Are Kias Reliable? Here's Everything You Need To Know
Can Kia match Toyota in the reliability stakes?
Kia recently posted record sales in the United States, emphasizing just how far the brand has come since the Sephia compact arrived here in the first half of the 1990s. Once known for little more than plasticky, high-value econoboxes, today's Kia's are true style leaders, boast the latest tech, and some are as quick as far more expensive sports cars. One would assume that the brand's success has something to do with a strong reputation for dependability, too, but are Kias actually reliable? And can the brand match Toyota in this aspect? We'll try to answer that here.
Brand Reliability Vs. Model Reliability
Many consumers like to paint a single brand and all its models with the same brush. Just because you were able to cover 250,000 trouble-free miles in a basic Civic doesn't mean that all Hondas are automatically as reliable, which is why it's important to distinguish between brand reliability and model reliability. Often, there is some correlation, but even the best manufacturers are guilty of producing a lemon every now and then.
For this exercise, therefore, we'll hone in on specific Kia model issues while also taking a bird's eye view of the brand as a whole. We'll consult a range of reputable sources and customer complaints, as one source can often be at odds with another.
Most of our information will also be based on Kia models from the 2022 model year and older, as it's impossible to make an accurate dependability assessment for vehicles that are still quite new and which have not racked up many miles.Kia's Brand Reliability: Consistently Better Than Average
We'll start by looking at Kia as a brand. According to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. Vehicle Dependability Study, which assesses issues that owners of 2022 model year vehicles experienced over the first three years of ownership, Kia fares quite well.
The study ranks automakers by the number of problems per 100 vehicles (PP100); the lower the number of problems, the higher that manufacturer ranks. Vehicle owners were surveyed about aspects such as the driving experience, infotainment systems, the seats, the powertrain, and anything else that could affect the ownership experience.
Kia was ranked 11th out of 30 brands, with 196 PP100. This was marginally better than the study average of 202 PP100. With this score, Kia outperformed the likes of Honda and Subaru, while ranking far higher than its corporate rival, Hyundai (222 PP100). Rival brands like Mazda (161 PP100) and Toyota (162 PP100) performed better than Kia, but the Korean brand still put in a decent showing.
We went back a few years to see how Kia performed:
2024 study: Ranked 8th with 187 PP100 (study average: 190 PP100)
2023 study: Ranked 3rd with 152 PP100 (study average: 186 PP100)
2022 study: Ranked 1st with 145 PP100 (study average: 192 PP100)
2021 study: Ranked 3rd with 97 PP100 (study average: 121 PP100)
2020 study: Ranked 14th with 132 PP100 (study average: 134 PP100)
2019 study: Ranked 10th with 126 PP100 (study average: 136 PP100)
So, how reliable are Kias? Based on these results, we can see that while Kia's ranking has fluctuated, it has consistently been above-average in brand rankings for dependability.
Consumer Reports ranks Kia ninth out of 22 brands for predicted reliability. Much like J.D. Power's results, Kia is above average but does not quite hit the consistently high ratings of Toyota.
Examples Of Reliable Kia Models
Below, we've looked at some of the most reliable Kias between the 2010 and 2020 model years. We've chosen this time span, as these vehicles have been around long enough for reliability data to accumulate, but they're also not so old whereby maintenance will become an issue.
These models have a low number of recalls and complaints, and the complaints that were logged are also not severe or have been successfully resolved via a recall. This is by no means an exhaustive list of reliable Kias, but gives us an idea of specific models and years that have high ratings.
2020 Kia Sportage
J.D. Power quality and reliability rating: 89/100
No. of complaints via Car Complaints: 12
A high quality and reliability rating and few complaints single out the 2020 Sportage, which is part of the crossover's fourth generation. This model was affected by two recalls for a fire risk, but these recalls affected many Sportage model years and once addressed, we see no issue with buying one of these.
