Federal lawsuit aims to make recordings of Oakland County court proceedings public
A federal lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan aims to make the audio and video recordings of Oakland County court proceedings available to the public and the parties or attorneys in a given case, a move that could maximize public engagement with the courts.
The lawsuit, Hallman v. Reeds, was filed in April in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Aside from increased public engagement, a win for the plaintiffs could also serve as a way to hold judges accountable when they are accused of courtroom errors or misconduct. That last aspect could be beneficial to voters when it comes time to select local and statewide judicial candidates in election years.
Several Michigan courts made live streams of proceedings available to the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Michigan Supreme Court routinely streams its proceedings and for a time encouraged local courts statewide to continue live streams even after the pandemic, but each court had discretion on the matter. Some courts have since completely retreated from the virtual sphere and no longer live stream their proceedings. Other courts have continued on, but with the caveat of producing a live stream without archiving the proceeding.
Philip Mayor, an attorney with the ACLU of Michigan and the plaintiff's counsel in the Hallman case, told Michigan Advance that streaming proceedings is now technologically feasible, so the courts should be making their recordings available.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The named defendants in the case are Oakland District Court judges Travis Reeds and Lisa Asadoorian, as well as Oakland Chief Circuit Judge Jeffery Matis. A message seeking comment from Oakland County was not immediately returned.
Aside from courts that do make their proceedings public, the court sued in Hallman only provides a transcript when asked.
Mayor said a transcript is inadequate compared to an audio or video recording in capturing the tone, tenor and demeanor of a given judge, especially when an attorney or a party is seeking to highlight a judicial error upon appeal.
'Judges know this, because our appellate courts defer to trial judges when they make credibility findings, or when they talk about a witness's demeanor, because they say that judge was there to see that and experience that in person,' Mayor said. 'We recognize that that's meaningful. The Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission recognizes this when it evaluates judges accused of misconduct because it looks at the videos and it discusses not just the words that were said, but the demeanor with which it was said, and the way people are treated by judicial officials.'
Mayor said that from a democracy standpoint, the public had a right to be informed about what goes on in Michigan's courthouses.
'It's just not realistic that [members of] the public are going to read a 40-page transcript, but it is realistic that the public, in informing themselves before an election, may watch a five minute clip of something that happens in the courthouses,' he added.
The lawsuit's complaint also details that paradigm as a taxpayer return-on-investment issue.
'Taxpayer dollars are used throughout Michigan to create recordings of courtroom proceedings, but those same taxpayers are routinely denied access to the very recordings their hard-earned funds pay to create,' the complaint said. 'This lack of transparency violates the First Amendment by denying the public the right to access and disseminate records of critical judicial proceedings, many of which constitute the bedrock upon which a functioning democracy is built.'
The Hallman lawsuit centers around one such instance where a recording of the court's proceedings was suppressed, implicating access and First Amendment issues.
The lead plaintiff, Dr. Samantha Hallman, said her brother was subjected to alleged abusive conduct from an Oakland District Court judge. A lawsuit in the Oakland Circuit Court followed to ferret out issues of the district judge's demeanor and the fact that her brother was denied an audio recording of the proceeding.
A local administrative order ultimately denied dissemination of that recording.
Hallman then attempted to get a copy to inform voters about the judge's courtroom conduct and demeanor, but she was denied under the same policy. She was later allowed to view a recording of the proceeding but was denied permission to disseminate the copy to the public, legislators and other policy makers.
Her lawsuit in the federal district court notes that a transparent and open court was one of the hallmarks of American democracy, and that civic engagement and government accountability depended upon open access.
'It was once a civic expectation that the public would attend trials and directly engage with democratic governance by doing so,' the complaint said. 'That is not possible in the modern world, but providing the public with access to existing recordings of what happens in our courts is the closest modern analog to this historical practice.'
The case is awaiting an answer from the defendants and possibly a motion to dismiss, Mayor said.
He noted that the issue wasn't specific to Oakland County. Mayor said there was a similar recent instance in Hamtramck where a judge had allegedly berated a cancer patient who had been sued on a civil offense for not keeping his lawn mowed. Someone had recorded the hearing, potentially in violation of the same policies Mayor and the ACLU of Michigan were suing to overturn in Oakland County. The video went public and drew voter attention, leading the judge to apologize.
