Liberals set to table bill on knocking down internal trade barriers
The government has put a bill on the House of Commons notice paper that could potentially be tabled as early as today.
Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged to break down internal trade barriers by Canada Day to create one economy — although the time left on the parliamentary calendar suggests the legislation will not gain Royal Assent by the time the House rises for the summer.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
It also comes just days after Carney met with the country's premiers to discuss the need to build major projects across Canada and fast-track their approval.
1:51
U.S. may be looking to remove non-tariff barriers, report shows
Several other provinces, including Ontario and Quebec, have also tabled such legislation to remove interprovincial barriers to the trade of goods across the country.
Story continues below advertisement
It comes against a backdrop of U.S. President Donald Trump roiling the country's economy with stop-and-go tariffs in an escalating trade war — and as Carney has been engaged in behind-the-scenes talks with Trump on trade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Letters to The Sun: U.S. isn't capable of making a trade deal with Canada
Re: Carney has no choice: Trade deal with U.S. requires end of supply management Since 'supply management' (along with inter-provincial trade barriers) has been on the Fraser Institute's naughty list as supposedly reducing 'economic freedom' in Canada, it is no surprise that it is tossed out as a trade bargaining chip. Would this supposed bargaining position be discarded in exchange for nothing like the digital services tax was? I wrote to the federal minister of agriculture during the original General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade talks, explaining how supply management is actually an animal-rights issue, since you can't raise animals humanely on speculation. But now, with Canada's hard right-turn federally, all 'soft' issues standing in the way of economic freedom are jettisoned, along with Indigenous rights, the environment, entitlements and, apparently, Canada's sovereignty. We do not need a 'trade agreement' with the U.S. Any bargaining chips should be used to convince that rogue nation to conform to international law, and allow normal trade to proceed under WTO rules. America is not agreement-capable. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Kathleen McCroskey, Surrey Prime Minister Mark Carney does have a choice. Certainly there are problems with the current system, but not with the principle of supply management. For one thing, quotas should not be a marketable commodity. If you can afford to pay a million dollars to buy a quota, you can afford to sell your produce at a lower price. U.S. President Donald Trump keeps saying they don't need anything that Canada produces. So what makes him think we need their dairy products? Oh yes, he can't think. Farmers are easy to throw under the bus. The prairie farmers were certainly tossed when it was decided to tariff electric cars coming from China. The auto industry is important, but so is agriculture. Bruce Frankard, Vancouver Chickens and cows aren't widgets. They are living creatures that experience both physical and emotional pain. Ending supply management would initiate a race-to-the-bottom in dairy prices, and therefore in animal health and welfare. As Trump's big beautiful bill so clearly reveals that current U.S. leaders are willing — even eager — to sacrifice the health and welfare of their own citizens for the sake of bloated corporate profits and tax cuts. Given they don't even care about their own people, no way do U.S. leaders flinch at treating domestic animals as machine slaves. At what point do we become the 51st state simply by doing as Trump would like us to do, whether we're a separate nation or not? Keep Canada's supply management system. Deborah Jones, Delta Re: NDP alters course on supportive housing projects Low-barrier housing — such as supportive housing — is a necessity if there is to be a decrease in 'tent cities' and street use of substances. But after volunteering with an outreach support group for people who use substances, including many who live in supportive housing, it's been made clear to me that the existing situations are untenable. When there are suites crawling with cockroaches, broken elevators, flooding, thefts, and untreated overdoses, the residents have little reason to respect rules. The management needs to be accountable as well as the residents. Primarily, seniors with disabilities having no experience with substances should not be forced to live in supportive housing. Many fear for their safety in an unknown environment, and their isolation only increases. Secondly, people who are in recovery from substance use should not be forced to live in supportive housing. If our aim is to assist those folks, they should not be surrounded by triggers that can cause relapses. Thirdly, those living in supportive housing must be formally consulted and included in decision-making and allowed to take ownership of the circumstances where they live. Debbie Picco, Maple Ridge Re: 'There's a fear of coming to America': B.C. to Washington State travel down five months in a row 'There's a fear of coming to America' is just part of the story. Our decision to cancel our Alaska cruise was not only based on fear of border hassles, it was also because we did not want to support the Trump regime financially. As Canadians, we have no political clout in the U.S. But voting with our feet is still effective and satisfying. Steen Petersen, Nanaimo Letters to the editor should be sent to sunletters@
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Federal Minister planning to table First Nations water bill despite opposition from Alberta and Ontario
