Chaos to coordination: the evolution of POW swaps in the Russia-Ukraine war
While ceasefire and peace negotiations have gone through periods of halts and bursts, increasingly institutionalized prisoner exchanges are one of the few enduring areas of direct cooperation between Ukraine and the Russian Federation.
On average, Ukraine and Russia exchanged 135 prisoners — mostly military, but with a sizable civilian component – each month from February 2022 through May 2025 (excluding the planned 1,000 for 1,000 exchange that began on May 23). But a deeper inspection of the data reveals a number of meaningful trends.
Prisoner exchange numbers have surged — 277 individuals changed hands in April, and this weekend alone, 1,000 brave Ukrainians will come home. The picture is unrecognizable from last year, when prisoners were only returned on special occasions and holidays. Prisoner exchanges have been shaped by competing (and sometimes mutually exclusive) priorities including backchannel logistics, battlefield developments, and geopolitics. New data collected by KI Insights, an analytical research unit backed by the Kyiv Independent, gives a look behind the curtain into the institutionalization of prisoner exchanges.
The full-scale invasion brought two meaningful institutional changes to prisoner exchanges. Firstly, Russia became an official party to the conflict, creating room to directly engage in negotiations. (Before the full-scale invasion, the Russian Federation denied its involvement in aggression in Ukraine, and negotiations were done through Russian-backed proxies in occupied Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.)
Secondly, Ukraine created the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, an interagency working group created by the Cabinet of Ministers in March of 2022, which is responsible for prisoner exchanges. Since its creation, the Coordination Headquarters has gone through meaningful changes. Roles and responsibilities have changed hands, priorities have been defined, and each agency has a specific process it is responsible for. Kyrylo Budanov, leader of the Coordination Headquarters (since June of 2022, taking over from Iryna Vereshchuk) and Ukraine's chief of military intelligence, has successfully turned prisoner exchanges into an institution.
Data collected by KI Insights demonstrates the impact of institutionalization. The average number of prisoners swapped per exchange has steadily increased, growing by approximately 50% each year. The number of swaps, however, has been inconsistent, with frequent breakdowns until late last year. In 2022, an average of 50 prisoners were returned to Ukraine per exchange. In 2025, the number has risen to more than 200, with this weekend's exchanges driving the number higher.
The Istanbul negotiations failed to achieve a ceasefire, proving once again, Russia does not want peace. But for the prisoners who returned home, they were meaningful. The exchange also underscores an interesting dynamic of this war. There are lines of communication between Ukraine and Russia, and enough trust between officials to work together to return prisoners home. That is significant — the current frontline in Ukraine is more than 1,200 kilometers long, and any ceasefire will require significant amounts of communication and trust between Ukrainian and Russian officials.
Russia has broken off prisoner exchanges at key points over the war, often when Russia thinks it can inflict maximum psychological damage. Following the siege of Mariupol and Ukraine's unsuccessful counteroffensive, Russia froze prisoner exchanges. Russian soldiers also tortured and killed Ukrainian prisoners of war at Olenivka Prison and on the battlefield. Refusing to return prisoners is a tactic Russia uses to exploit existing divisions in Ukrainian society and exploit the pain of families of the imprisoned as a political resource.
For Russia, prisoners are resources — for psychological warfare and for bargaining. While pressure from the United States hasn't brought Russia to the table for a ceasefire, it likely has caused Russian President Vladimir Putin to make a show of reasonableness by agreeing to a prisoner exchange.
The latest exchange is historic and could be a tipping point that helps U.S. President Donald Trump realize that U.S. pressure on Russia makes a difference. It could also solidify the shadowy infrastructure built between warring states and set the stage for an all-for-all prisoner exchange. Maybe it could, as Trump puts it, 'lead to something big???' Even if it doesn't, it is a battle won on the road to returning Ukrainians to Ukraine.
