logo
Businesses to notify government about ransom payments in cyber crime crackdown

Businesses to notify government about ransom payments in cyber crime crackdown

The Home Office's proposals come after Marks & Spencer has refused to say if it paid a ransom to hackers in a major attack earlier this year.
New measures would ban public sector bodies and operators of critical national infrastructure from paying ransom demands to hackers.
The Home Office said this would help 'smash the cyber criminal business model' and make UK public services and businesses a less attractive target for ransomware groups.
Nearly three-quarters of respondents involved in a public consultation, opened in January, showed support for the proposal, it said.
Furthermore, under the proposals, businesses not covered by the ban would be required to notify the government if they intended to pay a ransom.
The Government hopes this would allow it to give affected businesses advice and support, including alerting them if such a payment would risk breaking the law by sending money to sanctioned cyber criminal groups, many of whom are based in Russia.
Ransomware refers to software used by cyber criminals to access the computer systems of its victims, which can then be encrypted or data stolen until a ransom is paid.
M&S was targeted by hackers in April, forcing it to shut down its website for six weeks and costing the business an estimated £300 million.
Co-op's hackers accessed data from all 6.5 million of its members (Co-op/PA)
Co-op also had to shut off parts of its IT systems after a cyber attack that resulted in all 6.5 million of its members' personal data being stolen – including names, addresses and contact information.
M&S's chair Archie Norman said earlier this month that the hack was believed to be instigated by hacking group Scattered Spider and an Asia-based ransomware operation named DragonForce.
He refused to say whether or not the retailer had paid a ransomware demand following the attack, but said the 'damage had been done' once its systems were compromised.
Security minister Dan Jarvis said: 'Ransomware is a predatory crime that puts the public at risk, wrecks livelihoods and threatens the services we depend on.
'That's why we're determined to smash the cyber criminal business model and protect the services we all rely on as we deliver our plan for change.'
The chief executive of the British Library, Rebecca Lawrence, said it had been the 'victim of a devastating ransomware attack in October 2023'.
'The attack destroyed our technology infrastructure and continues to impact our users, however, as a public body, we did not engage with the attackers or pay the ransom,' she said.
'Instead, we are committed to sharing our experiences to help protect other institutions affected by cyber crime and build collective resilience for the future.'
Co-op's chief executive Shirine Khoury-Haq said she welcomed the Government's proposals, adding: 'We know first-hand the damage and disruption cyber attacks cause to businesses and communities.'
The package of measures could also result in the introduction of a mandatory reporting regime, which would give law enforcement greater intelligence to track down perpetrators, according to the Home Office.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Urgent reformation' of property tax needed to revitalise market
'Urgent reformation' of property tax needed to revitalise market

BreakingNews.ie

time4 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

'Urgent reformation' of property tax needed to revitalise market

The Irish Property Owners' Association (IPOA) has said there is an urgent reformation of property taxation needed in Budget 2026 to revitalise the property market. In its pre-budget submission for 2026, the IPOA proposed a number of practical measures to "level the playing field" for landlords and make the rental market more sustainable. Advertisement The association's key asks include: Taxing rental income the same as income to a trading business; Abolishing close company surcharge; Increasing the number of allowable claims under the Residential Property Rental Income Relief (RPRIR); Expanding the range of expenses for tax deductibility for landlords, including Local Property Tax. Despite the fact that many small landlords are dependent on rental income as their main income and business, business expenses in the rental industry are treated differently to other industries, the IPOA said. The association said changes such as affording landlords the same access to tax deductible expenses as sole traders and allowing Local Property Tax as a business expense would go a long way to rejuvenating viability of the market. The IPOA also backs a tiered relief system for RPRIR allowance that reflects the reality of the market. As of Q4 2024, 72% of all landlords had only one or two tenancies, and 79%, or 83,031 had 3 tenancies or fewer. As such, allowing the RPRIR credit to be claimed for up to two or three tenancies would provide a benefit for the vast majority of landlords, the IPOA said. Advertisement The IPOA is also calling for the Government to introduce a limited, trial-based investment scheme aimed at attracting individual investment into the rental sector, taking learnings from the overextension and unsuitability of previous tax relief schemes. Chair of the IPOA, Mary Conway, said: 'It is clear that radical changes are needed to stabilise the apprehension in external investment in the Irish property market and to accelerate progress in housing delivery. "As the national voice for private residential property owners, the Irish Property Owners' Association has a deep knowledge of the sector, and we believe that these proposals are urgently needed to inject fresh energy to the market. "With uncertainty, rising costs and inflation, it is imperative to reform taxation of landlords in recognition that letting of residential property is a legitimate and important business activity. Meaningful supports, incentives for investors, and fair tax treatment will go a long way towards stabilising the rental supply, and in turn, controlling rising rents."