'That just shows that a transcript of that hearing wasn't going to capture the public's attention, but the video did,' Mayor said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's order on homelessness gets it all wrong, and here's why
President Trump has the answer to homelessness. Forcibly clear the streets. On Thursday, he signed an executive order to address 'endemic vagrancy' and end 'crime and disorder on our streets.' He called for the use of 'civil commitments' to get those who suffer from mental illness or addiction into 'humane treatment.' This comes after last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling making it legal for cities to punish people for being homeless, even if they have nowhere to go. There's some truth in what he says, and California's record on housing and homelessness is ripe for criticism. I've watched too many people suffer from addiction and mental illness and asked why the help is so slow to arrive. But I also know there are no simple answers for either crisis, and bluster is no substitute for desperately needed resources. Like a lot of what Trump does, this is another case of grandstanding. In the meantime, the Washington Post reported Thursday that the 'Trump administration has slashed more than $1 billion in COVID-era grants administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and is proposing to slash hundreds of millions more in agency grants.' As it happens, I was in the middle of a column on the latest Los Angeles homeless count when news of Trump's executive order broke. I had just spent time with two homeless women to hear about their predicaments, and none of what Trump is proposing comes close to addressing their needs, which are tragically commonplace. Namely, they're living in poverty and can't afford a place to live. In his executive order, Trump said that 'nearly two-thirds of homeless individuals report having used hard drugs … in their lifetimes. An equally large share of homeless individuals reported suffering from mental health conditions.' I don't know where he got those numbers, but truth and accuracy are not hallmarks of this administration. No doubt, addiction and mental illness are significant factors, and more intervention is needed. But that's more complicated than he thinks, especially given the practical and legal issues surrounding coercive treatment — and it's not going to solve the problem. When the latest homeless count in Los Angeles was released, a slight decline from a year ago was regarded by many as a positive sign. But when Eli Veitzer of Jewish Family Service L.A. dug into the numbers, he found something both unsurprising and deeply disturbing. The number of homeless people 65 and older hadn't gone down. It had surged, in both the city and county of Los Angeles. 'This isn't new this year. It's a trend over the last couple of years,' said Veitzer, whose nonprofit provides meals, housing assistance and various other services to clients. 'It's meaningful, and it's real, and these people are at the highest risk of mortality while they're on the streets.' The numbers from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority showed a 3.4% decrease in the total homeless population in the city, but a 17.6% increase among those 65 and older. The county numbers showed a 3.99% decrease overall, but an 8.59% increase in the 65 and older group. In the city, the increase over two years was from 3,427 in 2023 to 4,680 this year — up 37%. Reliable research has shown that among older adults who become homeless, the primary reason is the combination of poverty and high housing costs, rather than mental illness or addiction. 'They or their spouse lost their job, they or their spouse got sick, their marriage broke up or their spouse or parent died,' Dr. Margot Kushel of UC San Francisco's Homelessness and Housing Initiative was telling me several hours before Trump's executive order was issued. Her team's landmark study, released two years ago (and covered by my colleague Anita Chabria), found that nearly half the state's homeless residents were 50 and older, and that participants in the study reported a median monthly household income of $960. 'The results … confirm that far too many Californians experience homelessness because they cannot afford housing,' Kushel said at the time. Among the older population, Veitzer said, the jump in homelessness comes against the backdrop of federal and local budget cuts that will make it harder to reverse the trend. And harder for nonprofits, which rely in part on public funding, to keep providing group meals, home-delivered meals, transportation, social services and housing support. 'Every provider I've talked to in the city of L.A. is cutting meal programs,' Veitzer said. 'We're going to have to close two of our 13 meal sites, and last year we closed three. We used to have 16, and now we're down to 11.' On Wednesday, I went to one of the sites that's still up and running on Santa Monica Boulevard, just west of the 405, and met Jane Jefferies, 69. She told me she's been camping in her vehicle since February when living with her brother became impossible for various reasons. She now pulls into a Safe Parking L.A. lot each night to bed down. Jefferies said she collects about $1,400 a month in Social Security, which isn't enough to get her into an apartment. At the senior center, she uses her own equipment to make buttons that she sells on the Venice boardwalk, where she can make up to $200 on a good weekend. But that's still not enough to cover the cost of housing, she told me, and she's given up on government help. 'All the funding has been cut, and I don't know if it's because a lot of the city and state funding is subsidized by the federal government. We all know Trump hates California,' she said. As Veitzer put it: 'There's nowhere near enough low-income senior housing in L.A. County. Wait lists open up periodically,' with far more applicants than housing units. 'And then they close.' His agency delivers a daily meal to Vancie Davis, 73, who lives in a van at Penmar Park in Venice. Her next-door neighbor is her son, Thomas Williamson, 51, who lives in his car. Davis was in the front seat of the van when I arrived, hugging her dog, Heart. Her left leg was amputated below the knee two years ago because of an infection, she told me. Davis said she and another son were living in a trailer in Oregon, but the owner shut off the utilities and changed the locks. She said she reached out to Williamson, who told her, 'I've got a van for you, so you'll have a place to live, but it's going to be rough. And it is. It's very, very rough.' I've heard so many variations of stories like these over the years, I've lost count. The magnitude that exists in the wealthiest nation in history is a disgrace, and a sad commentary on an economic system and public policy that have served to widen, rather than narrow, the inequity gap. On Thursday, Trump's executive order on homelessness grabbed headlines but will do nothing for Jane Jefferies or Vancie Davis and for thousands like them. We know the interventions that can work, Kushel said, but with deep cuts in the works, we're moving in the wrong direction. Davis' son Thomas told Times photographer Genaro Molina about another person who lives in a vehicle and has been a neighbor of theirs in the parking lot. She wasn't there Wednesday, but we'll check back. It's a 91-year-old woman.