Read also: BREAKING: Ukraine, Russia hold largest prisoner swap since start of Russia's war
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
21 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Russia says it will stop abiding by missile treaty
The US Defense Department did not immediately comment on the Foreign Ministry's statement Monday. The 1987 pact, also known as the INF Treaty, banned ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (311 to 3,418 miles). As a result, more than 2,600 Soviet and US missiles were eliminated, in what was seen as a Cold War breakthrough. In 2019, during President Trump's first term, the United States pulled out of the agreement. The Trump administration argued that Russia had long been violating the treaty with the deployment of 9M729 cruise missiles, also known as SSC-8 missiles. Russia denied any knowledge of the violations. Advertisement Accusations of Russian violations date to 2014, when the Obama administration raised them. Moscow's announcement Monday came three days after Trump ordered the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines in response to a nuclear threat made online by Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president who is deputy chair of the country's security council. In a post on social media platform X later Monday, Medvedev highlighted the Foreign Ministry's announcement, which he blamed on what he called the anti-Russia policy of NATO countries, and he warned, 'Expect further steps.' Advertisement The ministry's statement did not mention Moscow's use in November of the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile against a city in Ukraine. The Oreshnik has a range that violates the INF Treaty. Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed Friday that the Oreshnik had entered service and would be deployed to Belarus, which shares a border with three NATO countries. The missile is capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Last year, the United States announced that Washington would begin 'episodic deployments' of intermediate-range missiles in Germany starting in 2026. Russia vowed countermeasures. The announced collapse of the INF Treaty and tensions with Russia over Ukraine have raised worries in the West of a return to a dangerous Cold War-style arms race, in which extremely fast Russian missiles armed with nuclear weapons could reach European capitals in a matter of minutes, with little warning or ability to mount a defense. Russian news media have bragged that the Oreshnik could reach Ramstein Air Base in Germany in just 15 minutes. Upon withdrawing from the INF Treaty, the United States said that, essentially, Washington had been adhering to the pact's restrictions unilaterally. By then, the Pentagon had grown uncomfortable with the treaty's limits. Adhering to the pact meant the United States could not deploy any midrange missiles in Asia, which would be a crucial part of any effort to defend Taiwan, the self-governing island that China has long claimed as its own. In its statement Monday, Russia's Foreign Ministry said that as the United States and its allies were moving toward the deployment of intermediate-range missiles in Europe and Asia, conditions for what it called its 'unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons' were no longer in place. Advertisement The statement came as Trump's special envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, prepared to visit Moscow this week to discuss possibilities for peace with Ukraine. Trump has threatened to apply tariffs on Russia and secondary tariffs on its oil buyers if Putin doesn't agree to a ceasefire by the end of the week. The Kremlin has refrained from issuing threats in response, in contrast to the remarks by Medvedev, who regularly makes bombastic comments online and isn't seen as speaking for Putin. On Monday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov played down Trump's decision to reposition submarines. 'Russia treats the issue of nuclear nonproliferation with great care, and we believe everyone should be extremely cautious with nuclear rhetoric,' Peskov told reporters. He noted that US submarines were regularly on combat duty. 'We don't believe this is a case of any sort of escalation,' he said. The only major arms control agreement left in place between Moscow and Washington is the New START Treaty, but Putin announced in 2023 that Russia was suspending its participation in that pact. The treaty expires next year. Phil Breedlove, a retired US Air Force general who led US European Command from 2013-16, said he wasn't surprised that Russia had announced the move shortly after Trump threatened to get tough on Moscow over the conflict in Ukraine. 'This is a fairly standard approach Russia takes when they're trying to deter or intimidate the West,' Breedlove said. 'Every time the West considers a change, like giving new weapons to Ukraine, this is what happens.' Advertisement
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump administration escalates probes of rivals with Russia grand jury
