
Agribusiness and Trade: NZ food security at risk as dairy, meat prices soar, says KPMG
In the interests of food security and protecting New Zealand's 'brand' – an export marketing feature on which it heavily leans - farmers could opt into voluntary domestic pricing initiatives through their milk processors with a portion of their production priced to meet Kiwis' needs for healthy and nutritional food at a reasonable cost. Photo / Bloomberg
The carrot to any buy-in by farmers will be the reassurance that New Zealand is investing in bioeconomic tools and systems to ensure the whole of their farming system - not just the milk or meat - is monetised, Proudfoot says.
He cites the wine industry as an example of where an entire farming system could be monetised.
In wine production only about 2% of the product becomes wine. All the leafy matter, and the woody matter left over from pruning vines has had 'huge' money invested in their production but becomes unutilised waste, he says.
'It could be a bioenergy source. It could be thinking about what's an active ingredient in the leaves that we can extract? It could be thinking about how we use the grape waste creatively?
'If we can say to farmers we are investing in a bioeconomy which offers all these other business opportunities, then the idea of finding circular solutions for everything they are growing and asking them to give up a small percentage of their price on a small percentage of their production starts to make sense.'
To the suggestion that farmers, already burdened by high costs, would throw their hands up in horror at the idea, Proudfoot says on the contrary, he is sure some would like to protect the New Zealand brand and help build resilient domestic food security.
'If we don't have the ability to be resilient, to ensure that our people here in New Zealand have food security, it can very quickly become a part of how the food we export is viewed – are we exporting at the expense of our society?'
Proudfoot says food security is still under-prioritised among the 200 agribusiness leaders whose insights formed the 2025 Agribusiness Agenda, despite an increased global focus and action on food security challenges.
'Food security is national security', he says, and despite data showing higher food insecurity among Kiwis due to the cost-of-living crisis, the subject recorded the lowest-score since surveys started. Biosecurity ranked top priority for the 15th year running.
On whether farmers would support a domestic price, Proudfoot says internationally, initiatives haven't stopped because they didn't get 100% support.
'The price of food is under constant direct or indirect regulatory pressure ... in some countries it is set by the Government , you can't sell it for more than that price. But in many other countries what we are seeing, and that's definitely the case in New Zealand … is governments are looking to manage the cost of living because of the political consequences and they are putting pressure on supermarkets in particular not to increase the price of food. We're basically seeing it all over the world.
'It's not a question of will the farmer be able to generate enough money from selling their food. We think the answer to that is probably no, but actually how you ensure the farmer is able to monetise the full value of their farming system and be able to gain a return for 100% of what they grow.
'How do you monetise and get a return for the biomass you grow alongside the food you're targeting to produce, how do you ensure you are paid for the way you act in your farming system, the way you grow, look after biodiversity, water.
'It's the answer for a much more secure farming and food system and it also enables us to think much more about how we ensure local domestic food security.'
Proudfoot's Agenda this year also calls for a national food and fibre data exchange to unlock value and accelerate innovation, with surveyed agribusiness leaders citing poor data quality, challenges integrating technologies into farming systems and unclear returns-on-investment as barriers.
He says it's time New Zealand 'started having the sort of conversation the rest of the world has been having for a number of years' about bioenergy and a bioeconomy.
Overseas, agribusiness leaders talk about the three Fs - food, fibre and fuel, he says.
'Why are we only able to talk about food and fibre, not the fuel part of the equation?
'When I sit down with clients all over the world, so often the conversation hasn't started with how much butter has been exported or what countries they're exporting to, but very often it's what the farmer is doing with farmer and grower partners in connecting them up to energy.
People are starting to work out that a big part of the answer to our energy challenge sits within the farm gate. Ian Proudfoot
'There's a lot of talk about green co-ops in villages and towns in Europe and a lot of talk about investment into anaerobic digestors or other forms of bioenergy. You come back to New Zealand and the conversation just hasn't been happening.
'We must be one of the best places in the world to grow biomass, and climate change makes us even better. People are starting to work out that a big part of the answer to our energy challenge sits within the farm gate.'
Proudfoot reckons the most important job in New Zealand agribusiness right now is held by Mark Piper, chief executive of the New Zealand Institute for Bioeconomy Science, launched this month. A public research organisation, it was formed by merging four Crown Research Institutes, AgResearch, Landcare Research, Plant & Food Research, and Scion.
'The priority of this organisation is how we ensure we connect our farmers to the bioeconomy, whether it be the energy part or the animal feed part, other forms of fuel replacement or whatever. It is so important because that is the future for a resilient food sector.'
Proudfoot says a stark message relayed to him by KPMG offshore agribusiness teams was that 30% of farmers in 14 key food-producing countries in Europe plan to quit farming in the next 10 years because it doesn't make economic sense any longer.
