
3,000 ‘smart buses' to be added to ST fleet
The new buses would help extend the ST fleet as well. A tender had in fact been floated for 3,000 new buses. Now, all those buses will need to have a certain set of eight smart features.
The transport department held a meeting on Thursday with bus manufacturers and a safety consultancy and it was decided that all 3,000 new buses should be smart vehicles.
As such, each vehicle will now come fitted an anti-theft system that will sound an alarm if someone tries to enter a locked ST vehicle. This, it is felt, could help prevent incidents such as the rape at Swargate, Pune. The digital breathalyser system in front of driver's seat will ensure that no inebriated driver can take the wheel.
The foam-based fire-control system would be an aide in any kind of blaze. The Global Positioning System or GPS feature would ensure that every bus can be tracked at all times. Artificial intelligence or AI-aided closed-circuit TV cameras would monitor all activity within a bus. An LED TV could be used to broadcast emergency messages from government authorities and live telecasts, and would generate revenue through the day by screening advertisements. In a worst-case scenario, if all other measures fail or in case of an unforeseen event, a panic button installed for passenger safety could be used to alert control rooms to a mishap, accident or crime underway.
Transport minister Pratap Sarnaik said the three bus manufacturers who attended Thursday's meeting have been informed that every vehicle will need to come fitted with all these features. 'We have told them to the present a sample smart bus by the end of the month, after which they may submit their proposals,' Sarnaik added.
Once a model has been approved, the companies will submit their bids, in response to the tender. 'The high-tech features will definitely add the cost of each bus. But the safety of the passenger is more important,' Sarnaik said.
The recent incidents involving ST vehicles have certainly raised questions about passenger safety. In the first of the most major recent cases, a 26-year-old was raped in a bus parked at the Swargate depot in February. A history-sheeter was allegedly captured on a CCTV camera, fleeing the scene; was later arrested and has since been charged. Meanwhile, also in February, a bus carrying 44 passengers crashed into a median on the Pune-Solapur Highway, in a case of alleged drink-driving. There were no serious injuries.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Deccan Herald
16 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Kannada & culture director booked for 'abusing' Dalit artist
Based on the complaint from Jogila Siddaraju, 55, the SJ Park police filed the case against KM Gayathri, the government officer concerned. She has been booked under relevant sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).


Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Man killed in motorcycle accident near Dhoraji
Rajkot: A 21-year-old named Ayan Khebar, who worked for a private company, died in a road accident near Supedi village on the Rajkot-Porbandar highway on Saturday night. A complaint was filed by his friend, Alfaz Mansuri, at Dhoraji Taluka police station against the driver of an ST bus under Sections 106 (1), 281, 125(B) of the BNS and the Motor Vehicles Act. The complainant stated that on July 12, he and his friend Ayan went to Junagadh from Upleta on a motorcycle to get a mobile phone repaired. While returning to Upleta from Junagadh, Ayan was riding the motorcycle. Near Adinath Factory in Supedi village, an ST bus driver recklessly took a U-turn from the divider without giving any signal. Our motorcycle collided with the ST bus, causing both of us to fall on the road. I suffered a fracture to my leg, while Ayan suffered a severe head injury. He was taken to Upleta Govt Hospital by a 108 ambulance and then referred to Junagadh for further treatment, where the attending doctor declared him dead.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Foul language doesn't mean stalking, rules Karnataka high court
Bengaluru: Using swear words at each other in private messaging between two individuals could be indecent, but it does not necessarily mean 'stalking', Karnataka high court has ruled, striking down charges of stalking against an Allahabad man who faced allegations of voyeurism and criminal intimidation. Justice M Nagaprasanna, who delivered the ruling, emphasised that for a charge of stalking to be legally valid, it must meet specific criteria laid out in Section 354D of IPC. The section defines 'stalking' as a man following or contacting a woman repeatedly to foster personal interaction, despite clear disinterest from the woman; or monitoring her use of electronic communication. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru "In the present case, the allegation is loosely laid," the judge noted, adding: "The exchange of messages, even those containing profanity, does not by itself constitute stalking." Background The case involves a Bengaluru-based woman and the accused, who had met in 2022 while preparing for their UPSC exams in Delhi. Their interaction, which was initially based on sharing study materials, gradually blossomed into an intimate relationship. The woman used to stay at a rented accommodation in Delhi, arranged by the accused. However, following a breakup, the woman filed a police complaint in Bengaluru in October 2023, alleging that the man had secretly recorded private footage of her and threatened to circulate it on social media. The case invoked multiple charges under the IPC and Information Technology Act, with additional sections added under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as the complainant belongs to a Scheduled Tribe community. The complainant even filed a rape case against the accused in Prayagraj on November 2, 2023. The accused man, though, insisted they were in a consensual relationship. Despite the allegations and counter-allegations, the couple's marriage was registered on November 10, reportedly facilitated by their families. However, the complainant later alleged that her consent was obtained under duress and she filed another complaint on December 14, 2023, in Prayagraj. Courtroom drama Partially allowing the petition, the court upheld multiple charges against the accused, including voyeurism and offences under the Atrocities Act, given the accused's awareness of the complainant's ST status. The disputed facts, though, required trial resolution. "The complaint details several serious allegations against the accused, reportedly committed under the promise of marriage. The consensual sexual relationship between both the parties is documented. Regarding the stalking charges, the complainant's allegations primarily concern sexual acts under marriage promises," the judge noted in his order while pointing that the offence of stalking was loosely laid against the petitioner.