Lebanese Druze Leader Wiam Wahhab in Fiery Interview: Israeli Strikes in Syria to Defend the Druze Are Justified; Sunnis Curse Us, Call Us Heretics, Want to Slaughter Us and Our Children
He stated that all the Arabs are making peace with Israel, while he is criticized for supporting Israel's attack on Syria. Shouting, he accused Sunnis of cursing the Druze, branding them heretics, and threatening to slaughter them and their children. Raising his voice further, he lashed out at Sunnis with derogatory names, saying they should go to Palestine and that he would follow right behind them, adding that they were 'pushovers' who are 'all under Netanyahu's boot.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
8 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Security fears prompt Iran's GPS cut
Shafaq News – Tehran GPS services were disrupted in parts of Iran due to security concerns, the country's Minister of Communications, Issa Zarepour, confirmed on Wednesday, citing the threat of Israeli cyber and intelligence activity. Speaking to local media, Zarepour explained that the move was taken "in response to threats," underlining that it was authorized by 'relevant authorities' to protect public safety. 'The decision was made to prevent the misuse of location data by Israel,' he clarified. The minister added that efforts are underway to mitigate the impact on daily life. 'In cooperation with domestic knowledge-based companies, we are working on solutions to manage this situation and reduce the inconvenience to citizens, especially drivers,' Zarepour said, noting that testing and implementation of these solutions had already begun. The GPS restrictions follow broader digital and security measures adopted by Iranian authorities. In June, the government tightened i nternet access across the country, citing fears of Israeli exploitation of communication networks for military purposes. The Ministry of Communication and Information Technology stated at the time that these controls were necessary due to "Israel's use of telecommunication networks for military objectives." Following a recent ceasefire with Israel, Iran launched a nationwide campaign resulting in the arrest of dozens of individuals accused of being 'saboteurs' and 'spies' allegedly connected to Tel Aviv.
Memri
11 hours ago
- Memri
For Jolani, The Kurds Are Next
Eight months after the fall of the Assad regime, Syria has plunged further into sectarian and ethnic violence. The U.S. policy of legitimizing and supporting the Syrian Interim Government with the intention of stabilizing the country, has so far failed; it has instead enabled the militias to carry out numerous massacres with full impunity and no accountability. The chaos resulting from the attack against the Alawite and Druze minorities by the government has now spread across Syria. Minorities are being systematically targeted with thousands of civilians killed, women abused, and forced into sexual slavery, and hundreds of thousands of people displaced. Children massacred by Al-Nusra front, led by Ahmed Al-Sharaa, August 5, 2013 After Alawites And The Druze, The Kurds Are Next Recent remarks by Tom Barrack, U.S. ambassador to the Republic of Turkey and special envoy for Syria, in which he likened Al-Sharaa – a former ISIS and Al-Qaeda member – to George Washington,[1] and rejected federalism for Kurds and other minorities,[2] have been interpreted by the Syrian government as a green light to attack Syria's minorities. After deadly attacks against the Alawites, Druze, and Christians, the Kurds are now the next target of Syrian government backed by Turkey. Since Assad's fall, Turkish proxy forces have launched several large-scale attacks against the Kurds, committing unspeakable atrocities against civilians including massacres, rape, and sexual slavery. If the U.S. pressures the Kurds to disarm, they will face mass killings at the hands of Syrian government forces and Turkish-backed militias. The Kurds have been the most reliable ally of the U.S. in Syria for over a decade; they lost more than 11,000 fighters in the fight against ISIS. Kurdish forces are guarding approximately 9,000 battle-hardened ISIS terrorists in detention facilities, described as a "ticking time bomb" and "a terrorist army in detention" by U.S. officials.[3] There is no guarantee that the Syrian government would keep these terrorists imprisoned. If the Kurds lose control over Northeast Syria, the U.S. will not only lose a loyal partner in the fight against terrorism, but also risk an ISIS resurgence. "There Is No God But Allah, Kurds Are The Enemies Of Allah" Ahmed Al-Sharaa and his militia groups have a long history of takfiri[4] jihad against the Kurds in Syria, guided not by religious difference, as the majority of Kurds are Sunni Muslims, but by their ethnic prejudices against the Kurds, who are not ethnically Arab. In 2013, sheikhs of the Al-Nusra Front led by Al-Sharaa (then Abu Muhammed Al-Jolani) issued the following fatwa against Kurds: "Kurds are kuffar [unbelievers] and killing Kurds, taking their women, plundering their property, and destroying their homes is just and fair."