
Student loan borrowers blocked from affordable repayment plans
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
"The department is reviewing repayment applications to conform with the 8th Circuit's ruling," a spokesperson for the Education Department said Thursday, adding that it updated information for borrowers on StudentAid.gov, including on a page about court actions related to SAVE.
Advertisement
Here's what we know now:
What just happened?
The 8th Circuit upheld a temporary ban on a portion of the SAVE plan issued by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The appeals court sent the case back to the district court with instructions to expand the preliminary injunction to the entire SAVE rule (although other legal rulings had already temporarily suspended the program).
But the appellate court didn't stop there: The judges also said the Education Department secretary lacks the explicit authority to grant loan forgiveness in any Income-Contingent Repayment plans, even though it has been done for more than three decades. (Borrowers make monthly payments equal to a percentage of their discretionary income, which varies across income-driven plans. But after a set number of years, usually 20 to 25, any remaining balance is canceled.)
Advertisement
"This is a radical departure from how this statute has been interpreted and administered for nearly 30 years," said Michele Zampini, senior director of college affordability at the Institute for College Access and Success, a research and advocacy group.
The Education Department posted a banner on its website that said the injunction prevents it from administering SAVE and parts of other income-driven plans -- and, as a result, applications for those plans and online loan consolidations were unavailable.
It is important to remember that the decision is not final and that litigation is continuing, said Abby Shafroth, director of the National Consumer Law Center's Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project. "But the decision is very worrying for borrowers who depend on the SAVE plan to manage their payments and work toward being debt free," she said.
What's likely to happen next?
Scott Buchanan, executive director of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, an industry group, said he would expect that applications for at least one of the income-driven plans, known as income-based repayment, will become available again "as soon as practical."
The reasons are complicated: That's because the income-based repayment plan was created as part of a July 2009 law, which explicitly permits loan cancellation at the end of the repayment term, whereas SAVE was a regulation established by the department using authority established under a 1993 law. The states that initially brought the lawsuit argued that loan cancellation wasn't explicitly permitted under the 1993 law, and the appellate court sided with that interpretation.
But the department has relied on that authority to create three other income-driven programs, all before SAVE, each of which incrementally improved on the plans before it. They were Income-Contingent Repayment, introduced in 1994; Pay As You Earn (PAYE), introduced in 2012; and Revised Pay As You Earn (REPAYE), which became available in 2015 and was replaced by SAVE.
Advertisement
Are income-driven loan applications being processed now?
No, all applications have been temporarily halted, according to Buchanan. He said the servicers have received instructions to stop processing the income-driven and loan-consolidation applications for three months, but he expected they will receive additional guidance in the coming weeks.
Monthly payments are still being collected on the other existing income-driven plans (Income-Based Repayment, Pay As You Earn and Income-Contingent Repayment) while SAVE borrowers remain in an interest-free forbearance while the litigation continues.
Is the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program still available?
Yes, it is still open to government and nonprofit employees such as public schoolteachers, librarians and public defenders. After 120 qualifying payments are made, any remaining balance is wiped out.
But there is one major obstruction: Most borrowers need to be enrolled in an income-driven repayment plan to be eligible for loan cancellation, and it's not possible to apply to any of those plans right now.
If you're already in a qualifying repayment plan, however, and you become newly eligible for the public service program (because of a new job, for example), you can still enroll. But if you're in the SAVE plan, where payments have been halted because of the ongoing litigation, your qualifying payments have also been put on hold -- and you can't make any progress toward forgiveness.
The public service program, which President George W. Bush signed into law in 2007, is not at risk right now, and student-loan experts say there isn't a broad appetite dismantle the popular program, which would require Congress to pass a bill.
Advertisement
What if I'm close to making all of my payments in the public service program, but I am stuck in the SAVE plan?
More than 2 million people are enrolled in the public service program and hundreds of thousands of them are approaching the finish line: About 21,700 borrowers have made enough payments to qualify for cancellation, while 330,100 had made 97 to 119 qualifying payments as of Dec. 31, according to data from the Education Department's Federal Student Aid office.
Borrowers who are enrolled in the SAVE plan and have nearly enough qualifying payments have few good options.
"Borrowers stuck in SAVE can either wait for the IDR applications to open back up and switch to another IDR plan," said Betsy Mayotte, president of the Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a group that provides free guidance to borrowers. "Or ride out the SAVE forbearance and plan on using what's called 'buyback' to get credit for those months once they have certified 120 months of eligible employment."
