Weird swelling revealed first sign man's fingers and toes were ‘completely replaced' by cancer
It turned out to be a rare sign of cancer that had spread through his body - and the bones in his digits had been " completely replaced" by cancerous tumours.
2
Prior to swelling, the 55-year-old from Australia had been diagnosed with metastatic squamous-cell lung cancer.
Squamous cell lung cancer is known for spreading to multiple sites, including the brain, spine and other bones, adrenal glands, and liver.
It's a type of non-small cell cancer, the most common type of lung cancer, and accounts for roughly 80-85 per cent of all lung cancer cases.
His case was published this month in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Six weeks after noticing swelling in his right middle finger and his right big toe, the man went to his local hospital.
Doctors found the tip of each was red and swollen, and an ulcer had formed near the nail of the affected toe.
The swollen areas were firm to touch and tender, the doctors reported.
Scans revealed his hand and foot contained "destructive lytic lesions that had completely replaced" the bones in the finger and toe.
Lytic lesions are areas of bone destruction that appear as holes or weakened spots on imaging scans.
While cancer that's spread to the fingers and toes may mimic gout on a physical examination, a scan called a radiograph can help identify lytic lesions, the patient's doctors noted.
The man was diagnosed with acrometastasis - the rare occurrence of cancerous tumours metastasising to the bones of the hands or feet.
Acrometastases account for about 0.1 per cent of all metastatic cancers, according to a 2021 review.
In most cases, the condition is seen in patients who already have cancer.
But in some instances, acrometastasis can be the first sign for undiagnosed cancers.
It's most often linked to cancers of the lung, gastrointestinal tract and genitourinary tract.
Acrometastases are seen more often in males than in females, according to the review.
2
And it tends to be rare, because in most cases, cancer cells are drawn to bone marrow, which is found in the long bones of the arms, legs, ribs, backbone, breastbone and pelvis.
Finger and toe bones contain less bone marrow.
Additionally, the further a bone is from the heart, the less blood it gets.
Lower blood flow makes it harder for cancer cells to reach the fingertips or toes, so acrometastases happen less often there.
Because acrometastases are usually seen in late-stage cancers, they're linked to poor survival rate.
Treatments are typically focused on relieving a patient's pain and retaining as much function in the hand or foot as possible.
In the 55-year-old's case, he was started on palliative radiotherapy, which aims to relieve symptoms rather than cure the disease.
The doctors reports he died three weeks later from complications of refractory hypercalcemia - persistently high calcium levels in the blood that don't respond to standard treatments.
Common symptoms of acrometastasis
Acrometastasis, the spread of cancer to the bones of the hands or feet, can present with symptoms like pain, swelling, redness, and warmth in the affected area.
These symptoms can mimic benign conditions like arthritis or infection, leading to potential diagnostic delays.
Common symptoms include:
Pain: Often deep-seated, intermittent, and may not be relieved by typical painkillers.
Swelling: Can be localized to a specific digit or involve a larger area.
Redness and warmth: May indicate an inflammatory process, but can also be a sign of acrometastasis.
Tenderness: The affected area may be tender to the touch.
Functional impairment: Difficulty using the hand or foot due to pain or swelling.
Ulceration or bleeding: In some cases, the skin over the affected area may ulcerate or bleed.
Palpable mass: A lump or mass may be felt in the affected digit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Men need to discuss penile cancer — a bigger killer than testicular
If you asked 100 people to name a cancer, most would probably come up with one of the more common, high-profile types such as breast, bowel, lung, prostate. Indeed, I would wager that cancer of the penis wouldn't even feature — yet it's on my mind this week following indications from a UK trial that immunotherapy can improve survival rates. The six-year EPIC study, led by the urologist Professor Amit Bahl at University Hospitals Bristol, is ongoing. However, if these initial findings are confirmed, it could offer help to prolong the lives of a significant minority of men with advanced disease, many of whom have left it too late to benefit fully from other treatments. Late presentation is all too common in penile cancer, because men are either unaware of the threat posed by early symptoms or too embarrassed to seek help. Here's what every man should know. Penile cancer is a rare condition typically not seen until middle age or beyond, but it can develop much sooner. And while it is uncommon compared with other cancers, 1 in 400 men in the UK will develop it at some point in their lives, and it kills more than twice as many people as testicular cancer. Early diagnosis not only improves the chances of a cure, it means treatment can be less invasive and less disfiguring. Or, to put it another way, early presentation may not only save your life, but your penis too. So what signs should you be looking out for? • Why is the cancer rate surging among the under-50s? Cancer can develop anywhere on the penis but typically it starts under the foreskin or on the head (glans). Early signs include areas of discolouration — often red or bluish-brown — and a persistent rash or sore that lasts longer than a month. It can also cause bleeding, an abnormal discharge, and an obvious lump, either on the penis itself or, in more advanced cases, in a lymph node in the groin. In some cases it can also tether the foreskin, making