
‘I hate the arrangements!' Two Bruce superfans dissect Springsteen's lavish lost albums box set
Bruce Springsteen is opening his treasure trove: Tracks II: The Lost Albums features 83 previously unheard songs – unless of course you're one of the close friends that Springsteen has apparently been playing them to 'for years' – from unreleased albums made in the gaps between his storied catalogue, spanning 1983 to 2018. To make sense of this vast tranche of new material, we got 'tramps' Michael Hann and Laura Barton to pull apart the risks, regrets and riches in this landmark box set.
Michael Hann I saw the trailer for Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere the other day, which shows the symbolic moment in which the young Bruce buys his first new car, a 305 V8. 'It's awfully fitting for a handsome devil rock star,' the salesman says, leaning through the window. 'I do know who you are.' Springsteen looks up and says, wistfully. 'Well, that makes one of us.' I think that captures what Tracks II: The Lost Albums are, with Springsteen making sense of himself in those years when the world had decided on a very clear idea of which Bruce Springsteen it wanted, thank you very much. My feeling is that now, he's very clearly delineated the Boss from another, more nuanced version of Bruce Springsteen. The Boss tours with the E Street Band; Bruce Springsteen writes a memoir, performs a Broadway one-man show, makes left-field records following his muse. Now he's maybe able to do what he wanted to do in the late 80s and through the 90s because he's secure in being able to switch between those two ideas – and he does know 'the Boss' is an idea that he created – and also secure that his audience trusts him enough not always to be the Boss.
Laura Barton I think you're spot on about this, and particularly about what The Lost Albums are. But it's interesting that even in the early 80s, shortly before these recordings began, he stepped away from being the Boss – releasing Nebraska rather than Born in the USA. I'm never quite sure whether that was through confidence or compulsion or a kind of necessity. Whatever it was, I think it established a tension between these two Bruces that has proved fruitful. I should probably add that maybe that tension began with songs like Stolen Car and The River in 1980, but that's for another conversation, and probably he addresses it himself in 1987 on Tunnel of Love's Two Faces …
MH Where do you hear the closest to your platonic ideal of Bruce within this set?
LB In the first two tracks from the Streets of Philadelphia Sessions, made around 1993 – Blind Spot and Maybe I Don't Know You. They have all that encroaching darkness that marks my favourite Bruce songs. You?
MH I thought it would be on LA Garage Sessions '83. They really did just sound like band demos. What surprised me and tickled me the most was Twilight Hours, the Bacharach-style album, where there were plenty of other musicians. He wrote this in tandem with 2019's Western Stars, and while I wasn't mad about Western Stars, I thought the Twilight Hours songs found something very reflective of age in them, and also take Bruce back to an American bar tradition, albeit a different kind of bar to The Stone Pony.
LB I laughed out loud when Twilight Hours opened, in a warm and surprised way. I love that tradition of American songwriting – and performance. It's Bacharach, but there's a lot of the longing of Jimmy Webb or Glen Campbell to the material. But his voice here is fascinating to me, because I'm guessing for a lot of singers there comes a point where they wonder which way to go, and an awful lot of well-known artists pursue the classics and mine the American songbook and take on that sort of fireside persona, and it's interesting that Bruce could have taken that path.
MH That's interesting, because I don't hear these songs that way. Darkness on the Edge of Town, from 1978, is my favourite Springsteen album, and this seems – in a very peculiar way – a companion to that. It sounds like the record the parents of the characters in Darkness might have been listening to, addressing their concerns.
LB That's a good way to put it, but I'm not saying it sounds like a fireside album. I'm saying that the croon of his voice opens that avenue, and it's not one I ever considered for Bruce.
MH You're right about the croon. I think his voice sounds better on Twilight Hours than it does on rock songs now. It's nice not hearing the effort. But I want to bring you back to the Streets of Philadelphia Sessions. I love the songs there, but hate the arrangements. Well not even the arrangements. The drum loops, inspired in part by the era's west coast hip-hop. It dates it all so badly. I keep expecting manager Jon Landau to shout: 'Hear the drummer get wicked!' We both have bits of the Bruce catalogue we don't much like the sound of. But this?
