logo
Abortions can resume in Kansas City after Missouri ruling, Planned Parenthood says

Abortions can resume in Kansas City after Missouri ruling, Planned Parenthood says

Miami Herald04-07-2025
Abortion services are poised to resume in Kansas City and across Missouri after a Jackson County judge on Thursday blocked a series of restrictions that temporarily banned access.
Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Jerri Zhang, in an order issued late Thursday afternoon, halted requirements that abortion providers must obtain state licenses, among other restrictions. The licenses included rules that providers called unethical, including mandatory pelvic exams for women.
The order marks a key moment for abortion rights supporters, effectively restoring access after a procedural ruling from the Missouri Supreme Court temporarily banned the procedure in late May.
Planned Parenthood's clinic in Kansas City immediately planned to restore access on Monday, the organization confirmed to The Star.
'Abortion is legal again in Missouri because voters demanded it and we fought for it,' Emily Wales, the president and CEO of Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, said in a statement. 'Care starts again on Monday in Kansas City. We're not stopping until every Missourian can get the care they need, close to home.'
Thursday's ruling came roughly a month after the state Supreme Court ordered Zhang to vacate two preliminary injunctions that had allowed abortions to resume in the state. The Supreme Court order temporarily halted all abortions in what providers called a 'de facto ban.'
The court had ordered Zhang to reevaluate her rulings based on a different legal standard. After a series of legal fights between abortion providers and attorneys for the state of Missouri, Zhang's order on Thursday blocked the same restrictions and effectively restored access.
Zhang's order on Thursday was mixed and did not block all restrictions sought by abortion providers, including a ban on medication abortions. But the ruling halted enough of the regulations for Planned Parenthood to begin offering procedural abortions again.
The order states the regulations should be blocked after voters in November approved an abortion rights amendment, called Amendment 3, that enshrined reproductive rights in the state constitution.
The restrictions, often called TRAP laws or Targeted Restrictions on Abortion Providers, included a 72-hour waiting period before receiving an abortion and clinic licensing rules. The regulations effectively caused the number of abortions in Missouri to drop from 6,163 in 2010 to 150 in 2021 before the state's former ban was enacted in 2022.
Abortion rights supporters quickly celebrated the ruling as a victory in the fight for restored access.
'Missourians voted to end the abortion ban and establish the right to reproductive freedom in the constitution, and today, a Missouri court once again ruled to uphold the will of the people,' said Mallory Schwarz, the executive director of Abortion Action Missouri.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, a Republican who fought against restored access, said in a statement that would he would immediately appeal the decision.
'I will always fight to make Missouri the safest state in the nation for women and children,' Bailey said.
While Thursday's ruling marked a win for abortion rights supporters, it also comes as a new fight at the ballot box looms.
Republican lawmakers in May voted to put a new abortion ban on the 2026 statewide ballot. If approved by voters, the proposed constitutional amendment, which will also be called Amendment 3, would strike down the November vote that legalized access and ban nearly all abortions in the state.
Schwarz nodded at the upcoming ballot fight in a statement on Thursday, saying, 'attacking Missourians' freedom will always be a losing strategy.'
'We will defeat abortion bans as many times as we have to, and we know that the majority of Missourians are with us,' Schwarz said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Puerto Rico bans gender-affirming care for trans people younger than 21
Puerto Rico bans gender-affirming care for trans people younger than 21

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Puerto Rico bans gender-affirming care for trans people younger than 21

Transgender Puerto Ricans younger than 21 no longer will have access to gender-affirming hormone therapy or surgeries under legislation signed this week by the U.S. territory's Republican Gov. Jenniffer González-Colón that threatens doctors with criminal penalties. The law approved late Wednesday would punish health care professionals who provide gender-affirming care to minors and young adults with a $50,000 fine per violation and a determinate prison sentence of 15 years. Doctors also would lose their licenses and permits and be permanently barred from conducting business in Puerto Rico. 'Minors, having not yet reached the necessary emotional, cognitive, and physical maturity, are particularly vulnerable to making decisions that can have irreversible consequences,' reads the law, set to take effect in October. 'Therefore, it is the State's duty to ensure their comprehensive well-being.' Under Puerto Rican law, the age of majority, or legal adulthood, begins at 21, making the island's ban on gender-affirming care for minors one of the most restrictive of any U.S. state or territory. Roughly half the nation has adopted laws since 2021 that limit access to prescription medications, such as hormones and puberty blockers, and gender-affirming surgical procedures, typically for children and teens under 18. Laws passed in Alabama and Nebraska restrict care up to 19 years old, similar to an executive order signed by President Trump in January that aims to end federal support for gender-affirming care for young people. In June, the Supreme Court dealt a victory to supporters of such laws, upholding Tennessee's ban on transition-related care for minors and ruling that the state's law, contrary to the arguments of transgender civil rights advocates, does not discriminate based on sex or transgender status. Major professional medical organizations criticized the court's decision, maintaining that gender-affirming health care for both transgender adults and minors is medically necessary and can be lifesaving. Conservative Puerto Rican officials applauded González's approval of legislation restricting care, which also prohibits the use of public funds for transgender health care for minors. 'The protection of our children and the well-being of all minors is fundamental and non-negotiable!' Puerto Rican Senate President Thomas Rivera Schatz, the bill's author, said Thursday on social media in a statement thanking González and the territory's Legislature for approving the measure. Schatz is affiliated with the New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico and the Republican Party. 'Now no minor will be able to be subjected to treatment for alleged 'sex change,'' Sen. Joanne Rodríguez Veve, a member of the Proyecto Dignidad Party, wrote on Facebook. She added in an accompanying video, 'This is great news for Puerto Rico!' Organizations including the Puerto Rico Psychological Association, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Puerto Rican Association of Professional Counseling and the Puerto Rico Bar Association had encouraged González to veto the bill. In a statement on Thursday, Puerto Rico's LGBTQ+ Federation said it would challenge the new law in court. 'Let there be no doubt: We will go to court to challenge the constitutionality of the governor's cruel and inhumane signing of a law that criminalizes health professionals for caring for trans minors,' said Justin Jesús Santiago, the federation's co-director. 'What a shame!' Pedro Julio Serrano, the federation's president, said Thursday. 'With her actions, Jennif[f]er González declares herself the most anti-equity governor in history.'

Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County
Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County

Los Angeles Times

time5 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Commentary: The reality of 'defunding' Planned Parenthood in Orange County

They came for abortion. But instead they took away your birth control, cancer screenings, and testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. Congress has passed Trump's budget bill and in doing so, they have jeopardized access to basic healthcare. The Trump administration and Congress have turned their backs on our communities, and the consequences of this bill will echo for generations in Southern California. One of the central provisions of this bill is 'defunding' Planned Parenthood, by excluding all Planned Parenthood health centers from any Medicaid reimbursement, simply because the organization provides abortion services. Far from being a 'handout' as some characterize it, Medicaid is actually a federal health insurance program that reimburses providers for medical services. By blocking Planned Parenthood from Medicaid, the Trump administration and its Republican allies have unjustly blocked the largest provider of reproductive healthcare in the country from accessing any federal reimbursement for all services, including birth control, STI testing/treatment and cancer screening. Here's the truth: the government has already prohibited federal funds from being used for abortion since 1977, thanks to the Hyde Amendment. But now, upset that they have not been able to ban abortion outright, Republican lawmakers have chosen to block access to more than 90% of the services we provide each year by excluding us from a major health insurance program enabling millions of low-income Americans to get healthcare. Republicans have turned misinformation into policy, traded facts for fear — and sacrificed lives for leverage. Defunding Planned Parenthood is not about balancing the country's budget. This is a blatant attack on healthcare access for people who need it the most, and a backdoor attempt to block people from accessing abortion, birth control, and other medical services that most Americans support and are legally protected in California. They may operate from hate, but we act from humanity. For Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties (PPOSBC), that means showing up, no matter what. At PPOSBC, we are exploring every possible budgetary solution to ensure that the more than 130,000 patients who rely on us for care each year can continue to access the medical services they need. Like any health care provider in this country that accepts Medicaid, we receive federal funding as reimbursement for the care we provide. Now we are being forced to make some tough decisions as a result of this targeted and unjust attack on the patients we serve. However, we refuse to let cancers go undetected or let STIs go untreated. We refuse to stand idly by while patients are blocked from accessing birth control, vasectomies, comprehensive sexual health education, and more basic and legally protected healthcare services. Even as the Trump administration tries to block people from accessing the health care they need, it cannot deter us from our mission. Our patients and communities are relying on us, and we will continue to show up for them with strength, courage, and dignity. Our compassion will always exceed their cruelty. This fight is not over, but we have difficult days ahead of us. If you're angry, heartbroken, believe in health care access for all, or have ever been to a Planned Parenthood for care, please channel that energy into action. We need everyone in our community to stand with us and help us fight back, because we will not stop fighting for our patients. With your support, we're not going anywhere, and neither is our care. Krista Hollinger is the President and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties. Previously, she held leadership positions at UCI Health and St. Jude Heritage Health Care. She is a resident of Anaheim.

121 million live in states restricting contraceptive access
121 million live in states restricting contraceptive access

Axios

time13 hours ago

  • Axios

121 million live in states restricting contraceptive access

State laws regulating birth control remain a patchwork, with wide variations in access and restrictions in some locales requiring parental consent or allowing providers to opt out of dispensing contraception, a new scorecard from the Population Reference Bureau shows. Why it matters: Contraception access has become a political flashpoint since the Supreme Court ended Roe v. Wade, with Democrats unsuccessfully pressing to codify nationwide contraceptive access and some patients concerned that conservative state legislatures could enact new curbs. What they found: States on both coasts generally had policies aimed at ensuring access, such as requiring insurers to offer no-cost coverage and allowing nurse practitioners or pharmacists to prescribe birth control. Nearly 35% of Americans, or 121 million people, currently live in a state that actively restricts access. Of the 16 states the group identified in that cohort, the most restrictive including Kansas, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama and Wyoming. The most protective included California, Washington, Connecticut, New York, New Mexico, Maryland and Oregon. Another 18 states were considered a mix between the two. "Reproductive health care access depends on where you live," said Cathryn Streifel, senior program director at PRB and co-author of the scorecard.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store