The federal minister of Indigenous services says her government plans to reintroduce legislation to ensure First Nations' rights to clean drinking water — despite calls from Alberta and Ontario for it to scrap the bill altogether. Two provincial environment ministers sent a letter to their federal counterpart this week calling on Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to abandon legislation they see as undermining competitiveness and delaying project development. 'Prime Minister Mark Carney has made a commitment to do things differently,' Alberta's Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz and her Ontario counterpart Todd McCarthy wrote in a June 30 letter to federal Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin. 'We are hopeful that this new federal government will move away from policies and legislation that undermine competitiveness, delay project development and disproportionately harm specific provinces and territories without any quantifiable benefits to the natural environment.' One of the bills they singled out is C-61, legislation introduced in the last Parliament that sought to ensure First Nations have access to clean drinking water and can protect fresh water sources on their territories. Story continues below advertisement 1:59 Progress slow on Alberta First Nation's water crisis That bill faced a lengthy committee process but was not passed into law before Parliament was prorogued. In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said everyone in Canada should have access to clean water. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'That's why our new government has committed to introduce and pass legislation that affirms First Nations have a human right to clean drinking water. To be clear, we intend to introduce this legislation this fall to advance this important commitment,' said Livi McElrea. 'Provinces, territories, and the federal government have a shared responsibility of reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples … We call on all parliamentarians, provinces, and territories to support this critical legislation to ensure that First Nations have access to clean drinking water.' View image in full screen A woman carries water jugs on the Neskantaga First Nation, in Ontario on Sept. 13, 2021. The Neskantaga First Nation hasn't had clean drinking water for over 30 years. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward The Liberals under former prime minister Justin Trudeau vowed to end all long-term boil water advisories by 2021 — a self-imposed deadline they failed to meet. Story continues below advertisement Indigenous Services Canada data shows 37 long-term drinking water advisories are still in place across the country — most of them in Ontario. The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations has been vocal in her desire for the bill to be reintroduced, saying after the election parliamentarians will be playing 'political games' with the lives of First Nations children if it doesn't make its way back to the House of Commons. 'Every member of Parliament in Canada that's going to sit in that House has an obligation to think about all the children of this country, and shame on people that played games, pushing it down politically, kicking it to each other and blaming each other, even through the election,' Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said in May. 1:19 Shamattawa First Nation calls on Feds to honour clean water commitment Schulz and McCarthy also pointed to the Species at Risk Act, the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, Clean Electricity Regulations and the Impact Assessment Act as pieces of legislation or policy that should be repealed. Story continues below advertisement Legislation to repeal the portion of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act that created the consumer carbon price was introduced in early June but is awaiting debate and votes in Parliament. The act will remain in place to maintain a carbon price for big industrial polluters. However the consumer carbon price was set to zero by regulation on April 1. Both provinces have been pushing the federal government to allow for developments of major projects, often finding themselves at odds with First Nations in their respective jurisdictions. One northern Ontario First Nation just completed a four-day demonstration that slowed down traffic on the Trans-Canada Highway to protest legislation designed to speed up mining and development, with leaders saying they feel heir rights are being violated and they are not being properly consulted in provincial and federal legislation. Bill C-5, which became law last week, gives Ottawa the power to fast-track projects meant to boost the national economy by sidestepping most of the environmental protections and legislation Alberta and Ontario want Canada to repeal.
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
U.S. ambassador expects Carney weighing growth options, including public service cuts
Article content Pete Hoekstra, the United States ambassador to Canada, said that he thinks the prime minister is considering all aspects to create growth, including public service cuts. Article content The Ottawa Citizen sat down with Hoekstra at a picnic table outside the ambassador's residence. Small American flags rested in little buckets as workers scuttled to put the finishing touches on the annual Fourth of July party held on the lawn at the ambassador's house. Article content Article content Article content The party is one of the marquee events of the summer, with more than 1,000 attending with live music, food and more elbow-brush-schmoozing than ' elbows up.' Article content Hoekstra wore a red tie with cartoons of American faces instead of stars on the U.S. flag. The ambassador also spoke with a personable and disarming touch, but stayed firm on U.S. government priorities. Article content Article content When asked if Prime Minister Mark Carney would follow a similar program of slashing and cutting to improve government efficiency, similar to Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, Hoekstra said he wouldn't speculate, but expects Carney is considering all avenues, including government clawbacks and cuts. Article content Still, even with public service cuts and other economic measures, Hoekstra does not think Carney will outpace U.S. economic growth. Article content Article content 'I'm disappointed that he won't meet that objective, because America will have a faster growth rate than Canada will have,' Hoekstra said. 'But I'd be excited if Canada was No. 2.' Article content Hoekstra argues that President Donald Trump's legislative victory around the passing of his so-called big, beautiful tax bill and cutting regulations will balloon growth despite critics, including inside the Republican party, worried about deficits. Article content The future of DOGE Article content Reflecting on the work of DOGE, he said that the work was precise, 'short-term focused emphasis' searching for waste. The difference now, he says, will be focused spending cuts through Congress rather than an outside government focus on those spending cuts. Article content He said the work and legacy of DOGE will go through Congress to pass spending rescission bills to put in law cuts and expenditures.
