Israel responds to WHO accusations over attacks on Gaza facilities
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Israel's military on Tuesday responded to accusations by the World Health Organization (WHO) that its forces attacked the UN agency's facilities in central Gaza and detained staff members.
The military said soldiers came under fire in the city of Deir al-Balah on Monday and returned fire in the direction the shots originated. However, the military did not specify whether the gunfire came from WHO premises in Deir al-Balah.
The WHO said that a staff accommodation facility was attacked on Monday and that a central warehouse had been damaged in a separate incident on Sunday.
According to a report by Israeli news outlet Ynet, citing a military spokesperson, the army is aware of claims that a residential complex housing WHO employees was struck. The report added that, according to the military, no agency staff were injured.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) publicly confirmed that several individuals were detained in Deir al-Balah on suspicion of "involvement in terrorism." It did not clarify whether those detained were WHO employees or their relatives, as the UN agency has claimed.
Most of those detained were released following on-site questioning, the army said.
The IDF did not comment on one individual who, according to the WHO, remains in custody.
In a statement on Monday, WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said male WHO staff and their male relatives had been handcuffed, stripped, searched at gunpoint, and interrogated on site.
Responding to the claim, the Israeli military stated on Tuesday: "At times during field questioning, it is necessary for individuals suspected of terrorist activity to temporarily remove parts of their clothing in order to ensure that they are not concealing explosive belts or other weapons."
Suspects are treated in accordance with international law, the military added.
Ghebreyesus also said that women and children related to WHO staff had been forced to flee on foot amid the fighting.
The Israeli military said it had warned civilians to leave the area prior to its operation and had been in contact with international organizations operating there.
The IDF advanced this week into the south-west of Deir al-Balah as part of its operations against Hamas and other militant groups.
Palestinians mourn over dead bodies after they were brought to Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City after Israeli forces opened fire on civilians who were waiting for humanitarian aid near the Zikim area on the northern Gaza coastline. Omar Ashtawy/APA Images via ZUMA Press Wire/dpa
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
12 minutes ago
- Axios
Iran worries U.S. will use nuclear talks as pretext for new attacks: Senior official
Iran is willing to return to the negotiating table with the U.S., "the sooner the better," but must be convinced the talks aren't cover for further military action, Tehran's nuclear negotiator Kazem Gharibabadi said on Wednesday. The big picture: U.S. officials were discussing the dates for future talks with Tehran last month while simultaneously coordinating war plans with Israel, Gharibabadi said. While Tehran knows it needs to negotiate with the U.S. to get sanctions lifted and avoid new ones, he said bluntly that "we don't trust the U.S." Driving the news: Iran and the "E3" — France, Germany and the U.K. — will hold talks in Istanbul on Friday on the issue of "snapback" sanctions. The European signatories to the 2015 nuclear deal could impose those harsh sanctions for Iranian non-compliance, though Tehran denies that such a move would be legitimate. Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister and lead nuclear negotiator, said Friday's talks were "important" but not "decisive," because even if an agreement is not reached "we still have time." Between the lines: The U.S. and the E3 jointly settled on the end of August as a deadline to impose the harsh snapback sanctions if no U.S.-Iran deal is reached by then. But Gharibabadi suggested that was a soft deadline, noting that the E3 had also called Iran's foreign minister to express their desire to come to an arrangement. The power to impose snapback sanctions expires in October, but the Europeans are expected to raise the possibility of extending that deadline. In return, they want Iran to take steps toward resuming the work of UN inspectors in its nuclear facilities and possibly move its 60% highly enriched uranium to another country. Gharibabadi said it was "premature" to discuss an extension. What he's saying: Speaking to reporters in New York on Wednesday, Gharibabadi said it was now incumbent on Iran to negotiate over snapback with the Europeans and over the broader nuclear issue with the U.S. But he made clear just how difficult that would be. The last time around, he argued, the U.S. repeatedly changed its positions in talks — making it difficult to make progress — and then turned around and bombed Iran. Gharibabadi said a military operation may always have been the true U.S. intention — something U.S. officials deny — and that could be the case once again. Concerns about future attacks are one reason Iran want assurances on the Trump administration's seriousness before returning to the table, he said. State of play: Gharibabadi said Iran had invited a technical team from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to visit Tehran in the next few weeks, but not to visit the country's nuclear sites. Iran suspended its cooperation with the IAEA due to the Israeli and U.S. attacks. Gharibabadi criticized IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi for declining to condemn those attacks, suggesting he had political motives. But he said Iran was willing to discuss "a new modality" for cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, including access to the nuclear sites that were not attacked and also those that were. The IAEA has not yet requested access to the three bombed nuclear facilities, Gharibabadi said, noting that it would be very dangerous for inspectors to enter them. The intrigue: When reporters repeatedly asked about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities and material after the strikes, Gharibabadi joked that rather than asking him they should trust President Trump's insistence that they were "totally destroyed." What to watch: The U.S. has continually proposed a resumption of talks since the war, and there have been several discussions in Tehran about the terms on which to resume them, Gharibabadi said. He insisted that any talks would be "indirect," conducted through mediators, despite the U.S. desire for "direct" talks. Asked why, he said "we don't trust the U.S." and don't think the process has reached a stage where direct talks are appropriate. Gharibabadi didn't lay out a timetable for the resumption of talks with the U.S., but suggested Friday's talks in Istanbul would be a factor.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iranian negotiator doesn't rule out exiting nuclear treaty if sanctions are reimposed
Iran Mideast Wars Nuclear UNITED NATIONS (AP) — A top Iranian official warned Wednesday that European threats to reimpose sanctions could lead Iran to withdraw from an international pact that limits the spread of nuclear weapons, one of the last remaining safeguards against the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi discussed with reporters his country's recourse against further financial punishment ahead of a critical meeting Friday with Britain, France and Germany. The talks between Iran and some of the remaining members of the 2015 nuclear deal, which the U.S. withdrew from in President Donald Trump's first term, are expected to take place in Istanbul. The three European countries have suggested triggering a so-called snapback provision in that accord that would reimpose sanctions on Iran if there is no progress on a deal to limit its nuclear program by August. The 2015 deal had eased economic penalties on Iran in exchange for restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program, which Iran has insisted is peaceful. Gharibabadi, who has been part of the nuclear negotiation team, said that despite domestic pressure to withdraw from the separate, older Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, especially in the aftermath of the recent Israeli and U.S. strikes on its nuclear sites, Iran has remained compliant with the 1970 treaty. 'But, I'm quite confident that if the snapback is triggered, Iran will not show more restraint in this regard,' Gharibabadi said. If Iran does exit the treaty, it will be just the second country to do so, after North Korea in 2003, whose withdrawal has never been formally accepted. The warning from Iran comes as the Trump administration is once again seeking to reach a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program. The two sides had held several rounds of talks before Israel staged a surprise attack in June. Gharibabadi and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, have remained optimistic that the triggering of sanctions and withdrawal from the treaty can be avoided with 'diplomacy and negotiation.' Gharibabadi said Friday's meeting is very important but that its success will depend on how the Europeans approach Iran this time around. 'We have always valued our meetings with the European countries. But there is an important issue: I think we have always told them that the policies of the European countries should be independent,' he said. 'They should not coordinate their positions with the Americans.' He added, 'If this is the case, why should we negotiate with the Europeans when we can negotiate with the Americans?' Iranian officials, including Gharibabadi, said they are open to proposals on how to prevent further sanctions and 'prevent a more complicated situation.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UN's top court: failing to protect planet from climate change may be violation of international law
The United Nations' top court announced Wednesday that if countries fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change, they could be in violation of international law.
