Keeping democracy on the straight and narrow through social dialogue
Image: Doctor Ngcobo / Independent Newspapers.
Democracies are sites of contestation. It is important to engage in debate anchored upon facts, honesty and respect for institutions of social dialogue.
Cosatu has been dismayed by the explosion of fake news over the past few years. Of late we have seen this addiction to peddling hysteria expand to the Nedlac labour laws reforms negotiations. It is important to reassure workers that their hard-won rights, guaranteed by the Constitution and set in law, will continue to remain intact.
Covid-19 highlighted numerous gaps in our labour laws, from 4 million informal workers falling outside the social security net, to actors and artists lacking collective bargaining protection.
The Department of Employment and Labour with Business and Labour at Nedlac agreed to an open discussion on our labour laws with all parties allowed to table proposed amendments.
Cosatu was deeply concerned by government and business' initial proposals which we felt would seriously erode the protections in law that took decades of struggles to achieve. We were disappointed that labour's proposals were disregarded.
The Federation chose to continue to engage, to prevent a rush to table Bills at Parliament and to battle on at Nedlac to not only block such proposed weakening of our labour laws but to put in place amendments to address many gaps that workers have experienced from our factories to our farms.
Negotiations require strategic acumen, tactical agility and a level of compromise. Most importantly they require you to pitch at the negotiating table. Pity parties at home with friends win nothing.
Cosatu is pleased that despite an initial set of proposals that have would gutted our labour laws, we managed not only to block amendments that would have set workers back but to score major victories that labour campaigned for over many years.
Initial proposals included exempting SMMEs from the bulk of our labour laws. Cosatu successfully blocked this as the majority of workers are employed by SMMEs and this would have left them vulnerable to abuse and exploitation.
Exemptions from retrenchment processes for SMMEs were tabled. This would have left workers exposed to no protections or retrenchment payments. Not only did we manage to have this proposal withdrawn but also secured an agreement to increase retrenchment compensation from one to two weeks' pay for every year employed going forward. This will be a powerful disincentive for employers to avoid retrenchments and provide workers with greater relief when they lose their jobs.
We were deeply concerned by proposals to allow for the firing of workers under thirty years of age with less than two years of experience without recourse to protections. Whilst we support the call to help young people find work this must not be at the expense of their rights.
Again, we managed to persuade negotiation partners that this is a flawed approach. Probation periods have long existed in South African labour law allowing employers some flexibility to assess a new employee's performance within a framework of protections.
Proposals to exempt middle-income workers from taking grievances to the CCMA were blocked and amended to the top tax bracket, e.g. CEOs who can afford to take matters to the Labour Courts. This will help free up a badly overstretched CCMA to focus on low- and middle-income workers who don't have the time or resources for Labour Courts.
Cosatu and our predecessors fought for decades for the National Minimum Wage, achieving this historic victory in 2019. Then too we were insulted as the greatest sellouts in the history of humanity by our critics. Today it has raised the wages of 6 million farm, domestic, construction, hospitality, transport and other vulnerable workers.
Initial proposals to roll back the NMW and allow blanket exemptions have been stopped and we have managed to secure a critical agreement protecting the NMW from deductions, e.g. bonuses, 13th cheques etc. that would erode its hourly value.
Alarming reports show 7 700 employers defaulting on pension funds. Agreement has been secured on requiring labour inspectors to check employers' pension funds' contributions compliance and with 20 000 labour inspectors being recruited to boost these efforts.
The economy is not static. Laws have to be amended to keep pace with the changing nature of work. We are pleased we have been able to secure amendments that recognise the rights of atypical workers, e.g. actors and e-platform workers to collective bargaining and that engagements will soon start on our proposals to ensure such workers, including those in the informal sector, are covered by the Unemployment Insurance and Compensation of Occupational Injuries and Diseases Funds. This may require a hybrid model but what matters is that all 17 million workers are protected.
There are areas where Cosatu remains deeply opposed to some proposed amendments, in particular the definitions of and protections from unfair labour practices plus exempting start up SMMEs from Bargaining Councils' collective agreements for two years. These would threaten millions of workers' protections and undermine collective bargaining central to the rights of vulnerable workers and labour market stability.
The proposed amendments are now before the State Law Advisor to ensure constitutional compliance they will be released for public comment. They will then return for further engagements at Nedlac and then be tabled at Cabinet. Parliament is likely to be seized with the Bills during 2027 and 2028 and will have further public engagements. They may then be submitted for Presidential assent in 2029.
