&w=3840&q=100)
China heiress Zong's fight with half-siblings sparks succession debate
For decades, Kelly Zong had been known as the only child to her late billionaire father, the founder of beverage empire Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co. His effort to groom her as a successor was hailed as a model for Chinese entrepreneurs during the one-child policy era.
But Kelly is now grappling with two overlapping legal challenges stemming from unresolved matters left behind by her father — cases that could set a legal precedent for wealth succession in China and cast a shadow over the reputation of one of the country's most iconic beverage empires.
In a Hong Kong court this month, Kelly was asked to help set up three trusts worth $2.1 billion for people who identify as her 'half brothers and sister' following what they say were her father's directives. The case has raised eyebrows and lit up on Chinese social media.
Separately, the 43-year-old heiress is being sued by some former Wahaha employees seeking to void a 2018 share buyback, according to people familiar with the case, who requested not to be named because it cannot be accessed by the public. The employees argue that the repurchase price was unfairly low, the people said. The lawsuit has been reported by local media including Caixin.
Wahaha's labor union said the share repurchase move was approved by staff representatives and was lawful, according to a September statement it posted on social media platform Weibo.
The cases have once again thrust Wahaha's leadership and its ownership structure into the spotlight — reminiscent of the corporate power struggle following the death of founder Zong Qinghou. The disputes also threaten to derail Kelly's long-standing efforts to take all or part of Wahaha public, following previous failed attempts.
Wahaha's affairs are also a government concern, as a Chinese state-owned firm has a 46 per cent stake and the company is a flagship enterprise for Hangzhou, where it is headquartered. Kelly owns 29.4 per cent, while the group's staff union holds 24.6 per cent, according to Qichacha.
'Chinese family business founders need to take careful note of the Wahaha case,' said Marleen Dieleman, family business professor at IMD based in Singapore. 'Especially when founders have smaller stakes, succession can quickly spiral into a battle for control.'
Since Kelly took over as chairwoman in August last year, some of Wahaha's existing production facilities have been shut down, leading to layoffs as part of business restructuring, the people said.
Kelly has been accused of trying to transfer a series of Wahaha's trademarks and some production of its water business to external entities, according to a March letter seen by Bloomberg News that was addressed to both state-owned and individual shareholders of the company's water business unit.
Wahaha said in a statement in February its trademark transfers were lawful and it didn't harm the company's operation or assets. The move awaited approval from the country's intellectual property watchdog, it added at the time. Representatives for Kelly and Wahaha didn't provide comments on multiple queries for this story.
Hong Kong Case
The Zong family has a family fortune of at least $3.3 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
The Hong Kong court case offers a rare glimpse into the family feud within the closely held group, which reported around 70 billion yuan ($9.8 billion) in revenue last year, according to local media.
The three plaintiffs — Jacky, Jessie and Jerry Zong — filed the lawsuit in December against Kelly and Jian Hao Ventures Ltd., a British Virgin Islands vehicle controlling an HSBC Holdings Plc bank account in Hong Kong. The suit sought to disclose the assets held in the account and to prevent Kelly from moving them.
One month before Qinghou passed away in February last year, he gave a 'hand-written instruction' to one of his subordinates, asking the person to 'get ready to go to Hong Kong. Set up trusts at HSBC, $700 million each,' according to statements from the attorney for the plaintiffs in court on July 11.
Shortly after, when they found out the account had a balance of around $1.8 billion, the senior Zong said: 'If the USD is not enough, covert yuan,' and told the person to 'set up the two for Jacky and Jessie first,' the plaintiffs' lawyer said at the hearing.
The plaintiffs' lawyer said that Kelly had agreed on Feb. 2 last year to follow an instruction from her father to set up the trusts funded with money from Jian Hao, which counted Qinghou as the sole-director.
Paperwork for the three trusts remains stalled, with no final agreement in place. Kelly's lawyer argued that the handwritten instructions were not addressed to her, and that it's unclear where the funding to cover a $300 million shortfall would come from.
'We agreed to set up the trusts from the start, but only on the condition that the trust assets would be clearly defined,' Kelly's lawyer said.
The Hong Kong High Court will hand down a decision on Aug. 1, according to its website.
The delay in setting up trusts has prompted the three half-siblings to also file a lawsuit in Hangzhou with similar demands.