2019 Kia Soul
J.D. Power quality and reliability rating: 87/100
No. of complaints: 15
Kia's Soul is a simple, affordable crossover without a lot of technology that can fail. For the lowest-risk option, consider the base 1.6-liter model with no turbo and the manual gearbox. The only recall on record is from 2022 and relates to airbags, so as long as these have been checked, this should be a solid runabout.
2018 Kia Optima
J.D. Power quality and reliability rating: 86/100
No. of complaints: 12
With few complaints and a high quality score, the now-defunct Optima sedan makes for a solid used buy. Over at Kelley Blue Book, it also has a commendable 4.3 out of 5 rating for reliability. KBB suggests you can pick up a used example for under $10k, which is great value for a spacious and comfortable sedan.
2016 Kia Forte
J.D. Power quality and reliability score: 82/100
No. of complaints: 10
One minor recall for a trunk emergency release that could fail, few complaints, and a good quality score make the 2016 Forte a solid used bet. Consumers on KBB also rated it at 4.4 out of 5 for reliability, and a used example will cost you under $6,000. There's nothing remarkable about it, but the Forte is hard to beat for simple, honest motoring.
The Most Problematic Kias
According to Car Complaints, the following Kias have racked up the highest and/or most serious number of complaints by drivers:
2013 Kia Optima
2013/2014/2015/2016 Kia Sorento
The 2016 Sorento, for example, is prone to complete engine failure for a rod bearing issue. The typical repair cost is extremely high, at $7,390, and the average mileage this occurs is at just over 94,000 miles.
Major Kia Reliability Issues
No automaker is perfect, and even Kia doesn't have an untarnished reliability record. These are some of the brand's most serious issues to watch out for.
Theta II Engine Failure
This four-cylinder engine family was introduced in 2009 and went on to power many Hyundai and Kia models. Equipped with gasoline direct injection (hence the GDI name), two versions were available: A 2.0-liter and a 2.4-liter, both with four cylinders.
Once consumers began to put some miles on the Theta II engines, a range of very serious issues cropped up. In 2015, the NHTSA recalled 470,000 Sonatas with these engines, manufactured for the 2011 and 2012 model years. According to Hyundai, metal debris may have been left in the crankshaft's oil passages, forcing the debris into the connecting rod oiling passages amd restricting oil flow to the bearings. Ultimately, this leads to premature bearing wear, a knocking noise, and complete engine failure in some cases.
On Car Complaints, there are 193 complaints for a seized engine on the 2011 Sonata, with a typical repair cost of $5,150.
Later, the 2015 recall was expanded to include thousands of Optima, Sorento, Sportage and other models with the Theta engine. Lawsuits followed, and it's estimated that Hyundai and Kia spent over $2 billion in settlements and engine replacements related to this engine. In 2022, Hyundai and Kia announced a settlement for over 2 million affected vehicles, plus a replacement (if necessary) of vehicles still in the extended warranty period of 15 years/150,000 miles.
Some Kia model years appear to be much more affected than others, so we recommend thoroughly researching your specific model if buying a used Kia with this engine.
Other Kia Problems
On RepairPal, the most complaints related to Kia are for the following issues. Fortunately, none are as serious as the Theta II engine troubles:
Headlamps
Malfunctioning door locks
Difficulty starting due to malfunctioning anti-theft control module
Faulty throttle position switch
Transmission issues
We have also noted a few cases of owners noticing paintwork issues on some older Kias, which can be prone to cracking, peeling, or fading.
If Anything Goes Wrong, Kia Has A Brilliant Warranty
Together with Hyundai, Kia has one of the best warranties for new cars. Its limited warranty runs for five years/60,000 miles, but the powertrain warranty is particularly good, stretching to 10 years of 100,000 miles; that's double the duration offered by Toyota or Honda.
EV batteries are also covered for 10 years or 100,000 miles.
Kia's long-term reliability reputation may not match Toyota's, but its warranty provides great peace of mind.
Summary: So, Is Kia A Reliable Car Brand?