LB I love those loops and will defend them to the death.
MH You OK, hun? You've hardly touched your Little Steven bandana print toilet paper.
LB When I heard they would be included I feared they would sound dated, but unexpectedly I just don't think they do. There's something very stark and sombre about the way they're used. I'm listening to Streets of Philadelphia's Blind Spot and there's a yelp in there that is very different to the howl of say, I'm on Fire or Atlantic City, but there's something animalistic about it that hits a similar spot for me. Some of my favourite Bruce moments across his career are those beyond-words utterances.
MH I quite like the fact this is, in the main, a bunch of genre exercises. I usually think his genre pastiches are the weakest thing in his repertoire – top o' the mornin' to you Irish-American folk-punk – but putting these collections out in this way enables me to hear them not as 'the album after Tom Joad' or whatever, but as discrete little packages.
LB Oh that's interesting, because I now don't see them as discrete little packages so much as ongoing conversations with his own music.
MH I know that's what they are for him. Because he's been having that conversation with these songs over years, whereas for me they're brand new information. It's like hearing an old friend say: 'Did I ever tell you about the time I got married and divorced in a weekend in Ulaanbaatar?'
LB Do you think that will change with repeated listening? Because the way I've been listening to them over the past few weeks has been mixed in with the rest of his repertoire. Sort of stitching them back into the fabric of what I already know and love.
Sign up to Sleeve Notes
Get music news, bold reviews and unexpected extras. Every genre, every era, every week
after newsletter promotion
MH Yes, I think they will – as lots of the songs from the first Tracks collection, or from the Darkness and River boxes have. I'm fascinated by the way a generation of older musicians – Bruce, Neil Young, Bob Dylan, Joni Mitchell – have been emptying their vaults. I can't imagine it's solely about raking in those sweet geriatric bucks. I wonder if they all, in their ways, want to forestall all the questioning about, well, everything. It's as if they're saying: Here it all is, everything that has passed through my musical mind; you decide for yourself.
LB My suspicion is that it's something to do with the freedom and sure-footedness you can find the older you get. That it's something about not being afraid to be seen. So in the same way that Bruce wrote the autobiography and the Broadway show, and some of that exposed elements of his life and career that a younger Bruce might have wanted to keep hidden – to me this feels like an extension of that. And maybe there's a connection to the opening of the new Springsteen Archives/Center for American Music next year: a gift to our understanding of a body of work. It's acknowledging that there's illumination in showing your working.
MH There's something he's said in interviews that interests me, when he has said his audience 'wasn't ready' for these albums. Which suggests a certain insecurity he has since overcome. Because, in truth, only the obsessional are going to be delving deep into this much music, and that's fine, and that would have been true then, as well. But at that time, without the E Street Band, he maybe felt he risked too much. So if he wasn't going to make rock music for the best part of a decade, he had best not throw out too much non-rock, so that the rockers were still there when he was ready to come back. I don't think there's any such insecurity now he plays to 75,000 people a night again in Europe.
LB Yes, possibly. Or maybe it wasn't insecurity, it was just Bruce's understanding of how much an audience can take. I'm always really interested in how he knows just how long to take any solo or musical diversion or 'jam' in a live show. It never feels indulgent to me. In a similar way, I think he has a profound understanding of what an audience can take in a broader sense, perhaps before they do. Also, side note, I think a lot of the audience not being 'ready' relates to my beloved Streets of Philadelphia Sessions, and Bruce thinking audiences weren't able to take a fourth album about curdled relationships after Tunnel of Love, Human Touch and Lucky Town.
MH Can we talk about the missing thing? Electric Nebraska. In a Rolling Stone piece, Springsteen first said no such thing existed. Then a week later he texted the writer to say: Oh, I had a poke and there is an Electric Nebraska, 'though it does not have the full album of songs'. Which strikes me as both coy and disingenuous. But that seems so much part of this story, and I can only guess that's being held back for a Nebraska reissue to go with the film. Is it churlish to be unhappy about something missing from several hours of unheard music?
LB Yes it is churlish! I'm teasing you. Let's discuss it!
