Judicial review begins over special needs bailout
Last year, Bristol City Council entered into a deal with the Department for Education to receive extra money to help pay off a financial deficit caused by an increase in demand for special educational needs provision, or SEND.
As part of the agreement, known as a Safety Valve, the council agreed to reign in its spending, which parents feared would lead to less support for their children.
Bristol City Council said it would not comment on the case while proceedings were ongoing.
In the last few years, there has been a large increase in the number of children designated as having special educational needs in Bristol.
This has led to spiralling costs, as the council has struggled to find suitable school places for children with education, health and care plans (EHCP), which it is legally obliged to provide.
Thirty seven other councils around the country have entered into Safety Valve deals with the Department for Education.
Bristol City Council stands to get £54m over seven years, but this equates to a 25% cut in its spending on SEND.
The council was previously found to have broken the law by a judge in 2018, who ruled that cuts to its SEND budget then were illegal.
The case has been brought by Watkins Solicitors, who are representing a family from Bristol.
Managing partner of Watkins, Beverly Watkins, told the BBC: "It is so difficult, many of these parents had to give up work, they're looking after kids 24-hours-a-day.
"They don't want a golden ticket or special treatment, all they want is appropriate provision to meet the needs of their children.
"There is a chronic shortage of special schools and the idea that you can simply place the kids in mainstream schools is not a good one and will not work."
SEND campaigner Jen Smith said: "Bristol has a really long history of not getting this right.
"We're all very concerned because it will affect children now and in the future, the impact could be devastating," she added.
A judgement in the case is expected later this year.
Follow BBC Bristol on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Council to receive £53m bailout for SEND services
Council's SEND bailout plan criticised by charity
Council admits SEND children not having needs met
HM Courts and Tribunals Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opelousas residents begin early voting on sales tax renewal
OPELOUSAS, La. () — The special election to decide the fate of a 1% sales tax that has been in place for over 50 years in Opelousas, has been a major topic of discussion throughout the year. Now, residents have the chance to let their opinions be heard as early voting has officially begun. The 1% sales tax provides the city with just under $6 million a year and goes towards road work, infrastructure repair and also the salaries of city workers, including first responders. City officials have warned residents that the loss of that revenue can result in many of these employees having to lose their jobs. 'If you vote, 'No', then you say, 'Lay off the officers. Lay off your firefighters. Lay off the ones that we just gave a raise to that work for the city every day.' That's what you're saying. That's what you're saying to the families that are living off of this income. 'Prepare yourself to be laid off,'' Alderman at Large Marvin Richard said. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now With early voting beginning on August 2, registrar of voters Byron Stelly says 46 residents have shown up to vote in person and 164 residents have mailed in their ballots. While many residents are yet to vote, members of the city council including councilman John Guilbeaux have voiced how important the sales tax is to the city. Guilbeaux says, 'This is detrimental to the city and the citizens of Opelousas. You take away $6 million from the city's operating functions. You think things are bad? It's going to be a lot worse,' said Guilbeaux. Early voting is currently taking place and the special election for the sales tax renewal is scheduled for August 16. Latest news Typical August Weather for the Next Week With Low Rain Chances… Vermilion Parish enhances emergency response with new AEDs Six arrested for shooting at Cheneyville memorial service in June Opelousas residents begin early voting on sales tax renewal US economy on 'precipice of recession,' Moody's chief economist warns Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
10 hours ago
- CBS News
Baltimore County Council expected to decide on next inspector general Monday
The Baltimore County Council is set to vote at 6 p.m. Monday on whether to confirm Khadija Walker as the county's next inspector general, a decision that has sparked public debate and scrutiny. County Executive Kathy Klausmeier nominated Walker to replace current Inspector General Kelly Madigan, who founded the office five years ago. If the council rejects Walker's nomination, Madigan will remain in the role. In May 2025, Klausmeier notified Madigan that the county would reopen the inspector general position and invited her to reapply. Though legal, the move drew criticism from Madigan's supporters, who say it threatens the office's independence. Klausmeier defended the process in a memo last week, saying it followed a new, voter-approved amendment to the county charter. The Inspector General Selection Panel conducted interviews and recommended the most qualified candidates, according to Klausmeier. "In December 2023, this same County Council passed a charter amendment that put this process in the Baltimore County charter," Klausmeier wrote. "This process — which names the county executive as the appointing authority — was passed unanimously by this council and, subsequently, Baltimore County voters." Klausmeier said she preferred an open, competitive search over automatic reappointment. Madigan reapplied and participated in the process. Some residents argue that Madigan is more qualified, citing her investigative background. They have raised concerns that Walker, whose experience is primarily in auditing, lacks sufficient investigative credentials. Others pointed to Walker's nearly 200-mile commute from Fredericksburg, Virginia. Walker addressed the issue at a recent council meeting, saying, "Residency wasn't a requirement for the job. And I don't think it will interfere with me at all getting to work." Last week, supporters of Madigan rallied outside the Baltimore County Courthouse, urging the council to retain her. They credited her with increasing transparency and accountability since launching the office. Amid the controversy, Councilman Izzy Patoka proposed creating an Inspector General Appointment Board. The independent, seven-member body would select future inspector generals without direct influence from county officials. Patoka said the measure aims to reduce political pressure in the appointment process. If approved by at least five council members, the proposal would appear as a ballot question in the November 2026 election. In the fiscal year 2025 Inspector General Report, Madigan reflected on the office's progress. "Since this may be my last time issuing this report, I thought it would be appropriate to reflect on how far the office has come during my first term," she wrote. Madigan noted her early focus on outreach, establishing infrastructure, and building public trust. She cited achievements including the launch of a complaint line, hiring staff, and releasing the office's first investigative report in August 2020. Since then, the office has handled more than 1,000 complaints, initiated over 100 investigations, and issued more than 50 public reports, according to Madigan.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Where do Charlotte City Council candidates stand on new transportation tax?
