logo
I was dragged out by sheriff's deputies. Indiana Democrats stayed silent.

I was dragged out by sheriff's deputies. Indiana Democrats stayed silent.

I have spent my entire adult life working to advance the ideals of the Indiana Democratic Party.
I've poured my time, expertise, reputation, and heart into electing Democrats. I've defended policies I believed in. I've protected the people who proclaim to protect the rest of us. I helped build campaigns from the ground up, mentored staffers, trained interns, and gave everything I had to the belief that this party could be a force for justice.
At the June 9 City-County Council meeting, in the very chamber where I have sat as a professional, policy advisor, and believer in public service, I was dragged out and groped by law enforcement at the direction of those very Democrats I once helped into office.
All of them watched. Some turned away. Others remained silent. None of them intervened.
It wasn't because I had harmed someone, disrupted democracy, or posed a threat to anyone's safety. It was because I had the audacity to demand accountability for survivors of sexual assault harmed within our own party's infrastructure and city hall. Survivors who put their trust in us, in me, because we told them we were the party of women's rights that believed in bodily autonomy. Because we said we were different.
I worked for the Senate Democratic Caucus for nearly a decade. I fought like hell for their policies, districts, and image.
I was not just politically or professionally invested in the people who watched me in person and online, be removed. I had been to their weddings. Their baby showers. I've shown up at their doors when they lost loved ones. I've mentored their children. I've contributed to their campaigns. I've canvassed their districts, written speeches, edited press releases, and gone on television to defend their records, often sacrificing my own time in the process.
And now, when I've needed them most, hardly any of those officials have picked up the phone to check my well-being. When my image — my body — was plastered all over the news, groped by law enforcement's hands, there was overwhelming silence.
Not even the Chair of the Indiana Democratic Party, a woman I once called a mentor. A woman I believed, deeply, shared my commitment to safe, accountable, inclusive workplaces. A woman who has publicly acknowledged that workplace harassment in politics is no surprise.
Briggs: Hogsett's texts to women show Indianapolis mayor embodied toxic culture
The emotional weight has been crushing. The physical toll is real. And the psychological harm — to me, to the survivors I support, and to my partner and family — continues to deepen. I would say that the silence from our party's leadership is deafening. But it's worse. The continued chatter to impugn my motives and treat me like a troublemaker is worse.
But who did reach out to inquire about my well-being? The workers. The staffers. The volunteers. The people with the least power and the most to lose. They wrote to me, called me, whispered encouragement when they thought no one else would hear.
The only entity within the state party that has come out alongside survivors is the Howard County Democratic Party. A county party, which understands the message we send as a state party, and from our capital city, is never neutral.
They've all asked me to keep going — not because they don't see what this is costing me, but because they know the truth:
If someone like me — who's spent two decades building relationships, delivering results, and holding confidences — can be tossed aside for daring to speak up… what does that say to every survivor working quietly within our systems? What does that say to our neighbors living at the margins, without titles, connections or political capital?
What does that say about who we are?
Imagine that it wasn't me that night — someone who benefits from whiteness, who is straight and cisgender — but a queer Black woman. A trans organizer. An undocumented survivor. Instead of being a white Hispanic woman, a brown woman. Or someone with no media presence, connections, or political history to soften the blow. I know for a fact there were people of color prepared to testify that night. They saw what happened to me and stayed silent — because they knew it would be worse for them.
That is what is at stake right now.
This is about the soul of the Indiana Democratic Party. Who we really are when it counts. Whether our commitments to justice, safety, and dignity are real, or just slogans we dust off every two years for a campaign.
Opinion: Indianapolis makes construction too slow, expensive and exhausting
I haven't written this easily. I am grieving many losses– of relationships and expectations. But I still believe in accountability. I still believe in the people who whisper to me that they want to do better, but feel trapped in a system that punishes truth-telling.
To those people and everyone watching: now is the time to choose. Will we protect survivors, or protect those with perceived power? Will we lead with courage, or cower in silence? Will we be the party we claim to be — or something else entirely?
The Indiana Democratic Party cannot afford to look away any longer. Mayor Joe Hogsett has lost the moral clarity to lead and must resign. There are others who can do that job far better, and to the degree the people of Indianapolis deserve.
The truth is here. And so am I. Even now — especially now — I'm still fighting for what's right.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Green resigns from Congress to take mystery job — narrowing Republicans' threadbare majority
Mark Green resigns from Congress to take mystery job — narrowing Republicans' threadbare majority

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Mark Green resigns from Congress to take mystery job — narrowing Republicans' threadbare majority

