New Orleans mayor heading to France
The United Nations Ocean Conference will take place June 9-13. The lead up to the conference will take place June 4-8 and the Summit will take place on June 7.
According to city officials, the global conference will bring together elected leaders and officials from major coastal cities and regions to develop a plan focused on research, resources and long-term resilience strategies.
New Orleans police search for food trailer stolen from Algiers
Cantrell will participate in a conference event with French President Emmanuel Macron and renew a twinning city agreement with the city of Nice, France.
City officials said Cantrell is working to strengthen the historic connection between New Orleans and France.
Cantrell will extend an invitation to French leaders to participate and support events for the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.
Cantrell will return to New Orleans at the end of the summit.Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office investigates in-custody death
New Orleans mayor heading to France
Procter & Gamble cutting thousands of jobs in wake of Trump tariffs
WATCH: Follow 4-dolphins' journey from Gulf World to a better home
Senate GOP prepares to unveil SNAP piece of Trump agenda bill as some expect changes
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does JOST Werke SE (ETR:JST) Create Value For Shareholders?
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of JOST Werke SE (ETR:JST). ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. How Is ROE Calculated? The formula for return on equity is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for JOST Werke is: 11% = €46m ÷ €406m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. Another way to think of that is that for every €1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn €0.11 in profit. See our latest analysis for JOST Werke Does JOST Werke Have A Good Return On Equity? By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see JOST Werke has a similar ROE to the average in the Machinery industry classification (10%). That isn't amazing, but it is respectable. Even if the ROE is respectable when compared to the industry, its worth checking if the firm's ROE is being aided by high debt levels. If a company takes on too much debt, it is at higher risk of defaulting on interest payments. Our risks dashboardshould have the 3 risks we have identified for JOST Werke. Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same. JOST Werke's Debt And Its 11% ROE JOST Werke clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.52. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it. Summary Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE. Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
New Hampshire is expanding school choice. Will Massachusetts follow?
Advertisement This surge in school choice is part of a broader national trend. Enrollment in such programs has more than doubled since 2020 — from roughly 540,000 to more than Massachusetts, home to some of the nation's strongest private, parochial, charter, and vocational-technical schools, is increasingly being left behind, politically unwilling and legally constrained from offering families access to private options. The catalyst for this wave of private options was the US Supreme Court's 2020 decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The court Advertisement Her story resonated nationwide, particularly during the pandemic. The move to online learning by public schools, union resistance to returning students to the classroom, and a seeming disregard for students' mental health and learning loss drove many families toward private and homeschool options. Even in Massachusetts, Massachusetts may remain among the top-performing states nationally, but that status masks a troubling decline. On the National Assessment of Educational Progress (the nation's report card), average eighth-grade The pandemic and student distraction due to cellphones are partially to blame, but the decline is Clearly there is a hunger for options other than traditional public school. Advertisement New Hampshire's latest choice expansion is relevant to Massachusetts because, in addition to the two states' cultural and demographic similarities, they post nearly identical academic performance. On the 2024 NAEP, New Hampshire eighth-graders scored averages of 280 in As student performance declines, Massachusetts lawmakers remain committed to a top-down, monopolistic education system. They refuse to consider private school choice, hiding behind 19th-century anti-Catholic amendments in the state constitution that prohibit public funds from flowing to religious schools, even indirectly. At the same time, lawmakers have stood by as the pillars of the Commonwealth's landmark 1993 education reforms — strong academic standards, accountability through testing, and choice through charter schools — have steadily eroded. New Hampshire is taking a more pragmatic approach: It is steadily expanding school choice with thoughtful fiscal safeguards and a clear focus on helping the students most in need. As a result, many more New Hampshire parents will now be able to narrow class- and race-based achievement gaps — whether through public or private schools, the small learning groups called The recently passed 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' President Trump's massive tax and spending plan, enacts the first national school choice program, offering scholarships funded through tax credits to all but the wealthiest families. Starting in 2027, taxpayers nationwide will be able to redirect up to $1,700 in federal taxes to approved scholarship organizations. Advertisement The program could benefit many of the 120,000 families in Massachusetts paying a private school tuition, or using homeschool and microschool options, which grew enormously during the pandemic. Expanding its appeal further, the program benefits families paying for after-school supplemental learning, including tutoring. The catch? States must opt in. For now, Massachusetts officials say they are For the dozens of states with school choice programs, including New Hampshire, the pathway forward is clear: Private school choice has broad public support and expands equality of educational opportunity. What will Massachusetts do?
