Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie launches Lurie Autism Institute in Philadelphia
According to a press release, the $50 million gift that will launch the Lurie Autism Institute (LAI) is "the largest single donation to U.S. academic medical centers focused on autism research across the lifespan."
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), perhaps obviously, focuses its efforts in autism research with children, while Penn largely works with the adult community.
One of LAI's main goals is to combine the work of CHOP and Penn and aid researchers in painting a broader picture of autism's effects over a lifetime. As LAI Interim Director Dr. Dan Rader put it, the work they do will help researchers "better understand the condition, the heterogeneity, and how we can actually ultimately use the research to make a difference in their lives."
In addition, the new institute and its funding will aim to incentivize other doctors and researchers — those not currently working on autism-related work — to join in supporting the work of CHOP and Penn Medicine. To that end, LAI will launch a certificate program from PhD trainees and postdocs called the "Next-Generation Program in Autism Bioscience," the press release said.
"This is a time when we've seen so many advances in neuroscience, genetics, imaging, molecular pathways, processes and artificial intelligence," Lurie told USA TODAY in an exclusive interview. "It's opening up an entirely new world of possibilities for autism research."
Both Rader and Lurie emphasized that a big part of LAI's work will be determining how translational therapeutics might be effective in treating individuals on the spectrum, in part with the aid of the latest in artificial intelligence.
In other words, LAI's efforts will consist of collecting data from existing and ongoing research and then, using new technology and AI, figuring out how that data can be translated into a form of treatment. That treatment, according to Lurie, could consist of repurposing certain drugs or gene editing.
"The complex part of autism is there's no single gene, there's no single reason," Lurie said. "So it's very research-based in order to get to the therapeutics."
As LAI focuses largely on research, the clinical efforts at CHOP and Penn will continue and "likely expand" in the wake of LAI's launch, Rader said. Then, as those two organizations diagnose and work with more individuals on the spectrum, they could "recruit" those individuals as "partners in the research to better understand this complex condition."
In addition, Lurie said one of the main visions he has for LAI is to become a "catalyst" for more worldwide funding and research to tackle the complexities of understanding autism.
As part of those efforts, the institute will host an annual international symposium and award a prize for autism research, according to the press release.
Lurie and his family are not newcomers to advocating for autism research and awareness.
'My brother is autistic. So for my family and me, we've been supporting the autism community for ... decades," Lurie said. "That's really where it all originated from.
"My mother has really led the way over all these decades as the primary investor in autism research, and the rest of the family has followed suit. What I've done is just re-emphasize that over the decades, over the years."
Lurie's mother, Nancy Lurie Marks, founded the Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation (NLMFF) in 1977 to aid individuals with autism. In 2009, the NLMFF established the Lurie Center for Autism at Massachusetts General Hospital.
In 2018, Jeffrey Lurie started the Eagles Autism Foundation. And in 2019, the Eagles, the NFL team Lurie has owned since 1994, opened the NFL's first in-stadium sensory room, "a dedicated space designed by medical professionals for those who may need a quieter and more secure environment," according to the team's official website.
"And wherever we go, whether it's Brazil or the Super Bowl, we bring it along with us," Lurie said. "And (sensory-inclusive efforts have) become adopted by so many sports teams. It's gratifying."
Indeed, many sports teams across various leagues — MLB, MLS, the NBA and the NHL — have adopted similar sensory rooms and other tools. The Buffalo Bills, for example, offer sensory inclusion kits that include things like noise-canceling headphones and fidget toys to help make their games and events more inclusive to their neurodiverse fans.
Said Lurie: "I've always grown up in an atmosphere of acceptance and inclusivity, so when we have done things with the Eagles like we do with different organizations ... we want to try to create inclusive atmospheres for autistic people no matter if they're young or old."
The topic of autism research on a national level has gained steam in recent months. That has been inspired in part by U.S. health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who in the past has promoted scientifically discredited theories that autism is linked to childhood vaccines — declaring in April that the U.S. will find the cause of autism by September.
As part of those efforts, Kennedy announced "a massive testing and research effort" that will "involve hundreds of scientists from around the world."
An HHS official told USA TODAY in late April that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is using $50 million to invest in autism research. Other efforts headed by NIH — namely launching a real-world data platform using public data from federal agencies and data collected from private sector sources like smart watches and fitness trackers — and lack of clarity surrounding those efforts have resulted in heightened privacy concerns.
