logo
Why deterrence remains India's best strategy against China

Why deterrence remains India's best strategy against China

First Post13-07-2025
Deterrence works when the adversary believes that any aggression—even limited—will be met with swift, smart, and unrelenting retaliation. To achieve this, India must ensure that its forward-deployed forces are not just present but primed read more
Advertisement
In geopolitics, sometimes the best move is to deny your opponent a winning one. File image/CNBC TV18
The India–Pakistan confrontation following the Pahalgam terror attack was a moment of unprecedented escalation. Pakistan, brazen in its support for terrorism, responded to India's calibrated Operation Sindoor with indiscriminate aggression, even if that meant targeting civilian sites. Overnight, India's defence posture was put to the test. In response, the Indian state acted with precision and resolve, delivering a firm, proportionate strike that reminded Pakistan of the costs of adventurism. But beyond the tactical success, the episode reinforced a larger lesson: that military readiness must be a constant—even in times of perceived calm, the fog of escalation can descend within hours. A stable regional order is never a guarantee against kinetic action.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
To quote External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, 'It's imperative that a contemporary and informed assessment of capabilities is made.' The recent encounter with Pakistan only reaffirms that assumption—that our adversaries will abide by rules of engagement—is not just naïve, but dangerous, especially as stakes mount.
And one must not be surprised by such an act either. We need not look far for precedent. The epic, Mahabharata, provides striking examples of how 'well-laid rules' of combat are bent, broken, or cast aside to seek unintended benefits on both sides. Perhaps most telling is how Krishna engineered the killing of Jayadratha, employing strategic deception. He created an artificial sunset—prompting the Kaurava camp to relax their guard—only for Arjuna to launch his fatal arrow when Jayadratha emerged. Bhishma was brought down when a woman warrior, Shikhandi, was used as a tactical shield. Even after the war had ended, Dronacharya's son, Ashwatthama, slaughtered the Pandavas' sleeping sons under the cover of midnight. Rules, in war, are often only as strong as the desperation to violate them.
This wisdom holds just as true in modern geopolitics—perhaps most strikingly in how China approaches the use of force. Beijing is unlikely to seek a full-scale war to seize territory outright; instead, its military posture is designed around calibrated coercion. And just like in the epic, the damage they cause isn't merely tactical—it's moral and strategic.
The Political Logic of a Limited War
Unlike 1962, a modern-day India-China war is unlikely to be about territorial aggrandisement. Chinese incursions—actual or threatened—are more plausibly tools of political coercion, designed to impose costs, alter India's strategic behaviour, or extract concessions. In such a scenario, the ability to militarily endure and function under pressure is as decisive as battlefield outcomes.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India faces operational challenges in mobility, communications, and force agility that could constrain its effectiveness in a high-intensity conflict along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), especially under conditions of electronic and kinetic disruption. When units are forced to operate autonomously not by design but by system failure, the cost is not just tactical—it is strategic.
Experts believe this is precisely the risk China would seek to exploit—short, sharp engagements that don't aim for territorial gain but for psychological and political advantage. This is why a limited war scenario must be central to India's defence thinking. Not because China seeks a war, but because it may see utility in calibrated military pressure if India appears brittle. Ironically, a limited war benefits the weaker power, not the stronger. For China, even a stalemate could be seen as a reputational loss. That is why China, too, has reasons to avoid escalation—but only if deterrence is credible.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Risk of Operational Collapse
At the operational level, India faces the acute risk in the face of a concerted Chinese campaign involving electronic warfare, precision strikes, and infrastructure denial. If lines of communication—already narrow and weather-dependent—are severed or jammed, Indian subunits may become isolated, resulting in limited mobility, both on land and in airlift capacity, further constraining rapid reinforcement.
And this, ultimately, is the strategic risk. This is the scenario China might seek: not conquest, but coercion through degradation. (Note: This is just an assertion). According to a defence expert on India-China, 'India builds for mass, but modern threats—especially from China—require agility, survivability, and responsive enablers.' However, it lacks the enabling capabilities (like airlift, C4ISR, and logistics) needed to remain effective in fast-moving, limited conflicts—especially at high altitude. In a protracted conflict, this could be decisive.
