
Beyond functionality: Building products people love to use
EVERY APP 'JUST WORKS'
In 2025, AI tools have made functionality table stakes; every product more or less works. The bar for performance has been normalized. From AI code assistants like Cursor to design and prototyping tools like Figma Make, teams can build, design, and iterate at a pace that would've been unthinkable a few years ago. Transcription models like Whisper now produce near-perfect transcripts in real time. Chatbots built on GPT-4o or Claude can answer support queries, onboard users, or summarize meetings with almost no setup. Tasks that once took weeks now happen in days or even hours.
Speed and capability are no longer bottlenecks. As a result, the differentiator isn't what a product does, but how it makes people feel while doing it. In this new landscape, delight isn't a bonus feature. It's the foundation of product love.
This isn't a new idea. The most beloved products have always felt like someone cared deeply about every detail. Jony Ive, reflecting on Apple's design philosophy at the 2025 Stripe Sessions conference, said, 'I believe that when somebody unwrapped that box and took out that cable, and they thought, 'Somebody gave a shit about me,' I think that's a spiritual thing… It did genuinely come from a place of love, and from care.'
In the past, that level of care sat on top of core functionality. Today, in a world where building things is becoming easier, it's what makes products stick.
1. Walk In Users' Shoes (Literally)
In my experience, delight rarely comes from wireframes or metrics alone. Rather, it comes from feeling what users feel. That means looking past mocks and dashboards and into the messy, emotional, very human experience of actually using the product. This is why I encourage our engineers and designers to join support calls, build a personal customer advisory group to test ideas with, and even shadow users in person to truly understand their experience.
You can't capture the sigh after the fourth loading spinner in a survey. You can't measure the hesitation before a confusing click. But by being close to your users, you can hear the catch in someone's voice as they hit a wall, or the quiet 'ohhh' when they finally get something to work. These are the moments that teach you why your product matters (or doesn't).
2. Delight As The Antidote To Bloat
At Rilla, we ship fast, experiment often, and use AI where it helps. But in a world buzzing with AI features, it's tempting to pile on every new capability. Chasing delight helps us stay disciplined. It forces us to ask: Is this actually helping someone? If a feature adds complexity without clarity, it's noise.
True delight is often rooted in simplicity—the kind that makes it instantly obvious what the goal is, and what happens when you get there. It shows up when every element has a purpose, when the interface feels obvious. When people don't just use the product, they get it. That kind of clarity builds trust. And trust is what makes people come back.
3. Turn Chores Into Moments Of Joy
Some parts of a product are expected: forms, checklists, filters. They're not flashy. But they don't have to be painful.
Delight lives in the details: a playful micro-interaction, a smart autofill, a helpful nudge that shows someone's thinking ahead for you. These touches turn a routine task into a moment of progress. The shift is subtle but powerful. It turns 'I have to do this' into 'That was smoother than I expected,' which turns into 'I kind of enjoy doing this.'
When people feel capable, they feel good. And when a product makes someone feel good about themselves, not just the tool, that emotion is sticky. It's why they tell their teammates. It's why they come back.
A NEW FRONTIER FOR CRAFT AND CONNECTION
We're at a rare moment. Thanks to AI, the scaffolding is handled: the boilerplate, the routing logic, the endless setup. That means our time can shift from building what's functional to crafting what's meaningful for the people we're serving.
The real opportunity in this new era isn't just speed. It's space. Space to care more. To notice more. To build with empathy and intentionality. When we obsess over the tiny moments—when someone smiles, breathes easier, or just feels understood—that's where product magic happens.
