High Courts Reluctant to Hire Retired Judges Despite Supreme Court Approval to Address Criminal Case Backlog, ET LegalWorld
According to people aware of the procedure to appoint Supreme Court and high court judges, none of the high court collegiums have so far recommended names of retired judges to be appointed as ad-hoc judges.
There are 25 high courts in the country. Till June 11, no high court collegiums sent any such proposal to the Union Law Ministry.
Considering a backlog of over 18 lakh criminal cases, the Supreme Court on January 30 allowed the high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges, not exceeding 10 per cent of the court's total sanctioned strength.
Advt
Advt
Article 224A of the Constitution allows the appointment of retired judges as ad-hoc judges in high courts to help deal with pendency.According to the laid down procedure, the respective high court collegiums send recommendations or names of candidates to be appointed as HC judges to the Department of Justice in the law ministry.The department then adds inputs and details of the candidates before forwarding the same to the Supreme Court Collegium.The SC Collegium then takes a final call and recommends to the government to appoint the selected persons as judges.The president signs the 'warrant of appointment' of the newly-appointed judge.The procedure to appoint ad-hoc judges will be the same except that the president will not sign the warrant of appointment. But the assent of the president will be sought for appointing ad-hoc judges.Except in one case, there is no precedence of appointing retired judges as ad-hoc HC judges, officials had earlier pointed out.In a judgement dated April 20, 2021, on the appointment of ad-hoc judges in the high courts, the top court imposed certain conditions.However, later a special Supreme Court bench comprising then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justices B R Gavai (incumbent CJI) and Surya Kant relaxed certain conditions and kept some in abeyance.The verdict, which was authored by former chief justice S A Bobde, directed retired high court judges to be appointed as ad-hoc ones for a period of two to three years to clear the backlog.While one condition said that ad-hoc judges cannot be appointed if a high court was working with 80 per cent of its sanctioned strength, the other said ad-hoc judges could sit separately on benches to deal with cases.Relaxing the conditions, the court said the requirement that vacancies should not be more than 20 per cent of the sanctioned strength for the time being shall be kept in abeyance.The bench also said each high court should keep the appointment to two to five ad-hoc judges and not exceed 10 per cent of the total sanctioned strength."The ad-hoc judges will sit in a bench presided over by a sitting judge of the high court and decide pending criminal appeals," the apex court's order said.The rarely used Article 224A of the Constitution deals with the appointment of ad-hoc judges in high courts."The chief justice of a high court for any state may at any time, with the previous consent of the president, request any person who has held the office of a judge of that court or of any other high court to sit and act as a judge of the high court for that state," it says.
Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox.
All about ETLegalWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETLegalWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
4 minutes ago
- India Today
Brazil's Lula says ‘will not call Trump,' aims to strengthen ties with Modi, Xi
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Tuesday that he will not call US President Donald Trump, saying Trump does not want to talk. Lula referred to the day the tariffs were imposed as "the most regrettable" day in the bilateral relations between the Lula said will speak with other world leaders, including India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "I will call Xi Jinping, I will call Prime Minister Modi. I won't call Putin, because he can't travel now. But I will call many Presidents," Lula said as quoted by local media. advertisementThese leaders represent nations within Brics, a coalition that has drawn warnings from the US. Trump has said that countries supporting Brics policies that conflict with US interests will face an additional 10% IMPOSES 50% TARIFFS ON BRAZIL The United States imposed an additional 40% tariff on Brazil, bringing the total tariff amount to 50% on Brazilian imports. This has caused a serious strain between the two countries. Lula said Brazil will use all available tools, including the World Trade Organisation (WTO), to defend its trade Trump had said Lula could "call him anytime" to talk about trade. Brazil's finance minister, Fernando Haddad, welcomed Trump's move and said Lula would be ready to take such a call. However, Lula has made it clear that he will not be the one to start the conversation with RISE AFTER BOLSONARO'S ARRESTThe tensions are not only about trade. The United States recently condemned a decision by Brazil's Supreme Court to place former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest before his trial on charges of plotting a US State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs called Justice Alexandre de Moraes a "US-sanctioned human rights abuser" and accused him of using Brazil's courts to silence opposition voices. They demanded Bolsonaro be allowed to speak de Moraes, who is sanctioned by the US under the Magnitsky Act for alleged human rights violations, said he would continue his duties despite the sanctions.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC seeks to know TN's stand on quota for trans persons
Chennai: While commending Tamil Nadu govt's Policy For Transgender Persons, 2025, and calling it a significant step forward for the community, Madras high court said the govt's stand on granting horizontal reservation for the community in education and jobs remained unclear. "It is not clear as to whether the govt wants to provide horizontal reservation, which has been the request of the community and which has been reflected in many of the earlier orders passed by various courts, including a division bench of this court," said Justice N Anand Venkatesh on Tuesday. Hence, the state is directed to take a decision in this regard so that the community need not knock on the doors of this court every time and seek the reservation, the court added. Besides the horizontal reservation, the other issue requiring immediate consideration pertains to the district-level and state-level committees to monitor and review the progress in the implementation of the policy, the court said. "The state must ensure that there is representation of at least one transwoman, transman, and intersex person in the committee for its effective functioning," Justice Anand Venkatesh said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai Insofar as the marriage of transgender and intersex people is concerned, the same was already recognised by the Supreme Court; however, the real challenge is faced when they seek registration of marriages before the registrar," the court pointed out. "Hence, the state must issue necessary directions to the registrars about the legal sanction of these marriages," he added. Another suggestion for the govt was regarding the deed of familial association or other types of domestic partnership/civil union which the parties may enter to govern their rights. This issue has significance since none of the Succession Acts recognises such rights, and therefore, the parties must be able to at least deal with their rights by entering into such agreements, the court said. The court further recorded the submission of the govt that insofar as the policy for LGBTQIA+, the same is under process and some time is required to finalize it. Now that the govt has come out with a policy for transgender and intersex persons, it is time that it comes up with a policy for LGBTQIA+ people also. This process should be expedited, the court said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
PSUs shouldn't behave like Shylock to become money-minded: SC
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court has said that public sector units should not be guided only by commercial interests for making money like a private company but their conduct must be like a model citizen and came down on Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) for behaving like "Shylock" and getting into unnecessary litigation on tariff against wind power producers in Gujarat from which it purchases power. A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Satish Chandra Sharma rejected the plea of GUVNL which contended that tariff rate of Rs 3.56 per kWh as mentioned in power purchase agreements (PPAs) was binding on the four power generating companies. The court said govt has been promoting renewable energy to reduce carbon footprint and to make the country energy self-sufficient and less dependent on fossil fuels and GUVNL should be mindful of the policy. The PSU took the stand that these wind energy projects had willingly entered into PPAs with it, binding themselves to the tariff rate of Rs 3.56 per kWh, and were, therefore, not at liberty to seek determination of tariff on a case-to-case basis thereafter, a plea which was rejected by the SC. "GUVNL cannot be guided only by its own commercial interests, like a private business entity and it's conduct, as a state-instrumentality, must be of the standard of a model citizen. However, patently unfair treatment was sought to be meted out by GUVNL to the respondent companies by binding them to a rate that was wholly inapplicable to them. Such conduct, akin to a Shylock, does not reflect positively upon GUVNL," the bench said.