MH You talked about this music being part of the ongoing conversation. In this case, it feels a little like your friend telling you: 'That thing you really want to know? I'll probably tell you. Yeah, but not now.'
LB To which I would say: 'That's fine, it's yours to tell or not tell.'
MH Which album do you think is weakest? For me, it's Faithless, recorded between 2005 and 2006 as a soundtrack to a movie that never got made. I think it's the weakest not because of any explicit shortcomings on its part, but more because its sonic character isn't as fully defined as the others: it sounds as though any one of those songs could have been on the other records, but few of those songs could have been on Faithless.
LB I actually like Faithless. Though at times it was one of the points in this collection that made me want to hear Bruce work with other, more unexpected collaborators. I'd love to hear a soundtrack that set Bruce's voice against, say, an Oliver Coates cello piece. I took a little longer to find my footing in Inyo. Which surprised me, because Inyo really came out of The Ghost of Tom Joad, which I love.
MH I love the splashes of colour on Inyo from the mariachi band. It's not quite the mariachi album that was billed, but there's a joy in those songs – amid the hard times of a lot of the lyrics – that, again, reminds me of the thing the E Street Band do of finding joy in the despair.
LB Yes, I think it took a while for me to see those splashes of colour, because for a while it all felt quite bleached-out. What did you think of Perfect World? Less an album, more a compilation of tracks from the mid-90 to early 2010s.
MH It's a ragbag, but I think he was right that the collection needed some rock, and while there's no Badlands on it, there are some songs I'd be very happy to hear in the live set. I guess what's amazing is that at this point it is possible for Springsteen to release all this unheard music and for it to contain music that's not just interesting, not just decent, but contains a worthwhile number of songs that genuinely bear comparison to anything from any point in his career. The Klansman, Shut Out the Light, High Sierra – those all seem like masterpieces to me. And, as with Tracks, there are some smaller numbers that are fantastic – Janey, Don't Lose Your Heart on both Tracks collections, and on this one The Great Depression is, I suspect, going to be my go-to semi-throwaway.
LB I was going to ask you if there is a song on this collection you think might grow to be one of your favourites? I know when I got Dylan's Biograph the version of I'll Keep It With Mine on there eventually became my favourite Dylan song of all time. I'm not sure whether I've yet found that overwhelming feeling about a song here yet, but I agree with you about The Klansman and High Sierra. And I could see my relationship with Maybe I Don't Know You becoming quite intense.
MH And there's Tracks III to come, touted as five more albums-worth of music stretching from his debut in 1973 to last year. Plus – I bet – Electric Nebraska. It feels like so much. I just hope we get to hear some of this music some time. Preferably standing next to each other.
Bruce Springsteen's Tracks II: The Lost Albums is released on Sony on 27 June
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Adorable moment unlikely friendship forms between bear and coyote
Footage released by Altadena Sheriff's Station in Los Angeles captured an unexpected encounter between a bear and a coyote. The two animals met under a bush at night, initially staring at each other. They then appeared to interact in a friendly manner, nuzzling noses and standing side-by-side. The police station shared the sweet interaction online with a humorous caption. Watch the video in full above.


