
The EPA didn't release its annual U.S. greenhouse gas emissions report, but we got the data. Here's what we found
As a member of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the U.S. is required to submit a national greenhouse gas emissions inventory report by April 15 each year. The U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sink Inventory report is critical for the government and the public to understand where the majority of the country's greenhouse gas pollution comes from, so policies can be crafted to reduce it and help reach reduction goals.
When the deadline passed for the publication's 2025 report, and it was still not available to the public, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), an environmental nonprofit, filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the report and published it publicly last week.
The report, which examines greenhouse gas data from 1990-2023, found that while the U.S. is making progress to reduce its most potent greenhouse gas emissions, it's not doing it fast enough to reach certain climate goals, and environmental groups worry that new policies passed by the Trump administration might make carbon pollution worse in the future.
CBS News reached out to the EPA for comment about it not releasing the data.
"The U.S. greenhouse gas inventory is one of the most detailed and transparent in the world," David Lyons, a senior methane scientist at EDF, told CBS News. "This is a scientific document that should help inform society."
According to an EDF analysis of current climate and air quality standards, the U.S. would avoid 28 billion metric tons of additional climate pollution through 2055 if said policies remain in place. That's the equivalent of taking more than 250 million cars off the road for 20 years, the analysis found. But keeping those standards in place is unlikely to happen, as the Trump administration and the EPA administrator, Lee Zeldin, have promised to roll back dozens of policies that would increase emissions, claiming environmental protections are too costly for many businesses.
How much has the U.S. reduced its greenhouse gas pollution?
In 2024, the U.S. published an updated goal to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 61-66% from 2005 levels by 2035. But according to the 2025 inventory, the U.S. appears to be far off from that goal. In 2015, Congress said one of the United States' targets was to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2025.
The report found that in 2023, gross greenhouse gas emissions dropped about 17% since 2005. Historically, the U.S. has only reduced emissions by about 5% since 1990 and 2% since 2022.
Although the U.S. still has a decade to meet that minimum goal of a 61% reduction, the current 17% reduction indicates a lot needs to change, according to the Environmental Defense Fund.
"We have to further accelerate the pace of those reductions to meet our science-based climate commitments," Peter Zalzal, associate vice president of clean air strategies for the EDF, told CBS News. "The replacement of coal power with natural gas and renewables has been driving a lot of the drop in emissions over time."
Which greenhouse gas does the U.S. produce the most?
Carbon dioxide made up most of the greenhouse gas emissions in 2023, at nearly 80%, according to the report. This is consistent with data dating back to 1990. The U.S. does not set individual reduction targets for each gas.
Zooming in on carbon dioxide, about 93% of all carbon dioxide emissions come from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas. The rest comes from sources such as iron, steel, cement and petrochemical production. The more the U.S. can reduce the use of fossil fuels, the faster it will cut carbon pollution.
Which sector produces the most greenhouse gases?
The transportation sector is responsible for the most carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels, producing 39%, and the electric power sector was second with 31%, according to the report.
With transportation and electricity generation, Zalzal said he is concerned that the Trump administration's policies to disincentivize electric vehicles and prioritize fossil fuels over renewable energy will undo progress the U.S. has made to cut emissions in those two areas.
Although transportation was the top-emitting sector in 2023, it hasn't always been. In 1990 and 2005, respectively, the electric power sector emitted the most greenhouse gases, accounting for about a third of all greenhouse gas emissions. By 2023, emissions from electric power had dropped to about a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions.
Since 1990, the greenhouse gas emissions in the electric power sector have dropped nearly 23% due to a larger share of renewable energy.
How does the U.S. generate its electricity?
The U.S. needs electricity, and over the years, the country's energy generation has begun to shift to incorporate more clean sources versus traditional fossil fuels.
In the 1990s, more than half of electric power generation came from coal. But by 2023, coal had dropped to just 17% and natural gas jumped to 42%. Meanwhile, wind and solar power generated 14% of electricity in 2023. In 1990, wind and solar only made up 0.1% of all electricity generation.