Tennessee Rep. Mark Green announced that he has resigned from Congress to take a new mysterious new job — narrowing Republicans' already ultra-slim majority by one seat ahead of messy fights such as the looming government shutdown battle in the fall. The retired US Army officer had revealed his intention to step down last month after passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but had refrained from giving an exact date. On Friday, he tendered his resignation, which is effective July 20, per his letter to GOP leadership. 'It's with a heavy heart that I say farewell,' Green said in a statement. 'To my constituents across Tennessee's 7th District—thank you. The trust you put in me is humbling. I will look back fondly on my years of serving as your voice in Washington.' 'While I cannot give the details here, I will be doing something specifically designed to help America compete against the CCP [Chinese Communist Party], but this time in business,' Green explained in his resignation video. Shortly after his announcement last month that he intended to leave Congress, Notus reported that Green had been floating business opportunities in Guyana to lobbyists. Now that he is stepping aside, Republicans will have a 219-212 majority in the House. 3 Mark Green had said he wouldn't step down from the House until Republicans passed their megabill. Getty Images But that is set to further shrink when Democrats fill three vacancies for reps that died earlier this year during special elections in the fall. Democrats are heavily favored to reclaim all three of those seats. Eventually, there will be a special election to replace Green, who had won Sen. Marsha Blackburn's (R-Tenn.) old House seat in 2018. Blackburn is now eyeing a potential run for Tennessee governor. Green was also the chairman of the chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, which played a critical role in developing the border security provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that cleared the House last week. 3 The Tennessee Republican has been tight-lipped about his next job. X/@RepMarkGreen With the Tennessee rep stepping down, Republican leadership will have even less room for error during key fights coming up later this year, such as a potentially nasty government shutdown showdown in the fall when Congress has to fund the government for the next fiscal year. His departure also makes the math harder for other GOP goals, such as House Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) plan to pursue another reconciliation bill later this year — the legislative vehicle Republicans used to wrangle the One Big Beautiful Bill Act without Democratic support. The Tennessee Republican declined to provide details of his next gig in the private sector. 3 Republicans are not set to have a slimmer 219–212 House majority. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Last September, Green drew national headlines after his wife accused him of having an affair. She filed for divorce and alleged that he was having a dalliance with a woman employed by Axios. She later admitted to misidentifying the purported mistress, telling Politico, 'I want to correct the record, because I misidentified someone in that message. My husband has never had a relationship with a reporter from Axios, and I regret having said that.' The retired U.S. Army officer had previously announced that he wouldn't pursue another term in the 2024 election cycle, but abruptly changed course about 15 days later.

Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' migrant center: Letters to the Editor — July 7, 2025
Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' migrant center: Letters to the Editor — July 7, 2025

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' migrant center: Letters to the Editor — July 7, 2025

The Issue: President Trump's 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigrant detention center in the Everglades. Is that what Dems think a concentration camp is ('Peek into 'Swamp cooler,' ' July 2)? The main component of concentration camps were the gas chambers. Alligator Alcatraz has air conditioning. This is a good place for the ICE rioters to go. I love it. Carol Meltzer Manhattan Forget attractions like Miami Beach and Disney World. Florida has a new tourist destination called 'Alligator Alcatraz.' That's right: The state is spending $450 million a year to lock up every immigrant it can catch; many who have been here for years picking produce, cleaning toilets, changing sheets at our hotels, fixing your roof, washing dishes at your favorite restaurant and doing jobs that no American wants to do. Some states have very patriotic symbols of immigration: New York has the Statue of Liberty that long welcomed immigrants to our shores. Here in the 'Free State of Florida,' we have Alligator Alcatraz. Since we use these immigrants for their services more than any other state, that makes us the nation's biggest pack of hypocrites. John Bonano Gulfport, Fla. So now the weak, cowardly, infantile, looney Democrats are whining about sending illegal immigrant thugs to a prison surrounded by alligators. And the Dems still can't figure out why we don't vote for them. Jake McNicholas Whitestone The newly built Alligator Alcatraz center to detain illegal migrants slated for deportation has been branded by liberals like Joy Reid as a 'concentration camp for brown people.' Reid is a hard-core, far-left radical and this 'concentration camp' label is a reflection of her severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Democrats need to have their history refreshed. 'Concentration camps' was the term mostly used during Nazi Germany's brutal rule. They were death camps set up specifically for one use only: the assembly-line murder of 6 million completely innocent Jews. No one came out alive. Plus: The left probably knows, but chooses to ignore, the fact that during World War II it was a Democratic president, Franklin Roosevelt, who incarcerated innocent, law-abiding, American citizens simply because they were of Japanese descent. Max Wisotsky Highland Park, NJ I never thought that I would live long enough to see a US president support a detention facility that holds people without due process in the Florida Everglades surrounded by snakes. Vin Morabito Scranton, Pa. The Issue: The University of Pennsylvania strips transgender swimmer Lia Thomas' past titles. It is completely acceptable for Lia Thomas to be stripped of her titles in female events ('Penn yanks trans titles,' July 2). However, there should be a separate category for transgender women with its own awards and records. If a transgender woman finishes in the top three in an event, she should be entitled to a medal, but it should be in addition to the medals awarded to the top three cisgender women. Everyone should be allowed to compete, but they should not have complete freedom as to which category they compete in. Bruce Couchman Toronto, Canada The actions undertaken by the University of Pennsylvania to nullify its transgender swimmer's titles is nothing less than a tacit expression of what has been known all along: This was a biological man competing against young women in grievously unfair athletic competitions. Anthony Parks Garden City Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