[5] In the first half of 2013, Al-Nusra Front, allied with ISIS and supported by Turkish forces, carried out brutal attacks across Kurdish regions. They burned Kurdish homes, killed civilians indiscriminately, and continued to kidnap many Kurds on a daily basis throughout Syria's Kurdish region, all with Turkish military support on the ground. Al-Nusra carried out numerous massacres of Kurds including approximately 450 people, mainly women and children in Tal Abyad, Tal Hassil, and Tal A'ran. Al-Nusra massacred 120 children and 330 men and women in the district of Tal Abyad on August 5, 2013. More than 1,200 Kurds, men and women, were abducted during this period.[6] In 2018-2019, Al-Sharaa's Hay'at Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS) militia (formerly Al-Nusra) participated in the ethnic cleansing of nearly 500,000 Kurds in northern Syria, particularly Afrin and Serekaniya, in systematic ethnic cleansing campaigns carried out by Turkey to change the demography of the region by settling Arabs, Turkmens, and families of foreign fighters in place of displaced Kurds.[7] Since Al-Sharaa declared himself president of Syria, a calculated and coordinated hate campaign has been launched against Kurds by Syrian media affiliated with the government and Turkish media, with the aim of fueling hatred and inciting violence against the Kurds. "Lā ilāha illā Allāh, a-l-Kurdī ʿaduw Allāh [There is no god but Allah, the Kurd is the enemy of Allah]" has become a popular sectarian and racist slogans chanted by supporters of Al-Sharaa.[8] Ethnic discrimination policies against Kurds have reached alarming levels. On July 21, 2025, Kurdish youths were arrested in Damascus for speaking Kurdish in public.[9] Between July 19-22, 2025, at least 25 Kurds, including underage girls, were abducted by Syrian government forces.[10] These anti-Kurd campaigns are widely seen as a preparatory stage for a military attack against the Kurds. By portraying Kurds as foreigners, saboteurs, Zionist agents, and enemies of the state, Syria and Turkey seek to rally around Arab and Turkic takfiri groups. Declaring Kurds "enemies of God" provides religious legitimacy for their murder and sexual enslavement. If the Syrian regime forces manage to occupy the Kurdish region, a full-scale genocide of Kurds and Christians is to follow in northern Syria. Turkey's Neo-Ottoman Ambitions: "The Road to Jerusalem Goes Through Damascus" The fall of Assad has effectively eliminated the influence of Iran and Russia in Syria, but it has conversely opened the door for Turkey to take control of the country and implement its neo-Ottoman colonial policies. Turkey's end goal is not a peaceful and prosperous Syria, but rather a centralized regime controlled by Ankara, which it can use as a launchpad to target Israel and destabilize the Middle East. While the Shiite "Axis of Resistance" led by Iran has been largely weakened, a new Sunni "Axis of Resistance" led by Turkey and funded by Qatar is emerging in Syria, which is, in the long run, anti-American, anti-Western, and anti-Israeli. Before the fall of Assad, the Kurdish forces were a major obstacle to IRGC expansionism in Syria due to their geographical position. Similarly, they are now a major obstacle for Turkey and Qatar's ambitions to form a Sunni coalition hostile to American and Israeli interests. Conclusion: Kurds And Other Minorities Demand Federalism In a recent interview U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack claimed, "I think all of the minority communities are smart enough to say, 'We're better off together, centralized.'"[11] This statement contradicts the consistent demands from minorities – Kurds, Alawites, Druzes, and Christians – for a decentralized, federal system, and an end to authoritarianism. Al-Sharaa's reliance on sectarian, extremist policies, have led to bloodbaths in large parts of Syria. As president of Syria, he has failed to meet U.S. expectations: Rather than guiding the country toward stability, his government has intensified repression against minorities and increased sectarian violence across Syria. Therefore, a new U.S. Syria policy is needed to prevent further sectarian and ethnic bloodshed, to prioritize a federal system that gives communities control over their regions. On top of that, Turkey must be prevented from dominating Syria and use it a staging ground to destabilize the region and undermine U.S. interests. The U.S. must continue to support the Kurds in Northern Syria who control around 30 percent of the country. If the U.S. abandons the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) coalition, it will not only betray a loyal partner, it will also lose its foothold in Syria and risk the creation of an anti-American Sunni "Axis of Resistance." *Himdad Mustafa is special advisor to MEMRI's Kurdish Studies Project.