"The use of registries and registry data in general can be a valuable tool in helping to understand the causes of diseases and disorders, but in this case, the lack of clarity around how data will be collected, shared, maintained and tested for accuracy raises red flags," a statement from the Autism Science Foundation read.
Despite the relevant timing, the launch of the LAI is not an event that is happening in response to Kennedy and the HHS's recent initiative, Lurie clarified.
"This notion of merging CHOP and Penn — I've been looking for where to do this for about three years," he said.
"It just came to be probably about two years ago, and we've been talking ever since of how to make this great. So, no, it had nothing to do with anything else but trying to impact the lives of those with autism with all these new technologies and discoveries as best as possible."
That doesn't take away from the significance of the timing, says Rader.
"There's a lot of confusion right now about what are the causes of autism, what should we be doing about it, how might we better prevent it," he said. "It's more important than ever to bring this information together in a synthetic way that allows us to really better understand this complex condition.
"So, I think, yes, the rationale for this got even greater over the last few months."
Kinsey Crowley contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Lurie Autism Institute: Jeffrey Lurie funds new research initiative
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nurse on new CDC vaccine panel said to have been ‘anti-vax longer than RFK'
One of the new members of a critical federal vaccine advisory board has argued for decades that vaccines caused her son's autism – a connection that years of large-scale studies and reviews refute. Registered nurse Vicky Pebsworth is one of eight new members to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (Acip), all hand-picked by the vaccine skeptic and Donald Trump's health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr. 'She's probably been anti-vax longer than RFK has,' said Dr David Gorski, a Wayne State University School of Medicine professor, who is considered an expert on the anti-vaccine movement. Kennedy fired all 17 of the committee's previous members in June and stacked it with ideological allies. Pebsworth and Kennedy would have probably been known to each other, because their respective non-profits supported one another's efforts. Related: RFK Jr's new vaccine panel votes against preservative in flu shots in shock move 'If I had a child who I believed had been harmed by whatever – it doesn't have to be vaccines – I wouldn't then trust myself to be on a federal safety commission on that issue,' said Seth Mnookin, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor in science journalism who met and profiled Pebsworth in the mid-2000s. Pebsworth was also part of a 2020 lawsuit against Covid-19 vaccine mandates that aligns with Kennedy's agenda. In a declaration to federal court, Pebsworth argued that 'increases in the number of vaccines in the CDC schedule may be causally related to increases in the rates of chronic illness', an assertion that appears to be based on a debunked study, but has long been a talking point of anti-vaccine activists. 'They're the oldest prominent organization,' said Mnookin, whose book is called The Panic Virus: A True Story of Medicine, Science, and Fear. The information center represents 'the start of the modern-day anti-vaccine movement in the US', said Mnookin. Pebsworth joined Acip from the National Vaccine Information Center, where she has served as volunteer research director since 2006, according to a résumé filed in the same case. The Guardian sent a list of questions and an interview request to Pebsworth, but did not receive a response. The National Vaccine Information Center started in Virginia as Dissatisfied Parents Together in 1982, before changing its name in 1995. The group went on to receive major funding support from Dr Joseph Mercola, once described as 'the most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online'. Like other new members of Acip, Pebsworth comes to the role with medical credentials; she has a doctorate degree in nursing, taught college research courses and served as a consumer representative on federal panels. For decades, she has publicly argued that her son, Sam, was injured by the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in 1998 – despite evidence showing there is no connection between vaccines and autism. Pebsworth organized conferences about alternative treatments for autism as early as 2001, including one in Michigan where then-doctor Andrew Wakefield spoke and where she told a reporter she had placed her son on a restrictive diet and administered chelation therapy – a treatment for heavy metal poisoning. Neither has been found to effectively treat autism. 'Back then in the early 2000s or the late 1990s, there were two main flavors of the anti-vax,' said Gorski. In Britain, Wakefield's paper in the Lancet proposed a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. His paper would be retracted in 2010 amid evidence of fraud and conflicts of interest. 'But then there was the American flavor with mercury and thimerosal, which had been used in several childhood vaccines as a preservative,' said Gorski. 