it hard to retract. Fortunately, there are many other possible causes for these symptoms. Colour changes and rashes can develop as a result of infections such as thrush (candida) or inflammatory conditions including lichen sclerosus, balanitis and psoriasis. Bleeding can be a result of trauma, including a torn frenulum (the bit underneath that connects part of the foreskin to the glans) after intercourse. Difficulty retracting the foreskin is often caused by more innocent tightening (phimosis), and lumps in the shaft can sometimes form from scarring caused by Peyronie's disease, a relatively common condition that can lead to bends in the penis when it is erect. So when you see your GP or specialist, there is a good chance the result won't be as bad as you feared — but that doesn't mean it's OK to put off that appointment. Caught early, penile cancer is relatively easy to treat, with more than 90 per cent of men still alive five years after diagnosis. However, the outlook for men with the most advanced cancer, where it has spread to other parts of the body, is bleak: no men in this group are expected to survive for five years. • Read more from Dr Mark Porter The other major advantage of early diagnosis is that often it means treatment is less invasive: the earliest suspicious lesions can be 'burnt' off using lasers or chemotherapy and immunotherapy creams. However the more established and advanced the tumour, the more aggressive the treatment required — ranging from circumcision of the foreskin and/or local excision with skin grafting to amputating the head of the penis (glansectomy), or even total removal (penectomy). If the penis has to be removed — and this includes the 'root' inside a man — then a new outlet for the bladder is fashioned between the anus and scrotum, which means he will have to sit down to pee. Luckily this should preserve continence because the sphincter and muscles that control urine flow remain intact. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy are all treatment options, sometimes given before surgery to shrink tumours and afterwards to reduce the risk of spread or to control cancers that already have spread. Any man can be affected but some are more at risk than others, including smokers, those infected with the human papillomavirus (HPV, see below), men with a weakened immune system because of an underlying disease such as HIV, and those who have not been circumcised. Circumcision as a child or teenager offers protection against the disease as it reduces exposure to secretions (smegma) produced by the foreskin. • Read more expert advice on healthy living, fitness and wellbeing Conversely, an inability to retract the foreskin (phimosis) increases the risk. While often normal in young children (those under three), it affects as many as 1 in 30 men at some point — because it either persists from childhood or develops later in life owing to scarring following infection or trauma. Treatment often involves circumcision. For more information about penile cancer visit • There are more than 150 strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV) and nearly all of us will be exposed to at least one type at some stage, often through sexual contact. • Most infections don't cause significant issues and are cleared by the body, but some can cause problems ranging from tissue overgrowth, as seen in warts and verrucas, to changes that can start the cell on a pathway to cancer.• Strains 16 and 18 are responsible for the majority of penile and cervical cancer cases.• The cervical cancer vaccine, which protects against types 16 and 18, should also reduce the risk of penile cancer because it is now administered to boys and some men. However, more research is needed to determine exactly how much protection it provides.• For more information on the vaccine visit
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Resident doctors' focus on pay is doing untold damage to the NHS
As a retired doctor, now 80, I feel sad as I watch our resident doctors struggle to exert pressure on the government to increase their pay packet (Wes Streeting 'thought he had struck deal to halt strike by doctors', 27 July). This behaviour will have far-reaching consequences, which are unlikely to be beneficial either to the doctors or the country. Clearly, the action will cause delays in treatment and probably unnecessary morbidity and mortality. This will make the NHS vulnerable to pressure from those who favour its abolition. Already, it has alienated large sections of the population whose support the doctors have always been able to count on previously. But the British Medical Association has assured resident doctors that it is necessary for them to put their livelihood ahead of the wellbeing of the public, to ensure that the NHS survives into the future. This is a false promise. The commitment of resident doctors and nurses has always been integral to the success of the NHS, and there is no doubt that this has been central to the incredible efficiency it has demonstrated since its inception. It was conceived as a non-commercial organisation. There have always been areas of the globe where doctors could earn more than at home. But for most, the attractions of the NHS outweighed pecuniary advantages available elsewhere. I fear that in setting their sights purely on increased remuneration, today's resident doctors are leading the NHS towards a change in its entire ethos, the ethos that made it a success. The BMA should concentrate on improving doctors' working conditions, as Wes Streeting has offered BehrmanCookham Dean, Berkshire On Sunday I cancelled my subscription to the British Medical Association after being a member for 39 years, in disgust at its insistence on going ahead with the strike of resident doctors in pursuit of a 29% pay rise, despite having had a 22% rise over the previous two years. It is hard to know what