Let's use this space well. Not just to build faster, but to connect deeper. To move beyond tools that 'work,' and toward experiences that feel personal, joyful, and unforgettable.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
13 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
iPhone 17 Air leak shows off impossibly thin battery — and it's bigger than we thought
We are so close to the launch of Apple's next iPhone generation. The iPhone 17 series is expected to be officially announced next month, and consistent rumors have suggested that there will be an iPhone 17 Air accompanying the usual suspects. A new rumor from reliable leaker Mijan Bu reveals the iPhone 17 Air's battery capacity, which is reportedly 2,900mAh, slightly larger than initially expected. The leak also says the battery is housed in a steel case. Previously, we had heard that Apple's extra-slim phone would have a 2,800mAh battery. Sure, it's only 100mAh difference, but when you're talking about a battery that small (the iPhone 16 uses a 3,561mAh battery, for perspective) any extra juice is a good thing. As scary as a battery that small is, reports indicate that it'll still offer a full day of battery life thanks to improvements in battery life technology and some performance tweaks in iOS 26. Obviously, we'll need to test this for ourselves to see if a battery under 3,000mAh can really meet the demands of iPhone users, but I'm hopeful. The battery is expected to be small, as previous reports have indicated that the phone will be just 5.5mm thick. The iPhone 16 is 7.8mm, so there's a noticeable difference in depth between the current phone and the rumored Air. If Apple manages to get to that rumored thickness, that would just beat the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, which measures 5.8mm. Apple may not be the first to release a thin phone, but it might have the thinnest, which seems to be the way Apple operates. The iPhone 17 Air is rumored to replace the iPhone 16 Plus in Apple's lineup, meaning the company would still release four devices — iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Air, iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The current prevailing rumor has said that Apple will hold its iPhone 17 event between September 8 and 10, so we won't need to wait too long to learn all about the thin iPhone on the horizon.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Apple's $275 Billion China Bet Is Now A Major Risk
Apple sells more than 220 million iPhones a year. By most estimates, nine in ten are made in China. Many of the components in Apple products are made, sourced, and assembled in China. The tech giant reported robust earnings for the three months to June, but the future is cloudy. It has been for some time because of Apple's reliance on China and the increasing tension between China and the US. Tariffs are one manifestation of the growing geopolitical strife. Chief executive Tim Cook told analysts on a conference call that tariffs had already cost Apple $800 million in the previous quarter, and may add $1.1bn in costs to the next quarter. But it is not just the costs that tariffs will add to the Apple supply chain. Apple has nurtured Chinese companies whose products are now highly competitive with the tech giant. In the book Apple in China, the author Patrick McGee reports that Apple pledged in 2016 that over the following five years, it would invest more than $275 billion in China. That pledge was exceeded. The sophisticated supply chain Apple built in the country, with suppliers that Apple nurtured, is now being leveraged by Chinese companies, notably Huawei, to build sophisticated electronics products. Huawei's Mate XT is a more expensive phone with alluring features than the iPhone. Apple isn't expected to match these product capabilities until 2017. Apple has gone from leadership in design in this market, with the margins to match, to having serious competition. How could Apple have been so stupid? A fundamental concept of risk management is that you don't put all your eggs in one basket. Patrick McGee explains how this came to be in his outstanding book. McGee interviewed over 200 people, mostly Apple employees, to provide insights on this 'famously secretive company.' Apple's Historic Supply Chain Historically, Apple manufactured its own products across several regions. In 1983, Apple opened a highly automated plant in Fremont, California, to produce the first Macintosh computers. Apple established a presence in Europe with a plant in Cork, Ireland. This plant, which opened in 1980, later manufactured customized Macintosh computers for European markets. This is the historic way of hedging your bets and managing risk. Apple understood this principle. But as contract manufacturing emerged as an alternative to a company owning its own manufacturing plants, Apple experimented with this model and achieved positive outcomes. The theory behind contract manufacturing is that companies should focus on what they do best, their core competencies. In Apple's case, that was design. Initially, they were working with American firms and had plants in the US. But Taiwanese headquartered Foxconn proved to have better capabilities than its US rivals, and Foxconn won an increasing share of Apple's final assembly business. You can still practice effective risk management using contract manufacturers with plants in different regions of the world. Foxconn, at Apple's behest, did experiment with manufacturing in other regions of the world in addition to China. But Foxconn, a tremendously harsh taskmaster when it comes to their labor force, struggled to achieve the same level of quality, cost, and scalability anywhere but in their facilities in mainland China. Foxconn then committed to relying on production based in China. As Foxconn delivered better results than its competitors, they gained a larger and larger share of Apple's business. Apple's Strategy in Procurement Apple does not believe in win/win procurement or vested outsourcing. McGee points out that the iPhone accounts for fewer than 20% of smartphones sold globally, yet it garners more than 80% of industry profits. 