Memri
11 hours ago
- Memri
Palestinian Articles: Hamas Must Release The Hostages Immediately And Disarm; The Lives Of The Gazans Are More Important Than Its Rule In Gaza
In the recent period, the Palestinian Authority (PA) press in the West Bank has been even more vociferous than before in urging Hamas to end the Gaza war by releasing the Israeli hostages and agreeing to disarm and to cede power in Gaza.[1] Many articles in the PA mouthpiece Al-Hayat Al-Jadida and in the daily Al-Ayyam blamed Hamas for the ongoing war and said it was being stubborn and manipulative in the negotiations in order to buy time and maintain its control over the Gaza Strip. Had Hamas agreed to the aforementioned demands in the first months of the war, they argued, many Gazan lives would have been spared and the total destruction of the Strip would have been avoided. The articles also criticized Hamas's leadership for spreading a false narrative of victory while sitting in Gaza's tunnels or in "seven-star hotels" in Qatar and ignoring the heavy cost in human lives and the suffering of the Gazan people. Since the October 7 attack, they said, which was an "act of collective suicide," Hamas has lost the support of the Gazans, who hold it responsible for their disaster and suffering. Therefore, if Hamas now steps down in favor of the PA this will not be a Palestinian defeat but rather a victory for the Palestinian people and their desire to live. The following are translated excerpts from several of these articles. PA Daily: Every Hour Hamas Refrains From Stepping Down Means More Destruction, Hunger, Victims And Martyrs An editorial published in the PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida on June 23, 2025, during the war between Israel and Iran, called on Hamas to release all the hostages and cede power in Gaza, stressing that the movement's insistence on continuing the war was insupportable. The editorial said: "Hamas must hurry up and hand over the hostages immediately, and explicitly declare it is ceding power in the Gaza Strip… What more has to happen before it takes a step in the direction of reason and realism? From now on, Hamas's populist rejectionism and flowery speeches will no longer help it reach negotiations in hopes of achieving some of its ambitions as a ruling [force]. The situation after the Israel-Iran war will not be the same as the situation before it… "Hamas [must] make a clear declaration about [releasing] the hostages and about the day after [the war] in the wounded [Gaza] Strip, which will be marked by a complete absence of [Hamas's] rule there… Every hour it spends waiting today is another hour of destruction, hunger, victims, martyrs and injuries. Will Hamas be wise and stop the clock of this [endless] wait? "[2] In an earlier editorial, from June 1, 2025, the daily also urged Hamas to release the Israeli hostages and put an end to the war, stressing that the lives of the Gazans "are more precious and important" than Hamas's control over Gaza, which it is so eager to maintain. The editorial said: "Many of those who applauded the [Al-Aqsa] Flood [i.e., Hamas's October 7 attack], which boomeranged against its perpetrators from the very first moment… now urge Hamas to accept the ceasefire proposal of U.S. [Envoy Steve] Witkoff… "[Oh Hamas], release the hostages you are holding… without any arrogance, verbal tricks or boastful false demands. Accept [Witkoff's] proposal… Release them, oh Hamas leaders. The lives of the people are more precious and important than your control [over Gaza], which you delusionally believe you can still maintain. Release them. There is no longer any flood except for the flood of death and destruction… Release them and step off the stage. This will not be a defeat or a surrender for the Palestinian people, but rather a triumph of its will to live…"[3] Former PA Minister: The Gazans Hold Hamas Responsible For Their Disaster And Will No Longer Tolerate Its Rule In his June 4 column in the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam, Ashraf Al-Ajrami, a former PA minister for prisoner affairs, wrote that Hamas's sole purpose in negotiating today is maintaining its control over the Gaza Strip, in disregard of the fact that Israel will never agree to this: "Twenty months after the October 7 war and [the outbreak of] the war of extermination in Gaza, Hamas's leaders have yet to realize the inevitable consequences of this war. Unfortunately, they continue their manipulations aimed at retaining control of Gaza, believing that the rules of play that applied before October 7 will somehow become relevant again. Hamas is trying to buy as much time as possible, hoping to cause the world to accept the status quo and pressure Israel into accepting a permanent ceasefire with Hamas still [in power]. "[But] in practice, the events of October 7 created an unprecedented reality in Israel, and united the Jewish Israeli society around one [belief] – despite all the contrasts and disputes within it – [namely] that Hamas must not remain in Gaza in any way that allows it to threaten Israel. The meaning of this, as [Israeli Prime Minister] Binyamin Netanyahu has said on more than one occasion, is that the hostages must be released and Hamas must be removed from power and disarmed… Nobody is willing to accept Hamas's [continued] control over Gaza. "Had Hamas accepted these demands in the first months of the war, the Gazans' suffering would have stopped, their lives would have been saved, and the complete destruction of Gaza would have been avoided… Perhaps the number of fallen martyrs is immaterial to the Hamas leadership, who speaks of them in terms of numbers [and objects] that can be manufactured or produced again,[4] but each [of the fallen] is an entire world… If some force that purports to carry out resistance does not care about the lives and the suffering of the people, its resistance is evil – because ultimately, any resistance or national struggle are meant to defend the people and their rights and afford them a life of dignity, not to treat civilians as fuel for achieving the purposes of some organization or other, in disregard of the national goals that are a matter of national consensus. "What is Hamas currently pursuing in its negotiations?... In practice, it is negotiating for its own purposes, rather than anything else, because its main [goal] in the negotiations is to end the war while remaining in Gaza, so it can reassume control of it once the occupation army withdraws. Hamas's weapons – which it so eagerly tries to protect –are directed only inward, for this movement will not be able to pose a serious threat to Israel in the foreseeable future… "[Hamas] has lost the support of the Palestinian people in Gaza, especially of those who can no longer tolerate its existence and hold it primarily responsible for their disaster and their suffering, while this movement, [for its part], ignores the fate of the [Gaza] inhabitants. For this reason, Gaza will no longer tolerate Hamas's rule. Since the day Hamas [first] staged a coup against the legitimate PA [authorities], the Gaza Strip has been under siege… Its people cannot remember even a single good day [under] Hamas's rule, which was established by force. So how can they tolerate it today[?]… "The Palestinian people need an elected leadership that will express their aspirations and hopes. [But] in order to hold elections, the PA must return to Gaza and reunite the homeland. Every day that passes without this war coming to an end means further bloodshed and a heavy cost [in human lives]. When will Hamas rise [to the occasion], assume its national responsibility and feel the suffering of the people, who are the victims of foolishness and mistaken considerations?"[5] Former PA Minister: Hamas Leaders Ignore The Gazans' Suffering And Spread A False Narrative Of Victory In his May 25 column in the Palestinian daily Al-Ayyam, Atef Abu Sayf, a former PA minister of culture, slammed Hamas for its claims of victory and urged it to let the PA assume responsibility for the negotiations to end the war. He wrote: "The war continues month after month, as though it exists just in order to continue… Hamas's [goal] can be summarized in a single sentence: restoring the situation that prevailed before October 7… Hamas's negotiators are [either its leaders abroad, who are living] in seven-star hotels in friendly capitals [such as Doha], or [its leaders in Gaza,] who are underground. Neither [of these groups] sees what is happening in Gaza or hears the sighs and the suffering of its people. Even if they watch tv, they see only one channel [the Qatari Al-Jazeera], which prettifies reality for them and presents it as a blatant victory... That is the essence of the crisis: those negotiating in the name of the [Gazan] people do not see them or notice them… "Hamas's holding of the hostages, and the Israeli army's failure to reach them, do not in themselves constitute steadfastness [on Hamas's part]… Steadfastness and sacrifice were supposed to prevent the [Israeli] army from entering Gaza, or to stop it and defend the city and its people, not leave them to face death and starvation. There is a false [Hamas] narrative that must be fought forcefully and firmly, without fearing the machine [that spews] accusations of treason or heresy or the attacks of the misguided herd.[6] I don't know how anyone can claim victory after everything that has happened… "Hamas, who wants to produce new [people to replace] the martyrs…[7] knows that there is only one solution, but rejects it because it is the only national solution, and [Hamas] is clearly uninterested in a nation solution. [The solution] is for its leaders to contact the Muqata'a [the PA headquarters in Ramallah] and ask President Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas] to undertake the Gaza negotiations on behalf of the Palestinian people and all its factions…"[8] Palestinian Journalist: After October 7, Two Choices Remain – To Sacrifice Hamas Or To Sacrifice The People In his May 25 column in Al-Ayyam, Palestinian journalist Akram 'Atallah wrote an open letter to the Hamas leadership in which he implored the movement to realize that the October 7 attack was "an act of collective suicide" that has left the Palestinians with two main choices: "to sacrifice Hamas" and thereby save the people, or "to sacrifice the people and its future" in order to save Hamas. Addressing Hamas, he wrote: "…What you did on October 7, [2023] was a very great operation, that for several hours brought down a country that had prided itself on its security, technology and walls. Nevertheless, in all fairness, I am compelled to say that this was a collective act of suicide on the part of the [Hamas] movement. "It is true that Israel was off balance for several hours, but our people, and all the peoples who support it, cannot accept the consequences of a deed of this magnitude… With this great operation [the October 7 attack], you doomed yourselves to death… The Israelis, with the backing of the Americans and the Europeans, will not allow your [continued] existence as a force, as the ruling power in Gaza, or as an armed [movement]… The war will not stop as long as you remain in Gaza and maintain your weapons… "The time has come to think in a more realistic manner… An end to the war, and your [continued] existence after [that act of] suicide are two incompatible outcomes. If you don't understand that, the price will be higher than you and your people are able to pay. [The people] asked you to quickly announce the end of your rule in Gaza, but you were convinced that those voices were [just] intended to conspire against you and to remove you from power… "[Today] we have two options, and I do not see a third: to continue the war on the pretext that you are being persecuted and eliminated, or to commence negotiations about the day after [the war], when you will be absent, based on an understanding of the reality on the ground… What happened on October 7 was a very great event with even greater implications, and it has left Gaza with [only] two options: to sacrifice Hamas or to sacrifice the people and its future. The choice is in your hands…"[9]