The Trump administration's launch of a grand jury probe into Obama-era officials marks an escalation in its use of the justice system to go after political adversaries, amid mounting pressure to release the Epstein files. It's the first sign the Justice Department is acting on criminal referrals made by Trump intelligence officials, including after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused officials of a 'treasonous conspiracy' related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The documents released by her office, however, do not appear to back that claim, instead largely showing officials discussing what they acknowledged shortly after the election — that Russia was never able to manipulate vote totals. Nonetheless, the White House broke with the practice of maintaining secrecy around grand jury proceedings, confirming the probe in pointing to 'the compelling case' outlined by Gabbard, which they argue 'exposed clear and blatant weaponization by corrupt intelligence officials acting at the behest of the Democrat Party and likely former President Obama.' The White House further argues the Obama officials 'worked to sabotage the Trump administration.' 'It doesn't get more serious than this. This is a criminal conspiracy. The evidence is clear there's a criminal conspiracy here and nobody is above the law,' Mike Davis, an ally of President Trump who runs The Article III Project, said on Fox News. The administration's attempts to focus attention on the Russia findings come as Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi face pressure, including from many Republicans, to release more information related to the case of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Among the possible targets are former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who in a joint op-ed blasted the accusations against them as 'patently false' while falsely minimizing Russia's 2016 efforts. 'Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election,' the two wrote. 'Contrary to the Trump administration's wild and baseless claims, there was no mention of 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the assessment,' they added. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said beyond Clapper and Brennan, he also made referrals for former FBI Director James Comey as well as Hillary Clinton. Critics argue that launching a grand jury probe is yet another instance of Trump weaponizing the government against his political foes. He has previously revoked security details from those he disagrees with, targeted universities that do not align with his administration's policies and gone after law firms with ties to Democrats. And over the weekend, the Office of the Special Counsel acknowledged a probe into former special counsel Jack Smith. The court action quickly prompted criticism that the Trump administration was abusing the Justice Department. 'Trump – 'the hunted' – has indeed become the hunter – facts and law, be damned. These folks are using the court of law to shape the court of public opinion. They're also making a mockery of grand jury secrecy rules, which are in part designed to protect uncharged individuals,' Anthony Coley, who served as a spokesman for the Obama Justice Department, wrote on X. The probe comes after Bondi announced the creation of a 'Strike Force' to investigate claims related to the 2016 election. It's not clear where the grand jury has been empaneled — a detail that could matter in the Democrat-heavy jury pool of Washington, D.C., which might be skeptical of claims of wrongdoing in an election Trump won. It's also not clear what conduct it might be exploring. Republicans have, at turns, accused intelligence officials of lying to Congress in the prior reviews of Russia's interference in the 2016 election and the intelligence community response. But the documents supplied by Gabbard — which accuse leaders of 'suppression of intelligence' — largely show figures like Clapper discussing how Russia was not able to manipulate the vote even as the adversary tried to sow chaos in the 2016 election. Gabbard also released a previously classified House Intelligence Committee Republican assessment that called into question whether Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help Trump win; however, all assessments found the country was seeking to impact the election. Trump on Tuesday denied that he had any involvement in the Justice Department's decision to open a grand jury investigation, though he has not hidden his approval of the move. 'Pam is doing a great job,' Trump said on CNBC of Attorney General Pam Bondi. 'I have nothing to do with it. I will tell you this, they deserve it. I was happy to hear it.' Davis, who runs the conservative advocacy group the Article III Project, argued those being investigated could face potential perjury charges related to their previous testimony about Russian interference in the 2016 election. He also pointed to potential conspiracy charges, arguing that the alleged ongoing 'cover-up' would mean that the statute of limitations has not expired. 'I would say to these lawfare Democrats, lawyer up,' Davis said on Fox News. 'Because justice is definitely coming.' Some lawmakers have said any eventual charges could actually be fruitful in fighting the claims forwarded by Gabbard and others. 'The reason I want her to bring charges is that there is not a court in the United States that will do anything other than to laugh hysterically over the bulls‑‑‑ that Tulsi Gabbard is peddling right now,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told The Hill last month when the DNI first began releasing documents. 'They're not dumping documents. They're making up lies,' Himes added. The issue of Russian interference in the 2016 election has been a fixation for Trump for roughly eight years, as he has repeatedly claimed he was the victim of 'spying' and politically motivated probes around Russia's influence campaigns. Gabbard's findings, and the decision to launch a grand jury investigation, also carry political ramifications for the White House. Some Democrats, including a spokesperson for Obama, have dismissed the Russia claims as an attempt at distracting from the Epstein controversy. 'The real politicization is the calculated distortion of intelligence by administration officials, notably Mr. Trump's directors of national intelligence and the C.I.A., positions that should be apolitical,' Brennan and Clapper wrote in their op-ed. 'We find it deeply regrettable that the administration continues to perpetuate the fictitious narrative that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election.'
