
China Rising, America Retrenching: Japan Must Stand on Its Own
Staying true to its "America First" agenda, the Donald Trump administration has ramped up pressure on elite Ivy League institutions like Harvard University. Pointing to violent protests and a rise in antisemitism linked to pro-Palestinian activism, the government has taken a hardline stance. It is cracking down on students, pushing for changes to diversity-driven admissions policies, and moving to freeze subsidies and terminate contracts.
On May 30, United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio directed American diplomatic missions to screen visa applicants, students, faculty, and guest speakers affiliated with Harvard for social media posts containing antisemitic content. At the same time, the US began revoking visas for Chinese international students conducting research in sensitive fields authorities believe have ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
That same month, the US House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party sent a formal inquiry to Harvard's president. The letter sought details about exchanges and donations involving the CCP, citing reports that members of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, accused of involvement in the Uyghur genocide, had taken part in Harvard training programs. It also raised concerns about Chinese universities linked to the People's Liberation Army (PLA) participating in research funded by the US Department of Defense. Tomoko Ako, Professor at the University of Tokyo
Harvard also openly accepts the children of high-ranking Chinese officials. The daughter of President Xi Jinping and the son of the disgraced Bo Xilai both graduated from Harvard.
As globalization advances and the world becomes increasingly interconnected, tensions between nations are rising. These are often fueled by deteriorating diplomatic relations, territorial disputes, economic sanctions, and cyberattacks. People, goods, capital, and information are actively flowing across borders. Yet, we are seeing more and more situations where the true nature of "exchanges" with adversarial countries and regions must be called into question.
You may have come across the story of a Chinese student who recently delivered a commencement speech at Harvard while dressed in hanfu , traditional Han Chinese attire.
In her speech, the Chinese student recalled an episode from her internship in Mongolia. A friend interning in Tanzania reached out to her, unable to read the Chinese characters on a washing machine. Sharing this anecdote, she declared that the world was "becoming a small village," and repeatedly emphasized the idea of "shared humanity." When rendered in Chinese, the phrase closely echoes Xi Jinping's slogan: "a community with a shared future for mankind."
Her speech quickly went viral on Chinese social media, where comment sections were filled with prideful remarks like, "The voice of a community with a shared future for mankind is echoing across the Harvard campus."
While she received widespread praise on Chinese platforms, criticism emerged from some overseas Chinese communities. Much of the backlash stemmed from the fact that she had been admitted to Harvard Kennedy School with a recommendation from the head of a government-affiliated organization, one that appears to be a private entity on the surface. Adding to the skepticism, the first Chinese media outlet to report on her speech published the story in its Political Affairs section.
I recently translated an article by a Chinese intellectual who offered a critical analysis of the case. The author argued that the CCP deliberately sends young people like her to study at top American universities as part of a broader strategic effort. Beneath the feel-good narrative of a "small village," the author pointed to signs of large-scale bribery, debt diplomacy, and the exploitation of Chinese laborers working in harsh conditions with confiscated passports.
They posed an incisive question: "Can we really call this a 'small village' when cheap Chinese-made washing machines flood the African market at the cost of human rights abuses and severe environmental degradation in China?"
Trump's exclusionary policies targeting foreigners and Chinese nationals may ultimately undermine America's own technological and economic progress. At the same time, it's undeniable that the CCP is actively working to infiltrate democratic societies. Ironically, the Chinese intellectual who wrote the critical article I translated cannot publish under their real name. With family still in China, they face the risk of threats and political persecution.
Back in 1989, during the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the Chinese government arrested intellectuals while the PLA turned its guns on citizens demanding freedom and democracy. People gather in Taipei, Taiwan for a memorial rally in remembrance of the Tiananmen Square incident on the June 4, 2025. The lights are arranged in the shape of "8964" (1989 June 4), representing the date of the massacre. (©Sankei by Yoshiaki Nishimi)
In the years that followed, Japan and America sought to encourage political reform in China by integrating it into the international order. To do so, they maintained engagement with the Communist Party. Supported by the democratic world, China rose to become an economic superpower. Today, however, it poses a growing threat to regional stability in Asia and to global peace.
That said, Japan should avoid embracing the extreme measures seen under the Trump administration, such as cutting ties with China or treating all Chinese individuals as potential threats.
Instead, Japan ought to engage with Chinese citizens who share democratic values and acknowledge the challenges posed by the CCP's rule. By working with these allies, Japan can more effectively stand against authoritarianism and safeguard its national interests.
