Same old NIMBY excuses are threatening to hold Hyde Park Square back
The increased density will help existing businesses in the Square by driving more traffic. The project will create space for new businesses and, therefore, more jobs. Over 100 units of housing will be added to the city's supply, which is strained. The agglomeration effects of higher density, especially of high-wage earners, will promote activity in an area well beyond the Square itself and generate higher tax revenue into perpetuity.
The virtues of the project hardly need to be stated. It's textbook good urbanism.
But the age-old enemy of every ambitious development project has reared its head: NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard). The NIMBYs have forcefully made their case against the project in City Council meetings, street protests, and in the Enquirer. Now that council has approved rezoning the NIMBYs are even mobilizing to field a ballot initiative to kill the project.
I've read their objections and find them thoroughly unpersuasive.
More: Cincinnati council ignored Hyde Park. Your neighborhood could be next. | Opinion
They think the project's too tall. Really? Eighty-five feet is hardly a skyscraper.
They're concerned they weren't listened to in the planning process. But City Council did listen to them; they just decided (correctly) that they were wrong.
Some NIMBYs are opposed to the project because it doesn't include subsidized housing. But if opponents want more subsidized housing, they should go support subsidized projects, not obstruct good market-rate projects.
The Hyde Park NIMBYs say the same thing NIMBYs say everywhere. They're in favor of development, just not this development. They support housing, just not this housing. They support local businesses, just not these local businesses.
Notice a pattern? NIMBYs who approve of development in general but never in particular are standing athwart progress yelling "Stop!" They're also standing athwart housing costs yelling "Higher!"
The opponents of the Hyde Park Square project need to be honest with themselves. This is a perfectly reasonable development, and their opposition to it amounts to supporting stasis and decay.
More: We walk Hyde Park Square every day, and we know how badly this project is needed | Opinion
There is one concern I share with some of this project's skeptics. That is the aesthetic quality.
Hyde Park Square is one of our city's better public spaces. That is why so many people are understandably concerned about changing it. It's natural to want to steward beautiful things. If a project wants to contribute to Hyde Park Square rather than detract from it, the project should be a pleasing aesthetic addition.
The bar isn't that high. Hyde Park is far from perfect. It contains one of the city's rather lesser examples of Art Deco. The eclectic mix of architectural styles has its weaker points. Somebody's already built a bland, single-tone brick apartment complex on the east end, one of those with the tiny jutting balconies that look like they were stuck on as a hasty afterthought.
The new project must rise above that. It must be pleasing to look at. Beautiful buildings on the scale that are planned can be a centerpiece for the Square. They can concentrate the gaze and enliven the experience of walking or eating, or simply sitting anywhere in Hyde Park Square.
While it is possible to create a beautiful building in a modern style, the developers should look to Cincinnati's rich architectural past if they want to greatly increase their chances of success. It will be much better if whatever they build recalls Over-the-Rhine row houses or Concert Hall, or the Richardson Romanesque of the San Marco building and City Hall, or the classical facades of the early 20th century mid-rises downtown, literally anything other than the bland, placeless 5-over-1 style that gets thrown up everywhere these days.
More: Proposed redevelopment of Hyde Park Square would damage beauty of neighborhood | Opinion
If they can do that, if they can both increase the amenities of the neighborhood as well as the beauty of Hyde Park Square, then the project's developers will win over many of their critics, who, once the dust settles, will concede it looks great, is good for the neighborhood, and move on with their lives.
But if they don't, if they announce they're planning something that looks like one of the more slapdash student housing projects that have sprung up around the University of Cincinnati recently (I'm looking at you Central Parkway and McMillan at Auburn!) then I'd be happy to join the NIMBYs at the barricade.