Based on the available data, we'd say that yes, Kia can generally be regarded as a reliable car brand. It consistently ranks higher than the average for all car brands in terms of the number of customer issues, and many individual models score highly. Build quality of modern Kias has improved steadily, to the point where most of its models now feel quite premium.
The Theta II engine scandal is a particularly serious blemish, though, so we'd advise you to find a used model without one of these engines, or to make sure that your particular model year isn't one of the riskier options. That said, even Toyota has had engine troubles; it had to recall certain Tundra and Lexus LX models for almost exactly the same issue as the Theta II engines, whereby machining debris could be left in the engine from the manufacturing process. While these issues are damaging to the brands' reputations, it would be unfair to suggest they don't make any reliable cars.
If you buy a well-maintained used Kia, it has the potential to last for a long time before a serious issue occurs.
FAQs
Is Kia a good, reliable vehicle?
Many Kias are reliable, but watch out for models equipped with the Theta II engine.
Do Kia cars last long?
Kias can last for well over 10 years if well-maintained, although the brand doesn't have the same reputation for longevity as Toyota.
Where does Kia rank in reliability?
Depending on the study or year, Kia often ranks above the industry average, and has even been as high as number 1 previously.
Is Kia as reliable as Toyota?
Kia ranks as better than average, but it does not consistently outrank Toyota for reliability.
Is Kia or Honda better?
In terms of reliability, both brands are above average, but Honda has a slightly stronger reputation in this area. Kia leads in some areas, though: Its cars are more boldly styled, generally pack in more tech, and its EV lineup is much broader than Honda's.
Are Kias Reliable? Here's Everything You Need To Know first appeared on Autoblog on Jul 20, 2025
This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jul 20, 2025, where it first appeared.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NASCAR Through the Gears: Denny Hamlin dries off. Court date looms. Chase Elliott morphs
Talk about mixed emotions at Dover. The week turned out quite well for Denny Hamlin the racecar driver. Denny Hamlin the plaintiff? Not so much, though he suggested things won't get fully up to speed for several more months. We'll get to that and honestly try to make sense of it all, but let's assume everyone is OK if we start by talking about auto racing. Good? Good. Hamlin and his No. 11 Toyota have been pretty darn good all year and that shouldn't be a shocker, since that particular man-and-machine combo has been really good for just about this entire century. But to win Sunday, Hamlin chose Nomex over vulcanized rubber. You heard me right, but settle down, I promise we're still talking about racing. Along the way, Hamlin had to beat back two on-rushing teammates in the closing laps. First, Christopher Bell took himself out with as pretty a pirouette as you'll ever see — he never touched a thing, but some of those in avoidance mode sure did. And then Chase Briscoe, who nosed to the lead on the final overtime restart but couldn't stick the landing. Turns out, he was on newer rubber but older Nomex. Grab that shifter and let's get up to speed. First Gear: Who needs fresh Goodyears when you have dry duds? It's doubtful you came here for an old Deion Sanders quote, but here you go. 'If you look good, you feel good. If you feel good, you play good. If you play good, they pay good.' During one of two late rain delays, Hamlin told the TNT broadcast audience he was going to change into a fresh Nomex-woven uniform because his was soaked with that nasty brew of sweat and rain and Lord knows what else gets kicked up and tossed through that window net. Yes, he was on worn tires, but he suggested fresh duds might make him feel fresher than he really was. He won, you know, so who's to doubt him? What's doubtful, however, is anytime in the near future, we'll hear a crew chief call his driver to the pits for right-side tires and a dry uniform. But there was also a time when sub-20-second