'Back in the day we used to call them the 'mercury militias', but others used to call it the 'mercury moms'.' Thimerosal is a vaccine preservative that has been used since before the second world war. Its safety is considered settled science and yet it has been the subject of misinformation for decades. A galvanizing moment for the anti-vaccine movement came in 2015, when one of the worst measles outbreaks in years tore through Disneyland in California. The outbreak prompted lawmakers to tighten vaccine requirements for schools, drawing parents into the fray and providing a platform for anti-vaccine groups. 'I used to call anti-vax the pseudoscience that spanned the political spectrum – you could find leftwing anti-vaxxers, rightwing anti-vaxxers,' said Gorski. 'But now it's really, really built into the right,' he said. 'You can't deny that any more. It's become part of rightwing ideology.' In 2017, Pebsworth testified before a Virginia house subcommittee against a school mandate for a meningitis vaccine. In 2020, as Americans anxiously waited for a Covid-19 vaccine, she warned Americans could face unknown consequences from the vaccines. Pebsworth later testified in 2021 before the University of Hawaii's board of regents, arguing against Covid-19 vaccines. In most public testimony, Pebsworth identifies herself not only as the volunteer research director for the National Vaccine Information Center, but also as 'the mother of a child injured by his 15-month well-baby shots in 1998'. 'Groups like hers and probably even more prominently the Informed Consent Action Network have seen that most vaccine policy is at the state level,' said an expert in state vaccine law who declined to go on the record for fear of retaliation from the Department of Health and Human Services. 'They have a list of model legislation they encourage supporters to try to get introduced,' the expert said. At the same time, the groups have failed to accomplish their 'big swings': getting schools to drop vaccine mandates. The expert continued: 'My sense is that legislators know they're hearing from a very vocal minority. Landslide majorities still support requirements. It's lower than it was before the pandemic, but the public still understands the needs for these laws.' By 2017, Trump was weighing whether this vocal group could become part of his coalition. Before his first inauguration in early January 2017, Trump publicly said he was considering Kennedy to head a new committee on vaccines and autism. Only days before she was appointed to ACIP, Pebsworth and the founder of the National Vaccine Information Center argued against Covid-19 vaccines, stating in part: 'FDA should not be recommending mRNA Covid-19 shots for anyone until adequate scientific evidence demonstrates safety and effectiveness for both the healthy and those who are elderly or chronically ill.' More than 270 million Americans have received Covid-19 vaccines, and the federal government has closely monitored for rare events. That old trope of thimerosal played a leading role in the first meeting of Kennedy's reconstituted Acip panel. Committee members heard a presentation against thimerosal from Lyn Redwood, the former president of the World Mercury Project, which would become Kennedy's anti-vaccine group Children's Health Defense. A report on thimerosal's safety by career CDC scientists was pulled from the meeting by Kennedy's office. Ultimately, members recommended against seasonal influenza vaccines that contain thimerosal in a decision that shocked medical and scientific communities. Pebsworth abstained, arguing she wanted to vote separately on whether to recommend influenza vaccines. Pebsworth later said she wanted to vote separately on whether to recommend seasonal flu vaccines. She did not respond to questions from the Guardian about how she would have voted on flu shots, if she had the chance.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Vaccine Shortages. Viral Outbreaks. Widespread Illness. More Death.
It's September 2026. Routine childhood vaccines are now optional in the United States, and government officials, after hastily compiling an immense research registry of autistic people, have added the neurodevelopmental condition to the list of compensable vaccine injuries, thereby opening up vaccine makers to an onslaught of lawsuits. Facing decreased demand and increased litigation, some vaccine makers have pulled their shots from the domestic market entirely. Outbreaks are spreading across the country, sickening tens of thousands of people; too many are dying, especially children, pregnant people, and older adults. Something similar is unfolding around the world because the U.S. government ended vaccinations for millions globally. This is one scenario America faces if we continue down the path being bushwhacked by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other anti-vaccine activists at the Department of Health and Human Services. And when I called up vaccine experts to ask whether my dystopian fears made me a doomer, they agreed that this grim scenario was plausible—and that it could get even worse. Every day seems to bring more ominous news about Kennedy's war on vaccines. Within just the past few weeks, Kennedy has done the following: He abruptly fired all 17 members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, known as ACIP, and replaced them with largely inexperienced people, some of who are outright anti-vaccine activists—who then promptly voted to ban thimerosal, a rare but safe preservative, from flu vaccines. He changed CDC recommendations so that they no longer say healthy children and pregnant people should receive Covid-19 vaccines. And he announced the U.S. would stop funding Gavi, an international organization that vaccinates children around the world. 