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
Christopher Wood is a neurologist who lives in Clifton.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: The future of Hyde Park Square shouldn't be held hostage | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
David Greising: Chicago aldermanic privilege raises its stubborn head again. This time against granny flats
When Lori Lightfoot was sworn in as mayor, her first executive order aimed to wipe out the impact of aldermanic privilege on the way city government functions. But privilege won out, as it so often does, and the City Council practice of allowing local aldermen to veto city actions in their wards — zoning and permitting changes in particular — remains almost wholly intact. Privilege raised its stubborn head again last month. A move to allow more accessory dwelling units in Chicago, in part to increase affordable housing citywide, seemed headed to passage at the July council meeting. But no — a deference to aldermanic privilege and a neatly executed parliamentary maneuver delayed a vote. Thanks to pushback from self-identified 'Bungalow Belt' aldermen, a yearslong push to allow 'granny flats,' coach houses and basement apartments throughout the city will need to wait until September. The proposal introduced by Ald. Bennett Lawson, 44th, was backed by Mayor Brandon Johnson, but the power of the mayor's office isn't what it once was when this particular mayor squares off against an increasingly independent-minded City Council. The effort to address the city's severe housing shortage — at least 150,000 units are needed, probably more — will have to wait. Homeowners who might have earned extra income will have to wait. Apartment dwellers seeking freshly constructed shelter, possibly in neighborhoods they might normally not be able to afford, will have to wait. Many aldermen claim the power of their privilege is their best bet for protecting their wards from unwelcome changes in city policy. They know what's best for their wards, they say. Besides, voters hold them responsible for everything that happens there. They need the veto power. The arguments may seem sensible at first blush. But the truths about aldermanic privilege, sometimes called aldermanic prerogative, should be enough to make an honest alderman blush. Aldermanic privilege is well known as a contributor to Chicago's culture of corruption. For example, aldermanic privilege lent credibility to then-Ald. Ed Burke's threat to block a Burger King construction project in his ward if the restaurant's owners refused to hire Burke's law firm and make a campaign donation. The extortion attempt helped put Burke in federal prison. A lesser-known attribute of aldermanic privilege is the way it perpetuates racial and economic inequities in Chicago. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development said as much in 2023 after investigating a complaint from Chicago fair housing groups that aldermanic privilege perpetuates racial segregation in housing. 'By limiting the availability of affordable housing, the local veto disproportionately harms Black and Hispanic households,' HUD found. In addition to enabling corruption and exacerbating discrimination, aldermanic privilege also can simply enable bad policy — or block the adoption of good law. That's what is happening with the push to prevent expansion of accessory dwelling units across the city. The move to expand the use of granny flats and other ADUs is long overdue. It has been in the works since before 2021, when a pilot project launched in five test zones began — two each on the North and South sides and one on the West Side. Until then, ADUs were banned citywide, due to 1957 vintage zoning codes designed to reduce the risk of overpopulation. Redlining and blockbusting were the go-to tactics of race-based housing discrimination back then, and academic studies have shown the ban on granny flats was informed by segregationist intent, too. Overpopulation is no longer a concern. Chicago has lost around 800,000 residents since 1957. But rising economic inequity and increased gentrification are making it ever more difficult for many people to find decent, affordable housing. And the lack of affordable housing exacerbates racial and economic segregation, too. The delay by the City Council is all the more confounding because early results from the city's five pilot zones show some promise, but also some lessons that there is more work to do to bring more affordable, accessible housing to neighborhoods across the city. According to a report by my organization, the Better Government Association's Illinois Answers Project, around 300 units have popped up in the zones, but 90% of them are on the North Side. This means the West and South Side zones that could benefit substantially from new housing have not yet seen much impact. A restriction limiting ADU to owner-occupied properties, added only in the West and South Side zones, may have contributed to the limited adoption in those neighborhoods. Most of the new ADUs are in remodeled basements, where both construction costs and occupancy numbers tend to be smaller, not the coach houses that feed concerns among some opponents about population and building density, Illinois Answers reporter Alex Nitkin found. The pilot test, alongside lessons from other cities with more open ADU policies, have informed some of the compromises adopted in order to get the proposal out of the City Council's zoning committee last month. Limiting permits to owner-occupied buildings throughout the city is one of them. So are limits on the number of permits per block, based on zoning. The proposal also limits the use of granny flats for short-term rentals. Other cities have provided further protections that could be worth considering: requiring off-street parking, for example. But an Urban Land Institute study published just before Lightfoot launched the pilot-zone test warned that some such measures can impede the growth and socioeconomic benefit of ADUs. The City Council likely will take up the measure in September. Meanwhile, state Rep. Kam Buckner, D-Chicago, has drafted a bill for the state legislature that would ban prohibitions on ADUs and add measures designed to encourage their construction. The benefits of ADUs and the momentum toward removal of the ban are powerful enough that aldermanic privilege must not be allowed to stand in their way. A city ordinance drafted with appropriate safeguards could help address the city's housing shortage at minimum cost to our cash-strapped city. In other words, ADUs are an idea whose time has come — and the delays caused by the claims of aldermanic privilege are yet another reason why the end to that outdated tradition is long past due.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
8 candidates vying to be mayor of Brockton. Who are they?
