logo
Free city centre parking to end despite objections

Free city centre parking to end despite objections

Yahoo02-05-2025
Free parking in Liverpool city centre after 18:00 will come to an end after councillors went against public opinion to back the move.
Nearly two-and-a-half years after the proposals were first announced following a review in 2018, parking charges will apply until 23:00.
Parking in on-street bays will be charged from 07:00-23:00 rather than from 08:00-18:00.
Members of Liverpool City Council's highways and public spaces representations committee agreed to the move despite nearly 90% of respondents to public consultations saying they were opposed.
In addition to the time period amendments, parking in the city will also cost more.
Under a scheme adopted last year, 30 minutes in the city centre will go up from £1.20 to £2, while an hour will cost £4 rather than £2.40.
An informal consultation resulted in 89% of respondents saying they were against the changes.
And in a 2023 formal engagement exercise, only 9% of those surveyed said they would support the idea.
Local resident Sue Williams said it would put her off attending concerts at the Philharmonic Hall or the Everyman, two of the venues along Hope Street in the city's Georgian quarter.
"Parking in this area is a nightmare at the best of times," she said.
"But making it paid up until 11 o'clock would make me think twice about coming to certain things.
"I live in the north of the city, so getting a bus from Hope Street involves a long walk to Queen Square, and there's no train station nearby.
"Why can't they bring in a free shuttle bus to take people to and from places?"
Changes to lengthen the two-hour maximum stay around Hope Street were backed however.
The council said moving to a four-hour maximum stay would "support the continuing growth of the night-time economy in the area, in consideration of the feedback from the initial informal consultation, particularly from businesses".
Hollie Cooke works at Painted Ladies tattoo parlour on Hope Street. She said her main concern had always been the two-hour limit, and would welcome an extension of parking time.
"Customers are always panicking about their parking and running out halfway through a tattoo to feed the meter," she said.
But she added: "Ending free parking after 6pm isn't good for theatres or restaurants, especially older customers.
"It's expensive to park as it is, but I'm not sure people in their 70s would want to be catching a bus home late at night either."
The local authority said changes to on-street parking would seek to "achieve a balance between the various parking demands of users, including those of residents who often are unable to find places to park near to their home while also allowing parking opportunities for visitors".
Officials also hope it will help tackle pavement parking problems.
Federica said she could "see both sides" of the parking debate.
"I want to see fewer people drive into and around the city, but last week I used public transport and I was two hours late for work," she said.
"If they want us to use public transport more, it needs to be better."
The proposed extended hours will require additional enforcement, with the fines expected to bring in almost £240,000 in revenue until parking behaviours improved.
A phased recruitment exercise is underway to recruit additional civil enforcement officers from 52 to 100.
The cost of this enforcement will be met from within existing budgets and also from the potential additional revenue generated not only in the city centre but across the city.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Liverpool City Council
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nonsensical Roundabout With Corners Causes Chaos in Australia
Nonsensical Roundabout With Corners Causes Chaos in Australia

Motor Trend

time02-07-2025

  • Motor Trend

Nonsensical Roundabout With Corners Causes Chaos in Australia

The roundabout (traffic circle to some of us Yanks) is a great idea for certain intersections. It speeds us along when traffic is light (pro tip: you don't need to stop if no one's coming from your driver's side) and it eliminates those annoying red lights where we are held for traffic that never comes. Europe, particularly the UK, has embraced them decades, and we're seeing more and more traffic circles in the States. A new diamond-shaped roundabout in Austral, Sydney, caused confusion and chaos, with drivers struggling to navigate it. The Liverpool City Council, facing a public inquiry, is unclear about its construction and costs. The roundabout's shape and lack of signage contributed to the issues. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article Read Next But it is apparently possible to screw up a roundabout, and officials in Austral, a suburb of Sydney, Australia, have apparently mastered this dubious achievement by creating what could best be called a 'rhombusabout.' The problem seems to have stemmed from a little overzealous action on behalf of the local council, which was urged to ease traffic on a particularly busy road. At one not-quite-perpendicular intersection, road workers created a new roundabout in the shape of a squished diamond (Rhombus! Sort of! Just let us have "rhombusabout."). Chaos ensued almost immediately. According to news reports, some drivers didn't realize there was a new roundabout there—the traffic control device appears entirely painted on barely raised ground—and blasted straight through. The biggest problem, though, seemed to be motorists who could not figure out how to negotiate the tighter right turns (across opposing traffic, similar to our left turns, since stuff's backwards in right-hand-drive Australia) without driving right over the top of the diamond—in fact, three cars in a row were shown doing exactly that on live television as 9 News reporter Sarah Stewart looked on. 'No one knows what to do,' said Stewart. 'It's this funny shape, there's not enough room and there's not enough warning. People get on top of it and they don't know what to do.' Cars going straight through the roundabout could not seem to jog around the diamond without clipping the corners, and the edges of the roundabout were already showing tire discoloration just hours after the ill-conceived roundabout was installed. How did this all go so wrong? No one seems to know. Anchor Karl Stevanovic of Australia's Today show grilled Liverpool City council member Peter Ristevski, who claimed not to know how the roundabout was built, calling it an 'operational matter' and appearing to blame rogue road contractors. He also noted that the Liverpool City Council was subject to a public inquiry regarding corruption and confidence, and admitted the council had no idea what the rombusabout cost or what it would cost to rectify. 'A roundabout, by name and nature, is round,' Stevanovic drily observed. Indeed.