'It's hard to know how this is all going to play out. But right now, everything appears very dark,' said Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine. And yet, he added, 'I don't think we've hit bottom. I think he's continuing to chip away, with some pretty big chips, to erode our vaccine ecosystem. I don't see a turnaround at this point. We're still in free fall as far as I'm concerned.'I'm not the first to try to gaze into a crystal ball about the future of vaccines in America. In January 2025, at Kennedy's confirmation hearing, Senator Elizabeth Warren began rattling off the actions he could take as secretary, given his history of profiting from lawsuits against vaccine makers: You could publish your anti-vaccine conspiracies, but this time on U.S. government letterhead, something a jury might be impressed by. You could appoint people to the CDC vaccine panel who share your anti-vax views and let them do your dirty work. You could tell the CDC vaccine panel to remove a particular vaccine from the vaccine schedule. You could remove vaccines from special compensation programs, which would open up manufacturers to mass torts. You could make more injuries eligible for compensation, even if there is no causal evidence. You could change vaccine court processes to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits. You could turn over FDA data to your friends at the law firm, and they could use it however it benefited them. You could change vaccine labeling, you could change vaccine information rules, you could change which claims are compensated in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The bottom line, Warren added: 'Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make millions of dollars while he does it. Kids might die. But Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.' Sure enough, some of this has come to pass. In an X video in May, Kennedy announced that the CDC was changing its recommendations for the Covid vaccine. The agency turned the childhood recommendation from 'should' to 'may' and called the process 'shared clinical decision-making,' while eliminating the recommendation entirely for pregnant people, who are at significantly higher risk for severe illness and death. I asked the experts: Could other vaccine recommendations be softened like this? 'I think it's a real possibility—I think in many ways it's a goal,' said Paul Offit, professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine. Project 2025, the right-wing blueprint for the second Trump administration, specifically called for eliminating the CDC as a recommending body. If a vaccine is no longer recommended, 'that means that it couldn't be required for school entry.' (School mandates have long been a target of anti-vaccine activists.) Others thought it might be even worse. '[Kennedy's] end goal is to remove most or all childhood vaccines—to make them inaccessible, is my view,' said Dorit Reiss, professor at UC Hastings College of Law. 'So your scenario is plausible, although you're being very cautious in saying they might move to shared clinical decision-making. They could say 'this is no longer recommended.'' The new ACIP advisers could stop recommending some vaccines entirely: HPV, influenza, and hepatitis B shots have all been targeted by anti-vaccine activists. They could also vote to end Vaccines for Children, a $5 billion program covering the vaccinations of nearly half of all children in the United States. The administration may also make it difficult to approve new vaccines. 'It's not only about Kennedy's insistence on saline placebos,' Hotez said, referring to the health secretary's announcement in May that vaccines would need to go through new, unethical clinical trials involving placebo tests. 'There's so little vaccine expertise now, either at FDA because people seem to be leaving, and with ACIP, there's almost no vaccine expertise in its current group.' And, of course, there's the harm that figures like Kennedy do with public advocacy against vaccines. That includes the ACIP advisers' recommendation on Thursday to remove thimerosal, a preservative used only in multidose vials of flu vaccines—about 4 percent of all flu vaccines given in the U.S.—in order to prevent bacterial and fungal infections. Thimerosal was removed from all other childhood vaccines in 2001 as a precaution when anti-vaccine activists first began linking it to autism—a connection that multiple studies have disproven. Banning it entirely now could undermine American's sense of vaccines' safety and June, Health and Human Services awarded $150,000 to the Arizona law firm Brueckner Spitler Shelts for its legal 'expertise' on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which is run by the Health Resources and Services Administration, a subagency of HHS. Drew Downing, a lawyer at the firm, has a reputation for representing people who say they've been injured by vaccines, and he has been involved in lawsuits against vaccine makers. Several of the new advisers on ACIP have also served as expert witnesses in lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies. 