Sudiksha Kochi and Joey Garrison


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
AOC Turns Up Pressure on Senator Murkowski Over Trump Bill
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has called out Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who has at times bucked her party, for siding with Senate Republicans to advance President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" spending bill. Three Republicans broke with their party earlier this week, forcing Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking vote and underscoring the weight of Murkowski's decision. Newsweek has contacted Murkowski's press team for comment via email on Thursday. Why It Matters Ocasio-Cortez has been a pillar of the Democratic Party's left wing since her 2018 election. She shook the party's establishment when she defeated longtime incumbent Representative Joe Crowley in New York's 14th Congressional District. Her brand of progressive politics has gained traction as she and others speak out against Trump and Republicans, but many Democratic establishment figures remain less outspoken as they catch their bearings following widespread 2024 election losses. Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani's victory over former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the New York City mayoral primary offers evidence of the growing left flank. Murkowski, an Alaskan Republican, has at times broken with her party. In 2021, she voted against Trump during his second impeachment. In 2022, she backed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court nomination, and she has voted against some of Trump's recent nominees. A composite image showing Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York on Capitol Hill on June 10 and Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska at the U.S. Capitol on June 3. A composite image showing Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York on Capitol Hill on June 10 and Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska at the U.S. Capitol on June 3. Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images What To Know On Tuesday, Murkowski wrote a long post on X, formerly Twitter, outlining why she ultimately voted for Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. After voting in favor of the spending bill, she told reporters, "My hope is that the House is gonna look at this and recognize that we're not there yet." On Thursday, Ocasio-Cortez responded to the senator's post, writing: "This isn't about you. This is about the 17 million Americans whose health insurance you're taking away." The congresswoman added, "And after you turned your back on them to vote 'YES', you said your fellow House GOP should vote NO." This isn't about you. This is about the 17 million Americans whose health insurance you're taking away. And after you turned your back on them to vote "YES", you said your fellow House GOP should vote NO. Americans are going to suffer. YOU admit that. And YOU supported it. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 3, 2025 A report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that 11.8 million more Americans would be uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. Murkowski was one of the final holdouts in the Senate, citing concerns about the bill's effects on Alaska's vulnerable populations. GOP leaders spent hours negotiating with her, offering carve-outs for Alaska on Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funding. While some provisions passed parliamentary review, others—such as enhanced Medicaid payments—were ruled noncompliant with Senate budget rules. Trump's massive budget proposal, while backed by many of the president's supporters, has drawn sharp criticism from some lawmakers and health experts over its proposed Medicaid cuts. The CBO estimated that the bill would slash the program by about $790 billion over the next decade to help offset about $4.5 trillion in tax breaks. Medicaid provides health coverage to tens of millions of low-income Americans, with about 71 million people enrolled in the program. Other provisions include permanently extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts while exempting overtime pay, tips and some Social Security income from taxation; repealing most clean‑energy tax credits created under President Joe Biden; authorizing a $40 billion border security surge and funding a nationwide deportation initiative; and raising the federal debt ceiling. Ocasio-Cortez wrote in her post: "Americans are going to suffer. YOU admit that. And YOU supported it." Murkowski, who took office in 2002, said in her July 1 post that her decision to support the bill was "one of the hardest votes" she's had to cast. "My goal throughout the reconciliation process has been to make a bad bill better for Alaska, and in many ways, we have done that," she added. "While we have worked to improve the present bill for Alaska, it is not good enough for the rest of our nation—and we all know it," she continued, adding, "This bill needs more work across chambers and is not ready for the President's desk." What People Are Saying House Speaker Mike Johnson wrote on X on July 3: "The time is now! President Trump is waiting with his pen. Today, we will deliver the One Big Beautiful Bill to the President's desk—and the American people will FINALLY get the relief they demand and deserve." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries wrote on X on July 3: "Just took to the House Floor to speak in support of a country where everyone can afford to live the good life. And in strong opposition to Trump's One Big Ugly Bill that is devastating to everyday Americans. We will not be silenced." Senate Majority Leader John Thune wrote on X on July 1: "Since we regained the majority in January, our Republican team has been laser-focused on achieving the mission before us today. Now we're here—passing legislation that will make America safer, stronger, and more prosperous." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wrote on X on July 1: "Today's vote will haunt Senate Republicans for years to come. Americans will see the damage done as hospitals close, as people are laid off, as costs go up, and as the debt increases. Democrats will make sure Americans remember the betrayal that took place today." Elon Musk wrote on X on June 30: "Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky wrote on X on June 29: "There's no such thing as a tax relief without spending cuts. Gov't can reduce the tax rate, but the spending still must be paid for. Gov't must borrow money (which raises interest rates & requires more taxes later) or print money (which causes inflation). Both hurt Americans." What Happens Next Both chambers must agree on the final version of the bill for it to advance to the president's desk to be signed into law. The House minority leader is holding the House floor in a speech that has already run for more than six hours, delaying what Republican leaders hoped would be a quick march to the final vote on Thursday.