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) is likely to combine electronic warfare (EW) and kinetic strikes to degrade, if not deny, Indian C4ISR capabilities. Once degraded, Indian forces risk being thrown into an operational environment where command and control becomes fragmented, mobility is constrained, and units are forced to fight in isolation—not by design, but by default.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Building a Nimble and Combat-Effective Force
India must pivot from a strategy of attrition to a strategy of agility. In high-altitude conflict, success won't come from size alone, but from adaptability under stress. A force that can bend without breaking is a force that can buy time, space, and leverage.
This is not to say India will fold. Indian soldiers, as history has shown, will fight even in degraded conditions—both at the subunit and national level. The likelihood of political collapse due to casualties remains low. However, the danger lies not in India's will to fight, but in its ability to fight effectively.
The strategic risk, then, is cumulative. China might aim to degrade India's operational capacity to the point that New Delhi loses political leverage, not territory.
The goal isn't necessarily for India to win a limited war—but to make sure it can withstand one. The longer India can sustain a coherent and resilient defence posture under pressure, the less attractive coercive war becomes for China.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Yet, India's ability to offset operational risk is hampered by structural constraints. Defence spending as a percentage of GDP has steadily declined, even as the strategic environment has worsened—well below the 2.5 per cent experts deem necessary to address threats from China and Pakistan. Capacity shortfalls—whether in war stocks, communications infrastructure, or high-altitude mobility—continue to limit resilience. Roads and airlift capacity beyond Leh remain scarce. Enablers are sparse. And if these vulnerabilities are not addressed, India risks losing not just operational cohesion but strategic credibility.
The Political Dividend of Strategic Preparedness
Ultimately, this is about more than battlefield calculus. It's about protecting India's political agency. When Indian forces remain effective under pressure, they do more than fight—they buy the political leadership time, options, and strategic autonomy. That is the true value of deterrence: it shields not just territory but sovereignty itself.
This is the heart of the matter: India must invest not in maximalist power projection but in minimal viable deterrence. It must be able to hold its ground—not indefinitely, but long enough to make coercion fail. Long enough to retain bargaining power. Long enough to deny China the quick, political gains it might hope to secure through a limited war. In this environment, India's best strategy is not reactive defence but credible deterrence. Deterrence works when the adversary believes that any aggression—even limited—will be met with swift, smart, and unrelenting retaliation. To achieve this, India must ensure that its forward-deployed forces are not just present but primed. Survivability, speed, and synergy must become the defining metrics of readiness.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India needs not just military reforms but political investments in deterrence. To recalibrate India's deterrence posture along the LAC, reforms must prioritise agility over accumulation. This means shifting away from a legacy force designed for deep, conventional campaigns towards leaner units with high mobility, integrated command systems, and greater autonomy in degraded conditions.
China is a civilisational adversary that reveres dissimulation as statecraft. As Sinologist Shyam Saran has observed, deception, ambiguity, and trickery are not merely tactical tools but celebrated virtues in popular Chinese thinking—immortalised in the Three Kingdoms epic and enshrined in the Thirty-Six Stratagems of the Book of Qi.
Wars today are not always about who wins more land but about who loses less control. To deter such an adversary, India must move beyond reactive strength to proactive imagination. In a world where technology fragments the battlefield and tempo outruns deliberation, the strength of a nation lies in its ability to absorb shocks without political collapse. In geopolitics, sometimes the best move is to deny your opponent a winning one.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Shreyash Sharma is a columnist and research scholar. He holds a degree in Economics & International Relations from City University of Hong Kong.Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Melting pot bubbling
Melting pot bubbling