'I think [Kennedy's] goal is to either remove vaccines from the vaccine injury compensation program or add to the list of compensable injuries, all of which will weaken the vaccine infrastructure,' Offit said. Autism, for example, could be added to the list of injuries based on the administration's fast-tracked research to find a link between the condition and vaccines, despite decades of scientific research showing otherwise. Changes to the compensation program could mean vaccine makers simply choose to stop making shots available in the U.S., Offit said: 'Make vaccines expensive enough, or make them more subject to frivolous litigation, and they'll leave.' Something similar has happened before. In 1980, 18 companies made vaccines; by 1990, that number had fallen to four. A 1981 study suggested that the whole-cell pertussis component of the DTP vaccine could in rare cases cause permanent brain swelling. Subsequent studies found no such link; in fact, the swelling was caused by infant epilepsy. Even so, litigation against pertussis vaccine makers and then manufacturers of all vaccines began to mount, causing vaccine prices to skyrocket and pushing some manufacturers out of business. Faced with a volatile vaccine market, Congress passed a law in 1986 leading to the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 'If you really want to hurt vaccines, mess with the vaccination compensation program,' Offit said. After all, vaccines aren't usually a big payday for pharmaceutical companies, he said. 'They make money on things that you give frequently. They don't make as much money as things that you give once or a few times in a lifetime.' The vaccine market is big, but for pharmaceutical companies, 'vaccines are still a very modest component of their revenue compared to all the small molecule drugs that they're producing,' said Hotez. Facing litigation, companies might decide vaccine production isn't worth it. 'If it becomes untenable for them to remain in the U.S. market, they may just pull the plug on their vaccine side altogether.'If the measles vaccination rate declines by 10 percent, 11.1 million people will contract measles within 25 years, according to a new study coauthored by Hotez. Other vaccine-preventable diseases would also come roaring back. The resulting illnesses and deaths would be 'absolutely devastating,' he said. But this isn't just a future fear. Outbreaks are already cropping up: 2025 has already been one of the worst years for measles in decades; whooping cough cases increased sixfold between 2023 and 2024; polio was detected in wastewater in 2022. 'Things are already starting to fray,' Hotez said. 'Measles is the first one you see break through, because it's so highly contagious, but the others will follow. I worry about pertussis. I worry about bringing back things like Hib meningitis, which I used to take care of as a pediatric resident. And I even worry about polio coming back.' But outbreaks tend to underline the importance of vaccines, increasing their importance among the public. 'As outbreaks grow, we will see people clamoring for vaccines. Remember that most people still vaccinate their children,' Reiss said. Most parents—91 percent—believe vaccines are safe for most children, according to a new poll from the opinion research program at Harvard's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'People want to vaccinate their children,' Offit said. He believes we won't reach a scenario where vaccination rates drop low enough for widespread outbreaks. 'We won't let it get that far,' he said. 'I have to believe the federal government will step in.' Hotez agreed: 'Ultimately it's going to come down to the White House.' After all, outbreaks wouldn't be seen as solely the fault of top officials like Kennedy, Reiss said: 'Outbreaks are not going to be limited to the 'Kennedy outbreaks' or the 'HHS outbreaks,' they're going to be the Trump outbreaks. So I don't know how much Trump is willing to give Kennedy leeway when polio or diphtheria starts coming back.' Regardless, much damage has already been done, and Kennedy has only been on the job for less than five months. 'It will take decades, not years, to fix the damage,' said Reiss. Kennedy and other officials 'essentially took a machete to our public health institutions, and fixing that and rebuilding trust is going to take a while.' Yet there are no signs the damage is ending or that reprieve is coming, she said. 'We're in trouble.'
Medscape
3 days ago
- Medscape
Chelation Therapy for Heart Disease? The Hype Doesn't Hold
This transcript has been edited for clarity. If you're like me, you use social media to follow dog accounts because the dogs are all very good boys. If you surf the dark corners of the internet where people with no medical training dole out medical advice without any qualifications, then you may have heard someone talk about heavy metals — and no, I don't mean the music. Heavy metals — things like mercury, lead, arsenic, and iron — supposedly cause everything from heart disease to autism. Now, you might be saying to yourself, 'Wait a second, lead poisoning isn't good for you. I learned that in medical school.' You are right, but the problem here is that people are using this factoid to push chelation therapy on an unsuspecting public. Now, if you don't know, chelation therapy is a medical procedure where you remove heavy metals from the body. This is obviously useful in cases of acute lead poisoning, for example. It isn't going to cure autism, and it's certainly not going to reduce your cardiovascular risk. However, about a decade ago, the TACT trial suggested that it there were problems with this study, such as a high dropout rate, maybe blinding failed, and numerous interim analysis. To make a long story short, even with all these caveats, the benefit was mainly limited to people with diabetes. A confirmatory follow-up study was planned. TACT2 was supposed to settle this issue definitively, and it was negative. If someone tries to sell you chelation therapy, don't buy it. It doesn't prevent heart disease, it doesn't treat autism, and it's potentially dangerous. It took over a decade and how many millions of dollars for us to figure it out, but at least it's done now. For Medscape, I'm Dr Christopher Labos.
