Illegal migrant from Jamaica gets job as POLICE OFFICER in sleepy Maine town
Jon Luke Evans, who works as a reserve police officer in Old Orchard Beach, was taken into custody by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials on July 25, the agency said.
Evans, who entered the US via Miami in September 2023 on a weeklong visa, never returned home and wound up becoming a cop in the popular resort town, according to ICE.
His illegal status was uncovered after the reserve officer attempted to purchase a firearm that he told officials he needed for his job.
'The fact that a police department would hire an illegal alien and unlawfully issue him a firearm while on duty would be comical if it weren't so tragic,' said ICE Boston acting Field Office Director Patricia H. Hyde.
'We have a police department that was knowingly breaking the very law they are charged with enforcing in order to employ an illegal alien.'
The Old Orchard Beach Police Department confirmed Evans' employment, adding that he was a member of the reserves and was hired in May.
Reserve police officers are part-time employees hired on a seasonal basis to assist the department with tasks including beach patrol and community policing, the department said.
Reserve officers do carry firearms but are not allowed to bring them home and must return them to the department after their shifts, according to Old Orchard Police Chief Elise Chard.
Chard clarified that reserve officers aren't asked to purchase firearms themselves and aren't allowed to carry other firearms for their duties.
As part of the police department's hiring process, Evans was required to submit an I-9 Form to the Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify Program, the department said.
An I-9 Form is a required document to work in the US. Both citizens and undocumented migrants are required to submit the form before employment.
Chief Chard confirmed that Evans submitted his I-9 Form to Homeland Security and submitted photo identification for his employment with the department.
'The form was submitted and approved by DHS on May 12, 2025,' the police chief said.
'Evans would not have been permitted to begin work as a reserve officer until and unless Homeland Security verified his status.'
The department added that Evans had an approved Employment Authorization Document that wasn't set to expire until March 2030.
Maine allows non-citizens to work in law enforcement as long as they obtain legal work authorization.
Chief Chard said that Evans had passed all physical and medical checks, a background check, and was approved by DHS before starting as a reserve officer.
After his detainment by ICE, Evans's probationary status with the department was put under review.
The department said it wasn't notified of his arrest and found out about Evans' detainment from a public news release.
'In hiring Evans, our department and our community relied on the Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify program to ensure we were meeting our obligations, and we are distressed and deeply concerned about this apparent error on the part of the federal government,' the department said in a statement.
'We intend to investigate this matter to determine what other steps we should take moving forward to ensure our continued compliance with all applicable laws.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 hours ago
- The Independent
Blow for Trump's ICE raids as court upholds ban on snatching people based on appearance or job
The Trump administration suffered another blow to its mass deportation agenda on Friday after an appeals court upheld a lower court's ruling that prevents Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents from detaining a person based on their appearance, native language, or job. A three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Los Angeles said the plaintiffs, a cohort of five individuals and three immigration advocacy organizations, were likely to succeed on their claim that ICE agents violated the Fourth Amendment by relying on four factors to form reasonable suspicion to support detention stops. Those four factors include apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a particular location such as a laborer pick-up site, and the type of work a person does. Three plaintiffs who are day laborers said in their original lawsuit against Trump administration officials that they were waiting to be picked up to go to a construction site job when ICE agents swooped in and intimidated them. The plaintiffs said the immigration law enforcement officers never identified themselves, stated they had arrest warrants, nor informed the plaintiffs of the bases for the arrests. The Ninth Circuit panel upheld a previous temporary injunction set by District Court Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong in June. In keeping with Trump's mass deportation agenda, immigration law enforcement officers were deployed throughout Southern California to begin conducting sweeping raids. Many of those raids, according to the lawsuit, were conducted at 'certain types of businesses' such as car washes, because immigration law enforcement officials determined those businesses were more likely to hire people without legal documentation. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit referred to those as 'roving patrols' and said they were being detained without reasonable suspicion. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable search and seizures. The raids, which led to protests in downtown Los Angeles back in May, have been challenged by multiple individuals and immigration advocacy groups. One plaintiff, Jason Brian Gavidia, said ICE agents stopped him in June after he stepped onto the sidewalk outside of a tow yard in Montebello, California. Gavidia, who is an American citizen, identifies as Latino and said ICE agents pushed him up against a chain-link fence and interrogated him. Even after Gavidia gave ICE agents his Real ID, they seemingly did not believe him. In her earlier ruling, Frimpong said Gavidia and other plaintiffs were likely to succeed 'in proving that the federal government is indeed conducting roving patrols without reasonable suspicion and denying access to lawyers.' Frimpong ordered immigration law enforcement not to rely solely on the four factors 'except as permitted by law.' While the appeals court panel upheld much of Frimpong's ruling, they did strike the 'except as permitted by law,' saying that language was too vague.
