logo
Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech

Is an AI backlash brewing? What 'clanker' says about growing frustrations with emerging tech

NBC News17 hours ago
It's a slur for the AI age.
'Clanker,' a word that traces back to a Star Wars video game, has emerged in recent weeks as the internet's favorite epithet for any kind of technology looking to replace humans. On TikTok, people harass robots in stores and on sidewalks with it. Search interest for the term has spiked. On X, Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., used the term last week to tout a new piece of legislation.
'Sick of yelling 'REPRESENTATIVE' into the phone 10 times just to talk to a human being?,' he posted on X. 'My new bill makes sure you don't have to talk to a clanker if you don't want to.'
In one video, which has more than 6 million views on TikTok, a small, four-wheeled delivery robot gets berated with the word.
'It makes me sick just seeing a...' Nic, a 19-year-old student and aspiring content creator in Miami Beach who posted the video, says as it approached, adding: 'Clanker!'
A slur is generally defined as a word or phrase meant to denigrate a person based on their membership to a particular group such as a race, gender or religion — one that goes beyond rudeness into overt bigotry. They are almost always directed at people.
'Clanker' appears to have peeked into the internet's lexicon starting in early June, with Google Trends data showing a sudden uptick in search interest. An entry on KnowYourMeme.com, a website dedicated to documenting the varied weirdness of the internet, traced the term back to the 2010s, when Star Wars communities adopted it from its use in various Star Wars shows to refer to battle robots. Other pieces of science fiction also predicted the rise of slurs for machines, most notably 'Blade Runner,' with 'skinjob' to refer to highly advanced, humanlike robots.
But there's a catch. By using a slur in a way that would typically apply to a human, people are also elevating the technology, offering some sense that people both want to put down the machines and recognize their ascension in society.
Adam Aleksic, a linguist who is also a content creator focused on how the internet is shaping language, said he first noticed the emergence of 'clanker' a couple of weeks ago. Its use mirrored classic slurs related to racial tropes and appeared to emerge out of a growing 'cultural need' related to growing unease with where advanced technology is heading. In one video — somewhat ironically appearing to have been created by AI — a man berates his daughter during a family dinner for dating 'a goddamned clanker,' before his wife steps in and apologizes to the robot.
'What we're doing is we're anthropomorphizing and personifying and simplifying the concept of an AI, reducing it into an analogy of a human and kind of playing into the same tropes,' Aleksic said. 'Naturally, when we trend in that direction, it does play into those tropes of how people have treated marginalized communities before.'
The use of 'clanker' is rising as people are more often encountering AI and robots in their daily lives, something that is only expected to continue in the coming years. The steady expansion of Waymo's driverless cars across U.S. cities has also come with some human-inflicted bumps and bruises for the vehicles along the way. Food delivery bots are an increasingly common sight on sidewalks. In the virtual world, cybersecurity firms continue to warn about the proliferation of bots on the web that comprise a growing share of all web traffic — including as many as one in five social media accounts.
The anti-machine backlash has long been simmering but is now seemingly breaking to the surface. A global report by Gartner research group found that 64% of customers would prefer that companies didn't use AI for customer service — with another 53% stating they would consider switching to a competitor if they found out a company was doing so. People are becoming more worried about AI taking their job s, even though evidence of actual AI-related job losses is relatively scant.
'Clanker' is also not the first pejorative term for something related to AI to have spread across the internet. 'Slop' as a catchall term for AI-generated content that is of low quality or obviously created by AI — such as 'shrimp Jesus' — entered internet parlance last year and has since become widely used. Other anti-AI terms that have emerged include 'tin skin' and 'toaster,' a term that traces back to the science fiction show Battlestar Galactica.
And there's even some pushback — joking and serious — about whether such slurs should be used. In a Reddit community for Black women, a post about 'clanker' offered some sense of the tension: 'And I know it's probably a joke in all from social media, but I can't help but feel like it's incredibly tasteless.'
Others have noted that some of the enthusiastic embrace of 'clanker' feels more about being able to throw around a slur rather than any deeper issue with technology.
Nic, whose TikTok video helped spark the 'clanker' phenomenon, said he sees both why people have taken to the phrase as well as why some find it problematic.
Nic, who asked to withhold his last name out of privacy concerns, said he did sense some people were using the word as a stand-in for a racial epithet.
Still, Nic, who is Black, said he saw the term more broadly as a lighthearted way to express a growing anxiety with where technology is headed, particularly as it pertains to the future of employment.
'I see it as being a push back against AI,' he said. 'A lot of lives are being changed because of robots ... and me personally I see it as a stupid way of fighting, but there's a little truth to it, as well.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Groom mistakenly blurted out ex's name during vows — people are shocked at the bride's reaction
Groom mistakenly blurted out ex's name during vows — people are shocked at the bride's reaction