Business Insider
9 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Ethiopia–Egypt dispute escalates after Trump's controversial remarks on $5 billion GERD project
The long-standing tensions between Ethiopia and Egypt over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) escalated recently following remarks by U.S. President Donald Trump that many Ethiopians have condemned as inflammatory and one-sided. Tensions between Ethiopia and Egypt regarding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) have intensified recently. Remarks by former U.S. President Trump favoring Egypt's stance on the dam have exacerbated the situation. Despite prolonged negotiations, Ethiopia and Egypt have yet to reach a consensus on the dam's operation and water-sharing guidelines. Speaking during a meeting with NATO officials in Washington, Trump appeared to align himself with Egypt in the ongoing dispute over the $5 billion hydropower project being built on the Blue Nile, one of the Nile River's primary tributaries. Referring to the dam, Trump said it was ' closing up water going to the Nile,' which he described as 'a very important source of income and life … to take that away is pretty incredible. But we think we are going to have that solved very quickly.' He added, ' I think if I am Egypt, I want to have water in the Nile and we are working on that.' A similar incident occurred in 2020 when Trump suggested that the dam should be blown up by Egypt. In a telephone conversation with Sudanese Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, Trump remarked that Egypt " will end up blowing up the dam" if no agreement was reached. The comments have provoked strong backlash among Ethiopians both at home and abroad, who view GERD as a critical piece of national infrastructure central to efforts to expand energy access, boost industrial growth, and lift millions out of poverty. Ethiopians reject Trump's position Ethiopian officials and civil society groups argue that President Trump's remarks not only undermine Ethiopia's sovereign right to utilize its natural resources but also risk aggravating an already fragile diplomatic situation. Experts like Fekahmed Negash, former executive director at the Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office (ENTRO) of the Nile Basin Initiative, view Trump's comments as too incendiary to be dismissed While responding to questions from The Reporter, he described the U.S. President's remarks as a clearly partisan intervention, albeit unsurprising, given Trump's populist posture. ' President Trump held grudges against Ethiopia for not adhering to his self-styled mediation efforts between Ethiopia and Egypt eight years ago during his first presidency, ' said Fekahmed, who also served as director of Transboundary Rivers Affairs at Ethiopia's Ministry of Water. ' The Egyptians got the better of him to take a stand that Ethiopia should sign a binding treaty with Egypt and Sudan regarding the GERD.' Fekahmed's comments echo a broader sentiment in Ethiopia: that Trump's rhetoric not only reveals bias but also revives unresolved diplomatic tensions rooted in earlier U.S. attempts to broker a deal, efforts which Ethiopia viewed as favoring Egypt's demands. The GERD Project The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), nearing completion on the Blue Nile near Sudan, is Africa's largest hydropower project and a centerpiece of Ethiopia's development agenda. Valued at $5 billion, it is expected to generate over 6,000 megawatts of electricity, doubling Ethiopia's power output and enabling it to export energy across the region. While Ethiopia sees the dam as vital for poverty reduction and economic growth, Egypt fears it could threaten its water security. With nearly 90 percent of its population dependent on the Nile, Egypt argues the GERD could significantly reduce the river's flow during critical periods. The dispute has become a regional flashpoint. Both Ethiopia and Egypt have sought international backing, and the involvement of global powers has added diplomatic weight. President Donald Trump's remarks appearing to support Egypt have been criticized in Ethiopia as undermining its sovereignty and risking greater tension. Despite repeated negotiations, the parties remain divided over how the dam should be filled and operated.