5 questions about the Democrats' Tea Party moment
5 questions about the Democrats' Tea Party moment

Vox

time4 hours ago

  • Vox

5 questions about the Democrats' Tea Party moment

Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor, speaks during a press conference celebrating his primary victory on July 2. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images Last weekend, my colleague Christian Paz wrote about how the Democratic Party could be on the brink of a grassroots takeover, similar to what the GOP experienced with the Tea Party movement. It's a fascinating piece that could have huge ramifications for Democratic politics, so I sat down with him to chat about his reporting for Vox's daily newsletter, Today, Explained. Our conversation is below, and you can sign up for the newsletter here for more conversations like this. Hey, Christian, how are you? Remind us what the original Tea Party was. What is this movement we're talking about? The movement that I'm talking about started before Obama was elected. It was a mostly libertarian, grassroots, localized, not-that-big movement — a reaction to the bailouts at the end of the Bush administration. The idea being there's too much deficit spending and government is becoming way too big and becoming unmoored from constitutional limited-government principles. It evolved when Obama was elected into a broader anti-Obama backlash and then a major explosion because of the Affordable Care Act fights. It basically turned into an effort to primary incumbent Republicans, an effort to move the party more toward this wing and eventually try to win back control of Congress. After it took off, what happened to the GOP? They were able to win, I believe, five out of the 10 Senate seats that they were challenging. Something like 40 members of Congress were Tea Party-affiliated. The primary thing was that they were successful in massively mobilizing Republican voters and getting people to turn out in the 2010 midterms, which turned out to be one of the biggest 'shellackings,' as Obama called it, that Democrats or that any incumbent president and their party had sustained. Democrats lost control of the House and lost seats in the Senate, and that was a massive setback. From then on, what happened was a successful move by more conservative primary challengers in future elections, the most iconic one being in 2014 — the primary that ousted Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, in favor of a Tea Party activist. It also forced the party as a whole to move to the right, making it more combative, more extreme, and more captive to a more ideological part of the Republican base. Why are we hearing about this now with the Democratic Party? The underlying idea is that there's a divide between the establishment Democrats and populist-minded progressive Democratic candidates. And that's part of the reason why we're hearing this now, because there was a victory in New York City's mayoral primary by Zohran Mamdani, a candidate who is fully in that latter category — a self-described democratic socialist appealing to this idea of bringing out new parts of the electorate, mobilizing people with populist appeal, with targeted, non-polished messaging, and taking more left-leaning positions on policy. The big thing fueling talk about this Tea Party moment for Democrats is that the base has never really been as angry as it is right now. What we're seeing is a combination of anti-Trump anger, wanting a change in direction, wanting a change in leadership, and also some folks who are like, Maybe we should become more progressive as a party. Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer, plus the most compelling stories of the day. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. So tell me about that. A change in leadership, a change in the establishment — what does this movement actually want? It's interesting. Because at least back with the original Tea Party movement, you could point to a core list of priorities there were about repealing Obamacare, about never repeating a bailout, about limiting the federal government's ability to spend. Something like that doesn't exist right now, because it is a pretty disparate energy. The core thing is Democratic voters do not want the current leadership in Congress. They don't like Hakeem Jeffries's style of leadership in the House. They don't like Chuck Schumer's style of leadership in the Senate. There's frustration at older members of Congress being in Congress and serving in leadership capacity right now. In the polling, over and over again, we see, Democrats should be focused on providing a working-class vision for Americans. They should be more focused on kitchen table affordability issues. And that is the thing that most Democratic voters can actually agree on, and basically saying that that's not what they think their current leadership is focused on. What would it look like for the Democratic Party if this actually happens? There are some strategists and activists who are drawing up lists of potential candidates to primary. There are already some challenges underway. I'm thinking of some House seats in Arizona, House seats in Illinois. There's talk, especially after this New York City mayoral contest, about primarying Kirsten Gillibrand or Chuck Schumer and finding challengers to some more moderate House members in the New York area. I'd be looking to see if there actually are younger people launching primary campaigns targeting older or centrist Democratic members of Congress. Once we get to primary season next year, how successful in fundraising are these candidates? Is there an actual effort by some established progressive members of the House to try to support some of these younger candidates?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store