New York Post

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Groom mistakenly blurted out ex's name during vows — people are shocked at the bride's reaction

It was a wedding to remember — for all the wrong names. Andrew and Rebecca Fildes were tying the knot in the English countryside back in 2023 when the groom accidentally delivered a blast from the romantic past — blurting out his ex-girlfriend's name in the middle of his vows. The Bedfordshire bride, to her eternal credit, didn't storm off in a taffeta tornado. She laughed. The guests laughed. Even Andrew laughed. The internet? Not so forgiving. The moment, posted to TikTok on July 28, shows the celebrant prompting, 'I take you, Rebecca Sarah Joan Qureshi…' Andrew, holding his bride's hands, replied: 'I take you, Sarah…' Cue the gasp, then giggles. Rebecca — mercifully — saw the funny side. 'His ex-girlfriend's name is Sarah, [and] so is one of my middle names,' she explained to Newsweek. 'I understood he was nervous and slipped up.' 3 To her credit, the bride didn't bolt in a taffeta twister — she laughed. The guests laughed. Even the groom laughed. The internet? Yeah… not so much. Serhii – 'I'm a lot more outgoing and sociable,' Rebecca continued. 'Andi [short for Andrew] is more introverted and sensible.' Still, the blunder was undeniable. 'He didn't even realize he'd left 'Rebecca' out,' she recalled. 'I told him and he said, 'I'm so sorry, I was so nervous that I'd do something wrong.' We laughed about it.' Rebecca's TikTok post (@scalesfeathersandfur), cheekily captioned 'Oh dear,' has racked up more than 30,000 views — and a comment section split between sympathy and scorched-earth. 'To be fair I think he just got HER names in the wrong order due to anxiety. He looks besotted with her. Congratulations,' one viewer wrote. 3 The bride's TikTok clip has racked up 30,000‑plus views — with commenters torn between compassion and savage takedowns in response to it. wideonet – 'Ross and Rachael … I mean Emily moment,' joked one commenter, referencing the infamous 'Ross says Rachel' moment from 'Friends.' Others weren't buying it: 'Oh no, that's awful. I would have been so upset.' One user dubbed it 'instant romance cancellation.' Another chalked it up to wedding‑day jitters: 'things like this happen when you are nervous…' One simply called it a 'no-go.' 3 Viewers flooded the video's comments section with nods to the 'Friends' infamous altar flub — Ross saying 'Rachel' in the Season 4 finale, 'The One with Ross's Wedding' (above). ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection Looks like she took 'Sarah' out of the vows — but not out of her happily‑ever‑after. And she's hardly the first Brit bride to see her big day go off‑script. As The Post previously reported, one Yorkshire father of the bride accidentally marched halfway down the aisle without his daughter, while another groom was left 'humiliated' after a prank garter toss swapped his bride for a groomsman. Ultimately, whether it's name‑drops, aisle‑walk mix‑ups or under‑the‑dress dupes, wedding‑day blunders have a way of living rent‑free in everyone's memories — and on the internet — for years.

WNBA Punishes Fever's Sophie Cunningham for Second Time in 2 Weeks
WNBA Punishes Fever's Sophie Cunningham for Second Time in 2 Weeks