pit stops seemed like science fiction. Second Gear: Denny Hamlin sends us an invitation (to court) Barring a serious change in strategy, not to mention tone, Hamlin's next big uniform change will see him shed the Nomex for wool or cotton, as he slips into a fancy bib-and-tucker for a December court date that continues to loom large up there around Turn 4. Up-to-speed time: Hamlin is co-owner of 23XI Racing, which along with Front Row Motorsports is suing NASCAR, alleging antitrust violations. Both teams have three cars, and all six are among the 36 'chartered' cars, meaning they're locked into each week's race while four additional spots are available to non-charted (or 'open') teams. Since the two plaintiff teams didn't agree to new charter terms late last year (13 other teams, which field 30 cars, did sign), NASCAR has said they forfeited their charters. A judge said that's not right, then another judge said yes it is, and another had to say the second judge was right and then … oh, never mind, who can keep up? Anyway, the two teams aren't currently chartered but won't miss any races, even if more than four 'open' cars enter an upcoming race (which is usually unlikely, given recent history). In fact, NASCAR did what it does throughout the season — update the rulebook. Usually it's about an evolving technical issue, but the day after Dover, NASCAR amended the rules in a way that basically guarantees 23XI and Front Row will have reserved seats for the rest of the season. And 29 days after the season finale, and just nine days after the awards banquet, the two teams and NASCAR (and their legal stormtroopers) are scheduled to be in court to start the official proceedings. Hamlin was asked about the ongoing friction during the Dover weekend and didn't break character. 'All I can tell you,' he began, 'and this will be my blanket answer for all questions about this … if you want answers, you want to understand all of why this is happening, come Dec. 1. You will get the answers that you are looking for and all will be exposed. 'Mark your calendar.' That's gonna be one awkward banquet if he finally wins a championship. Third Gear: Ty times Two as NASCAR brackets reach final rung Whose brackets had Ty Gibbs versus Ty Dillon in the final? Such a possibility was inherent when NASCAR debuted this five-week, in-season tournament to coincide with TNT's five weeks of coverage. At least Gibbs finished fifth at Dover to win his semifinal over Tyler Reddick, who slipped out of the top 10 in the late laps. Dillon finished 20th, one better than semifinal foe John Hunter Nemechek, and needed the day's final 'lucky dog' free pass to do it. Listen, don't be too cynical. At least they tried something, bless their hearts. And hey, there's a million bucks on the line for the Dillon and Gibbs teams. Assuming there's something close to the old industry standard — team and driver splitting race winnings — that'd be a helluva payday for Dillon. And not a bad one for team owner Matt Kaulig, who'd have to sell a lot of gutter guards to make 500k. Do your own research on that one. Fourth Gear: Chase Elliott makes his point(s) We should've smelled a rat when William Byron won the Daytona 500 but left town second in the standings, one point behind Ryan Blaney, who piled up race-day points with stage finishes of first and third. Two weeks later, Byron took over the points lead and held onto it after 17 of the next 18 races, despite not winning another race and despite a recent slump bordering on two months. He's finished 27th or worse in five of the last seven races, and in those other two, he was a ho-hum (for him) eighth and ninth. So your new leader atop the regular-season standings is Chase Elliott, who has morphed into Terry Labonte and become a points hoarder for most of this season. — Email Ken Willis at This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Denny Hamlin wins Dover, NASCAR amends, and it might get real awkward
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Racing Insights: All eyes on Kyle Larson this weekend at Dover
