
Threat of India and Pakistan nuclear war is real - but there's a silver lining
One of the UK's leading military experts in atomic warfare has declared India and Pakistan's nuclear weapons will likely 'prevent a major war.' But more terror attacks or unconventional warfare backed or planned by Pakistan would herald an increase in conventional strikes by militarily superior India, he warned.
Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon was talking as the world awaits Islamabad's threatened revenge move following India's strikes on Pakistan-controlled part of Kashmir and the mainland. India has claimed it was striking Pakistan-backed terror camps in retaliation for an April 22 terror attack that killed 26 tourists, mostly Indians, in its part of Kashmir.
And Pakistan claimed it has killed 'dozens' of Indian soldiers and that overnight it shot down 12 Indian drones. Delhi's military claimed in reply that it thwarted missile and drone attacks by Pakistan on Wednesday through to Thursday morning on 15 sites across the north and west.
And Col De Bretton-Gordon added that although neither India or Pakistan owns so-called traditional chemical weapons made by countries such as Russia and in the past Syria, there is always that danger.
The former Commanding Officer of the UK's Joint Chemical, Biological and Nuclear Regiment told the Mirror: 'In an odd way this means a future escalation is less likely.
"The thing that both countries having nuclear weapons does is it creates balance, equilibrium and parity. Look at what's happening in Ukraine where there is no nuclear parity and Putin is able to make threats about nuclear weapons and gets away with it.
'When you have nuclear parity this almost cancels the two sides out and avoids a conventional escalation.'
One problem may lie in Pakistan's complex relationships with terror groups, he added, saying: 'But at the same time it is true to say that Pakistan has had major problems with al-Qaeda, Islamic State and the Taliban. Pakistan must have some responsibility towards this.
"Pakistan will retaliate in some way to India's recent strikes but unlikely with a full scale invasion as there is no conventional parity. India is a much more powerful military entity and Pakistan knows that.
'That said the links between the Pakistan Inter Service Intelligence agency, the ISI and these organisations in the past is pretty unpleasant and that has to be watched. This has been a complex relationship.
"We could see more terror attacks and that could be met with a much more conventional response from India.'
Both India and Pakistan are said not to own chemical and biological weapons - but de Bretton-Gordon warns that chemical weapons can easily be used by both. He said: 'Russia is daily using these kinds of weapons and they are very easily made, even though the thing being used might not be what people think of as chemical weapons.
'Putin's troops are using riot control agents, which technically are chemical weapons, on an industrial scale and they are very effective. I was with the Kurdish Peshmerga in Syria when ISIS were firing mortars full of Chlorine and you then see a brave fighter used to running into a hail of bullets looking terrified.
"This is a very scary weapon and it can easily kill you. This stuff is called Chloropicrin and it can be deadly. Whilst India and Pakistan may not have what we usually think of as chemical weapons I am quite sure both do have these riot control agents.
'To summarise, if the situation worsens we may see an escalation of some kind , even perhaps more terror attacks - but this would not be in Pakistan's interest. Ultimately India is in a position of conventional military overmatch with Pakistan and a war could lead to the devastation of Pakistan.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
7 hours ago
- ITV News
Bill and Hillary Clinton subpoenaed by US Congress for Epstein investigation
Former US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary have been subpoenaed by the US Congress to testify about Jeffrey Epstein. The Clintons were among several high-profile people to be named by the House Oversight Committee on Tuesday as it began a congressional probe that lawmakers believe may show links to President Donald Trump and former top officials. The request by the Republican-controlled committee came while Congress is on a month-long break, indicating that interest in the Epstein files remains high - despite efforts by Trump to move past it. Lawmakers from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let go of the issue. James Comer, the Republican chairman of the oversight committee, noted in letters to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the former officials that the cases of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell 'have received immense public interest and scrutiny.' 'While the Department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell,' Comer said. Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial for sex trafficking charges, conspiracy theories have swirled around over what information investigators gathered on Epstein — and who else knew about his sexual abuse of teenage girls. Conservative conspiracists have formed a core part of Trump's base, and his decision to rein back on his promise of releasing the files has created fury within some circles. The renewed focus on the Epstein files has also galvanised public opinion on the issue, with many polls showing a majority of Americans now believe they should be released. Bill Clinton was among a number of senior politicians acquainted with Epstein, a wealthy financier, before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them. One of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre, once gave a newspaper interview in which she described riding in a helicopter with Clinton and flirting with Trump, but she later said in a deposition that those things hadn't actually happened and were mistakes by the reporter. Clinton has previously said through a spokesperson that while he travelled on Epstein's jet, he never visited his homes and had no knowledge of his crimes. The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last four presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Lawmakers also subpoenaed former FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller. The committee has also subpoenaed the Trump administration's Justice Department for its files on Epstein, in a move spearheaded by the Democrats on the committee. They were joined by some Republicans last month to successfully initiate the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee. 'Today was an important step forward in our fight for transparency regarding the Epstein files and our dedication to seeking justice for the victims,' said Democrats Robert Garcia and Summer Lee, who initiated the subpoena, in a joint statement. They added: 'Now, we must continue putting pressure on the Department of Justice until we actually receive every document.' The subpoenas give the Justice Department until August 19 to hand over the requested records, though such requests are typically open to negotiation and can be resisted by the Trump administration. The committee is also asking the former officials to appear for the depositions throughout August, September and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on October 9 and Bill Clinton on October 14. Multiple former presidents have voluntarily testified before Congress, but none has been compelled to do so. Trump resisted efforts to get him to testify in 2022 about the January 6 riots, with the committee ultimately withdrawing the subpoena. The committee had previously issued a subpoena for an interview with Maxwell, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein but was recently transferred to a Texas facility. However, Comer has indicated he is willing to delay that deposition until after the Supreme Court decides whether to hear an appeal of her conviction. She argues she was wrongfully prosecuted. As the Justice Department has tried to appease demands for more disclosure, it has turned its attention to Maxwell. Officials interviewed her for several days last month. But Democrats stressed the importance of gaining direct access to the investigative files, rather than relying on Maxwell's words.