Amilcar Cabral wisely said, 'Tell no lies, claim no easy victories'. These are words peddlers of fake news about the draft Bills would do well to reflect upon and to utilise the mechanisms provided for to engage on their content.
Cosatu will continue to utilise Nedlac and Parliament as well as bilateral engagements with government and business to ensure its remaining concerns are addressed before the Bills are tabled at Cabinet and Parliament and that workers' hard-won rights are not only protected but in fact strengthened and expanded. This is a battle that Cosatu will win.
Cosatu General Secretary Solly Phetoe
*** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
6 hours ago
- eNCA
Operation Dudula wants to ban foreign nationals from public schools
CAPE TOWN- Operation Dudula plans to prevent children of foreign nationals, from attending South African public schools. But Equal Education says this campaign violates South Africa's Constitution. READ | Migrants rights under spotlight as Dudula blocks access to healthcare services They have criticised Operation Dudula, warning that blocking children from accessing education is harmful and unlawful.

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
PRASA's Crisis of Accountability: Why the Boardroom Must Be Investigated and Raided
Law enforcement agencies — particularly the Hawks — have launched search and seizure operations against PRASA executives and administrative staff. Laptops are confiscated. Documents are removed. Offices are raided. However, board members remain untouched, says the writer. Image: Jacques Naude/Independent Newspapers By any standard of governance — legal, constitutional, or ethical — the failures plaguing the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA) can be traced directly to its board. What is less ordinary, and far more disturbing, is the way accountability has been applied so selectively. Time and again, executives and senior officials are suspended, investigated, or dismissed, often amid significant public attention. Yet board members — the very individuals tasked with oversight — remain untouched. That pattern is not only unfair, it is deeply damaging to the principles of the rule of law, institutional integrity, and public trust. PRASA, like all state-owned entities, has a functioning board that carries legal and fiduciary responsibilities. The tenders that are awarded, the procurement decisions that are made, and the operational directions taken are all the product of board-sanctioned processes. Executives do not act in a vacuum. They work within governance frameworks that require decisions to be reviewed, approved, and frequently initiated by the board. This raises a critical question. If some of the executives who have faced disciplinary action or criminal investigation were simply implementing board-approved decisions, then what role did the board play in those decisions? And more importantly, why has there been so little accountability at that level? The standard narrative — that executive management failed while the board remained passive or uninformed — begins to fall apart under scrutiny. It is not a theoretical concern. In terms of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), PRASA's board is not an advisory body. It is the accounting authority. That status carries with it binding legal obligations. Section 51 of the PFMA makes this crystal clear. Accounting authorities must ensure effective, efficient, and transparent systems of financial and risk management. They must prevent irregular, fruitless, and wasteful expenditure. The Companies Act reinforces this by imposing fiduciary duties on directors to act in good faith and the best interests of the company, or in the case of PRASA, in the public interest. Take the Afro 4000 procurement scandal. The board approved it. Technical warnings were reportedly raised about the specifications of the locomotives. The trains were incompatible with South Africa's rail infrastructure — too tall for existing tunnels and bridges. Yet the deal, worth R2.65 billion, went ahead. That decision was not made in isolation by a single executive. It would have passed through multiple governance layers and ultimately received board approval. That failure is emblematic of a deeper problem — one of institutional decay, negligence, and possibly complicity. During the 2018 and 2019 financial years, PRASA's board reportedly held meetings for a full year without keeping formal minutes. The chairperson at the time is said to have received over R1.2 million in remuneration for those undocumented meetings. The failure to record official board decisions is more than a lapse in procedure. It is a fundamental breach of governance practice. It suggests an environment where oversight was neither practised nor valued. And yet, when a scandal erupts, it is executives who are dismissed or paraded before the public. Their reputations are often destroyed long before any formal finding is made. Meanwhile, board members continue to serve or exit quietly, with little to no scrutiny of their role in the dysfunction. This imbalance begs the question: Is the lack of board accountability a matter of political convenience? Board appointments in state-owned entities are often political. Holding executives accountable may temporarily satisfy public outrage. But investigating a board risks exposing the very political networks that put them there in the first place. That makes such action far less likely. Which brings us to a recent and increasingly bizarre pattern. Law enforcement agencies — particularly the Hawks — have launched search and seizure operations against PRASA executives and administrative staff. Laptops are confiscated. Documents are removed. Offices are raided. But in all of this, not once has a current or former board member been subjected to similar treatment. Not one home has been searched. Not one board office has been entered. Not one director has faced the same intensity of scrutiny. That is not just strange. It is alarming. If wrongdoing occurred at the level of governance — and there is mounting evidence that it did — then failure to investigate the board undermines the entire justice process. The law does not distinguish between an executive who signs off on a questionable contract and a board member who authorises or enables it. In public entities, the board is the final line of defence. If mismanagement or corruption took place with board approval, or worse, with its silent consent, then it is not less serious — it is more so. The Zondo Commission taught the nation a vital lesson. State capture did not begin at the operational level. It began in the boardroom. It began with individuals who had oversight powers and either abused them or looked away. PRASA cannot afford to repeat this history. It would be naïve to believe that collapses of governance on this scale happened without the knowledge or involvement of the board. The idea that executives alone engineered PRASA's failures while the board watched passively stretches the limits of both logic and law. If justice is to be done — and be seen to be done — then the boardroom must be subjected to the same investigative scrutiny as the executive corridor.