What are my options if I can't afford payments (because I lost my job or some other reason)?
There are other options besides income-driven repayment plans that can generally be requested through your loan servicer or the company that manages your payments. Borrowers can temporarily pause payments through deferments or forbearance, but those programs have different eligibility requirements and consequences, largely because of the way interest is treated.
"Borrowers can receive deferments for things such as economic hardship or being unemployed," said Mayotte. "Forbearances are generally applied in cases of less specific financial hardship."
Advertisement
There are other repayment plans that can lower your monthly obligation: graduated repayment, where payments start lower and rise over time, and extended repayment, which lowers the monthly payment by lengthening the loan term.
Simply consolidating your loans can also lower your monthly payments by extending the repayment period, but there are drawbacks. You may have a higher interest rate on all of your debt, and you'll end up paying more overall.
Will I be penalized if I cannot recertify my loans?
Each year, borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans must recertify their income or face negative consequences, including being kicked out of the repayment plan. But those applications are also not available right now.
For now, it's not something you need to worry about, Buchanan said. The loan servicers have been instructed to push back those deadlines on a month-by-month basis, and they will be in touch with borrowers when they receive more clarity from the Education Department.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Move over premium bonds: here's how to earn passive income on the stock market
For years, premium bonds have been a popular choice for UK savers seeking minimal risk. However, the passive income available from high-yield dividend stocks should be so much more appealing. Here's why I think Britons need to look more carefully at investing, and put premium bonds to the back of their minds. Premium bonds currently offer an annual 'prize fund rate' of roughly 3.8%. This figure is not a guaranteed yield, as it reflects an average return based on luck in monthly draws. Importantly, most bondholders will earn less, and many never win at all. In contrast, several prominent UK stocks are delivering dividend yields that far exceed this rate. Stock Forward dividend yield (%) Legal & General 8.4% Phoenix Group 9% Lloyds 4.5% Greggs 3.9% Premium Bonds 3.8% (not guaranteed) While dividends are by no means guaranteed, these payments are arguably more predictable that the 'luck' of a premium bond prize. They are also typically paid biannually or quarterly, providing regular cash flow. The best FTSE income stocks are clearly outpacing premium bonds on yield. For those willing to accept modest stock market risk, dividends from companies like Legal & General or Phoenix Group can offer an inflation-beating source of passive income. And in the current market, I'd suggest it's entirely possible to create a portfolio of 10 stocks with an average yield of 6%. And the portfolio would be composed of dividend-paying stocks that appear sustainable. All these factors make me think premium bonds look less and less attractive by comparison. And it's even more compelling if an investor wishes to compound for wealth accumulation. For example, £10,000 would grow to £31,000 after 30 years in premium bonds, while that figure would be £60,000 in investments returning 6% per year. More seasoned investors averaging 12% per annum could turn £10,000 into £359,000. One investment to consider Yü Group (LSE:YU) is an AIM-listed stock that stands out for dividend investors. The forecast dividend yield is 4.6% and is expected to exceed 5% by 2027, based on strong projected increases in payouts — from 60p per share in 2024 to 95p by 2027. Buying Yü Group shares now would allow an investor to lock in today's attractive yield and benefit directly from anticipated dividend hikes over the coming years. A crucial strength is Yü's balance sheet. The group holds £80.2m in net cash, equivalent to 30% of its £273m market capitalisation. This significant cash buffer not only underpins dividend sustainability, but also signals further potential for increases, especially given a conservative payout ratio of about 33%. Moreover, the core business benefits from sector trends such as smart metering rollouts and demand for green energy. It's a licensed supplier of electricity, gas, and water to UK firms. A key risk to monitor is volatility in wholesale energy prices, which, despite effective hedging, could impact long-term margins. Still, the company's earnings strength and balance sheet resilience make its rising dividends especially compelling for long-term investors. I've got it on my watchlist. It may be worth broader consideration. The post Move over premium bonds: here's how to earn passive income on the stock market appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has positions in Lloyds Banking Group Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Greggs Plc and Lloyds Banking Group Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Survey takes pulse of fishing industry