Drivers erupt at council's 'dangerous' new roundabout in busy suburb
Drivers erupt at council's 'dangerous' new roundabout in busy suburb

Yahoo

time27-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Drivers erupt at council's 'dangerous' new roundabout in busy suburb

Questions are mounting about how a bizarre diamond-shaped roundabout got approved in a dense suburban area, with one local councillor admitting he's as confused as residents, branding the strange new addition to the road "embarrassing". Utterly baffled motorists are mystified over how to use it, with many opting to ignore it and drive straight over. Footage captured by Yahoo News Australia on Friday at the new Austral "intersection", in Sydney's southwest, shows several motorists driving right through the diamond-shaped roundabout, including a large truck and several SUVs. "It's f**king sh*t," a local told Yahoo News. "I can't even turn onto my street because of the shape of the roundabout." The man said that if he followed the road, he wouldn't be able to make it all the way around without either hitting another car or the pole on the side of the road. "Because it's shaped like that, by the time I do swing it back around, I would hit those cars waiting there or the pole, so it makes it dangerous," he said. "Getting around Sydney itself is already sh*t and then they add that little puzzle to the mix." Vision appears to suggest there was ample space for a standard circular roundabout, with the diamond design seemingly chosen due to the angled layout of Twenty Eighth Avenue. Yahoo News has sought an explanation from Liverpool City Council on the new roundabout. There are no visible signs directing road users how to properly use the diamond. Councillor Peter Ristevski has now called for an urgent investigation into why the diamond shape got approved in the first place. "My inbox last night was bombarded with over 300 responses asking, 'what is going on? You guys can't even build a roundabout'," Ristevski told Today. "They've pretty much lost confidence in the council, which is very concerning at the moment." Drivers reminded of road rule being ignored on roundabouts Controversial road rule change set to impact over a million Aussies from July Millions of Aussie drivers warned of road rule change with $961 fines Ristevski pointed to external contractors, and said he wasn't aware of the price tag of the roundabout. "It's quite embarrassing," he said. "I'm in Canberra for the Australian Local Government Conference, where I've had every single councillor here in Australia rip into me about this roundabout." Seven News reports Liverpool Council has acknowledged the confusing layout and is attempting to redesign it circularly. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

‘Tourists are taking over our £650-a-year car park'
‘Tourists are taking over our £650-a-year car park'

Yahoo

time08-06-2025

  • Yahoo

‘Tourists are taking over our £650-a-year car park'

Motorists paying almost £650 a year to park claim they are being squeezed out by tourists. Residents of Tetbury, near King Charles's Highgrove House in Gloucestershire, say they are left fighting with day trippers who pinch spots which should be allocated to them. The Georgian house, which was built in the late 18th century, is the private residence of the King and Queen. However, the gardens are open to the public between April and October, meaning there is more competition for spaces. For those who pay £640 for a season ticket to park in West Street car park, this is the hardest time to secure a spot near their homes. Although half are allocated to them, locals say they always struggle to find a space. Cotswold district council conceded that a season ticket 'does not guarantee a parking space' despite the price charged and that they are not exclusively available to residents. Dee Buss, 78, said his disabled neighbour was unable to reach her car for a hospital appointment. 'It's been really bad,' Mr Buss said, 'I have no choice, but the price has just gone up and up and up. 'In the house across, there's an elderly disabled lady who couldn't get her car out because another had been parked over her entry. 'Obviously we're happy to have King Charles over at Highgrove, but there's so many tourists and it seems to leave Tetbury as the car park.' Steve Tayler, 72, who lives nearby, said: 'It's a problem. 'They're about £600 a year, a hell of a lot, and there's no allocated spots for residents, so it's just a free-for-all.' John Evans, 87, added: 'I was looking out my kitchen window one day and there was a coach full of tourists that had come from Germany, parked in West Street. 'And because there's a real need for large vehicles to have places to park, I've seen coaches in the car park here. It happens all the time, it's crazy.' Kenneth Ford, 68, expressed concern that paying £600 a year got residents nothing. 'At the end of the day, like in all these towns, it's set up more for people coming into the town rather than the residents,' he said. Annie Bowen, 78, was one of those who decided to pay for a permit. However, she worried about the lack of CCTV and how protected the vehicles were after her car was hit by a Mini whose driver had left it without the handbrake on. 'So, what are we paying for?' she said. 'We're not designated a space. It's not safe, and it's ridiculously expensive.' Cllr Paul Hodgkinson, from Cotswold district council, said: 'With officers from the council, I have spent time in Tetbury talking to residents, local businesses and other stakeholders, so I have a good understanding of the issues they are facing. 'In recognition of the needs of season ticket holders, half of the standard parking bays in the West Street car park on Old Brewery Lane are allocated to them. ''While we understand that holding a season ticket does not guarantee a parking space and that these tickets are not exclusively for residents, opportunities to expand off-street parking in the town are unfortunately limited. 'In addition, we also provide the Old Railyard car park in Tetbury, which is free of charge. We remain committed to ongoing dialogue with local residents and businesses.' Highgrove House was contacted for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store