Corbyn throws his weight behind striking Birmingham bin workers
Corbyn throws his weight behind striking Birmingham bin workers

North Wales Chronicle

time6 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Corbyn throws his weight behind striking Birmingham bin workers

A day after Birmingham City Council said it had launched contempt of court proceedings against the Unite trade union over the all-out strike which began in March, Mr Corbyn said central government was underfunding local authorities. Addressing more than 100 workers and other protesters at a 'mega-picket' event outside a council refuse depot in the Tyseley area, the MP for Islington North, told the crowd: 'It wasn't the Birmingham bin workers that spent ludicrous amounts of money on the Commonwealth Games. 'And it wasn't the bin workers who created any of the problems that Birmingham faces. They are the people that keep this city clean. 'I am here today to support you but also to make this point. 'Birmingham is not isolated and Birmingham is not alone – the financial issues that affect Birmingham are actually there in almost every local authority in the country, particularly in the big urban cities. 'And those problems are that they have not enough money. The Government is not spending enough money on local government.' Mr Corbyn warned: 'Local government services are under pressure and in many cases, even without the Birmingham model, still facing cuts. 'If we win in Birmingham and they are not allowed to cut wages, not allowed to destroy conditions, not allowed to damage the working rights of bin workers, that's a huge victory. 'But if we lose, think which city is going to be next. 'That is the point. And so I say to the wider community – get behind the Birmingham bin workers.' The second, so-called mega-picket, with speakers from other trade unions, following a similar event in May, involved members of 26 organisations protesting at fives sites in Birmingham and Coventry on Friday. The city council said on Thursday night that it had had 'persistent evidence' of a breach of a court order previously agreed with Unite. A city council spokesperson said: 'We are taking this step to ensure the safety of our city and the safety of our workforce, including those who are on strike. 'Our injunction prevents the blocking of our refuse collection vehicles, both at our depots and on the streets. Despite writing repeatedly to Unite for several weeks to highlight what we believe to be clear breaches of the injunction, the situation has worsened. 'Since the injunction was granted, vehicles have been blockaded on roads to and from our depots, with Unite representatives and members stepping in front of, and even leaning against, moving heavy vehicles and blocking road junctions.' A Unite spokesperson said: 'The court application is the latest distraction from the real task of resolving the ongoing dispute. 'The court papers will be subject to a careful review and the interests of Unite and our members will be fully represented at any future hearing.' Speaking after his speech, Mr Corbyn urged the leader of Labour-run Birmingham City Council, John Cotton, not to dig himself into a hole and to settle the dispute. Mr Corbyn said: 'There has to be a settlement and they should not be facing a wage cut. 'We just don't need to stretch this thing out.' Asked what his message to Mr Cotton would be, he added: 'John, get a deal. Get a settlement, get the bin workers back to work. 'And remember, a lot of the public support the bin workers even though obviously it (the strike) does create difficulties.'

Asylum seeker ‘faked baby with European' to win right to stay
Asylum seeker ‘faked baby with European' to win right to stay

Telegraph

time7 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Asylum seeker ‘faked baby with European' to win right to stay

An asylum seeker won the right to stay in Britain after using fake birth and death certificates to claim he had a baby, an immigration court heard. Sameer Khan, a Pakistani citizen, presented the forged documents to a tribunal as part of his bid to stay in the UK, judges were told. He used the certificates to successfully argue the child proved his marriage to a European citizen was not one of 'convenience' but a genuine relationship, which therefore gave him the right to remain in Britain. But the Home Office has since uncovered evidence that the documents presented to the court to support his case were fake, throwing into doubt whether the child had ever been born. After the accusation of fraud, Mr Khan's case will now be heard again after judges were told his alleged dishonesty undermines his entire case to stay in Britain. An upper immigration tribunal was told Mr Khan had applied for leave to remain under the European Union settlement scheme after claiming to have married an EEA citizen – named at the hearing as Ms Rumenova – in Cyprus in August 2020. The Home Office refused the application on the basis that there were 'reasonable grounds for suspicion that the marriage was entered into for the purpose of securing leave to remain, and so was a marriage of convenience', the tribunal was told. Mr Khan appealed, and a hearing of a first-tier tribunal in November 2024 presided over by Judge Sarah Farmer was shown documents 'said to establish cohabitation and the relationship'. 'There was also a birth certificate for a child, 'AK', said to have been born in the United Kingdom on 10 August 2023 in Slough, County of Berkshire,' the tribunal was told. '[Mr Khan] and [Ms Rumenova] were named on the birth certificate as the parents of AK.' But the couple did not attend the asylum hearing, the tribunal heard, having emailed to say that the baby had died the week before. 'The Judge recorded in the Decision that [they] had emailed the Tribunal on the morning of the hearing, to say their child, AK... had died in the week before the hearing, and so they could not attend the hearing,' the tribunal said. Later that day, the judge was emailed a death certificate, saying the child had died of epilepsy related seizures and vomiting on Nov 15 2024, at Wexham Park Hospital in Slough, and the death had been registered on Nov 18 2024, the same day as the hearing. Judge Farmer allowed Mr Khan's appeal against the Home Office's decision to deny him leave to remain after finding that there was a 'wealth of reliable evidence', including the birth and death certificates, to show the relationship was not one of convenience. Document authenticity concerns After officials made checks, the registry office confirmed the birth and death certificates were forgeries. As a result, upper tribunal judges Daniel Sheridan and Hannah Graves said the evidence undermined the original ruling. They said there was 'sufficient' evidence to establish that there are 'legitimate concerns about whether those documents are genuine and capable of reliance'. 'We therefore find that the Judge was led into error, albeit inadvertently. We find that error was material and infects the credibility assessment made by the Judge, which was central to the findings of fact made and the outcome of the appeal,' they said. 'We therefore do not preserve any findings made in the Decision but set it aside in its entirety. The matter is now remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing, before another judge than Judge Farmer.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store