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Defence Minister defends SANDF's DRC deployment amid casualties
Defence Minister Angie Motshekga said the presence of the SADC Mission in the DRC in various areas of South Kivu from January 2024 provided safety, security, and stability for the people of the City of Goma and the surrounding areas. Image: Phando Jikelo / Independent Newspapers Defence Minister Angie Motshekga still maintains that the deployment of the SANDF to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) was a success despite the tragic loss of 14 soldiers and 174 injuries. Motshekga said the presence of the SADC Mission in the DRC in various areas of South Kivu from January 2024 provided safety, security, and stability for the people of the City of Goma and the surrounding areas. 'This was demonstrated by the communities coming back to their places of residence or homesteads as well as their livelihoods. 'The fights among various illegal armed groups, the M23 as well as the DRC Armed Forces were drastically reduced and with minimal displacement of communities in the far mountain areas,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Motshekga was responding to IFP MP Russel Cebekhulu, who noted the controversy surrounding the SAMIDRC (SADC Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo) and loss of life and conflicting accounts of its success. He wanted to know what Motshekga based her claim of success on, despite the rebels still in control of key areas such as Goma and Sake, while the peace efforts were elusive. Motshekga said the positive assessment of the SADC Mission's performance was demonstrated by the UN Mission reports as well as the positive reports by the UN headquarters in New York. 'A number of commendable statements of the positive work of SAMIDRC were issued by the UN.' She also said the success of the mission was demonstrated and has to be gauged on the ultimate achievement of the presence of the mission, leading to the engagement among the warring parties in North Kivu. Motshekga stated that there was a standing and planned session of the SADC Organ on Peace and Security to undertake a session on the lessons learned for future peace support operations. 'Reforms of future peacekeeping and or regional support missions reside in the domain of the region as a collective. Safety of peacekeepers is embedded in all peace support missions and or deployments as per the UN prescripts.' She stated that the SANDF will be involved as part of the collective that will undergo the SADC standing operating procedure of undertaking readiness review of deployments, including SAMIDRC. Motshekga added that all SANDF capabilities, including and not limited to intelligence, logistics support, and coordination with other role-players in SADC in SADC and AU missions, will be strengthened. According to Motshekga, the deployment in Goma, DRC, has confirmed and reiterated their position and outcry for the express requirement of adequate funding provision by the government to acquire an acceptable level of new and modern prime mission equipment. 'The lessons learnt will be utilised in our training centres and schools as scenarios as well as applied in our planning sessions at various levels to ensure improvement in the conduct of future peace-keeping missions,' said Motshekga when responding to ANC MP Dakota Legoete. Legoete asked about valuable insights the SANDF gained from its deployment in the DRC. Meanwhile, Motshekga also said there were lessons learnt in training and operations from the Battle of Bangui regarding the deployments of the SANDF. 'The lessons have been integrated into training by, for example, choosing terrain forms similar to the area of deployment. The integration into operations is based on our concept of train as you fight." She also said there were no deficiencies that were identified regarding accountability at the Battle of Bangui. 'Bearing in mind that our soldiers were outnumbered, they had fought bravely,' she said when asked about measures to prevent future operational failures and loss of soldiers' lives.