STV News
7 hours ago
- STV News
US House committee issues subpoenas for Epstein files and Clinton depositions
The US House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files in the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, part of a congressional probe that politicians believe may show links to President Donald Trump and other former top officials. The Republican-controlled committee also issued subpoenas for depositions with former president Bill Clinton, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials. The committee's actions showed how even with members away from Washington on a monthlong break, interest in the Epstein files is still running high. Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago. He has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation, but politicians from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let it go. Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges, conservative conspiracists have stoked theories about what information investigators gathered on Epstein – and who else could have been involved. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee nodded to that line of questioning last month by initiating the subpoenas for the Clintons, both Democrats, as well as demanding all communications between former president Joe Biden's Democratic administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein. The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last three presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Also subpoenaed were former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller. However, it was Democrats who sparked the move to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein. They were joined by some Republicans to initiate successfully the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee. 'Democrats are focused on transparency and are pushing back against the corruption of Donald Trump,' Robert Garcia, who is the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, told reporters last month. 'What is Donald Trump hiding that he won't release the Epstein files?' The committee had previously issued a subpoena for an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by the wealthy financier but was recently transferred to a Texas facility. PA Media US President Donald Trump speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport in Pennsylvania on Sunday. However, the committee's Republican chairman, James Comer, has indicated he is willing to delay that deposition until after the Supreme Court decides whether to hear an appeal to her conviction. She argues she was wrongfully prosecuted. Comer noted in letters to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the former officials that the cases of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell 'have received immense public interest and scrutiny.' 'While the department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell,' Comer said. The subpoenas give the Justice Department until August 19 to hand over the requested records, though such records requests are typically open to negotiation. The committee is also asking the former officials to appear for the depositions throughout August, September and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on October 9 and Bill Clinton on October 14. While several former presidents, including Trump, have faced congressional subpoenas, none has ever appeared before members under compulsion. Bill Clinton was among a number of luminaries acquainted with Epstein before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them. One of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre, once gave a newspaper interview in which she described riding in a helicopter with Clinton and flirting with Trump, but she later said in a deposition that those things had not actually happened and were mistakes by the reporter. Clinton has previously said through a spokesperson that while he travelled on Epstein's jet he never visited his homes and had no knowledge of his crimes. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


North Wales Chronicle
8 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
US House committee issues subpoenas for Epstein files and Clinton depositions
The Republican-controlled committee also issued subpoenas for depositions with former president Bill Clinton, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials. The committee's actions showed how even with members away from Washington on a monthlong break, interest in the Epstein files is still running high. Mr Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and claimed he cut off their relationship long ago. He has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation, but politicians from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let it go. Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges, conservative conspiracists have stoked theories about what information investigators gathered on Epstein – and who else could have been involved. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee nodded to that line of questioning last month by initiating the subpoenas for the Clintons, both Democrats, as well as demanding all communications between former president Joe Biden's Democratic administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein. The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last three presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Also subpoenaed were former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller. However, it was Democrats who sparked the move to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein. They were joined by some Republicans to initiate successfully the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee. 'Democrats are focused on transparency and are pushing back against the corruption of Donald Trump,' Robert Garcia, who is the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, told reporters last month. 'What is Donald Trump hiding that he won't release the Epstein files?' The committee had previously issued a subpoena for an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by the wealthy financier but was recently transferred to a Texas facility. However, the committee's Republican chairman, James Comer, has indicated he is willing to delay that deposition until after the Supreme Court decides whether to hear an appeal to her conviction. She argues she was wrongfully prosecuted. Mr Comer noted in letters to Attorney General Pam Bondi and the former officials that the cases of Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell 'have received immense public interest and scrutiny.' 'While the department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell,' Mr Comer said. The subpoenas give the Justice Department until August 19 to hand over the requested records, though such records requests are typically open to negotiation. The committee is also asking the former officials to appear for the depositions throughout August, September and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on October 9 and Bill Clinton on October 14. While several former presidents, including Mr Trump, have faced congressional subpoenas, none has ever appeared before members under compulsion. Bill Clinton was among a number of luminaries acquainted with Epstein before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. Mr Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them. One of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre, once gave a newspaper interview in which she described riding in a helicopter with Mr Clinton and flirting with Mr Trump, but she later said in a deposition that those things had not actually happened and were mistakes by the reporter. Mr Clinton has previously said through a spokesperson that while he travelled on Epstein's jet he never visited his homes and had no knowledge of his crimes.