Trump warns of 10% duties on BRICS
Trump has repeatedly criticized BRICS and recently escalated his rhetoric, claiming he is ready for tariffs not only on its members but also on any country that 'aligns itself' with the bloc, which he accuses of embracing 'anti-American policies.'
Asked whether the tariffs would take effect immediately, Trump said they would kick in 'pretty soon.'
BRICS, originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India, and China in 2006, has expanded to include South Africa, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates, and Indonesia. At the group's summit in the Russian city of Kazan last year, BRICS approved a new 'partner country' status in response to growing membership interest shown by more than 30 countries.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Sunday, during the BRICS Summit in Brazil, that the bloc's combined GDP has overtaken that of the G7 when measured by purchasing power parity. The group now represents nearly half the world's population and about 40% of global GDP.
Trump said he believed the bloc had 'largely broke[n] up,' while accusing BRICS of trying to undermine America's financial dominance by dethroning the dollar as the global standard. Losing the 'dollar is king' status, he warned, would be tantamount to 'a major world war.'
'We would not be the same country any longer,' he said.
BRICS leaders have repeatedly stated that they have no interest in weakening the dollar, and that the greenback can only be weakened by its politicization. Putin has criticized Washington's 'weaponization' of US currency through sanctions and financial restrictions, calling it a 'big mistake' that is pushing countries to seek alternatives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Senior EU diplomat blames global crises for being late to parliament
Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani has lamented that he is overwhelmed by international crises, calling himself 'the unluckiest minister in history.' Tajani said that on Tuesday after arriving late to a conference being held in the Italian parliament devoted to democracy and parliamentarism in the Mediterranean region. Apologizing to participants, he said it had been a difficult day: 'The foreign minister is the unluckiest in history – there's always something happening: two wars plus the trade one,' in an apparent reference to the Ukraine conflict, the Middle East escalation, and trade tensions with the US. This week, Tajani reaffirmed Italy's role in Ukraine's post-war recovery in an article published by the outlet Formiche. Rome is preparing to unveil financial support for firms involved in the rebuilding process, Reuters reported. The war in Gaza remains another major source of diplomatic strain for EU governments – including Italy – caught between calls for a ceasefire and continued Western arms deals with Israel. Tajani's remarks also come as the EU – the US' single biggest trading partner – braces for the possibility that President Donald Trump may follow through on his 'Liberation Day' global tariffs, first announced on April 2. Trump has repeatedly described the bloc as 'very difficult to deal with' and the US trade deficit with it as 'totally unacceptable.' He imposed a 20% tariff on all EU goods, along with a 25% duty on cars and metals. The 20% levy was suspended on April 9 for a 90-day period, with a 10% baseline duty remaining in place. The tariffs were initially set to take effect on July 9 and rise to 50% unless a deal was reached. However, this week Trump extended the deadline to August 1 and began issuing formal tariff notices to trading partners. Brussels, which has repeatedly warned of retaliation, said it hopes to reach a deal 'in the coming days.' However, Italian Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti was quoted by the BBC as saying the talks remain 'very complicated' and could go right to the wire.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Patriots ‘very expensive'
US President Donald Trump has said that the Patriot air defense system, another unit of which Ukraine has reportedly asked for, is 'very expensive.' He added that the request was under consideration, stopping short of revealing whether Washington would accommodate it or not. Trump has repeatedly criticized his predecessor, Joe Biden, for writing a blank check to Ukraine with respect to weapons deliveries. When asked by a reporter on Wednesday whether he was considering providing Ukraine with another Patriot unit, Trump replied that the air defense system is 'very rare… [and] very expensive.' 'We're gonna have to take a look' at the Ukrainian request, Trump added, noting that 'it's a shame that we have to spend so much money' on supporting Kiev. That same day, Germany's n-tv media outlet quoted a spokesperson for US arms manufacturer Raytheon, which produces Patriots and accompanying missiles, as saying that it intends to ramp up monthly production of PAC2 GEM-T rockets by 150% by 2028 due to 'unprecedented demand.' According to the publication, as of early 2024, around only 240 were being produced per year. Each Patriot missile is said to cost approximately $4 million. Earlier this week, Axios, citing anonymous sources, claimed that the US had promised to send more Patriot missiles to Ukraine, though the number would presumably be very report came shortly after the Pentagon announced a halt to weapons deliveries to Ukraine as part of a 'capability review.' However, on Monday, Trump appeared to go back on the military aid suspension. Commenting on the apparent reversal of the decision by the US president, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov criticized the conflicting statements coming out of Washington. Earlier this month, he suggested that the US apparently 'simply cannot produce [Patriot] missiles in the necessary quantities.' His remark seemed to be corroborated by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's assessment in late May, according to whom 'we can't make them fast enough.' Around the same time, Trump said that 'Biden emptied out our whole country giving [Ukraine] weapons.' According to Germany's Kiel Institute, the US has sent nearly $115 billion in military and financial aid to Kiev since the conflict escalated in 2022. Russia has repeatedly condemned Western arms shipments to Ukraine, arguing that they only serve to prolong the bloodshed without changing its course and increase the risk of broader escalation.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Dmitry Trenin: This is a long war, and it's not just about Ukraine
The trademark style of the current US president, Donald Trump, is verbal spectacle. His statements – brash, contradictory, sometimes theatrical – should be monitored, but not overestimated. They are not inherently favorable or hostile to Russia. And we must remember: Trump is not the 'king' of America. The 'Trump revolution' that many anticipated at the beginning of the year appears to have given way to Trump's own evolution – a drift toward accommodation with the American establishment. In that light, it's time to assess the interim results of our 'special diplomatic operation'. There have now been six presidential phone calls, several rounds of talks between foreign ministers and national security aides, and sustained contact at other levels. The most obvious positive outcome is the restoration of dialogue between Russia and the United States – a process that had been severed under the Biden administration. Crucially, this revived dialogue extends beyond Ukraine. A range of potential areas for cooperation have been mapped out, from geopolitical stability to transportation and sport. These may not carry immediate strategic weight, but they lay the groundwork for future engagement. Under Trump, the dialogue is unlikely to break off again – though its tone and pace may shift. One visible result of this diplomacy was the resumption of talks with the Ukrainian side in Istanbul. While these negotiations currently hold little political substance – and the recent prisoner exchanges occurred independently of them – they nonetheless reaffirm a core tenet of Russian diplomacy: we are ready for a political resolution to the conflict. Still, these are technical and tactical achievements. The strategic reality remains unchanged. It was never realistic to expect Trump to offer Russia a deal on Ukraine that met our security requirements. Nor for that matter would Russia accept one that compromised its long-term security interests. Likewise, any notion that Trump would 'deliver' Ukraine to the Kremlin, join Moscow in undermining the EU, or push for a new Yalta agreement with Russia and China was always fantasy. So the page has turned. What comes next? Trump will almost certainly sign the new US sanctions bill into law – but he'll try to preserve discretion in how those measures are applied. The sanctions will add friction to global trade, but they will not derail Russian policy. On the military front, Trump will deliver the remaining aid packages approved under Biden, and perhaps supplement them with modest contributions of his own. But going forward, it will be Western Europe – especially Germany – that supplies Ukraine, often by buying US-made systems and re-exporting them. Meanwhile, the United States will continue to furnish Kiev with battlefield intelligence – particularly for deep strikes inside Russian territory. None of this suggests the conflict will end in 2025. Nor will it end when hostilities in Ukraine eventually wind down. That's because the fight is not fundamentally about Ukraine. What we are witnessing is an indirect war between the West and Russia – part of a much broader global confrontation. The West is fighting to preserve its dominance. And Russia, in defending itself, is asserting its sovereign right to exist on its own terms. This war will be long. And the United States – with Trump or without him – will remain our adversary. The outcome will shape not just the fate of Ukraine, but the future of Russia itself. This article was first published in Kommersant, and was translated and edited by the RT team.