is the correct rate of pay for resident doctors, but no other group in the health service is seeking such a rise in pay, and the decision to strike seems to ignore patients, as well as all the other staff alongside whom they work. I believe that improvement in the working conditions of doctors and all other groups should be sought through discussions, as the government has offered, not strikes. Whatever the appropriate pay should be for resident doctors, they should be glad that they don't get the equivalent of the £2 per hour we were paid in the 1980s for each of the 60 hours a week we had to be in the hospital over and above our basic 40-hour David CameronBelhaven, East Lothian I do have a lot of sympathy for our resident doctors, even though I was on call on Sunday as a consultant. It is not just that pay has been eroded, but also that the cost of becoming a doctor has gone up, as has the cost of living in general. Unlike in most other higher-paid professions, half of doctors are women. The cost of childcare has gone up significantly since my day. There is no more cheap hospital accommodation. And the student loan system is misogynistic in principle, the interest accumulating during maternity leave. Women earn less during their careers but end up paying back a lot more for their student loans as a group. And because of the forced itinerant lifestyle, most doctors get their foot on the housing ladder quite late, having to pay increasingly unaffordable GemmekeEastleigh, Hampshire Wes Streeting rightly points out that 90% of resident doctors voted for strike action, with a 55% turnout (Resident doctors' strike undermines union movement, says Wes Streeting, 25 July). That means just under 50% of all resident doctors voted in favour. He fails to point out that Labour is in power on the votes of 34% of the 60% who turned out – about 20% of the electorate. The doctors' result looks more convincing as a test of opinion, whatever you think of the pay WestLondon Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Hospitals make record number of requests for doctors to work during strikes, claims union
Hospitals made a record number of requests for striking doctors to return to the wards this weekend as a five-day walkout prompted safety fears for patient safety, the British Medical Association has claimed. The BMA said hospitals had asked for more than 125 resident doctors to come off the picket lines during the walkout. The union has claimed some of those pleas were made inappropriately and had to be refused, while those that had been granted had to be revoked. It also said there had been incidents where patient safety was at risk due to trusts not having enough staff to cover emergency care. Resident doctors are taking part in a strike over pay, which began on Friday, 25 July and will end at 7am on Wednesday. The BMA's resident doctors committee has asked the government for a 29 per cent pay increase to address what it says has been a more than 20 per cent erosion of their pay since 2008. However, talks between doctors and health secretary Wes Streeting broke down last week and failed to avert strike action. Last week, NHS England chiefs told hospital leaders they must maintain elective care during the strikes, whereas during previous rounds, widespread cancellations took place. During strikes, employers can request 'derogations', in which a union can grant permission for a doctor or multiple doctors to come into work on strike days. NHS England's figures as of Monday show 58 requests for 'derogations' had been made, eight had been approved, 23 had been declined, 15 had been withdrawn, and some are still pending a decision. There has so far been a record number of approvals compared to previous strike rounds, according to NHS data. Over the weekend, the BMA claimed one hospital, in Sheffield, had asked for resident doctors to come in as its consultants were not able to use the trust's new electronic records system. The union also posted on X, claiming it had agreed to let a doctor return to work within the obstetric department at Queens Medical Centre, run by Nottingham University Hospitals Trust. Other trusts cited by the union include Lewisham and St George's Hospitals in London. In a message to resident doctors on Sunday, the BMA resident doctors' committee said: 'This dispute had exposed a small number of trusts where they have planned as if strikes were not even happening. We have received a record number of derogation requests this set of strikes. This is because NHS England has issued instructions to Trusts to try to keep elective activity open, despite our warnings of the risks to patient safety.' The message claimed the BMA has received 47 derogation requests from NHS England and that these contained requests for 125 resident doctors to return to work to cover gaps. Following requests, the BMA said it had granted 16 doctors permission to go back to work. It said the trusts where derogations were revoked were either 'misinformed about their staffing, or deliberately misled' the BMA. Other 'inappropriate' derogations the BMA said it had been asked for included where trusts planned for a full rota of resident doctors, and then were 'caught out when resident doctors went on strike'. Multiple trusts had 'prioritised elective activity over the safety of more urgent patients', the BMA claimed. It said due to 'poor timing of requests' there have been instances where patients' safety has been at risk, 'with not enough doctors to ensure emergency care,' which has led to 'last-minute' requests for doctors. Ahead of the strikes, the BMA was criticised for advising resident doctors against informing their employers of their plans to strike. In a rare intervention, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges published a statement to the BMA warning that this would risk patient safety. NHS England was approached for comment.