'In business families, conflict can be severe as the stakes are high and conflict is both financial and emotional,' said Dieleman.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
US defense bill proposes examination of Apple display supplier
A measure added into a massive U.S. defense spending bill in recent weeks will, if passed, ask the Pentagon to determine whether one of Apple's display suppliers should be listed as a Chinese military company . Being on the list does not block companies from doing business in the U.S. but will in coming years block them from being part of the U.S. military's supply chain. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Technology Data Analytics healthcare Artificial Intelligence Digital Marketing Product Management CXO Data Science Project Management Finance Leadership MCA Design Thinking Others Degree Public Policy Management Healthcare Cybersecurity PGDM MBA others Data Science Operations Management Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Weeks MIT xPRO CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India Starts on undefined Get Details The bill, known as the National Defense Authorization Act , was approved in July by key committees in both houses of the U.S. Congress. The final bill, considered a "must-pass" because it funds the U.S. military, is expected to become law later in the year. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Most Beautiful Twins in The World! Undo When the bill was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, a newly added amendment for the first time asked the U.S. Defense Department to consider whether BOE Technology Group Co, listed on Apple's official suppliers list, should be added to a list of firms that allegedly aid China's military. BOE and Apple did not respond to requests for comment. Live Events Craig Singleton, a China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington think-tank, said Beijing had offered billions of dollars in subsidies, tax breaks and loans to help firms such as BOE dominate global panel production. "This creates a single-source vulnerability that could be easily exploited to disrupt or degrade U.S. military operations, not to mention undermine commercial supply chains, during a conflict or period of heightened bilateral tension with Beijing," Singleton added. A study published last month by New York-based NERA Economic Consulting and commissioned by BOE's U.S. subsidiary found that the display industry, which includes major Korean players such as Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, remains highly competitive, with no single player capable of significantly affecting global prices. "There is no credible risk of a supply chain disruption by mainland China display manufacturers," the report said.


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
With new 40% tariff on transshipments, Trump takes aim at US dependence on China's factories
Ever since President Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses and factories in Southeast Asia, Mexico and elsewhere to bypass US tariffs with indirect shipments to the American market via other countries. But on Thursday, Trump took aim at all indirect American imports, which he blames for part of the $1.2 trillion US trade deficit. Trump imposed 40% tariffs on so-called transshipments, which will take effect in a week. And a senior administration official who briefed reporters said work was under way that could broaden considerably the definition of indirect shipments. The new rules cover indirect shipments from anywhere, not just China. But China, with its massive factory infrastructure and expansive manufacturing ambition, has been the main country to develop a global network for such shipments. Trade experts were quick to predict that China would be the most affected - and the most executive order Thursday created a new category of imports: goods that are transshipped through other countries instead of coming straight from the country of origin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Reportingly Undo The 40% tariffs on these goods will be on top of whatever tariffs would have applied if the goods had come directly from the country where they were originally made. The legal definition of transshipment is narrow: a good that did not undergo a "substantial transformation" in the country through which it was indirectly shipped. Countries in Southeast Asia have long denied that they allow a lot of transshipment. They contend that their soaring imports of Chinese components are being assembled into new and different products that can appropriately be labelled made in their countries, and not labelled "made in China. " Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025


Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Soy futures post weekly loss on expectations for big US crop
CHICAGO, - Chicago Board of Trade soybean futures finished flat on Friday but notched a second consecutive weekly decline as ample global supplies, favorable U.S. weather and weak Chinese demand hung over the market. U.S. farmers were expected to harvest bumper soybean and corn crops this autumn following non-threatening weather conditions. At the same time, they worried that President Donald Trump's latest wave of tariffs may hurt American farm exports at a time when soy and wheat sales have struggled. The United States faces stiff competition for global soy sales from Brazil, the world's biggest exporter of the oilseed. "Expectations of a robust U.S. harvest, alongside a second consecutive record Brazilian crop, are expected to weigh on prices for the remainder of the year," analysts at BMI, a unit of Fitch Solutions, said in a note. CBOT November soybeans ended unchanged at $9.89-1/4 a bushel after falling earlier to the lowest level since April 9. The contract lost about 3.1% for the week. China, the world's biggest soy buyer, faces an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration. The United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal, but it is "not 100% done," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday. A Chinese buyer signed a deal this week to import 30,000 metric tons of Argentine soymeal, as feed producers move to lock in cheaper supplies from South America, two trade sources said. In CBOT wheat, September futures ended down 6-1/2 cents at $5.16-3/4 per bushel. The contract set a low of $5.16-1/4 a bushel earlier in the session and tumbled 4% for the week as in the Northern Hemisphere brought in new supplies. CBOT corn also slumped, with the December contract closing 3 cents lower at $4.10-3/4 a bushel. It lost about 2% for the week. Export sales of corn have been brisk as buyers take advantage of low prices. The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported exporters sold a total of 352,160 metric tons of U.S. corn to unknown destinations via its daily reporting system. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.