Boston Globe
6 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
In Roswell, it's not Epstein, it's the UFO files Trump promised
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Like, where is it?' asked Eduardo Alvarez, 36, who works at the House of Aliens gift shop in Roswell, about the promised UFO files. 'They've been promising that for many, many times, right? Trump said he would be the guy to do it.' Advertisement Roswell, a city of 48,000 in southeast New Mexico, has had an international mystique as a result of that incident 78 years ago this month. Initially, the military said it had recovered a 'flying disc,' but quickly retracted the claim. The US government later said the debris was from a downed test balloon intended to detect Soviet atomic activity, but then revised the story again, claiming it was just a weather balloon. Advertisement People entered the Roswell UFO Spacewalk attraction in Roswell, N.M. PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images The shifting explanations and secrecy ignited a lasting conspiracy theory: that the government has proof aliens have visited America but is hiding it. Most tourists interviewed this week while visiting the Roswell International UFO Museum and Research Center, the two-story-tall alien holding up a Dunkin' sign, or the McDonald's shaped like a flying saucer, said they were simply stopping by as part of a kitschy Americana road trip. Bob Veitch, 61, of Huntingburg, Ind., said visiting Roswell was on his personal 'bucket list,' as his wife shook her head. Put another way, though, a pilgrimage to Roswell is also helpful for understanding American politics in 2025. 'There's always been a direct, if dotted, line from conspiracies like Roswell to the modern-day beliefs of groups like QAnon,' said Garrett Graff, a journalist and author of 'UFO: The Inside Story of the US Government's Search for Alien Life Here – and Out There.' 'The challenge of much of the MAGA movement is that it has risen to prominence by embracing one conspiracy after another — and now that's coming home to roost for Trump with Jeffrey Epstein.' During his three campaigns for president, Trump has been asked repeatedly whether he would declassify information about what the government believes to be true about UFOs and extraterrestrial life. In general, Trump has long said, 'I have never been a believer' in extraterrestrial life and that the topic overall has 'never been my thing. I have to be honest.' But during the 2020 reelection campaign, Trump appeared on his son Donald Trump Jr.'s podcast, where he was asked whether he had any more intelligence about UFOs and aliens, now that he had been president. Advertisement 'I won't talk to you about what I know about it, but it's very interesting,' the elder Trump responded. 'But Roswell's a very interesting place with a lot of people that would like to know what's going on.' Trump went even further in the 2024 campaign, during a September appearance on Lex Fridman's podcast, when Fridman asked if he would push the Pentagon to release more UFO footage. 'Oh yeah, sure, I'll do that. I would do that. I'd love to do it,' said Trump. As part of his second-term promise of 'radical transparency,' Trump has aggressively signed executive orders to release records related to the JFK, MLK, and Robert F. Kennedy assassinations. He has also sought to make public more information about the investigation into his ties to Russia that dogged his first term. But so far, there hasn't been any direct action from Trump on UFOs or, as they're now officially known, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs). The White House did not respond to a request for comment on why or whether anything might be released soon. There are, however, reasons to believe something could happen. Congress has taken bipartisan interest in the issue and even passed a law in 2022 establishing a formal process to examine declassifying more material. This came after the Biden administration released a report examining 144 UFO sightings from 2004 to 2021. Interestingly, Trump's current CIA Director John Ratcliffe said in the wake of that report in June 2021 that he worked to get more information out during Trump's first term because it is a matter of national security. 'There are technologies that we don't have and frankly that we are not capable of defending against, based on those things that we've seen, multiple sensors, in other words, where not just people visually see it, but where it's picked up on radar, where it's seen on satellites,' said Ratcliffe, speaking as Trump's former head of the Department of National Intelligence, on Advertisement Back in Roswell, Kitty Hjelmroth, 49, of Farmington Hills, Mich., who was visiting with her family, said she just couldn't believe Trump would keep any promise, especially one this big. 'I don't believe anything he says,' said Hjelmroth. Down the street, Devon London, 35, from Baton Rouge, La., offered the opposite view. 'If Trump says he will do something, he will,' he said, adding that he is personally dismayed by the Epstein story, which he sees as more important than anything related to UFOs. Alvarez, the gift shop worker, pointed to the store's best-selling T-shirt (featuring a green alien with the words 'illegal alien') and paused. Maybe, he said, he doesn't want Trump to shed more light on Roswell or UFOs after all. 'At this point, the fun is the mystery.' James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.