Kyle Larson will participate in this year's NASCAR Cup Series Playoffs. There's no doubt about that. With three wins in 2025, the Hendrick Motorsports driver is tied for most victories in the field with Denny Hamlin, Christopher Bell and Shane van Gisbergen. However, this summer has been rough for Larson's standards and he hasn't found race-winning pace since his dominant Kansas win in May. Will Larson get back to his winning ways Sunday at Dover Motor Speedway (2 p.m. ET, TNT Sports/truTV, HBO Max, PRN Radio, SiriusXM NASCAR Radio) or will the No. 5's July slide extend? Let's look at who Racing Insights projects to win at the 'Monster Mile' with a detailed look into the numbers. RELATED: | Defending Dover winner Denny Hamlin is projected to make it two in a row in Delaware this weekend. It should come as no surprise as the No. 11 Joe Gibbs Racing driver has outclassed the field on concrete tracks recently. At Dover, he has two wins, four top fives and an average finish of 8.43 in the last seven races. He also ranks first in speed and third in restarts at the track, according to NASCAR Insights. Larson comes second on the results prediction sheet, also just like last year, as Hamlin fended off the late surge from the California native. Larson will take another runner-up result this weekend as he's only placed in the top five once in the last eight races (Michigan). Within the eight-race span, Larson has only scored three top 10s and has only led a combined 37 laps — 34 in the Coca-Cola 600 and three at Sonoma. It's unfamiliar territory for Larson since joining Hendrick in 2021, but this drought should end Sunday. Larson's 938 laps led at Dover are the third most he's led at a track on the circuit in his career and he's finished third or better at the 1-mile oval in four of the last six events. FANTASY: | OTHER DRIVERS TO WATCH ROSS CHASTAIN: Just behind the pair of Hamlin and Larson at Dover is Chastain. The No. 1 Trackhouse Racing driver has been lights out at the track in the Next Gen car. He finished third and second in 2022 and 2023, respectively, but finished 12th last year to see his average finish in the last three Dover races dip to a not-too-shabby 5.7. CHASE ELLIOTT: Elliott should continue his impressive top-20 streak this weekend. He won the 2022 edition at Dover and followed up with results of 11th and fifth the last two years. The 2020 series titleholder sits just 14 points behind his Hendrick teammate William Byron for the regular season points lead and could be in line to jump the No. 24 on Sunday. ALEX BOWMAN: Don't forget about the No. 48. Bowman hasn't finished worse than eighth in his last four Dover starts and won the 2021 event. He enters the weekend 32 points above the playoff cutline and will need to turn in a fifth straight top-10 performance at Dover to build more breathing room. COLE CUSTER: The No. 41 Haas Factory Team driver may not be in line to win on Sunday, but his Cup numbers at Dover have been mighty impressive. He's finished no worse than 15th in four starts and racked up top 10s in the two 2020 events. A similar result this weekend would be a huge shot in the arm for Custer amid a difficult 2025 campaign. RACING INSIGHTS' PROJECTIONS FOR THE AUTOTRADER ECHOPARK AUTOMOTIVE 400 Racing Insights' advanced statistical formula incorporates current track, track type, recent performance, team data and pit-crew data to predict a projected winner and provide full race results. Updated on race day with practice and qualifying factored in. FINISH CAR NUMBER DRIVER 1 11 Denny Hamlin 2 5 Kyle Larson 3 9 Chase Elliott 4 24 William Byron 5 12 Ryan Blaney 6 20 Christopher Bell 7 1 Ross Chastain 8 17 Chris Buescher 9 54 Ty Gibbs 10 48 Alex Bowman 11 45 Tyler Reddick 12 19 Chase Briscoe 13 8 Kyle Busch 14 22 Joey Logano 15 23 Bubba Wallace 16 6 Brad Keselowski 17 43 Erik Jones 18 77 Carson Hocevar 19 21 Josh Berry 20 16 AJ Allmendinger 21 60 Ryan Preece 22 41 Cole Custer 23 7 Justin Haley 24 42 John Hunter Nemechek 25 4 Noah Gragson 26 71 Michael McDowell 27 99 Daniel Suárez 28 2 Austin Cindric 29 3 Austin Dillon 30 47 Ricky Stenhouse Jr. 31 38 Zane Smith 32 10 Ty Dillon 33 88 Shane van Gisbergen 34 34 Todd Gilliland 35 35 Riley Herbst 36 51 Cody Ware 37 44 J.J. Yeley
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Morgan Stanley's blunt challenge to GM CEO Mary Barra: ‘How does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?'