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Melting pot bubbling

New polls show majority of Americans are now against harsh action on immigration. That's good news 'Our policy to people born elsewhere should be clear: Enter by the law, or leave,' Trump wrote in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve. He won his second term after promising voters 'the largest deportation programme in American history', and started his presidency by signing an executive order titled 'Protecting the American People Against Invasion'. Trump struck a chord because US does have a major illegal immigration problem. There were over 11mn unauthorised residents by 2022, and roughly 1 in every 15 was Indian. India got a taste of his crackdown in Feb when the first Globemaster with 104 deportees touched down in Amritsar. And such flights have continued, with an average of 14,700 deportations worldwide every month. The number sounds big, but Obama was deporting 36,000 a month in 2013. What's different about Trump, though, is the noise and severity – people shamed and transported in cuffs. And America is sick of it, new polls this month show. A Gallup survey found that only 38% of Americans now support deporting all illegal immigrants, down from 47% last year. In fact, 78% are all for letting them become citizens. Why? Because the ordinary American recognises that the vast majority of illegal immigrants, who have lived for years in America without causing trouble, are useful. Now, a CNN poll also shows the majority of Americans (55%) think Trump has gone too far on deportations. They don't want any more detention centres, and 59% are against detaining illegal immigrants who have lived in America for years. Trump should pay heed to these voices, especially when the mood against immigration in his own Republican camp is changing fast – only 48% now want less immigration, as against 88% last year. Throwing out millions of settled workers would be disruptive for the US economy, and also for their home countries. Indians who have invested their wealth and time to build a life in America, after entering without authorisation, may draw some hope from these developments. So can students and professionals who have been waiting to study and work in America legally. And if Trump relents, America can go back to being the land of opportunity. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

The Bitter Half
The Bitter Half

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

The Bitter Half

Homely ramifications of an exposé at a Coldplay concert Kamala is not talking to me. Because of some Kiss Cam catching a cheating husband at a Coldplay concert. What does that have to do with me? I asked her in my usual whiny voice. I'm used to being blamed for everything. But not international affairs. I thought MEA was dealing with that. But these international issues have national ramifications. Think Global Act Local is not just a slogan for Indian housewives. It's a way of life. If Trump is claiming there is no Epstein file, Kamala is convinced I'm hiding something here. I tried to counter her with a generic Not All Men! but that was not acceptable defence apparently. She was convinced that all men were making a concerted effort to cheat on their bitter halves. I tried mentioning the husband of the lady in the picture. But Kamala was not discussing Cuckold Play. She was focused on the couple in the camera only. 'Shee! The way he ducked down when the camera caught him. That's a sign of sure guilt.' I assured her that I would smile and wave at the camera if I was ever caught at the neighbourhood Ganesh pandal. 'Did you know that 78.5 % of Indian husbands have cheated on their wives at least once in their lives. Socialite Saroja said that NASA has done research on this.' The statistics sounded as authentic as voter-turnouts in the Maharashtra elections. But I was not going to counter the fake news forward from her Kitty WhatsApp group. Shubhanshu Shukla may have gone to space, but even he didn't take his wife with him. I want to know with which lady he shared his gajar ka halwa. No space or any other trips for me. I was grounded. I knew I had to cancel my All Boys Bangkok break planned next month. I'm not sure whether they have jumbotrons in those massage parlours. Imagine if that was replayed on social media. I'm only worried the neighbours will know I have a paunch. Meanwhile the lady who shop-lifted in Target has been forgotten. I was about to use that exposé to curtail Kamala's shopping trips. But the latest scandal has checkmated me. I'm shifting from astronomy to astrology – but still seeing a sky full of stars. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Kharge: Trump's claim is humiliating
Kharge: Trump's claim is humiliating

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kharge: Trump's claim is humiliating

Mallikarjun Kharge NEW DELHI: Calling US President Donald Trump 's claim that he facilitated India-Pakistan ceasefire "humiliating", Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge sought a clarification on the issue. Kharge said that Trump has made the claim 24 times. Raising the issue during Zero Hour, the Congress president called for a two-day debate on the Pahalgam attack, Operation Sindoor and foreign policy. "The terrorists responsible have neither been apprehended nor eliminated to date," he said. "We had extended unconditional support to govt to maintain unity in the country and to strengthen the armed forces. In light of this, we wish to know from govt what the complete situation is," said Kharge, raising the issue. Kharge said the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS), Deputy Army Chief and one of the senior defence attache have made some revelations regarding Operation Sindoor. "Apart from this, govt should also clarify its stand on the statement of US President Donald Trump, because he has claimed not once but 24 times that he got the ceasefire done. This is humiliating for the country," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store