'In no other market does a minority player command this kind of dominance.' 'Insofar as this statistic was discussed at all, it was chalked up to Apple's brand appeal.' This is not entirely true, says McGee. Apple was able to get suppliers to work for a pittance. As the design leader, suppliers came to believe that other electronics OEMs would copy the cutting-edge features in Apple phones and that they would be the leading contenders to win deals with Apple's competitors. These deals would command much higher margins. The Taiwanese contract manufacturer Foxconn was the first to come to this conclusion. They bet big on this model. And they grew to be the world's largest contract manufacturer based on this bet. A Different Approach to Contract Manufacturing Companies can differentiate their products in different ways. Differentiation can be based on price, a broad set of product choices, service, or market-leading product capabilities. Being on the cutting edge of design is how Apple has always differentiated itself. This led to a fundamentally different kind of supply chain for Apple. Apple's electronics rivals sell a limited number of units across dozens of different models per year. The follow-the-leader strategy employed by these companies was based on using standardized parts with wider tolerances. 'But Apple was different,' McGee wrote. 'Apple's product portfolio remained radically simplified. Even by 2015, Apple was only releasing two new iPhones a year. They were hand crafting luxury phones but doing it in mass market quantities. In their search for suppliers, Apple gravitated toward quality, not price. To reach that quality, Apple had to come up with new processes to make the phones; but until Apple chose a new design these processes wouldn't exist. So it had to work far more intimately with suppliers.' This supplier intimacy model included designing and purchasing the equipment that the suppliers used. This is very different from standard contract manufacturing, where the contract manufacturer purports to have better manufacturing capabilities than the companies they work for, and their clients take a hands-off approach to managing production. 'Apple took extraordinary control over its suppliers to ensure it was getting the appropriate prices,' McGee explained. 'It demanded access to every detail about the suppliers' operating costs, from the wages of its workers and the cost of its dormitories to the bill of materials and expense of the machinery.' Apple also procured components on behalf of the suppliers. 'In fact, Apple often had a better sense of the supplier's operation costs than the supplier itself.' And as Foxconn concentrated on manufacturing in China, an industrial cluster of suppliers would grow up around these plants. Apple engineers would teach these suppliers, competing suppliers for different components, how to do quality manufacturing on a huge scale. China Subsidized Manufacturing in China Foxconn concentrated on manufacturing in China not just because of the low wages of the Chinese workers, but because the state subsidized and promoted export-led production in numerous ways. If you want to build a new factory in the US or Europe, obtaining the necessary building permits and complying with other regulations can take years. In China, authorities could make this happen in months. China would give Foxconn and some of the suppliers the land on which the factories would be built and then build the road infrastructure at no cost to Foxconn or their suppliers. Initially, China even bought new machine tools for companies like Foxconn. Local regions often lacked the necessary workers. China facilitated getting these workers from other, poorer regions of the nation. Are there rules about the number of hours workers are allowed to work, overtime, or environmental compliance? China prioritized building a sophisticated manufacturing base over the enforcement of these pesky regulations. Apple Has Been Captured by China McGee concludes that for Apple to extricate itself from production in China will be tremendously difficult. Suppliers with the requisite skills don't exist in other regions, and there is no guarantee that China will permit its indigenous suppliers to produce outside the country. The Chinese government can also make diversification painful. Beijing has deployed a number of tactics against other companies to make this point. Electricity suddenly becomes available for only a few hours a day. Raw materials can be stopped before they arrive at the factory. McGee concludes that there is no way Apple could diversify from China in any meaningful way within the next five years. 'It's just impossible.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Anthropic cuts off OpenAI's access to its Claude models
Anthropic has revoked OpenAI's access to its Claude family of AI models, according to a report in Wired. Sources told Wired that OpenAI was connecting Claude to internal tools that allowed the company to compare Claude's performance to its own models in categories like coding, writing, and safety. TechCrunch has reached out to Anthropic and OpenAI for comment. In a statement to Wired, an Anthropic spokesperson said, 'OpenAI's own technical staff were also using our coding tools ahead of the launch of GPT-5,' which is apparently 'a direct violation of our terms of service.' (Anthropic's commercial terms forbid companies from using Claude to build competing services.) However, Anthropic also said it would continue to give OpenAI access for 'benchmarking and safety evaluations.' Meanwhile, an OpenAI spokesperson said, 'While we respect Anthropic's decision to cut off our API access, it's disappointing considering our API remains available to them.' Anthropic executives had already shown resistance to providing access to competitors, with Chief Science Officer Jared Kaplan previously justifying the company's decision to cut off Windsurf (a rumored OpenAI acquisition target, subsequently acquired by Cognition) by saying, 'I think it would be odd for us to be selling Claude to OpenAI.' Sign in to access your portfolio