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I lived on baby food for a WEEK - what it did to my body shocked me
A YouTuber has gone viral after claiming he lost a dramatic amount of weight in just five days—by eating nothing but food and drinks designed for babies. San Diego-based Michael Alves, a former college football player, tried the so-called 'baby food diet' in a self-imposed challenge posted to his YouTube channel, Killdozer. The video has racked up more than 820,000 views and documents the 26-year-old surviving on pouches, purees and formula drinks for the best part of a week. Before starting, Alves lays out strict ground rules: everything he eats must be made for babies or toddlers. Drinks must come in child-sized bottles, and all meals must be consumed using baby utensils—including a novelty cow-shaped 'spork'. By the end of the experiment, Alves claims he dropped from 18st 2lb (254lbs) to 17st 10lb (248lbs)—almost half a stone—adding that the experience made him feel constantly hungry, demoralised, and at times physically unwell. 'This challenge sucks,' he says in the video at one point. 'I really don't want to eat any more baby food.' Alves, who has gained more than 500,000 subscribers for his humorous gaming and lifestyle content, appears shirtless at the start of the video for a weigh in and 'physique check'. He is optimistic, claiming baby food 'must have loads of protein because children need protein... I think.' But his enthusiasm quickly dissipates. 'There's no protein in anything here,' he says in disbelief while shopping the baby aisle at Target. 'Do babies not need protein?' Over five days, Alves samples everything from toddler snacks to infant formula and squeezable meat purées—with mixed and mostly negative results. Many of the meals left him visibly recoiling. The mashed carrots, he said, were 'diabolical,' adding: 'Zero flavour at all. And they almost melt immediately in your mouth.' The macaroni and cheese fared little better: 'The noodles immediately disintegrate... and the cheese? Not very flavourful.' Even the infant formula drink he chose proved unbarable. After one sip, he grimaced: 'What the hell are we giving our kids? This tastes like poison.' Only one dish—mashed potatoes with beef and gravy—earned faint praise. 'It still tastes like baby food, but it also does taste like beef. So it's a double whammy.' He adds: 'These meals taste like they were made by aliens.' Alves did, however, enjoy toddler crisps, including a packet of garden salsa puffs which he awarded 9.2 out of 10, calling them the best thing he ate all week. To supplement the low-calorie meals, he also added regular exercise—taking part in hikes wearing a weighted vest, gym sessions and long walks, often with his wife Jessica, 27. Although the final weigh-in confirms he's 6lb lighter, Alves says he suspects much of the weight loss may be water rather than fat. With barely any salt or carbs, the baby food diet left his body flushing out water and burning through its energy reserves. He adds that the sheer lack of flavour in most of the products he consumed made it impossible to overeat. 'I'm starving,' he says at the end of day five. He gives the overall experience a score of 3/10, noting: 'If I didn't have the snacks or Pedialyte [baby formula rehydration drinks], it would've been a one.' Nutrition experts would be unlikely to recommend the plan. Baby food is designed for small children with developing digestive systems and contains limited salt, spices and fibre—not to mention little in the way of protein, unless fortified. Alves notes that even the baby yoghurts he tried were labelled as 'not containing live cultures,' meaning they were shelf-stable and lacked the gut-friendly bacteria found in regular yoghurt. 'I really thought this would be better,' he says. 'Even the formula tastes like poison. What are we giving our kids?' The challenge ends with Alves rewarding himself with a burrito, saying: 'We've got to start giving these to babies.' Alves has seen a rapid rise in fame over the past year, transitioning from sport to streaming. As a former offensive lineman for UCLA, he began posting gaming content and challenge videos under the name Killdozer in early 2025. His fanbase – known affectionately as 'Dozer Purists' – have praised the video's humour, but even die-hard supporters seem unlikely to replicate the diet themselves. 'Please do not do the baby food diet,' he says. 'I'm so glad I only did five days and not seven.' The baby‑food stunt follows another extreme diet challenge that made waves earlier this year. Alves himself has previously gone viral, after consuming nothing but protein shakes for a week. And Oklahoma City based YouTuber Joshua Allard, 25, gained attention after attempting to eat 150 eggs in five days. Allard said the egg-only diet left him bloated, tired and eating up to 30 eggs a day, but also noted unexpected benefits such as improved sleep and reduced appetite. The challenge sparked huge interest online, along with warnings from nutritionists who said such restrictive eating plans are unsustainable and lack essential nutrients. Like Alves's baby food challenge, it showed how extreme diets can lead to short-term weight loss—but may come with side effects and should not be taken as health advice.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