"We've seen efforts to try to weaken important investments that the nation made in accelerating clean energy," Zalzal said. "Rescinding them is going to take us in the wrong direction."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Epstein victims accuse Trump administration of trying to protect wealthy, powerful enablers
NEW YORK — Women who allege Jeffrey Epstein abused them have accused the Trump administration, in new court filings, of trying to protect enablers of the well-connected wealth manager and criticized the government for treating victims as pawns 'in political warfare.' In letters filed late Monday with Manhattan Federal Judge Richard Berman — one of the judges who are mulling requests by the government to unseal transcripts from the grand jury proceedings against Epstein and his convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell — two women took aim at the Trump administration for its handling of the snowballing scandal. They referenced the memo released last month by the Justice Department and the FBI, in which the government declined to shed light on a trove of records gathered in Epstein investigations and concluded a major review found there was no 'client list' and that Epstein killed himself, contrary to conspiracy theories previously peddled by Trump's appointees. 'I feel like the DOJ's and FBI's priority is protecting the 'third-party,' the wealthy men, by focusing on scrubbing their names off the files of which the victims, 'know who they are'. To learn that our own president has utilized thousands of agents to protect his identity and these high-profile individuals is monumentally mind-blowing,' an anonymous victim wrote in one of the letters. The letter to Berman later added, 'I think what I would request from you, Your Honor, is to consider having an approved third party review these documents to ensure that NO victims' names or likenesses are revealed through this release. It is imperative with the scrutiny over this media frenzy that the victims are completely and entirely protected.' In another letter, a second victim addressed the government: 'What you have done and continue to do is eating at me day after day as you help to perpetuate this story indefinitely. Why not be completely transparent? Show us all the files with only the necessary redactions! Be done with it and allow me/us to heal. You protect yourself and your powerful and wealthy 'friends' (not enemies) over the victims, why? The victims know the truth, we know who are in the files and now so do you.' The second letter urged Berman to let victims' attorneys review what the Justice Department wants to redact from the grand jury transcripts the DOJ is trying to unseal and slammed the government for recently meeting with Maxwell behind bars to get more information. 'I regrettably feel the need to come forward and shed some light on the government's motion to unseal transcripts, documents and exhibits from the 'case' that was never tried. Sad to say, for the victims we never got our day in court. Apparently, Epstein killed himself under whose watch? Oh, was it Trump's DOJ? Hmmm, interesting,' the second letter read. 'I ask you to have our attorneys review the 'suggested' redactions as they are the ones who also know the victims, their names, their truths and their stories unlike the Unites States Government who did not and does not even care to know our truth. They would rather ask a convicted imprisoned sex trafficker/abuser for information.' The Epstein files scandal has only continued to grow as the Trump administration has sought to contain it. Following the memo by the Justice Department and FBI, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump's name was included in the government's nonpublic Epstein files and that he'd been informed of such, and that Trump wrote a cryptic message to Epstein on the financier's 50th birthday. Trump has denied writing the birthday missive and is suing The Wall Street Journal. The transcripts from the grand jury proceedings against Maxwell that Trump's appointees are trying to get unsealed contain little information that is not publicly known, the government said in court filings Tuesday. The public record does not include substantive exhibits shown to the grand jurors who indicted Maxwell. Still, the Justice Department is not, for now, trying to make them public, according to the new Manhattan Federal Court filings. Trump's appointees discussed the materials in response to requests for more information from Berman and Judge Paul Engelmayer, who will rule on the motions to unseal grand jury transcripts. They included sealed annotated transcripts from Maxwell's grand jury proceedings, specifically outlining what's not publicly available. In an accompanying letter, the Justice Department conceded 'much of the information' within was revealed at the British former socialite's trial in late 2021 or had otherwise been reported in accounts shared by victims and witnesses publicly. The government filing asked the judges to give the Justice Department until Friday to take a position on whether grand jury exhibits should be unsealed. In an order later Tuesday, Engelmayer granted the request. Engelmayer on Tuesday also ordered the Justice Department to respond to letters submitted from the victims about the disclosure requests. The Epstein grand jury met on June 18, 2019, and July 2, 2019, according to Tuesday's filings. The disgraced financier was arrested on July 6 that year on sweeping sex trafficking charges alleging he had for years abused dozens of teen girls and young women, more than a decade after he evaded justice in a maligned sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors in Florida. He was found dead a month after his arrest on Aug. 10, 2019, in his jail cell at the federal Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, with his death ultimately ruled as a suicide. The Maxwell grand jury met on June 29, 2020, July 8, 2020, and March 29, 2021, the Justice Department said in the new filings. She was indicted on July 2, 2020, and found guilty of sex trafficking counts, including one involving a minor, in December 2021. Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison following her conviction, a term she had been serving at FCI Tallahassee, Fla., until her surprise transfer last week to a much cushier setup in a dormitory-style prison for women in Bryan, Texas, after meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer, who framed the meetup as a truth-seeking mission. Tuesday's filings by the Justice Department said the government had failed to make contact with one victim of Epstein whose name featured in grand jury proceedings about the disclosure requests and would try to contact other victims who weren't identified in transcripts in the coming days. _____
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canoe EIT Income Fund Announces August 2025 Monthly Distribution and Quarterly Distribution on Preferred Units