Miami Herald
6 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Wealthy owner of Florida telecom firm gets 5 years for fleecing $110M from U.S.
The wealthy owner of a major South Florida telecommunications company was sentenced on Thursday to five years in prison and ordered to pay about $110 million to the U.S. government for fleecing a federal program known as 'Lifeline' that provides discounted phone services to low-income customers. Issa Asad, CEO of Q Link Wireless LLC, and his Dania Beach-based company pleaded guilty last year to conspiring to defraud the U.S. government program, including theft of public funds, before U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz in Miami federal court. At the same time, Asad, 52, of Southwest Ranches, also pleaded guilty to bilking a government loan program meant to help struggling businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the terms of the plea deals with prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney's Office, Asad and Q Link agreed to pay back the Federal Communications Commission in one of the largest financial penalties in the agency's history. Court records show they have paid almost all of the $110 million in restitution to the FCC. Also, Asad paid a criminal penalty of $17.5 to the government, representing his ill-gotten income from Q Link's Lifeline phone services scam. Asad also paid about $1.8 million in restitution to the Small Business Administration for laundering loan proceeds that his company received from the Paycheck Protection Program during the pandemic. He admitted to using that fraudulent money for construction on his new home, and more than $140,000 on property taxes, jewelry and donations to a local university. Asad must surrender to federal prison authorities in two months, Judge Ruiz ordered on Thursday. This was not Asad's first brush with the law. In 2014, Asad was charged with murder in connection with driving his Mercedes over a groundskeeper at his Dania Beach business following a dispute over $65 in pay for lawn services. Five years later, Asad pleaded no contest to misdemeanor culpuable negligence and was given one year of probation in Broward Circuit Court, according to court documents. Asad was also ordered to pay a $225 fine. Court records provided no explanation for the dramatically different outcome in the criminal case. But while the case was pending, the groundkeeper's family sued Asad over her brother's death in civil court, ending in a confidential settlement before the murder charge was substantially reduced to a misdemeanor. In Miami federal court, Asad and his company admitted to a longtime scheme to defraud the FCC's Lifeline program. It makes everyday communications services more affordable for low-income customers by providing deep discounts on certain monthly cellphone service, broadband internet service and bundled voice-broadband packages purchased from participating telecom provider. Asad and Q Link, represented by the law firm Kobre & Kim, admitted that they purposely conspired to defraud the FCC program between 2012 and 2021 by providing false information about their Lifeline customers and making repeated false claims for government reimbursement, according to a factual statement filed with their plea agreements. They also admitted to retaining Lifeline funds that they were not entitled to receive and deceiving the FCC about the company's compliance with program rules. 'Upon learning that the FCC was investigating their Lifeline billing, Q Link and Asad created and provided false records to the FCC to conceal the scam and to continue collecting reimbursement,' according to a sentencing memo filed by prosecutors Elizabeth Young and John Shipley. 'As part of this plan, they simply manufactured cellphone activity on behalf of Q Link customers who were not using their cellphones. 'At no point did Q Link amend past Lifeline claims for customers who were not using their cellphones or return any of the Lifeline payments (something they could have done),' they wrote in the memo. The case, filed last year, was investigated by the FCC, IRS, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and Special Inspector for Pandemic Recovery.