Setback after cashbacks: Gaming industry faces fresh GST trouble
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Mumbai: The world of real money gaming, which is often in regulatory crosshairs, has been hit by another salvo from goods and services tax (GST) authorities.At least four gaming companies have received communication from the indirect tax department for non-payment of GST on cashbacks and bonuses that the gaming platforms offer to the players.This comes at a point the gaming industry is waging a make-or-break battle with the tax department on the retrospective collection of GST for the period 2017 to late 2023. The matter now raised by the department adds to the plight of the industry and could boil over as a fresh dispute before the court.Bonuses, doled out to attract players, are a common practice in the trade. Several companies dip into their own funds and capital to give back the amount equivalent to the quantum of GST (collected from players on the betting amount) as bonus. The bonus received by the players is non-withdrawable and must be used for gaming.However, according to the department's interpretation, any bonus or cashback credited to the user's wallet - even if not directly paid by the user - is considered as "amount paid on behalf of the player" and is therefore taxable. Since these credits, including sign-up bonuses and other promotional credits, can be used for gameplay, they are now included in the taxable value.Alerting all gaming companies in a closed social media group, a senior official of a platform offering the board game ludo said that his company has received summons from the GST department."This has serious implications. Our business operations have been severely impacted, and we have been pressured to make voluntary payments to avoid further action. After extensive research and consultation, we strongly believe this interpretation is flawed and harmful to the industry. We are preparing to challenge this matter in the Supreme Court next week... I wanted to share an important update that may affect us all in the online gaming industry," said the person.The tax office has invoked Rule 31B, a seemingly wide regulation, of the Central GST Rules to back its demand of 28% GST on the total value of such bonuses or cashbacks disbursed to users since October 2023 when the rule came into effect.However, according to a legal expert, "The department's stand prima facie appears frivolous and untenable as discount can never be part of the consideration for GST." Some of the companies grappling with notices or summons from the GST office have broached the idea of a "collective legal front" before the apex court as the stand to tax bonus amounts could soon extend to all gaming platforms.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Edu dept extends CAP deadline to July 30 amid OBC quota uncertainty
Kolkata: The higher education department has extended the undergraduate application deadline on the centralised admission portal to July 30. This was the third extension amid the uncertainty over OBC seat reservations. The OBC matter is likely to be heard in the Supreme Court on Monday. "No decision on seat reservations has been taken. A merit list cannot be prepared without a verdict on reservations," said an official, hoping to get some clarity on Monday. Till Friday evening, 3,56,202 UG candidates had registered on the portal and submitted 20,49,517 applications. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Principals are upset with the deadline extension but expressed helplessness. Lady Brabourne College principal Siuli Sarkar said, "As the reservation issue is yet to be resolved, there is no other option but to extend the deadline again." But another principal said, "How long will the dates be pushed back? Admissions in other states are almost over. Even institutes outside the centralised portal have completed their process. I am not sure if we will get any student." CU interim VC Santa Datta De said, "I don't know why the govt hasn't solved this yet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo We finished admissions to our in-house UG courses, and classes will start from Aug 1, but affiliated colleges don't know when they can start filling seats." Scottish Church is among the colleges outside the portal. Principal Madhumanjari Mandal said, "Most seats are filled and we will start classes from Aug 1. We have not closed admissions as JEE results are not out and the portal is still live."
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
NDMC issues uniform signage rules for Khan Market; extra charges for boards over 2.5 sq mt
New Delhi, The New Delhi Municipal Council has issued a set of comprehensive guidelines for standardising shop signage and facades in Khan Market, one of the most posh and high-end markets in Lutyens' Delhi. NDMC issues uniform signage rules for Khan Market; extra charges for boards over 2.5 sq mt The move is aimed at enhancing civic aesthetics and ensuring architectural uniformity across the nationally renowned shopping and dining destination. According to the guidelines, all shopkeepers and premises owners are required to replace existing signage with new ones, conforming to the prescribed design within two months. In case of non-compliance, the NDMC will remove improper signage without issuing further notice. The guidelines permit shop signage to span the full width of the storefront if desired by the owner. However, as per the Delhi Outdoor Advertising Policy, 2017 framed under directions from the Supreme Court and finalised by the Environment Pollution Authority any signage exceeding 2.5 square metres will be subject to additional charges. The standard signboard size is 450 mm in height and 900 mm in length, backed by a pre-coated grey metal sheet. Retractable awnings are allowed, with a maximum projection of 1000 mm, while permanent awnings are not permitted. The document also regulates the installation of air-conditioning units, false facades, and drainage elements. Ground floor AC outdoor units must not project more than 750 mm from the wall surface. False facades are permitted to extend up to 200 mm from the original wall. Rainwater and drainage pipes on upper floors must be properly encased and connected to the municipal drainage system. To maintain visual clarity, all hanging wires must be removed, and water tanks placed on terraces must be screened from public view using suitable materials. These guidelines apply to all shop typologies including single-front, double-front, corner shops, rear-lane shops, and corridor-facing outlets. Sanjeev Mehra, president of the Khan Market Traders' Association, told PTI, 'We have requested the NDMC to provide a detailed presentation on the type of signboards that need to be installed so that everything is clarified at once. The NDMC is scheduled to give this presentation on Monday .' The initiative is part of NDMC's broader effort to create uniformity in urban design and preserve the elite and historic character of key commercial zones in the Lutyens' Delhi. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Cash loan of over Rs 20,000 not a ‘legally enforceable debt', rules Kerala HC
Kochi: High court has held that a cash loan exceeding Rs 20,000 does not constitute a 'legally enforceable debt' since such transactions are prohibited under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, if a cheque issued for the repayment of such an illegal loan is dishonoured, the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act would not be attracted. Justice P V Kunhikrishnan delivered the ruling while allowing an appeal filed by P C Hari of Pathanamthitta, challenging his conviction and sentence in a financial cheating case. The allegation against Hari was that he had borrowed Rs 9 lakh in cash from Shine Varghese of Pathanamthitta, and that the cheque issued by him in discharge of the said amount had been dishonoured. The trial court found Hari guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced him to one year of simple imprisonment along with a direction to pay Rs 9 lakh as compensation. An appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed by the additional district and sessions judge, Pathanamthitta, prompting Hari to move HC. In his appeal, Hari argued that the transaction, as admitted by the complainant, was in cash. He relied on Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, which mandates that any loan or deposit above Rs 20,000 must be made through an account transfer, cheque or demand draft. It was further submitted that the complainant had not paid income tax on the alleged loan amount. In such circumstances, Hari contended, the transaction itself was illegal, and a debt arising out of an illegal transaction could not be treated as legally enforceable. The court focused on the question of whether a cash loan above Rs 20,000 could be considered a 'legally enforceable debt.' Referring to prior judicial precedents, including decisions of the Supreme Court, the bench held that the disputed amount could not be treated as such. Consequently, HC set aside the conviction and sentence and acquitted the appellant. Additionally, HC observed that the trial court had erred in treating the cash loan as a legally enforceable debt. It cautioned that if courts begin to regularise such transactions, it would encourage illegal monetary dealings among citizens and potentially enable the conversion of black money into white through the machinery of criminal courts. The bench further noted that when the Govt of India is actively promoting a shift towards complete digital transactions, courts cannot turn a blind eye and effectively validate substantial cash dealings by recognising them as legally enforceable under law.