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
ICE raids
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Immigration enforcement agents have stepped up raids, detaining farmworkers, restaurant staff, meat packers, day laborers and construction workers. The Trump administration says the raids protect public safety and national security. Critics say they create fear among workers the country badly needs and impact asylum seekers trying to do the right thing. The first episode of On Assignment examines the impact of these raids across the country, from California to a New York courthouse. Further Reading Immigration raids leave crops unharvested, California farms at risk US immigration officials raid meat production plant in Omaha, dozens detained ICE's tactics draw criticism as it triples daily arrest targets
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
‘First Amendment has limits': Tom Homan insists that Mahmoud Khalil will be deported
Donald Trump's border czar is adamant that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil will still be deported from the country despite several court rulings that have kept the Palestinian activist out of detention. A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected a request from the Trump administration to re-arrest Khalil and keep him in immigration detention center while he continues to challenge the government's attempts to remove him from the United States. Homan says the administration will continue to appeal. 'We got radical judges just trying to stop the Trump administration from doing our job and enforcing the law,' he told Newsmax on Thursday. He claimed there is 'only one ending' to Khalil's case: 'We detain him and deport him, but regardless, he will be deported.' That same day, the immigration court judge overseeing his case voided her earlier ruling that allowed the government to deport him. Khalil, a prominent student activist against Israel's war in Gaza, was stripped of his green card and arrested in front of his then-pregnant wife in their New York City apartment building on March 8. He was then sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Louisiana, where he was held for more than 100 days and forced to miss the birth of his child. Trump administration officials have accused Khalil of 'antisemitic activities,' allegations Khalil and his legal team have flatly denied. Officials concede that Khalil did not commit any crime, but Secretary of State Marco Rubio has sought to justify Khalil's arrest by claiming that Khalil's presence in the country undermines foreign policy interests to prevent antisemitism. Khalil and his legal team argue his arrest and detention — and attempted removal from the country, which is currently blocked by court order — are retaliatory violations of his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and his Fifth Amendment right to due process of law, among other claims. 'Look, First Amendment rights have a limitation, too,' Homan told Newsmax. 'He did a lot of bad things. We're going to hold him accountable. He will be deported.' On June 11, a federal judge granted Khalil's release from ICE detention on bail while legal challenges against his arrest and threat of removal from the country continue in both federal and immigration courts. New Jersey District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled that the administration had unconstitutionally wielded the law against Khalil, whose 'career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled,' the judge wrote. The government has 'little or no interest in applying the relevant underlying statutes in what is likely an unconstitutional way,' Farbiarz added. 'Mahmoud spent 104 days in detention as punishment for speaking out for Palestinian rights,' ACLU senior staff attorney Noor Zafar said in a statement after this week's appeals court ruling. 'That is time with his family that he will never get back, but this decision affirms that he will remain free and that the government cannot pursue his removal based on the likely unconstitutional foreign policy charge as his case moves through appeal,' she added. 'We will not stand by and allow the government to weaponize immigration law to suppress lawful political speech.' Khalil's attorneys have also argued that the administration's secondary basis for his arrest and removal — allegations that he lied in immigration paperwork — are similarly retaliatory and violate his First Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process rights. The White House continues to insist that Khalil can still be deported on those grounds. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson told The Independent on Friday that 'Khalil was given the privilege of coming to America to study on a student visa he obtained by fraud and misrepresentation.' 'Despite the lower court judge's wishes to the contrary, the executive branch has the lawful authority to take actions that will protect America's foreign policy interests and promote the overall welfare of the public,' she added. 'The Trump Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue.'