an hour ago
Russia ramps up grinding summer offensive as Ukraine seeks US battlefield aid
LONDON -- Russia is ramping up a grinding summer offensive in eastern Ukraine as Kyiv appeals to President Donald Trump for more military aid and intensified pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin. Putin's latest push comes at a pivotal moment. Prevailing Ukraine-skepticism inside the Trump administration may be softening as White House frustration with the Kremlin grows -- but the president, who has in the past often acted in an unpredictable and transactional manner toward Ukraine, could still turn away from Kyiv. The European Union is still marshalling its vast industrial resources to help arm Ukraine, having already taken the lead in economic support for the war-weary nation. The bloc does not yet appear willing or able to shoulder the military burden so far mostly carried by the U.S. And at home, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's apparent efforts to weaken anti-corruption bodies sparked street protests, while the armed forces' persistent manpower strain is necessitating difficult conversations about widening conscription brackets and hardening responses to draft-dodging. Russia's now-routine huge drone and missile attacks on Ukraine's cities are also increasing the pressure. What began as a broad Russian push all along the 600-mile front in eastern and southern Ukraine now appears to be narrowing into three axes of attack -- in the northeastern Sumy region and in the eastern Donetsk Oblast cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka, two important defensive hubs. "The Russians did not have a very clearly definable beginning for this summer campaign season," Pasi Paroinen, an analyst at the Finland-based Black Bird Group told ABC News. "They intensified their attacks pretty much almost all across the front line around May and towards June." "The Russians are probably starting to reach the point where they will start to pick up the pace of the offensive," Paroinen said. "Overall, it is likely that the trend is going to be worse and worse for the Ukrainians over the summer. I don't see the Russians running out of steam anytime soon." Donetsk cauldrons In Donetsk, Ukrainian troops are engaged in a familiar dance, slowly ceding territory while seeking to inflict maximum damage on attacking Russian units. The costs appear high for Moscow's forces, with the Ukrainian army claiming to be "eliminating" around 1,000 Russian troops per day. But the attacks keep coming. There is growing alarm over Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka, which are at risk of being surrounded in the coming months. Russia has been struggling to take Pokrovsk for more than a year, but recently has managed to advance on the city's flanks. This means Russian forces are increasingly threatening Ukraine's supply lines, in part by intensively targeting them with drones. Russia last week also claimed to have finally captured Chasiv Yar, an important heavily fortified town that Ukraine has used to choke Russia's offensive towards Kostyantynivka for over a year. Although most independent analysts say the Russian claim was premature, the Washington D.C.-based Institute for the Study of War assessed Russia will "likely complete the seizure of Chasiv Yar in the coming days." It will open up more opportunities for Russia to strangle Ukrainian forces in Kostyantynivka. Many analysts remain skeptical that the mauled and plodding Russian forces are capable of achieving a significant breakthrough. But some Ukrainian and independent military analysts worry that small but accumulating Russian advances could snowball into a bigger crisis for Ukraine's frontline, as manpower shortages continue to worsen. The advances may also help persuade Putin he is right to maintain the war and continue rebuffing ceasefire demands from Kyiv and Washington. Earlier in the summer, Russian forces attacking in small groups with light vehicles -- among them motorcycles -- scored significant success, allowing them to "mitigate the effects of the Ukrainian drones by launching a lot of simultaneous assaults," Paroinen said. But those Russian units are now largely spent, he added, with time needed to train and equip their replacements. "In general, the basic tactics are relying even more on the manpower advantage and using those small infantry attacks in combination with heavy usage of firepower," Paroinen said. Fighting back in Sumy In Sumy, at least, Ukrainian forces say they have largely stalled the Russian push. Maj. Oleh Shyriaiev -- the commander of the 225th Separate Assault Regiment fighting in Sumy -- told ABC News that Russian forces pushed between 9 and 13 miles into the northeastern border region in places, though said that forward momentum has largely been arrested. In recent weeks, the 225th has advanced, taking back the villages of Kindrativka and Andriivka. But the Russians are also still pushing, Shyriaiev said. "They are trying to move forward in small groups" towards the city of Sumy, Shyriaiev said, speaking to ABC News from close to the front line while visiting wounded members of his unit at a medical facility. "Their troops constantly get new replenishments and they are still trying with so-called 'meat assaults' to find a way to move forwards," he added of the enemy forces, using a common term in Ukrainian military parlance to refer to Russia's unsophisticated, high-casualty assault operations. The city of Sumy, which is around 15 miles from the current front line, is already under fire. "Sumy is under constant threat," Yuriy Boyechko, the founder and CEO of