Diver convicted of freeing sharks off Florida coast says he was surprised by presidential pardon
'This is something I never thought I'd hold,' John Moore Jr. said Tuesday, as he showed off the document with U.S. President Donald Trump's signature scrawled across the bottom.
Moore and crew member Tanner Mansell were convicted in 2022 of theft of property within special maritime jurisdiction. The two men avoided prison time but were ordered to pay $3,343.72 in restitution. The felony convictions prevented them from voting in Florida, owning firearms or traveling freely outside the U.S.
Moore said he and his attorneys were surprised by the pardon, because they hadn't petitioned for one.
'We didn't reach out to the White House,' Moore said. 'We never approached them for a pardon, because that was kind of skipping steps, like we had actually filed the paperwork to take this to the Supreme Court.'
Moore and Mansell spotted the longline about 3 miles (5 kilometers) off the Jupiter Inlet in August 2020, according to court records. Believing it was an illegal fishing line, the men freed the sharks and a grouper, reported it to state wildlife officials and brought the line back to shore.
Federal prosecutors later charged the men with theft. Officials said the line belonged to a fisherman licensed by the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration to catch sharks for research.
Mansell and Moore were convicted by a jury, and their appeals were later denied. The full and unconditional pardons signed by Trump erase those convictions.
'Would I have done something different, now that I know that that was a legal line?' Moore asked. 'I was a commercial fisherman. I would never touch a legal line. But now I know more about this, that those things can exist.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Woman Was Found in Burning Car with Bleach in Throat — and She Was Set to Testify Against One of the Suspects
Cudjoe Young was indicted on multiple charges, including murder and kidnapping, in connection with the 2023 death of Mercedes VegaNEED TO KNOW A man accused by authorities of robbing an exotic dancer in Arizona has now been charged in connection with her 2023 killing Cudjoe Young was indicted this month on charges of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, kidnapping, arson and more Two other suspects are also facing charges related to the killing of 22-year-old Mercedes VegaA man accused by authorities of robbing an exotic dancer at gunpoint in Arizona has now been charged in connection with her killing. Cudjoe Young was indicted on charges of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, kidnapping, arson, armed robbery and more, according to an indictment filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on July 24 and obtained by PEOPLE. The indictment also names Sencere Hayes, who was arrested in November 2024 in connection with 22-year-old Mercedes Vega's 2023 killing. Hayes was also indicted this month on the same charges as Young, PEOPLE confirms. A third suspect's name is redacted in the indictment. PEOPLE couldn't immediately identify attorneys for the suspects. It's also unclear if they have entered pleas. According to AZ Family, Young said Tuesday, July 29 that he plans to represent himself in upcoming court hearings. Authorities said Vega was kidnapped from the parking lot of her Tempe residence on April 16, 2023 and found dead the next day in a burning car, according to court documents cited by AZ Central, NBC News and AZ Family. A medical examiner determined Vega had suffered blunt force trauma and was shot, in addition to having bleach poured down her throat, the outlets reported. AZ Family reports that the medical examiner also determined that Vega died from smoke inhalation, indicating she was still alive when the fire was started. Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. According to court documents cited by NBC News, Vega was scheduled to testify in an armed robbery case involving Young on the day she was found dead. The outlet reports that Vega claimed Young robbed her at gunpoint after she ended her shift at a strip club in Phoenix in October 2020. Investigators allege Young paid two people to pick up the car where Vega was found dead and that he was linked to plane tickets bought by the two other suspects, according to NBC News and AZ Central. In her obituary, Vega was remembered as a straight-A student who played the violin and "always stood up for others and protected those who could not protect themselves." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Some key Brazilian exports spared from Trump's new 40% tariff
By Brendan O'Boyle (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing a 40% tariff on Brazilian exports, bringing the country's total tariff amount to 50%. Some of Brazil's major exports, however, were exempted from the tax. Notable exemptions include products already covered by other specific tariffs, like passenger vehicles, iron and steel products, and a large number of parts and components used in civil aircraft. Below is a list of the products exempted from the tariff hike: PRODUCTS ALREADY SUBJECT TO PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED SECTORAL TARIFFS * Iron and steel (raw and derivatives) * Aluminum products (raw and derivatives) * Passenger vehicles (sedans, SUVs, minivans, etc.) and light trucks * Parts for passenger vehicles and light trucks * Semi-finished and intensive copper derivative products AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PRODUCTS * Brazil nuts * Orange juice (frozen and not frozen) and orange pulp CIVIL AIRCRAFT, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS * Civil aircraft, including airplanes, helicopters, unmanned aircraft (drones), balloons, and gliders * Aircraft engines (piston, turbojets, turbopropellers) and their parts * New, retreaded, and used pneumatic tires for aircraft * Undercarriages and other aircraft parts * Aircraft seats * Navigational instruments, radios, and radar apparatus for aeronautical use * A wide range of other components specified for civil aircraft use ENERGY AND MINERAL PRODUCTS * Crude petroleum, various petroleum oils, and fuel products * Natural gas (liquefied and gaseous) * Coal and related products (lignite, peat, coke, tars) * Electrical energy * Iron ore and tin ores * Silicon metal and metallurgical grade alumina (aluminum oxide) * Crude mica and worked building stone METALS AND METAL PRODUCTS (GENERAL EXEMPTION) * Nonalloy and alloy pig iron * Ferroalloys, including ferronickel and ferroniobium * Tin waste, scrap, oxides, and chlorides PRECIOUS METALS * Silver bullion and dore * Gold bullion and dore WOOD AND PAPER PRODUCTS * Various types of chemical and semi-chemical wood pulp * Sawn or chipped tropical wood * Paper and paper pulp products CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS * Various mineral or chemical fertilizers * A specific list of industrial chemicals, including potassium hydroxide and certain chlorinated hydrocarbons OTHER GENERAL EXEMPTIONS * Donations intended to relieve human suffering (e.g., food, clothing, medicine) * Informational materials (e.g., publications, films, music, artworks) * Binder or baler twine made of sisal or agave fibers
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
The Trump administration's misconduct complaint against Judge Boasberg and what happens now
The Trump administration filed a complaint Monday against Judge James Boasberg, an unusual move that follows clashes in court between the D.C.-based federal judge and the government over President Trump's deportation policies. It's rare for the Justice Department to formally accuse judges of misconduct. The move will kick off a long, complex review process — though some legal experts say the Trump administration could have a difficult time demonstrating that Boasberg violated judicial rules. The complaint accuses Boasberg of "making improper public comments" about Mr. Trump, and criticizes the judge's rulings in a high-profile case involving Venezuelan migrants who were deported to El Salvador, according to a copy obtained by CBS News. Much of the complaint focuses on a March session of the Judicial Conference of the United States, a panel of federal judges led by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts that weighs in on how the judicial branch is run. The Justice Department accused Boasberg of speaking up during one part of the biannual meeting to warn that the Trump administration could "disregard rulings of federal courts," leading to a "constitutional crisis." The source of those quotes is unclear, but they were first reported earlier this month by The Federalist, a conservative digital outlet that says it obtained a memo summarizing the meeting. CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department for further details. Those comments, the government argues, violated rules requiring judges to avoid publicly comment on cases and to "act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary." The complaint also takes issue with Boasberg's handling of Venezuelan migrants who were rapidly flown to a Salvadoran prison under the wartime Alien Enemies Act in mid-March, less than a week after the Judicial Conference meeting. Boasberg verbally ordered the government to return the migrants to the U.S., even if officials needed to "turn the planes around," but the deportees were still sent to El Salvador. Since then, the judge has accused the administration of defying his orders, and has threatened to hold the government in contempt. The Justice Department argued Monday that Boasberg "rushed the government through complex litigation, sometimes giving the Trump Administration less than 48 hours to respond." "Judge Boasberg publicly forecasted his baseless predictions of presidential lawlessness, then issued erroneous rulings based on that preconceived notion," says the complaint, which was signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi's chief of staff, Chad Mizelle. In April, the Supreme Court halted a ruling by Boasberg blocking deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, deciding the lawsuit should have been brought in Texas, not Washington, D.C. Several legal experts told CBS News the complaint could face a tough path. Federal law defines judicial misconduct as "conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts." That covers everything from harassment to making partisan statements and treating people in a "demonstrably egregious and hostile manner." Several law professors say that the parts of Monday's complaint that focus on Boasberg's handling of the deportation case are misdirected. In general, if a party in a federal case has issues with how a judge has