Newsweek

time3 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

WNBA Punishes Fever's Sophie Cunningham for Second Time in 2 Weeks

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham is no stranger to hearing from the league office. Less than two weeks ago the 28-year-old guard was fined $500 by the league for criticizing its officials in a TikTok video from July 18, in which Cunningham lip-synched the lyrics "Stupid, or is it, slow? Or maybe, useless?" from Sabrina Carpenter's "Manchild" song with the caption "@ some refs" on the screen. The video garnered 1.3 million views since its posting, and has helped boost Cunningham's social media profile. "I got fined $500 for this TikTok 🤣🤣 ," Cunningham wrote on X back on July 23. "idk why this is funny to me... like ok you got it bud! Cause there's not more important things to be worried about with our league right now." Cunningham seemingly didn't learn her lesson, as she was back criticizing the WNBA officials again during the debut episode of her "Show Me Something" podcast, which she co-hosts with Bravo star West Wilson. More WNBA: Diana Taurasi Silences Caitlin Clark Rivalry Talk With Latest Comments Sophie Cunningham #8 of the Indiana Fever shoots against the Las Vegas Aces at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 24, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. Sophie Cunningham #8 of the Indiana Fever shoots against the Las Vegas Aces at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on July 24, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana."I'm not saying that your job is easy, but when it is a simple call right in front of your face multiple times, what are you doing?" Cunningham asked. "They're just so inconsistent, like that's one thing. If you're on the other team, and you're going to be fouling the [expletive] out of me, cool. But let me do it to you. "I think players across the league, and new fans across the country are like, what is going on with the refs? And I'm like, 'I don't know.' And you fining me $500 is not going to do [expletive]." Well those remarks cost Cunningham three times as much as her first fine did as the Missouri alum revealed on Tuesday she had been hit with a $1,500 fine for her most recent remarks. "I'm like what? This is just the beginning," Cunningham stated on Episode 2 of her "Show Me Something" podcast. "... What happens is they email our GM, and she pulls me aside and goes, 'Come here, Soph, I have to talk to you.' ... And she just smiled and goes, 'Hey, they're going to fine you again." More WNBA: WNBA Commissioner Breaks Silence on Caitlin Clark Bullying Controversy sophie got fined $1500 for ref comments on ep 1 lmfaoooo 'they email our gm and she pulls me aside…and she just smiled and goes hey they're gonna fine you again. i even told them i credited them that their job was hard! i did say that and i said that i would not be good at it.' — correlation (@nosyone4) August 5, 2025 Cunningham then pointed out she even noted on the last podcast she acknowledged that the officials have a difficult job, and she seemingly felt the league overlooked that part in deciding on her latest fine. Cunningham isn't the only member of the Fever to have a run-in with the league over its officiating. Earlier this season Fever head coach Stephanie White was also fined after being critical of the refs following a loss to the New York Liberty.

What Is 'Mankeeping,' and How Do I Know If I'm Doing It?
What Is 'Mankeeping,' and How Do I Know If I'm Doing It?

Vogue

time22 minutes ago

  • Vogue

What Is 'Mankeeping,' and How Do I Know If I'm Doing It?

You know that friend who always brings her boyfriend to the hang (go home, Brad!), and seems 100% occupied with meeting his various needs, whether that means doing his laundry or making sure he's meeting up with friends and not succumbing to the male-loneliness epidemic? As it turns out, there's now a word to describe her: she's a 'mankeeper,' and the work she does to keep her less-than-motivated male partner going is 'mankeeping' in action. TikTok content This content can also be viewed on the site it originates from. But where did the term come from, and what's so wrong with it? Below, find everything you need to know about mankeeping: What is mankeeping, exactly? Mankeeping refers to the emotional and social labor that straight women often take on in their relationships with straight men, most specifically around social connection. The term is notably used in a 2024 Stanford study titled 'Theorizing mankeeping: The male friendship recession and women's associated labor as a structural component of gender inequality.' The study's researchers describe themselves as 'introduc[ing] the concept of 'mankeeping,' a concept that continues the legacy of Carolyn Rosenthal's sociological theory of 'kinkeeping,' where we explored three postulates: that women disproportionately compensate for men's lack of social support, that this compensation constitutes labor, and that such labor often comes at a cost to women through their wellbeing and time.' What's an example of mankeeping in action? One could argue that The Simpsons's Marge is a logistical mankeeper, if not a socio-emotional one; while her husband Homer certainly has no trouble pouring his heart out to his close circle of guy friends over a few Duff beers at Moe's, it often falls to Marge to make sure he's meeting bare-minimum parenting expectations, going to the doctor, taking care of house and hygiene chores, and basically presenting himself to the world like an adult. In terms of more emotional mankeeping, the episode of Gilmore Girls where Lorelai and Sookie force their significant others, Luke and Jackson, to hang out (largely against their will) feels relevant. Claire Dunphy from Modern Family also seems like a classic mankeeper…or is she just a Virgo-slash-control-freak? And what's so wrong with mankeeping, exactly? On the surface of things, there might seem to be nothing so terrible about making sure your partner is socially supported, but a key aspect of mankeeping is that it's unreciprocated.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store