Aarto traffic law, points demerit system rollout delayed yet again
This is according to the Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA) which said there had been recent fake news and misinformation surrounding Aarto, the government's plan to replace the existing criminal system with an administrative one. With Aarto, drivers will lose points for offences and face suspension or cancellation of their licences if they lose too many, in addition to any fine.
The controversial act, originally passed into law in 1998, has been hit by numerous delays. It was to have commenced in February 2024 but was deferred to a future date which has not been gazetted.
The points demerit system is not operational yet anywhere in the country, including in Johannesburg and Tshwane where Aarto has been piloted for more than a decade, said RTIA spokesperson Monde Mkalipi.
'The points demerit system and rehabilitation programme of traffic infringers are part of phase 3 of the Aarto rollout. Dates for the introduction of the points demerit system are likely to be included in the presidential proclamation which requires to be signed by the president with the date for the commencement of phase 2 and phase 3 of the Aarto national rollout,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
43 minutes ago
- The Herald
Churches must face corruption demons — SACC president Sipuka
'As the church seeks to remove the splinter of corruption in government and society, we also need to reckon with the possible log in our own eye. 'We have witnessed pastors living in mansions while congregations struggle in poverty, church leaders demanding 'seed offerings' that promise miracles that never materialise, denominational officials who misappropriate funds meant for community development and churches that become family businesses rather than houses of worship. 'The prosperity gospel, which promises material wealth in exchange for financial contributions, has become a form of spiritual extortion that preys on the desperation of the poor.' If the church calls for action against corrupt individuals in government and business, it must also apply to clergy who engage in corruption, he said. The SACC is the biggest forum for churches in the country, with its members including the Catholic, Methodist, Grace Bible, Gereformeerde Kerk in Suid Afrika, Dutch Reformed, Presbyterian and Baptist churches. Sipuka said any suggestion for a different treatment for churches when dealing with corruption would be nothing less than clericalism, which unconsciously promotes the use of clerical status for selfish reasons. 'Worldwide, the church is regarded as a moral authority, and when it is also corrupt, its role as a beacon of goodness is discredited, and people's hope in the church to overcome the cancer of corruption is eroded.' He said the church's role in combating corruption is not optional; it is prophetic. Churches' financial records should be transparent, their governance structures accountable and lifestyles consistent with preachings. 'We must speak boldly against corruption, regardless of who is involved.' TimesLIVE
The Herald
43 minutes ago
- The Herald
SAHRC's 'pro-foreigner stance' comes under fire from ActionSA's Mashaba
'It is important to note that no civic group or individual has the legal authority to control access to public health facilities or to enforce immigration laws,' it said. 'The power to inspect, arrest or detain undocumented people lies solely with the department of home affairs, supported by the police when lawfully required.' All South Africans and those who live in the country — regardless of nationality, race, gender, age, income level or geographic location — have a right to access health-care facilities, it added. Mashaba said residents of Hammanskraal in Tshwane had to contend with no drinking water for more than 20 years because of the influx of illegal foreigners. 'Another problem is how South Africa has now become a free-for-all. We say, 'Come to South Africa, we will give you free health care, free education.' We have opened our borders to international syndicates,' he said. It is likely 'five illegal aliens' deported to Swaziland by US President Donald Trump would end up in South Africa, he added. 'Was the Human Rights Commission established to protect the rights of illegal foreign nationals?' On failed sewer infrastructure, Mashaba said sewage spills onto beaches threaten the city's tourism prospects. TimesLIVE
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Small win for activists, but SA's HIV projects won't reopen
Activists helped save $400 million from being pulled out of Pepfar, but the Trump-era waiver banning support for groups with the highest chance of getting infected stays. (Flickr) The $400 million the United States Congress removed from a list of programmes from which the Trump administration will now take back previously approved but unspent funds doesn't mean HIV projects that have closed in South Africa, which were formerly funded by the US government, won't restart as a result of this decision. In fact, quite the opposite. The 'limited Pepfar waiver' that President Donald Trump Without a proper explanation for it, the $400 million seems to be a random amount that President Donald Trump's administration picked to take back from The amount is about 8.5% of Pepfar's Rescissions happen What the decision to remove the $400 million from the package does, however, mean is that activism could finally be starting to pay off. Activists have had hundreds of meetings with US senators and Congress committee chairs. There have been Opposition from within Trump's Republican Party against nonevidence-based cuts to a programme that has, for two decades, been supported by 'It's a small win within the bigger context, but nonetheless, a huge win for advocacy, and a reminder that activism is powerful and alive, and making an impact,' Jirair Ratevosian, a former head of staff at Pepfar and Bhekisisa at last week's Conference on HIV Science in Kigali. About But the Rescissions Act is, in itself, bad news. 'It opens the floodgates for the Trump administration to say 'we don't want this or that in the budget that Congress approved', says Mitchell Warren, the head of international advocacy organisation, Avac. 'It's trying to take the congressional power of the purse and put it in the executive branch to usurp the role of Congress in deciding how much money — and on what to spend it.' So how did this all happen, and does it hold any good in the long term for South Africa? We break it down. How did we get here? In the US, the Congress — But, as analysts at the In March, he signed the 2025 budget that Congress approved into law. Three months later, in June, he decided he wanted to change some of that and submitted Because there was a danger of them swinging the vote, the Republicans removed the $400 million from the Rescissions Bill and got the House to pass that too. All that's left is for Trump to now sign the Act. What was the $400 million that was removed from the Rescissions Act for? In short, no one really knows, because the Trump administration hasn't said what it was for — or what it plans to do with it. But what we do know is that the US law that governs rescissions, the We also know that the $400 million was part of the financial budget for 2025, says Warren, but because What will the $400 million now be used for? Again, no one knows. We don't even know if it will be used, because over the past few months, the Trump administration's main strategy has 'simply been to illegally impound funds — by announcing a 'funding freeze' or 'programmatic review' with no public notice at all — and force those harmed by the impoundments to pursue relief in court', the Centre on Budget and Policy Priorities But we do know what the money can't be used for. Unless the rules of Trump's In South Africa, for instance, Pepfar worked in the Now those projects, What do scientists and activists want the $400 million to be used for? Ratevosian says this moment should be used to gain Republican support to change the waiver rules, so that Pepfar money can cover more of the populations and services needed for HIV prevention. Lenacapavir, a pricey twice-a-year anti-HIV jab, which scientists believe could help to stop HIV in its tracks if it's rolled out properly, could be used to convince Republican Congress members, says Ratevosian. 'Pepfar has long wanted to get countries to transition to taking more ownership [read: pay more] for their HIV responses. So now activists are arguing: 'Preventing more new infections with the jab, will make it easier for countries to take ownership because the pandemic will be easier to manage.'' Warren says: 'If I were in charge, I would take the $400 million and double the two million people the Global Fund is planning to cover, because that's how you build a market, prevent new infections more quickly and drive the price down.' What will Pepfar look like in future? Trump's funding cuts didn't kill Pepfar — at least not in theory — but it's a shell of its former self. What it will look like, will depend on the size of its next budget (the Trump administration 'We're not going to get pre-January projects back; we have to build something different,' Warren points out. 'This has been the most seismic shift in democracy. We didn't think we lived in an earthquake zone, but January 20 [when Trump retook office] taught us: you need to be prepared for that earthquake and you therefore need a different infrastructure. 'In an earthquake you don't build back the same thing. You build better, something that is more resilient.' This story was produced by the . Sign up for the .