The weirdest (and unhealthy) lengths celebs go to in order to get their red carpet looks from questionable cookie diets to uncomfortable colonics
They say it takes a village to get celebrities red carpet ready. Some superstars have succumbed to a series of increasingly unorthodox and occasionally unhealthy methods in a bid to get their red carpet looks proving it's not always fun and games being a celebrity. From colonic irrigation to questionable cookie diets, extreme carb-cutting, obsessive calorie counting and rigorous juice cleansing, there's not much your average celebrity hasn't tried in their quest for what they deem to be the perfect body. But many of the strict dieting techniques come with some little-known side effects, and some A-list stars have opened up about their own shocking stories trying out these unconventional methods. 1. KOURTNEY KARDASHIAN - THE KETO DIET WHAT IS THE KETO DIET? The Ketogenic diet defines a low-carb, high-fat way of eating. Following this eating plan forces the body into a metabolic state, known as ketosis, which starves the body of carbohydrates but not calories. Carbs are shunned in the keto diet as they cause the body to produce glucose, which is used as energy over fat. Keto diets therefore lead to weight loss as they make the body burn fat as its primary energy source. On the diet, followers can eat: Meat Leafy greens and most vegetables Full-fat dairy Nuts and seeds Avocadoes and berries Fats, such as coconut oil People cannot eat: Grains, including rice and wheat Sugar, like honey and maple syrup Most fruit White or sweet potatoes Image-conscious Kourtney Kardashian made two attempts at losing weight on the keto diet, but in 2020 confirmed she had given it up for good. She now focuses on well-balanced meals and engaging in regular exercise to achieve a healthy, well-toned body. According to Medical News Today, the keto diet refers to a ketogenic diet, which is a high-fat, adequate-protein, low-carb diet. The main goal of the food plan is to get more calories from protein and fat than from carbs. It works by depleting your body of its store of sugar, so it will start to break down protein and fat for energy, causing ketosis. Ketosis is a metabolic process that involves fat providing most of the fuel for the body, rather than energy coming from foods eaten. Speaking to Health magazine in 2020, Kourtney revealed she had quit the keto diet but confirmed her household remains gluten and dairy-free. She said: 'I noticed that my body changed for the better when I quit the Keto.' 2. ASHTON KUTCHER - THE FRUITARIAN DIET In 2013 Ashton was hospitalized after trying a fruitarian diet in preparation for his role as Steve Jobs in the biopic Jobs. The actor said at the time that he was rushed to hospital before shooting his new movie Jobs about the late entrepreneur after embarking on a fruit-only diet for the biopic, favoured by the Apple co-founder who died of pancreatic cancer in 2011. He told USA Today newspaper at the premiere of the movie at the Sundance Film Festival: 'First of all, the fruitarian diet can lead to like severe issues. 'I went to the hospital like two days before we started shooting the movie. I was doubled over in pain. 'My pancreas levels were like completely out of whack. It was really terrifying... considering everything.' He studied hundreds of hours of footage of Steve for the role and claimed he discovered they had a lot in common. A fruitarian diet is a vegan diet primarily focused on consuming raw fruits, with some variations including nuts, seeds, and some vegetables. It's considered a restrictive eating pattern and may pose nutritional risks if not carefully planned. 5. KATY PERRY - THE M PLAN American singer Katy Perry was thought to have tried a mushroom based diet in a bid to lose weight as far back as 2012. Dubbed the 'M-Plan', the diet was devised to help women lose weight from their tums, bums, thighs and upper arms, but still keep their bust intact. It promised to help women lose weight from the stubborn areas over a 14-day period by replacing just one regular lunchtime snack or dinner with a mushroom inspired dish. Other celebrities to have been linked with the fad include Emmerdale and Waterloo Road star, Roxanne Pallett and Kelly Osbourne, who both previously claimed to have lost dress sizes from eating raw mushrooms regularly. Speaking in 2013, Katy admitted she had cut all junk food out of her diet while shaping up for a forthcoming tour. She told Rolling Stone: 'After this interview I'm going to have a nice healthy breakfast. I'm on a meal plan, which absolutely sucks...' 