the Hope for Ukraine charity, told ABC News. "Russian drones terrorize the city daily," added Boyechko, whose teams have been evacuating local residents from areas close to the fighting. "The area is relentlessly bombarded by missiles and smaller drones continue to target civilians," he added. Russian forces in Sumy are striking along roads, through towns and woodlands, Shyriaiev said. The later summer weather may offer new opportunities for Moscow's troops, with secondary roads and other terrain dried out and offering new avenues of assault. Among the Russian units in Sumy are some of the most celebrated within Russia -- and among the most reviled in Ukraine due to their alleged involvement in a litany of war crimes. The 155th Guards Naval Infantry Brigade, 40th Separate Guards Naval Infantry Brigade and 76th Guards Air Assault Division are all in the fight, Shyriaiev said, though added that even Russia's elite units are relying on "meat assaults." "All the advances that they were able to achieve were done at the cost of using a lot of infantry," the commander said. "Against every one fighter of the defense forces of Ukraine, they are putting up 10 people on the Russian side." Paroinen suggested Russian forces are thin on armor. "The Russians have been using fewer and fewer heavy vehicles like tanks and infantry fighting vehicles," he said. "In Sumy, for example, they have been almost completely absent." Perhaps the most punishing aspect of the Russian offensive is its use of so-called "glide bombs," munitions dropped by jets from as far as 25 miles from the front line, making it difficult for ground-based anti-air weapons to stop them. Glide bombs have been a constant danger to Ukrainians holding positions along the front, but recent months have seen the Russian air force significantly increase their use. "They really are just methodically pounding every Ukrainian position, using five to 10 glide bombs just to destroy one treeline," Paroinen said. "The accuracy of these weapons is enough to effectively dismantle the defenses." Addressing the glide bomb problem could prove "really important" for Ukrainian defenders, he added. Shyriaiev concurred, saying glide bombs are making operations "very difficult" in Sumy. "Every time our regiment has any type of success, the Russians are using glide bombs against them. They consider it worthwhile to use a glide bomb when they see a group even as small as four to five servicemen," he said. "When we were liberating Andriivka and Kindrativka, they were using 30 to 50 glide bombs in a 24-hour period," Shyriaiev recalled. American arms Throughout Russia's full-scale invasion, Ukrainian forces have sought to address Russia's manpower advantage through technological superiority -- both by adopting Western-produced arms and innovating new weapons, prime among them first-person view drones. President Donald Trump's return to office has thrown the continuation of American military aid into doubt. Still, Putin's relentless long-range strikes and frontline offensives have prompted Trump to promise new weapons for Ukraine -- much to the relief of Kyiv. American weapons are still making a real difference at the front, Shyriaiev said. "All of the successful actions that we have, all of this success in liberating our territory that we have been able to achieve, have been accomplished with the help of American weapons," he explained. HIMARS missiles, Javelin anti-tank weapons, Claymore mines, grenades and 5.56 mm-caliber American assault rifles are particularly valued by the 225th, he said. Alexei Baranovsky, a military journalist and a veteran of the pro-Ukraine Freedom of Russia Legion, told ABC News that long-range defensive and offensive weapons could help shift the battle in Kyiv's favor. "We need air defense systems -- Patriots -- to protect our cities from missile and drone strikes," he said. "Second, long-range missiles to strike deep into Russian territory at military facilities," Baranovsky added, suggesting the American-made Tomahawk cruise missile would be top of Ukraine's shopping list. Soldiers at the front are hoping Trump's frustration with the Kremlin boils over into a sustained policy pivot in supporting Kyiv's war effort, Shyriaiev said. In July, the president set a 50-day ultimatum for Putin to accept a ceasefire or risk new U.S. economic measures. Trump then shortened the window to "10 to 12 days," citing "disappointment" at Russia's continued attacks. "Fifty days is nowhere near enough for Putin to make any meaningful advances or have any type of spectacular success in the Sumy, Kharkiv and Donetsk directions, which is where the main thrusts of his offensive are happening," Shyriaiev said. "I am sure that we will be victorious -- and we will be victorious with the help of the United States," Shyriaiev added. Nonetheless, Ukraine is suffering from severe manpower strain. Discussions continue in Kyiv about broadening conscription brackets in a bid to fill the ranks, a divisive and politically sensitive subject. "People are exhausted, there's no disputing that," Shyriaiev said. "But we would like to finish this war so that our children won't have to fight it again later." As to the swathes of Ukraine already lost to the invading Russian troops, the commander acknowledged it will be a "difficult" and "long process" to reclaim it. "For that, we need long-range weapons so that we would be able to strike the enemy's logistic pathways, their military industry centers, their oil processing industry and all of the places where their army is amassing," he said. "Plus, of course, we need the intelligence help from the United States."