The field for Brockton's fall mayoral and city council elections is set. As you probably know, Brockton will get a new mayor, given Mayor Robert F. Sullivan's decision not to seek a fourth term. A new face is also guaranteed for the Ward 1 seat on the city council because of Councilor Tom Minichiello's decision not to seek reelection. Tuesday, July 29, marked the deadline for turning in nomination papers. It's a key step toward who will and won't be on your ballots this fall. Voters will winnow the candidates in the Sept. 16 preliminary election down to finalists for the general election on Nov. 4. Here are the mayoral and city council candidates. Who's running for Brockton mayor? The open mayor's race has attracted eight hopefuls, listed here in alphabetical order. Links are to the candidates' websites or social media pages, if available: Jean Bradley Derenoncourt Lawrence Fargo Eugenie Kavanagh Carina Mompelas Richard Reid Richard Wayne Ripley Moises M. Rodrigues Luz Villar Derenoncourt and Rodrigues are at-large city councilors, meaning they represent the whole city instead of particular wards. Rodrigues' fellow city councilors appointed him mayor in July 2019 to serve out the term of Mayor Bill Carpenter, who died in office. Rodrigues, who leads the Cape Verdean Association of Brockton and works for the Catholic Church, is seeking his first elected term as mayor. Derenoncourt, a corrections officer in Norfolk County, ran for mayor in 2017. Kavanagh, a business owner and social worker, ran for mayor in 2021. Reid is a local pastor. Ripley, a retired nightclub manager, is making his second run for mayor. Villar has worked in politics both on Beacon Hill and in Washington, D.C. No verifiable information was immediately available about Fargo and Mompelas. As of July 30, five mayoral candidates had set up committees with the state's Office of Campaign and Political Finance: Derenoncourt, Kavanagh, Reid, Rodrigues and Villar. That office monitors campaign contributions and spending. You can search to see who's giving money to which candidate and how they're spending it. The two top vote-getters in September advance to the general election. 'Awful incident' Brockton man found guilty of murdering homeless man walking service dog Who's running for Brockton city councilor at-large? Brockton has four at-large seats on the city council. Right now the field is 11 candidates. Voters will in September decide the top eight and those will be on November's ballot. Here are the at-large candidates. Incumbents are indicated by an (i): Jeffrey Charnel Steven Clay Carla M. Darosa Matthieu C. Delisme Winthrop H. Farwell Jr. (i) Joseph Edwald Francois Alix Arthur Gayaud Jed Hresko Judith Nelson Michael JF Nunes David C. Teixeira (i) 'Epitomizes one-of-a-kind luxury' Easton home on Sierra Drive sold for over $1M Who's running for city council Ward 1? Ward 1 will have new representation come January 2026. Incumbent Minichiello, a lawyer and former school committee member, did not seek reelection. The Enterprise was unable to reach him for comment. The open seat brought out four candidates. These will be cut down to two in September's preliminary election. Marlon D. Green William T. Keene Steve Lainas Ulisses Varela Who's running for Ward 2? In downtown's Ward 2, incumbent Maria Tavares has a challenger in Malice Veiga. Who's running for Ward 3? Ward 3 features a rematch of the 2023 election. Philip Griffin, now the incumbent, faces Gary Keith again. Who's running for Ward 4. There's also a rematch in Ward 4. Incumbent Susan Nicastro is being challenged again by Tony Branch, who is a Southeastern Regional School Committee member. Who's running for Ward 5? Ward 5, which is also downtown, is represented by Jeff Thompson. In what should be a lively preliminary contest, Ellie V. Teixeira makes her second run at the seat, this time with local podcaster Keith Hayes on the ballot. Who's running for Ward 6? A fierce fight is likely in Ward 6 as incumbent Jack Lally tries to fend off two challengers in September: Jamal Brathwaite and Lisa E. Crowley. Only two go on to the general election. Who's running for Ward 7? The only ward with an uncontested race is Ward 7, where long-term incumbent Shirley Asack is assured to keep her seat. How do I vote? For the Sept. 16 preliminary, you must register to vote by 5 p.m. on Sept. 6. To vote in the Nov. 4 general election, you must be registered by 5 p.m. on Oct. 25. Send your news tips to reporter Chris Helms by email at CHelms@ or connect on X at @HelmsNews. This article originally appeared on The Enterprise: 8 candidates vying to be mayor of Brockton. Who is and isn't running Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Henderson councilwoman accuses mayor of gerrymandering, city says look at the numbers
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) – A Henderson councilwoman is alleging her ward is getting gerrymandered in favor of an opponent endorsed by the city council. The mayor calls the accusation a 'stunning lack of knowledge.' During a July 15 Henderson City Council Meeting, Councilwoman Carrie Cox asked city staff to explain the reasoning behind the new ward redistricting set for a vote on Aug. 5, adding she was surprised to see it on the agenda. 'I had no idea this was coming until it was pointed out it was on the agenda,' Cox said. 'I had no prior knowledge, and that was disturbing to me.' Andrew Powell, the Henderson Planning Manager, said based on new population estimates, two Henderson wards are now 5 percent greater than another. The population difference requires redistricting to occur in a year when there is not a general election, according to Powell, who prepared two redistricting plan drafts. 'Because there's not a general election this year that we fit that bill,' he said. 