Wall Street was unimpressed by General Motors' Q2 earnings call. On the call, a Morgan Stanley analyst asked CEO Mary Barra: 'How does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?' Separately, Piper Sandler told clients that GM stock won't break free of its bargain-basement multiple of five times next year's forecast earnings if management is only tinkering around on the edges. The company needs a thesis-changing strategy like humanoid robots, it said. General Motors and its legacy auto industry peers need a bold strategy for the future if they ever want investors to rethink their growth prospects, investment bank Piper Sandler warned on Tuesday. Otherwise their collective tinkering around on the edges with cost cuts here and inventory changes there amount to little more than rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, the bank implied. And Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas had a blunt statement for CEO Mary Barra, comparing her company unfavorably with Tesla in the Q&A section of the earnings call. Shares in GM tumbled 8% after second-quarter adjusted net profit fell by a sixth, owing in part to a $1.1 billion hit from the Trump administration's tariffs. It comes after fellow Detroit carmaker Stellantis, the parent of Jeep and Ram, preannounced results for the first six months that revealed it swung to a €2.3 billion ($2.7 billion) loss from a net profit of €5.6 billion the prior year. A major uncertainty clouding the outlook for GM's North American profits moving forward remains the impact of import duties. As a result, on Tuesday, Piper Sandler warned clients it's possible that GM could end up closer to the $8.25 in adjusted earnings per share for this year rather than the upper bound of $10 in its forecast range. 'But to us, these aren't thesis-defining issues. More problematic, in our view, is that the call focused almost entirely on tactical or cyclical topics,' it wrote in a research note. Only worth paying five times next year's earnings for GM, bank argues The bank gave as an example issues like incentive spending, inventory levels, and cost offsets with regard to tariffs to name just one example. GM imports the popular Chevrolet Equinox and Cadillac Optiq EVs from Mexico. Both saw a surge in Q2 demand potentially reflecting pull-forward effects as dealers stocked up on inventory before the 25% auto sector tariffs hit, and as customers bought EVs before the Sept. 30 deadline for the end of the federal EV credit, discontinued by the Trump administration. 'In our view, if GM and other traditional automakers want to emerge from their multiyear funk, they don't need smart tactics,' Piper Sandler continued, 'they need bold strategic changes.' Otherwise the bank will continue to view GM share based on the same $48 price target that represents five times next year's forecast earnings. Shares in GM first listed on the New York Stock Exchange back in November 2010. At the time, the company boasted what it called a 'fortress balance sheet' free of legacy risks like pension and health care obligations for staff and retirees that helped plunge it into bankruptcy the year prior. Yet investors that bought in at the IPO price of $33 have not been rewarded relative to the broader equity market. The stock has averaged just a 2.6% annual compound return in the subsequent 15 years versus 11.8% with the S&P 500. 'How does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?' By comparison, Piper Sandler views Tesla, a $1 trillion–plus megacap company in the Magnificent Seven stock group, as being fairly valued at 140 times its estimated 2026 earnings. A major reason for that lofty multiple is Tesla's efforts in the area of artificial intelligence and humanoid robotics. In a research note published this weekend, Piper Sandler argued a further geographic expansion of the Austin area serviced by Tesla's new AI-powered robotaxi fleet (generally estimated to still include only a dozen cars) was likely favorable enough to overshadow any negative revisions to forecast earnings. CEO Elon Musk's company is due to report quarterly earnings after the close of markets on Wednesday. GM did not respond to a Fortune request for comment made outside normal working hours. But the carmaker's CEO, Mary Barra, faced scrutiny from analysts during her Q2 conference call, with another Tesla bull asking, where are its humanoid robots? 'Elon seems to be also exiting the auto industry, clearly pulling capital out of the business and doubling down on AI, autonomy, and robotaxis,' Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said during the Tuesday investor call. 'So how does GM expect to be profitable with EVs when players like Tesla apparently cannot?' Barra replied there were partnerships 'we're looking at' in the field of automation, but that when it comes to the subject, GM is mainly interested in improving efficiency at its automobile factories. 'Overall, we're focused on what's going to drive manufacturing optimization,' GM's CEO answered. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio