Cancer caused by HPV is increasing in some women in the U.S.
A new study shows that the percentage of women screened for cervical cancer fell from 47% in 2019 to 41% in 2023.
Rural women are 25% more likely to be diagnosed and 42% more likely to die from cervical cancer than women who live in cities, a trend that likely reflects lower screening rates in less populated areas, according to the study, published in JAMA Network Open this month.
Every year, 13,000 women in the U.S. are diagnosed with cervical cancer, which is almost always caused by HPV, or human papillomavirus. About 4,320 die each year, according to the American Cancer Society.
Cervical cancer rates have been edging upward among women in their 30s and early 40s, perhaps because women ages 21 to 29 are the least likely to be up to date on their screenings, with 29% being overdue.
Cervical cancer takes several years to develop, progressing from abnormal cell changes and precancers before transforming into cancer. Studies show that women are also less likely to be screened if they are nonwhite, uninsured or identify as gay, lesbian or bisexual.
HPV vaccines are safe and can prevent 90% of cervical cancers. Yet resistance to the vaccine, which protects against cancer-causing strains of the sexually transmitted infection, has persisted since it was approved almost 20 years ago. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has disparaged them as dangerous, linking HPV shots to autoimmune conditions and mental illness.A federal judge in North Carolina on March 10 dismissed legal claims that the HPV shot, sold by Merck as Gardasil, could cause patients to develop certain health conditions.
Another lawsuit alleging that Gardasil causes serious side effects has been put on hold until September because of Kennedy's involvement in the case. Although Kennedy disclosed in an ethics statement that he stood to receive referral fees from one of the law firms suing Merck, he later said he would give any earnings to his son.
Vaccine hesitancy has kept many parents from vaccinating their children. Only 61% of adolescents are up to date on all HPV vaccines, given as a series of two or three shots depending on age.
More than 42 million people in the U.S. carry at least one strain of HPV that can cause disease, including genital warts or cancer, and 47,00 a year are diagnosed with an HPV-linked malignancy. Yet research has found a decline in awareness that HPV is linked with a number of cancers, including cervical, throat and anal.
With so many people at risk, we asked experts to help clear up confusion over HPV vaccination and screening.
The American Cancer Society recommends that people have a primary HPV test every five years from ages 25 to 65. If primary HPV testing is not available, the society recommends either combining an HPV test with a Pap test every five years or a Pap test alone every three years
Among women ages 20 to 24 — who were eligible for HPV shots as adolescents — the incidence of cervical precancer fell nearly 80% from 2008 to 2002, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cervical cancer incidence fell 65% from 2012 to 2019 among women under 25. Death rates from cervical cancer among the same age group fell 62% from 2013-2015 to 2019-2021.
HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Among sexually active people, more than 90% of men and 80% of women are infected with HPV during their lifetimes. About half of HPV infections involve high-risk strains. In addition to cervical cancer, HPV can cause cancers of the vagina, vulva, anus, penis and head and neck.
Given how common these viruses are, no one should feel embarrassed to learn they have HPV, said Dr. Rebecca Perkins, an obstetrician-gynecologist and investigator at the Woman, Mother and Baby Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center. 'We need to decrease the stigma associated with having a positive test,' Perkins said.
Although there are more than 200 types of HPV, only a few cause cancer. These types are known as high-risk strains and are included in routine cervical cancer screenings, because they have the highest chance of causing cancer, said Dr. Verda Hicks, immediate past president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 'If an HPV test is positive for high-risk HPV, it indicates an active infection that increases the risk for development of a pre-cancer or cancer,' Hicks said.
Does being infected with high-risk HPV give you a high risk of cancer?
A. No. The immune system clears most HPV infections within a year or two, Hicks said. Most people with high-risk HPV experience short-term infections that cause mild changes in cervical cells, which return to normal once the infection clears.
Doctors become more concerned if someone tests positive for high-risk HPV for longer than two years as persistent infections can lead to the development of a precancer or cancer. About 1% of people with HPV develop a 'long-term, chronic infection' and even fewer develop cervical cancer, Hicks said.
'Women should not freak out' just because they have high-risk HPV, Hicks said. A positive test 'means the screening process is doing its job. It is identifying someone who possibly has a persistent infection.'
Undergoing routine screenings and any recommended follow-up tests allow doctors to catch these changes early, when they're easier to treat, Perkins said.
That's why it's essential not to skip any checkups, she said.
'The longer that someone remains positive, the higher the risk' of developing cancer, Perkins said.
Among women screened for the first time in their 20s and 30s, up to 20% learn that they have high-risk HPV, said Dr. Mark Einstein, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology and women's health at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.
There's no blanket prescription for people with high-risk HPV, said Hicks, who noted that doctors tailor their advice for each individual, depending on a variety of risk factors.
While people with high-risk HPV shouldn't panic, they should take the finding seriously, follow their doctor's advice and attend any recommended follow-up visits, she said. These visits allow doctors to look for abnormal cells, which can be removed before they turn into cancer.
Yes. That's because the original HPV shots, which were approved for children and adolescents in 2006, protected against the two riskiest viral strains, which together cause 70% of cervical cancer, as well as two strains that cause genital warts. Although the first HPV vaccines were very effective, people who were vaccinated with them could be infected with one of the HPV strains that cause the other 30% of cervical cancers, Perkins said. Updated HPV shots now protect against nine strains of the virus and protect against 90% of cervical and anal cancers, as well as most strains that cause mouth and throat cancers.
Yes. A positive HPV test doesn't necessarily reflect a recent infection.
Although the immune system usually does a good job of controlling HPV, the virus doesn't disappear from the body. HPV can sometimes reactivate, especially if a person's immune system has been under stress due to an illness or certain medications, Perkins said.
'We see reactivations in women who have not been sexually active in 10 years,' Perkins said. 'It's just a function of the virus escaping the immune system. You should never get a divorce over a diagnosis of HPV.'
In some ways, HPV is similar to the chickenpox virus, which can hide in nerve cells for decades before reactivating and causing a painful condition called shingles.
'It doesn't matter whether the infection is old or new; we still need to follow up,' Perkins said.
There's no cure for the virus itself. Health professionals can remove abnormal growths on the cervix, as well as genital warts.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines
Click in for more news from The Hill{beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told some expert groups that they will no longer be able to help review scientific data used to issue vaccine recommendations. © APSome members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice's (ACIP) working groups, including physician groups and infectious disease specialists, were sent e-mails late Thursday notifying them that they will no longer serve on the subcommittees. The groups were removed from the subcommittees because they were deemed biased by the Trump administration, according to a copy of the email shared with The Hill. "By definition, Liason organizations are special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a 'bias' based on their constituency/and or population that they represent," the email reads. "It is important that the ACIP Workgroup activities remain free of influence from any special interest groups so ACIP workgroups will no longer include Liason organizations." Eight of the advisory groups released a joint statement Friday saying they are 'deeply disappointed' that they are now barred from informing the development of vaccine recommendations. 'For decades liaisons from our organizations have reviewed published and unpublished data and literature related to vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety and provided unbiased input for ACIP's consideration,' the statement reads. 'To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines.' The groups, which include the American Medical Association, as well as the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called on the Trump administration to reconsider their exclusion from the vaccine review process. A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the CDC, said that experts will continue to be included in the review process based on 'relevant experience and expertise." 'Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions,' the spokesperson wrote. 'The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence and bias.' The notice is the latest move from the Trump administration to shake up the nation's vaccine policy and is another major change to the CDC's advisory panel on vaccines. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr abruptly fired all 17 sitting members of ACIP in early June, accusing them of having conflicts of interest and rubber-stamping decisions related to the COVID-19 vaccine. He then replaced the panel with eight hand-picked appointees, including some vaccine skeptics. Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changesMore than half of American adults — 59 percent — say they do not expect to get the COVID-19 booster shot this autumn, according to new poll findings from health care policy group KFF. Poll results show 23 percent of U.S. adult respondents said they will 'probably not' get the vaccine, while 37 percent said they will 'definitely not' get the shot. Americans who said they will 'probably' or 'definitely' not get the shot were … Full Story Blue states challenge Trump's restrictions on gender-affirming care More than a dozen Democratic attorneys general announced a lawsuit challenging recent moves by President Trump's administration to severely restrict access to gender-affirming health care for anyone under 19, including in states where treatment is legal and protected by law. Full Story Fired vaccine board members warn of fallout from RFK Jr. policiesRecently removed members of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory panel warn that Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s move to replace them shows he is 'abandoning' rigorous scientific review and open deliberation. Kennedy fired all 17 sitting members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in early June, accusing members of having conflicts of … Full Story In Other News Branch out with a different read: Number of Texans receiving out-of-state abortions quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texans who sought an abortion out of state more than quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 after a state law went into effect that bans the procedure in almost all cases. Data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) shows at least 7,844 Texas residents received an abortion in a different state in 2023, up from 4,718 in 2022 and 1,712 in 2021. Still the total number of abortions for Texas residents … Full Story Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care:More than 2,000 DACA recipients in California to lose health insurance (the San Francisco Chronicle) Some rural Texas seen THC as a lifeline for their health and economy (The Texas Tribune) Illinois becomes first state to require mental health screenings for students (ABC) What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: Medicare, Medicaid plans to experiment with covering weight loss drugs (The Washington Post) Wildfire smoke and unhealthy air fill the Midwest before spreading to the East (The Washington Post) Remember running a mile in school? The Presidential Fitness Test is coming back (NPR) You're all caught up. See you next week! Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox. Sign up for the Health Care newsletter Subscribe


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Childhood vaccination rates have dropped again, CDC data shows
Advertisement The report comes at a time when public health experts are particularly concerned about childhood vaccinations because of increasing skepticism of the shots, including among top health officials. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary, has questioned, without scientific basis, the safety of many childhood vaccines, including those for measles, hepatitis B, and polio. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In June, a panel of vaccine advisers installed by Kennedy announced that they would closely scrutinize the immunization schedules for children and adolescents. Kennedy's appointees have also restricted access to the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy pregnant women and children. The messaging from Kennedy's office seems 'specifically designed to sow distrust in vaccines,' said Dr. Sean O'Leary, chair of the infectious disease committee for the American Academy of Pediatrics. Advertisement 'The good news is the majority of parents are still vaccinating their kids,' he said. But it is concerning that rates have dropped, he said, 'because that really matters in terms of spread of disease.' In a statement, Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for the federal health department, said the CDC was committed to making vaccines accessible and raising awareness about their efficacy, but also emphasized that 'the decision to vaccinate is a personal one.' Immunization rates for the vaccine that protects against measles had, for years, held steady at 95 percent, the level needed to stop the disease from spreading in a community. It dipped during the 2020-21 school year to 93.9 percent and has continued to decline each year. In 2024-25, 92.5 percent of kindergartners had received the shots. Vaccination rates for polio also fell to 92.5 percent last year from 95% at the start of the pandemic. The percentage changes may seem small, but they represent large numbers. During the last school year, about 286,000 children entered kindergarten without documentation of receiving the two measles shots required for full protection against the disease, according to the CDC. Vaccinations are not evenly spread across the country. There are many vulnerable parts of the country where coverage is far lower than 93 percent, including West Texas, where the large measles outbreak began. 'You can have a city that has a 98 percent vaccination rate but have a community in that city that has a 60 percent rate,' Ratner said. 'I think the fear is that we have more of those now.' Vaccinations against pertussis, or whooping cough, have also steadily declined since the pandemic, falling to just over 92 percent last year, from 94.9 percent in the 2019-20 school year. Advertisement There were more than 32,000 cases of whooping cough in 2024, the highest tally in a decade. In California alone, the disease struck 2,000 people, including an infant who died, between January and October 2024. The number of children granted medical exemptions for shots otherwise required to start public school in many states has remained flat over the years. But nonmedical exemptions nationwide have spiked to 3.6 percent in the last school year from 2 percent a decade ago. Exemptions increased in 36 states and Washington, D.C., with 17 states reporting exemptions exceeding 5 percent, according to the CDC. Disruptions during the pandemic derailed immunizations across the world. But vaccination rates have not recovered since then, as many public health experts had hoped they would. Globally, vaccination for measles fell to 68 percent during the pandemic. Intensive efforts have improved the coverage somewhat, but by the end of last year, only 76 percent of children worldwide had received two measles shots. Some vaccine skepticism long predates the pandemic. Anti-vaccine campaigns have often targeted the measles vaccine, falsely linking it to autism. That's especially concerning to public health experts, because the virus is extraordinarily contagious and can rapidly tear through pockets of low immunization, as it has in Texas and neighboring states. The United States endured the consequences of falling vaccination rates once before. In the late 1980s, public health budget cuts by the Reagan administration brought down vaccination rates, particularly among low-income Black and Hispanic children. From 1989 through 1991, measles infected more than 55,000 Americans and killed 166. Infection can cause long-term harms, making people more vulnerable to other infections. Advertisement A 2015 study estimated that before widespread vaccination, measles may have accounted for as many as half of all infectious disease deaths in children. This article originally appeared in

2 hours ago
Multiple medical groups say they have been barred from work on CDC's panel of vaccine advisers
Multiple medical groups say they have been barred from working on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's panel of vaccine advisers. It comes weeks after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired the original panel of independent experts and replaced them with his own handpicked members -- many of whom have expressed skeptical views on vaccines. Liaisons representing major medical groups were historically invited to meetings of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) as non-voting members to provide their independent expertise in respective fields. In a joint statement, the groups said they have now been excluded "from the process of reviewing scientific evidence end informing vaccine recommendations." A total of eight groups signed on to the statement, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, teh American College of Physicians, the American Medical Association and the National Medical Association among others. In a statement provided to ABC News, an HHS spokesperson said: "Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions. The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence, and bias. We are fulfilling our promise to the American people to never again allow those conflicts to taint vaccine recommendations." The statement went on to say: "Experts will continue to be included based on relevant experience and expertise, not because of what organization they are with." In their statement, the medical organizations said they learned the groups will be excluded from the panel's work in an email late Thursday and noted they were "deeply disappointed and alarmed" by the move. "To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines," the statement read.