A majority of Charlotte City Council candidates said on Saturday they support the proposed 1-cent countywide sales tax referendum expected to land on voters' ballots this fall. Two candidates said they did not support the measure, while a handful of others declined to take a firm stance. The referendum would raise billions of dollars to overhaul the region's transportation system by expanding rail lines, addressing a backlog of road projects and improving the bus system. Critics argue the tax won't benefit all people equally and could have unintended consequences. Eighteen candidates who face primary elections in September spoke on Aug. 2 during a forum hosted by the Black Political Caucus of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. At least five incumbents, including five new candidates said they supported the tax. The issue hits close to home for at-large Councilwoman Dimple Ajmera. Her family relied on public transportation to travel to work, school and everything in between, she said. 'Our public transit system is broken. It is not safe. It is not reliable,' Ajmera said. 'We can't afford to have this kind of system that fails working families. Not everyone has a car in the city of Charlotte.' The tax is estimated to raise $20 billion over the next 30 years. If passed, 40% of the new money would go toward road projects, 20% to the region's bus system and 40% to transit projects, including rail. A 27-person board of trustees will lead a newly established public transportation authority to oversee the funds. The Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners will vote Aug. 6 on whether to place the referendum on ballots in November. Ajmera's fellow at-large council members James 'Smuggie' Mitchell and LaWana Mayfield, District 1 councilwoman Dante Anderson and District 5 councilwoman Marjorie Molina also backed the tax. City council will be responsible for appointing some of the trustees on the transit authority. Mayfield advocated for an interview process so council members can get a better idea of who is the right fit for the role. Challengers who supported the tax include District 3 candidate Montravias King; District 4 candidate Wil Russell; and at-large candidates Matt Britt, Will Holley and Namrata Yadav. Yadav said she would ensure the transportation authority has trustees who actually ride public transit and contractors that are from the communities being served by public transportation. 'Do I think it's perfect? No. But do I think this investment is required for a city, especially a city that's the 14th largest in the country? Yes, it is,' Yadav said. 'We need to act like a big city. We need this transit to go through. We need to make sure it goes through in a very accountable way.' Only 2 Charlotte City Council candidates stand against new transportation tax District 5 candidate J.D. Mazuera Arias was the first person to break from the pack and oppose the referendum. People in his district feel they would be left out of the plan, he said. The Metropolitan Transit Committee in May selected a transit plan that would expand train lines across the county but leave most of east Charlotte untouched. The plan builds the Red Line commuter rail from uptown to Lake Norman-area towns, extends the Blue Line to Carolina Place in Pineville, extends the Gold Line streetcar from the Rosa Parks Community Transit Center to Eastland, builds the Silver Line from Charlotte-Douglas International Airport to Bojangles Coliseum and includes improvements to the bus system. Molina, the District 5 incumbent who is facing Mazuera Arias in a head-to-head campaign, supported the plan. Her district stretches nearly to Cabarrus County, which raises questions of feasibility. 'There is no way to get rail out there,' Molina said. At-large candidate J.G. Lockhart was the only other person to oppose the 1-cent tax. The plan is not equitable for Charlotte, he said, which accounts for the overwhelming majority of Mecklenburg County residents and will therefore carry the tax burden to the benefit of neighboring towns like Pineville and Huntersville. 'We want to Band-Aid Charlotteans with a few more bus routes and microtransit. It's not gonna work,' Lockhart said. 'It is not for Charlotte. I promise you that.' Citing displacement, candidates remain neutral on 1-cent sales tax Six candidates stayed neutral, including District 1 candidate Charlene Henderson El, District 3 incumbent Tiawana Brown and challengers Joi Mayo and Warren Turner and District 4 incumbent Renee Perkins-Johnson. Incumbent councilwoman Victoria Watlington was the only person in a crowded pool of at-large candidates who remained neutral or undecided. 'We have always got to make sure that we are not putting in front of the community false choices,' said Watlington, who formerly served District 3 in west Charlotte, where concerns about displacement are especially strong. 'We need to make sure that we work with you to ensure that the plan that's on the table is the best plan for us, not just a good enough plan.' Mayo said west Charlotte does need more investment in transportation infrastructure, but the threat of displacement from the 1-cent tax plan gives her pause. The Silver Line that would run down West Boulevard means that some of Charlotte's most vulnerable residents could be forced to move if the city doesn't come up with a mitigation plan, she said. Mayo suggested the city set aside land for affordable housing and invest in workforce development initiatives to help people in the area who might be affected. King, who is running against Mayo in District 3, said that although the plan is not perfect and will likely uproot some people, the city has 'tools in our toolbox' to address displacement. He was the first candidate to throw firm support behind the referendum Saturday. 'Our city cannot afford to do nothing,' King said. Solve the daily Crossword