Fishers saw a drop in income despite more fish being landed in South West ports last year, according to an industry group. Seafish, the body which supports the UK seafood industry, said landings in 2024 in Devon and Cornwall were up 4.2%, compared with in 2023, but income was down 2.8%. The organisation released some of the findings of its 2024 fishing fleet survey as it urged boat skippers and owners to take part in this year's survey. It said researchers would be visiting harbours in the South West to interview skippers and vessel owners until 19 September. Seafish said the full results of last year's survey would be released later this year, but it indicated fishing activity across the UK had returned to pre-pandemic levels, but the size of the UK fishing fleet continued to decrease. It said total fishing income in the South West hit £119.1m in 2024. Seafish said the data collected from this year's survey would help policymakers make informed decisions and offer insights into how the industry was navigating challenges such as labour shortages and economic fluctuations. 'Invaluable resource' Juan Carlos Paredes Esclapez, economics project manager at Seafish, said: "Our annual Fishing Fleet Survey continues to be one of our most important projects. "It serves as an invaluable resource, allowing us to produce reports that support the UK fishing industry, including our Economics of the UK Fishing Fleet Report. "We strongly encourage as many skippers and vessel owners as possible to participate in this year's survey. "The information collected through this survey is essential for ensuring that the UK fishing fleet receives the support it needs." Follow BBC Cornwall on X, Facebook and Instagram. Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@ More on this story Surveys seek views on conservation area updates Related internet links Seafish

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Apple accuses YouTube influencer of illegally leaking iOS 26
YouTube influencer Jon Prosser allegedly violated Apple's intellectual property rights by illegally accessing and releasing trade secrets regarding the tech firm's iOS 26 operating system before its launch. Prosser and co-defendant Michael Ramacciotti allegedly misappropriated trade secrets and violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Apple says in a federal lawsuit filed Thursday in the U.S. District Court for Northern California. Apple revealed its iOS 26 operating system on June 9 during its Worldwide Developers Conference but says Prosser released important details two months earlier. Prosser's YouTube channel, 'Front Page Tech,' commonly predicts tech launches of consumer goods, including popular Apple products. Apple says he and Ramacciotti schemed to 'break into an Apple development iPhone, steal Apple's trade secrets and profit from the theft,' Wired reported on Friday. 'Prosser, working with defendant Michael Ramacciotti, improperly accessed and disclosed Apple's highly confidential, unreleased software designs, including details regarding the unreleased iOS 19 operating system, which is now known as iOS 26, for Apple mobile devices,' Apple says in the lawsuit. Apple accuses the pair of conspiring to break into Apple employee Ethan Lipnik's development iPhone to obtain Apple's trade secrets. Lipnik worked for Apple from 2023 to 2025, when he was terminated by Apple over the leak, Business Insider reported. The tech firm says it received an anonymous tip on April 4 that accuses either Prosser or Ramacciotti, who shared housing with Lipnik, of engaging the Apple employee in a FaceTime call that discussed the pending iOS 26 release. The unreleased operating system at the time was known as iOS 19 among Apple employees. The anonymous tip says Prosser obtained details on the unreleased operating system's lock screen, home screen, app animations and app interfaces. It also says Prosser had video from the FaceTime call that shows the operating system's unique interface. Apple claims Prosser learned Ramacciotti needed money and roomed with Lipnik, who worked on the unreleased operating system. Prosser and Ramacciotti 'jointly planned to access Apple's confidential and trade secret information through Mr. Lipnik's Apple-owned development iPhone,' Apple says. The tech firm also says Lipnik provided it with an audio message from Ramacciotti that alleges he used location tracking to learn when Lipnik would be gone for an extended period. Apple says the message indicates Ramacciotti acquired Lipnik's passcode and 'broke into his development iPhone,' which Lipnik did not properly secure in accordance with company policy. 'As he detailed in the audio message, Mr. Ramacciotti made a video call to Mr. Prosser and 'showed [the] iOS' on the development iPhone,' Apple claims. 'He demonstrated several features and applications, disclosing details of the unreleased iOS 19 operating system,' Apple says. Prosser denies Apple's claims against him. 'This is not how the situation played out on my end,' Prosser said in an X post on Thursday. 'I did not 'plot' to access anyone's phone,' Prosser continued. 'I did not have any passwords. I was unaware of how the information was obtained.' Prosser said he is 'looking forward to speaking with Apple on this.' Apple says it suffered financial losses exceeding $5,000 over a one-year period and seeks monetary and punitive damages in amounts to be proven at trial, plus interest. It also seeks injunctive relief to cease Prosser and Ramacciotti's alleged release of Apple's trade secrets to third parties without written consent and to return or help Apple to locate and destroy any trade secrets that might remain under their control. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.