CALGARY, Alberta, Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Canoe EIT Income Fund (the 'Fund') (TSX - announces the August 2025 monthly distribution of $0.10 per unit. Additionally, the Fund announces a quarterly distribution for preferred units. Cumulative Redeemable Series 1 ( and Series 2 Preferred ( unitholders will receive a distribution of $0.30 per unit. Unitholders of record on August 22, 2025, will receive distributions payable on September 15, 2025. About Canoe EIT Income FundCanoe EIT Income Fund is one of Canada's largest closed-end investment funds, designed to maximize monthly distributions and capital appreciation by investing in a broadly diversified portfolio of high quality securities. The Fund is listed on the TSX under the symbol and is actively managed by Robert Taylor, Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer, Canoe Financial. About Canoe Financial Canoe Financial is one of Canada's fastest growing independent mutual fund companies managing over $20.0 billion in assets across a diversified range of award-winning investment solutions. Founded in 2008, Canoe Financial is an employee-owned investment management firm focused on building financial wealth for Canadians. Canoe Financial has a significant presence across Canada, including offices in Calgary, Toronto and Montreal. For further information, please contact:Investor Relations1–877–434– Fund makes monthly distributions of an amount comprised in whole or in part of Return of Capital (ROC) of the net asset value per unit. A ROC reduces the amount of your original investment and may result in the return to you of the entire amount of your original investment. ROC that is not reinvested will reduce the net asset value of the fund, which could reduce the fund's ability to generate future income. You should not draw any conclusions about the fund's investment performance from the amount of this distribution. Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the information filed about the fund on before investing. Investment funds are not guaranteed and past performance may not be repeated. This communication is not to be construed as a public offering to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities. Such an offer can only be made by way of a prospectus or other applicable offering document and should be read carefully before making any investment. This release is for information purposes only. Investors should consult their Investment Advisor for details and risk factors regarding specific strategies and various investment in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New study showcases where home prices dropping the most
The housing market has been in a serious crunch since the COVID-19 pandemic, with limited inventory, elevated home prices and mortgages in the 7% range, continuing to keep many would-be home buyers locked out. But even amid such tight constraints, modest declines in home prices can still be found in some regions of the country. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes Your Path to Homeownership A quicker path to financial freedom That's according to a new report from which finds that median home prices across the 50 largest metro areas in the country have declined slightly in July 2025, compared with three years ago. Median home prices hit a peak of $443,000 in July 2022, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis. The extent to which home prices are declining varies from region to region according to the report, which is based on the brokerage platform's housing data. "The housing market has cooled modestly in 2025," Danielle Hale, chief economist at said in a statement on the report. "But the extent and persistence of rebalancing really varies across the country. And regionally, homebuyers and sellers are likely to experience a very different market." Behind those notable price differences is inventory. Right now, the housing market is essentially divided into two camps, with higher inventory in the South and West, where deeper price cuts can be found, and more limited inventory in the Midwest and Northeast, where price changes "remain relatively tight," according to the report. "It's a supply and demand story," Jake Krimmel, senior economist at and author of the July 2025 report, told CBS MoneyWatch. "When you have fewer homes for sale, and if there is still sufficient demand, that's going to maybe put upward pressure on prices or prevent them from falling." Cities where prices are falling The largest declines in median listing prices in 2025 tend to be concentrated in the South and West, where all 19 of the 50 largest U.S. metro areas with median housing prices below July 2022 levels are located. "After years of intense competition, it's starting to feel more balanced — especially in the South and West," Gary Ashton, founder of The Ashton Real Estate Group of RE/MAX Advantage said in a statement on the report. "It's not a buyer's market yet, but we're headed in that direction." The cities that saw the biggest declines in price were Austin, where median listing prices have fallen nearly 15% over the last three years; and Miami, where prices have dropped around 19%. According to Krimmel, inventory is rising in these markets due to the fact that homes are staying on the market longer, more home sellers are reducing prices and new listings are climbing. A boom in building also boosted housing supply in those regions during the COVID-19 pandemic, when demand for markets like Austin, Denver and Florida exploded, he added. Austin, Los Angeles and Miami saw the largest declines in median listing price over the past year, although prices in Los Angeles remain more than 18% above the median listing price in 2022. Cities where prices are rising Housing markets in cities in Northeast and Midwest remain squeezed, according to Krimmel, due to "sticky high" prices, and tight inventory, said Krimmel. Other contributing factors include stricter zoning and land use regulation laws that making building new houses more difficult, he said. In New York, for example, median listing prices have climbed roughly 16% since 2022, according to the report. Median listing prices in Milwaukee increased 26%. Furthermore, the number of active listings per month in the Northeast is still 50% below pre-pandemic levels, according to Krimmel. The number of active listings in the Midwest is down 40%, pointing to an inventory shortage in both regions, he said. While median listing prices have gone down over the last year in northeastern cities like Boston and Philadelphia, which saw 1.4% and 1.2% decreases, respectively, median prices remain at least 10% above those from 2022. "To the extent that there are falling prices in the Northeast and the Midwest, for the most part it's pretty modest numbers," said Krimmel. Quadruple murder suspect captured in Tennessee, officials confirm DOGE savings are a fraction of what the department claims, CBS News analysis finds Zelenskyy says he had a productive talk with Trump about war with Russia