ruled, they're expected to file an appeal — not a complaint against a judge — said Jeffrey Bellin, a law professor at Vanderbilt University who has served as a judicial ethics investigator. "You're not supposed to use the misconduct process to complain about the judge's behavior in the case that you're involved in," Bellin told CBS News. The parts of the complaint that criticize Boasberg for warning the Trump administration may defy court orders are less straightforward, says Charles Geyh, an Indiana University law professor. The government accused the Obama-appointed judge of violating a section of the code of conduct for federal judges that says they "should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court." Geyh said that in some circumstances, Boasberg's comments could be "a potential problem." But he still doesn't believe Boasberg deserves disciplinary action. He said courts have been "overwhelmed" by Trump-era executive actions, "many of which are of dubious constitutionality," and need to figure out how to preserve their legitimacy and ensure their rulings are followed. "They need to talk about it somehow," said Geyh. Also, while public comments about cases aren't allowed, if Boasberg's remarks were made in a session of the normally private Judicial Conference, "you could make a pretty good argument, I think, that that is something different," Geyh said. Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School, said remarks at Judicial Conference meetings typically aren't meant for public consumption. She also argued Boasberg's alleged comments about the risk of the Trump administration skirting court orders are based on "very real concerns." "This is not a novel issue being raised by one particular judge about, 'what if the administration doesn't comply,'" said Levenson. It's a complicated process that can take months. When a complaint is filed, the first step is usually for the region's chief appellate court judge — in this case, Judge Sri Srinivasin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit — to review the issue and decide how to proceed. In the vast majority of situations, the misconduct complaint is dismissed at that stage, Geyh said, noting that many complaints are from "disgruntled litigants who don't like how their case went, and so they kvetch about what went on in their case." The appeals court judge can also privately take corrective action before the issue escalates. For example, they can encourage the judge to admit their mistake, said Geyh. If the appellate judge decides a complaint has merit, they can refer it to a special committee of judges to conduct an investigation and make recommendations. Then, the region's judicial council — yet another committee of judges — decides whether to punish them. "The quickest thing is if they dismiss it," Bellin said. "If they don't dismiss it … we won't hear about it for a while." First off, district court judges can't be fired — unless they're impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate, which requires two-thirds of senators to vote in favor. "It's very hard to discipline a sitting federal judge because they have life tenure," said Bellin. Short of that, a judge found to have engaged in misconduct can be publicly censured or reprimanded, or barred from taking on any new cases. The judicial conference can also choose to refer a judge to Congress for impeachment proceedings. They're not unheard of, though punishments are rare. Last year, Boston-based U.S. District Judge Michael Ponsor was the subject of a misconduct complaint after he criticized Supreme Court Justice Alito in a New York Times op-ed. An appellate judge didn't take further action because Ponsor apologized. Bellin said it's "pretty common" for parties in cases to file complaints about judges, but "these are not usually done by people who are professional litigators." Instead, most attorneys just work their issues with judges into their appeals. It's especially unusual for the Justice Department to file complaints. "You just don't have a history of the Justice Department having an acrimonious relationship with the judiciary," said Geyh. "Historically, it's just a dumb thing to do. You want an amicable relationship with the judges who are going to be deciding your cases. You don't want to be suing them. You don't want to be filing complaints against them." Still, Mr. Trump has been more openly critical of judges than his predecessors. Besides Boasberg, the Trump administration filed a misconduct complaint in February against D.C. District Judge Ana Reyes, accusing her of "hostile and egregious misconduct" during a hearing. The D.C. appeals court has not addressed the complaint. The administration also sued every judge in Maryland over a standing order in that court district blocking the immediate deportation of migrants challenging their removal. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump and his staff have lashed out at judges who have ruled against the government. The president has called for Boasberg to be impeached. "It strikes me as a bit of posturing, as an aggressive pushback by the administration against the federal judges," Levenson said of the complaint against Boasberg. "I think it's a real uphill battle for the administration, but the mere filing of the complaint is sort of the shot across the bow."Jacob Rosen contributed to this report.