'I've tested that in New Zealand, Australia and the US and it's probably the same. We have that risk of people deciding it's not worth farming any longer ... if we can't make farmers economically resilient they will stop making food, and if food doesn't arrive at the back door of the store, it's not available at the front door.'
Ian Proudfoot: Opening up opportunities
Some years, Ian Proudfoot looks back at the KMPG Agribusiness Agenda he's just published and thinks: 'Why are they just not getting it?'
Why are agribusiness leaders whose insights form the Agenda not 'getting' that food security or energy, for example, should rate higher on their top-of-mind issues?
'But that just means I'm not communicating properly and I have to do better,' says KPMG's global head of agribusiness, lead author of the project that recently marked its 16th year.
The Agenda is Proudfoot's baby. He created it and writes most of it.
It's a love-hate relationship, he says.
Writing up the priority issues of the 200 agribusiness leaders surveyed can be an all-consuming grind.
But gathering the information and knowledge that goes into the publication is a joy.
'They are fascinating conversations. We start with a blank piece of paper and you never know what themes will come out.
'People look forward to the Agenda. They engage with the content ... it has helped change the perspective of people towards not just thinking about volume and price but the broader opportunities …
'It has contributed to change in the narrative in the food and fibre sectors. Some of the things talked about have been adopted and are now accepted.
'But there are still some areas we've got to keep banging away on.
'I'll keep banging away on the fact we have to focus on how to build a vibrant, growing, sustainable ocean economy.
'The bioeconomy is a massive opportunity but one we are underplaying, I think.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZ 'back on course', govt says
By Russell Palmer of RNZ The government has launched a defence of its record on tackling the cost of living. Finance Minister Nicola Willis joined Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at the Beehive Theatrette for the weekly post-Cabinet briefing. She spent much of the previous week facing questions about her meeting with Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell. Luxon said this week marked a full year since the tax bracket changes National campaigned on had come into effect. "It's only through a strong economy that wages rise faster than inflation, that Kiwis can get ahead of their daily costs and our businesses can take risks that can mean that they can invest, grow, and create more jobs," he said. He directly targeted National's main rival in opposition. "Other parties in Parliament believe that raising taxes, growing the public sector, and giving more handouts to those who refuse to work is the answer. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more as Labour and others advocate for didn't work in the past and it won't work in the future." The government's decision to increase fees paid to board members on Crown entities - in some cases up to 80 percent - may undercut the messaging that National is prioritising low and middle-income New Zealanders' interests. But Luxon today pointed to the building products changes announced over the weekend, and the proposed ban on payment surcharges as recent examples. He then pointed to other items in the government's agenda, including: the current pipeline of infrastructure projects, Roads of National Significance, completing the City Rail Link, signing trade deals with the United Arab Emirates and Gulf Cooperation Council, starting negotiations with India, the digital nomads visa, and the Investment Boost policy. Willis soon picked up the baton, rattling off her own list of changes the government had made which she said had helped lower costs, including: the Family Boost policy, ending the Reserve Bank's secondary mandate to account for unemployment, curbing government spending, changing residential tenancy laws, tax deductability changes for landlords, delaying the previous government's petrol excise increases, scrapping the Auckland Regional Fuel Tax, increasing rates rebates for seniors, increasing Working for Families support, and extending maximum subscription lengths. She said National had campaigned on tackling the cost of living crisis, and pointed to rising GDP per capita and wages rising faster than inflation as a result of the government's interventions. "Taking the pressure off inflation - that is the general level of price increases across the economy - helps with the cost side of the cost-of-living equation. Lower inflation means less pressure on prices... it's pleasing to say that wages are now growing faster than inflation and forecasts show this trend continuing over the next few years." She said the government's tax changes meant "households have benefited by an average of $60 a fortnight". The change to interest deductibility for landlords had helped to take the heat out of the rental market, she said, noting "the 2.6 increase for the year to June was the lowest since 2011". She said the government was also making big structural changes, saying "the last government conclusively proved that band aids are not enough" and pointing to a series of policies yet to come to fruition: the Going for Housing Growth policy, Fast-tracking renewable energy consenting, work to address supermarket competition, and to curb council rates increases. "Economies are like oil tankers, you can't turn them around on a dime. But New Zealand is back on course," Willis said. The lists of government achievements kept coming, with Willis also pointing to: education reform, the investment boost (again), promoting global trade and investment, changes to the research and development sector, and "delivering infrastructure projects faster and better". Meanwhile, a Cabinet Office Circular reveals the government signed off on increases to fees available to board members of Crown entities. This includes increases of 30 percent for Group 2 and 4 boards and Audit and Risk committees, and an increase of 80 percent for Group 3 bodies. Luxon said the public sector director fees "have got completely out of whack compared to private sector fees". "Obviously we will never pay as much as someone in the private sector but when you are spending $32 billion on healthcare for example, it's important that we are actually able to attract really good governors for the Health NZ board, for example," he said. The changes took effect at the start of July.

RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Surcharges on PayWave etc to be banned
Tapping or swiping your bank cards is about to get cheaper for shoppers, as the government announced it is set to ban surchages for paywave by 2026. The Commerce Commission estimates Kiwis pay about $150 million in card surcharges each year, including up to $65 million in excessive charges. Commerce & Consumer Affairs Minister, Scott Simpson spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

1News
3 hours ago
- 1News
Govt proposes ban on in-store payment surcharges
The Government is proposing a ban on surcharges for most in-store payments, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Scott Simpson announced today. 'By May 2026 at the latest, we will ban surcharges for in-store payments," Simpson said. "Shoppers will no longer be penalised for their choice of payment method, whether that's tapping, swiping or using their phone's digital wallet.' Transactions made through the Visa and Mastercard networks, and by EFTPOS, were the main method of card payment in New Zealand, and Simpson said surcharges on some purchases were "a hassle and an unwelcome surprise when shoppers get to the till". "That pesky note or sticker on the payment machine will become a thing of the past," he said. "We're banning surcharges so consumers can shop with confidence knowing how much they will pay for their purchases. ADVERTISEMENT Scott Simpson. (Source: Getty) The Retail Payment System (Ban on Surcharges) Amendment Bill was expected to be introduced by the end of this year. Kiwis paid an estimated $150 million in surcharges annually, including $45-$65 million in excessive surcharges. Simpson said this was "money that could be saved or spent elsewhere". However, retail and hospitality groups have cautioned that businesses might raise total prices to pass fees on. Earlier this month, the Commerce Commission moved to lower interchange fees paid by businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments, citing high costs for businesses. The commission put the overall cost of interchange fees at around $1 billion for businesses, which were often passed on to customers through surcharges and higher product costs. Visa and Mastercard logos on credit cards (File image). (Source: ADVERTISEMENT "Surcharges cover the fees businesses pay for accepting contactless payments and credit cards, but we know these are often excessive," Simpson said. "In some cases, the retailer doesn't even make it clear what the percentage is. "A ban on surcharges means no more surprises for people who currently feel like they're being charged to use their own hard-earned money. It means they can make a purchase knowing exactly what they'll pay, and how they'll pay it." The ban would not apply to online payments, foreign-issued cards, prepaid gift or travel cards, or cards issued by other networks like American Express or UnionPay. Surcharges may be absorbed into total prices — groups Reacting to the announcement, business groups were positive that it would improve customer experiences at the checkout. But they noted businesses could pass the costs on through higher prices. ADVERTISEMENT BusinessNZ advocacy director Catherine Beard welcomed the change and said it was "the way the rest of the world is regulating". "We used to pride ourselves on being early-adopters of new technology, but surcharges felt like a step back for New Zealand." Hospitality NZ chief executive Steve Armitage said consumer savings would depend on how businesses responded and "whether cost recovery mechanisms remain viable." "It's important to recognise that electronic payments come with real costs to businesses. If surcharges are removed, many operators will have to adjust their pricing to reflect that — particularly for small hospitality operators already under pressure," he said. (Source: "Margins across the hospitality sector remain very tight. Some operators may be able to absorb the cost, but for many, particularly smaller businesses, that won't be realistic. These businesses may have no option but to reflect those costs in their pricing." Retailers 'have no choice but to pass the costs on' ADVERTISEMENT Dairy and Business Owners Group chairperson Ankit Bansal said the big banks were to blame for high transaction fees for small businesses. "If these changes go ahead, small retailers will have no choice but to pass these costs on to consumers through higher prices," he said in a statement. "If the Government wants to eliminate surcharges, then it should start by fixing the root cause — the banking sector's lack of competition and its unfair pricing model." But Consumer NZ advocacy head Jessica Walker said she was "thrilled" at the change.' "The ban is a no-brainer. These new rules will bring an end to a very messy situation." Walker said the cost of products "shouldn't increase by that much" if at all. "Any increase should be very minimal because interchange is being lowered which will reduce the cost to businesses of accepting payments." ADVERTISEMENT A Mastercard spokesperson "welcomed" the changes, at a time when the multinational giant said "payment acceptance costs have never been lower". Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young said work would be needed to ensure terminals had the ability to distinguish between domestic debit and credit cards, and commercial or international credit cards, and charge differential surcharge rates. Paying for a doctor's appointment (file image) (Source: Young said Retail NZ wanted certainty around the Commerce Commission's ability to monitor and enforce both the new interchange fees and the ban on surcharging. "The Commerce Commission will need to ensure that the fees being charged to merchants reflect the new legislation, that the savings are passed on to retailers and that other fees are not increased. "We will be seeking more detail on the surcharge changes, particularly around commercial credit cards which are not mentioned in today's announcement, and possible future changes to online transactions," she said.