3. JENNIFER LOPEZ & GWYNETH PALTROW - COLON HYDROTHERAPY It's a treatment that can be traced back to ancient times and has celebrity fans including Jennifer Lopez and Gwyneth Paltrow. But the term colonic irrigation - not the mention what the procedure actually involves - is far from glamorous. In an attempt to make it sound more appealing, the treatment has since been rebranded as 'colonic hydrotherapy'. The practice, which involves flushing the colon with about 60 litres of water via a tube inserted into the rectum, is said to promote health and well-being by ridding the body of toxins. The idea is that for around £90 a time, people can have their digestive tract cleansed and purified leaving them feeling fresh and not bloated with a flatter stomach and renewed energy. Advocating the procedure on her Goop lifestyle website, Gwyneth wrote: 'For the uninitiated, a colonic is essentially a way to hydrate and irrigate your colon – a section of your intestines that's approximately five feet long – by filling it with warm water and then flushing it out repeatedly.' Other celebrity fans reportedly include supermodel Cindy Crawford, TV personality Paris Hilton and R&B singer Beyoncé. But despite its popularity, re-branding, and claims at being good for you, there have been no studies that prove a scientific benefit. 4. GWYNETH PALTROW (AGAIN) - THE GOOP CLEAN PROGRAM The three-week long $475 cleanse was designed by cardiologist and detoxification expert Dr. Alejandro Junger. The program, tried and tested by Paltrow, 'involves an easy-to-follow formula' of daily shakes, supplements, and whole food recipes, and it calls for participants to eliminate soy, dairy, gluten, plant-based protein, refined sugars, grains, several different fruits, and alcohol. The program includes two vegan meal-replacement shakes per day, one 'solid, clean' meal for lunch, and a daily regimen of 24 supplements. According to Gwyneth, the cleanse made her feel 'pure and happy and much lighter', with the Goop founder gushing that the program is 'amazing'. Posting on her Goop lifestyle blog in 2020, she wrote: 'I've used Clean in the past with great results, losing a few pounds and kickstarting a healthier and more energetic New Year.' It's not for everyone, and with good reason, but the prospect of eating 14 jars of baby food a day apparently appealed to the likes of Jennifer Aniston It's not for everyone, and with good reason, but the prospect of eating 14 jars of baby food a day apparently appealed to the likes of Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon. As the name suggests, the Baby Food Diet involves substituting adult foods for soft, spoon fed jars of baby food. Each one contains roughly 80 calories, meaning 14 consumed each day will provide users with a daily intake of around 1,000 calories. The diet be offset with one adult low-calorie meal per day, but the minimal calorie intake calls into question its long-term benefits. Regardless, sales in dry baby food were given a significant 59% boost, while wet baby food sales went up by 20% following claims that Reese Witherspoon had tried the diet. Reports of the diet began to circulate in 2010 when Jennifer was said to be using it to get in shape for her rom-com Just Go With It. Aniston, it was reported, was eating 14 portions of baby food purees a day followed by a grown-up dinner of grilled fish and green vegetables in the evening and had managed to lose 7lbs in a week - not recommended at all. Pictures of her with co-star Brooklyn Decker showed then then 41-year-old Aniston looking every bit as toned as the Sports Illustrated model, 18 years her junior. Cheryl Cole, in preparation for her appearance as a judge on the U.S. version of the X Factor, also reportedly turned to the outrageous diet. 6. NICOLE 'SNOOKI' POLIZZI - THE COOKIE DIET On paper it sounds perfect, but could you really live on a diet of cookies? Originally trademarked by Australian Dr. Sanford Siegal in 1975, the bizarre diet is based on meal replacement... in the form of a biscuit. Featuring ingredients including milk, sugar, eggs, wheat and a 'secret amino acid protein mix' that kerbs hunger pangs, the diet has been tried and tested by a number of celebrities - notably Jersey Shore star Nicole 'Snooki' Polizzi. Snooki reportedly tried the diet in 2010, with the reality TV personality consuming just six 90-calorie cookies and one small meal each day. The diet involves swapping breakfast, lunch and any snacks in between for just six of the brand's special biscuits - available in flavours including butterscotch, cinnamon oatmeal, chocolate brownie, blueberry, banana and maple syrup - or nine of the little 60-calorie ones. You are permitted to eat a healthy, sensible dinner - just so long as your daily calorific intake does not top 1,200 calories. The cookies - which, according to Madonna, made her then-husband Ritchie lose his sex drive in 2008 - are made from fibrous grains such as oats, fruit and amino acids, and the diet claims to help you drop 10lb per month. In 2009, Kim Kardashian publicly denied turning to the diet after an article on named her as a celebrity advocate. 'Not true! I would never do this unhealthy diet! I do QuickTrim!' she tweeted at the time.