Author: Tomoko Ako
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
14 minutes ago
- National Post
Israel agreed to terms of a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, Trump says
U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday night that Israel agreed to the 'necessary conditions' that would lead to a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which time Washington 'will work with all parties to end the war.' Article content 'My representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza,' the president stated on Tuesday. Article content 'The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring peace, will deliver this final proposal,' Trump stated. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this deal, because it will not get better. It will only get worse.' Article content Marshall Wittmann, the AIPAC spokesman, told JNS that 'we appreciate the efforts of President Trump and Steve Witkoff to work with our ally Israel to reach a hostage deal in Gaza.' Article content Article content 'Now, it is incumbent on Hamas, which has been the ongoing obstacle to peace, to accept the agreement,' Wittmann told JNS. Article content AIPAC stated that those calling for 'ceasefire now' were silent, 'as Hamas is once again the obstacle to a deal.' AIPAC called that silence 'revealing.' Article content According to Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, there was a 'large majority in the government and among the people' for the proposed hostage deal. 'If there is an opportunity to do so—it must not be missed!' the diplomat posted to X on Wednesday morning. Article content However, Minister of Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism Amichai Chikli, in a response to Sa'ar said that the terms of the proposed deal were 'not presented to the government at all.' Article content Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, a senior member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government,' also responded: 'Ending the war in Gaza—not a moment before defeating Hamas.' Article content Netanyahu stated on June 21 that 'there are those around the world, and in Israel, who say 'Enough. Come on, end the war,'' per an English translation of the premier's remarks, which his office released. Article content 'I have news for you. I am ready to end the war, according to clear conditions that will ensure the security of Israel,' Netanyahu said. 'All of the hostages will return home. Hamas will lay down its weapons, leave power, its leadership—whoever is left—will be exiled from the Strip. Gaza will be completely demilitarized, and we will carry out the Trump plan, which is so correct and so revolutionary, and it says something simple. The residents of Gaza who wish to leave will be able to leave.' Article content Anyone who calls for Israel to stop fighting prior to achieving those aims 'is, in effect, calling for Hamas to stay in power,' Netanyahu said at the time. Article content 'What does this mean? This means that all of our achievements and all of the sacrifice of our heroic soldiers will have been for naught,' he said. Article content 'Hamas will rebuild, resume its missile production, dig more terrorist tunnels and reposition itself with armed terrorists a short distance from the communities of the Negev,' he added. 'We will receive more abductions, more murders, more rapes and more burning of infants.' Article content


Edmonton Journal
21 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Israel agreed to terms of a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, Trump says
Article content U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday night that Israel agreed to the 'necessary conditions' that would lead to a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which time Washington 'will work with all parties to end the war.' 'My representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza,' the president stated on Tuesday. 'The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring peace, will deliver this final proposal,' Trump stated. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this deal, because it will not get better. It will only get worse.'


Toronto Sun
28 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Paramount to pay $16M in settlement with Trump over '60 Minutes' interview
Published Jul 02, 2025 • 2 minute read President Donald Trump speaks during a roundtable at "Alligator Alcatraz," a new migrant detention facility at Dade-Collier Training and Transition facility, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Ochopee, Fla. Photo by Evan Vucci / AP Photo In a case seen as a challenge to free speech, Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump over the editing of CBS' ' 60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris in October. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Paramount told media outlets the money will go to Trump's future presidential library, not to the president himself. It said the settlement did not involve an apology. Trump's lawyer said the president had suffered 'mental anguish' over the editing of the interview by CBS News, while Paramount and CBS rejected his contention that it was edited to enhance how Harris sounded. They had sought to get Trump's lawsuit dismissed. There was no immediate word from the White House about the settlement of the case, which Trump filed in Amarillo, Texas. The case has been closely watched by advocates for press freedom and by journalists within CBS, whose lawyers called Trump's lawsuit 'completely without merit' and promised to vigorously fight it after it was filed. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In early February, '60 Minutes' released a full, unedited transcript of the interview. Under the settlement reached with help of a mediator, Paramount agreed that '60 Minutes' will release transcripts of future interviews of presidential candidates, 'subject to redactions as required for legal and national security concerns,' CBS News cited the statement as saying. Trump, who did not agree to be interviewed by '60 Minutes' during the campaign, protested editing where Harris is seen giving two different answers to a question by the show's Bill Whitaker in separate clips aired on '60 Minutes' and 'Face the Nation' earlier in the day. CBS said each reply came within Harris' long-winded answer to Whitaker, but was edited to be more succinct. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The president's lawyer, Edward Andrew Paltzik, said that caused confusion and 'mental anguish,' misleading voters and causing them to pay less attention to Trump and his Truth Social platform. Paramount and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone were seeking the settlement with Trump, whose administration must approve the company's proposed merger with Skydance Media. CBS News President and CEO Wendy McMahon and '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens, who both opposed a settlement, have resigned in recent weeks. The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a media advocacy group that says it is a Paramount shareholder, has said that it would file a lawsuit in protest if a settlement was reached. In December, ABC News settled a defamation lawsuit by Trump over statements made by anchor George Stephanopoulos, agreeing to pay $15 million toward Trump's presidential library rather than engage in a public fight. Meta reportedly paid $25 million to settle Trump's lawsuit against the company over its decision to suspend his social media accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.