'We also have to complete that redistricting effort at least six months before the closing of the candidate filing period, which is fast approaching in March.' Cox thanked Powell for his explanation; however, reiterated her concerns about the motivation behind the decision and said in her opinion, it felt like it was made behind closed doors. 'It's an unbelievable to me that we're in this situation for the second time in two years, during my term,' she said. 'And my ward is being set up to be the most affected.' Sitting nearby, Annette Dawson Owens, a Nevada State Board of Education board member running against Cox, became the subject of the conversation between the city council and staff. 'I question how political this is,' Cox said. 'As requirement I understand, but given recently, an opponent is in the race and was supported by the mayor and council.' Councilwoman Monica Larson pushed back on claims the decision was made behind closed doors and pointed to the growth in the neighborhoods of Cadence and Inspirada. 'It was implied this was a back-door meeting, closed-door meeting, we all found out at the same time,' Larson said. 'This is a state law, a state requirement.' 'Clearly looks political' Two weeks after the city council meeting, Councilwoman Cox furthered her statements in a press release from Lisa Mayo-DeRiso, a Nevada campaign consultant. The release characterizes the decision as politically motivated and directed by Henderson Mayor Michelle Romero. 'Redistricting should reflect facts — not political convenience,' Mayo-DeRiso wrote. 'By bypassing the U.S. Census, the city has eroded public trust and possibly violated redistricting norms designed to protect equal representation.' The release claims the changes were made using internal population estimates, not official U.S. census data, to redraw all wards but Ward 1. The release characterizes the redistricting of Ward 3, which would be the second in two years, as an act to disenfranchise thousands of voters, and an attempt to weaken Cox's position. Cox wrote that she is directly challenging the assertion made by city staff that the 5 percent population growth rate justifies the redistricting. 'Redistricting is a huge concern for me. As always, my number one priority is my constituents. It is well known that I have stood up for them and have not always agreed with the mayor,' Cox wrote in response to 8 News Now request for comment. 'The redistricting of my ward twice in a two-year period is not typical and frankly unheard of. My ward stands to be most impacted, with two other wards being affected also, which is unacceptable. The 'estimated' numbers do not make sense and clearly, this looks political; it amounts to suppression of the voters and a needless tax burden to the residents.' The city's reasoning and documents associated with the redistricting were also disputed by Dr. Scott Gavorsky, a demographer, according to the press release. 'The 'Consensus Population Estimates' that the city provides are consistently higher than any publicly available Census estimates,' Gavorsky wrote. The data used to arrive at the city's 'population estimates' have yet to be approved by the city and it has not yet been explained where the data came from, according to the press release. City staff answer questions The City of Henderson responded to several of the accusations outlined by the press release and Cox's questions, again describing the redistricting as normal. 'This is not a new process and has been systematically followed for years. It is guided by highly skilled City staff who are experts in municipal planning and follow best practices and established standards,' city staff wrote. 'It is conducted impartially and independently, without influence or direction from elected officials.' The formula and data set used by city staff was a specific question from opponents who questioned the origin of the internally generated estimates. 'The data utilized to estimate the population includes building permit data, U.S. Census Bureau persons per household data, and local utility record data provided by NV Energy and other utility providers,' staff wrote. 'The estimate methodology is consistent with the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes and Nevada Administrative Code that govern the estimation of population in Nevada. The U.S. Census Bureau does not estimate population at the election precinct level and would not be usable for redistricting outside of a decennial census.' Opponents also questioned the frequency of the changes for Cox's ward. City staff described that change as normal and within guidelines. 'We avoid moving precincts from one ward to another to the extent practical, particularly if they were already moved during the last redistricting effort,' city staff wrote. 'Although we strive to minimize back-to-back changes, sometimes it cannot be avoided, as in this instance. Fast-growing areas require adjustments often. The fastest-growing area in the City of Henderson in recent years has been the Cadence Master Planned Community, located in Ward 3, which necessitates back-to-back ward updates in that area.' 'Stunning lack of knowledge' Mayor Romero responded to an 8 News Now request for comment regarding the specific accusation that she was behind the choice to redistrict the wards. A mayoral campaign spokesperson sent the response, not city staff. 'Ward maps are developed independently of the Mayor and Council office. The newly drawn Ward maps presented at the last city council meeting were made available to the Mayor, City Council and the public at the same time, a week prior to the meeting,' Romero wrote. 'The allegations made by Ms. Cox display a stunning lack of knowledge of the process for both city operations and redistricting as described in our city charter.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
