Big court win for Lehrmann inquiry chair
Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution.
An investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists from the ABC and The Australian prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission.
The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned in the Federal Court. Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution. NewsWire/Tertius Pickard Credit: News Corp Australia
Lawyers for the Speaker of the ACT Legislative Assembly in May submitted the proceedings should be dismissed over claims the report was covered by parliamentary privilege, meaning it couldn't be tendered in court.
Therefore, the retired judge couldn't seek judicial review.
Justice Wendy Abraham said she allowed the Speaker to make the submission but ultimately dismissed it on Wednesday morning during a brief case management hearing in the Federal Court.
'I am not satisfied that the conduct of the proceedings on the material on which the applicant seeks to rely involves an infringement of Section 16 of the Parliamentary Privilege Act,' Justice Abraham told the court.
'I'll provide reasons for that in my final judgment.'
The matter is scheduled for a final hearing on July 21 and 22. Mr Sofronoff is attempting to overturn a report by the ACT Integrity Commission that found he engaged in serious corrupt conduct during the 2023 inquiry. Supplied. Credit: Supplied
Documents filed by his legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'.
The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'.
The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped.
Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Historic native title ruling for Victorian traditional owners
A group of Victorian traditional owners have won a decade-long legal contest against the state government, gaining exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights to sections of land spanning from Mildura to the South Australia border. The landmark ruling in the Federal Court on Friday provides recognition for the traditional owners of the Millewa-Mallee – including those who identify as Latji Latji, Ngintait and Nyeri Nyeri people – and grants them exclusive possession over areas reserved or held in trust expressly for Aboriginal people, such as properties owned by Indigenous corporations. It is the first time exclusive native title has been granted in Victoria. In her judgment, the result of a 10-year-long negotiation between the traditional owners and the state, Justice Elizabeth Bennett said this was testament to the strength of the Indigenous community and their ancestors. The traditional owners will also receive exclusive possession over certain national park areas to be agreed with the state government. Entry to designated park sections by those who are not Millewa-Mallee Indigenous people may require permission, pending future negotiations between traditional owners and the state. However, these rights will not affect any privately owned land. The determination also grants the traditional owners non-exclusive native title rights, including to hunt, fish, gather and camp across the entire determination area, which traces the Murray River and stretches south along the Calder Highway, and extends west through the Murray-Sunset National Park to the South Australian border. 'The parties, in their joint submission, have recognised that, despite the dispossession and other atrocities inflicted upon the Native Title Holders and their predecessors, the Native Title Holders have maintained their traditional laws and customs and have under them a deep and enduring connection to the Country,' Bennett said.
The Age
8 hours ago
- The Age
Historic native title ruling for Victorian traditional owners
A group of Victorian traditional owners have won a decade-long legal contest against the state government, gaining exclusive and non-exclusive native title rights to sections of land spanning from Mildura to the South Australia border. The landmark ruling in the Federal Court on Friday provides recognition for the traditional owners of the Millewa-Mallee – including those who identify as Latji Latji, Ngintait and Nyeri Nyeri people – and grants them exclusive possession over areas reserved or held in trust expressly for Aboriginal people, such as properties owned by Indigenous corporations. It is the first time exclusive native title has been granted in Victoria. In her judgment, the result of a 10-year-long negotiation between the traditional owners and the state, Justice Elizabeth Bennett said this was testament to the strength of the Indigenous community and their ancestors. The traditional owners will also receive exclusive possession over certain national park areas to be agreed with the state government. Entry to designated park sections by those who are not Millewa-Mallee Indigenous people may require permission, pending future negotiations between traditional owners and the state. However, these rights will not affect any privately owned land. The determination also grants the traditional owners non-exclusive native title rights, including to hunt, fish, gather and camp across the entire determination area, which traces the Murray River and stretches south along the Calder Highway, and extends west through the Murray-Sunset National Park to the South Australian border. 'The parties, in their joint submission, have recognised that, despite the dispossession and other atrocities inflicted upon the Native Title Holders and their predecessors, the Native Title Holders have maintained their traditional laws and customs and have under them a deep and enduring connection to the Country,' Bennett said.
West Australian
13 hours ago
- West Australian
No Lattouf contempt probe after Nine names lobbyists
Nine has dodged a contempt prosecution despite publicly naming several pro-Israel lobbyists who had their identities suppressed after complaining about an ABC radio host's views on Palestine. Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023 after a concerted email campaign by the lobbyists demanding she be sacked. She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June. As her Federal Court hearing against the ABC started in February, Justice Darryl Rangiah suppressed the names of nine individuals who had complained about Lattouf. He said there were safety fears if they were publicly identified. Then-ABC chair Ita Buttrose wrote to former managing director David Anderson that she was getting over the complaints two days into Lattouf's fill-in hosting shift, in an email presented during the trial. Nine published a series of articles in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age in January 2024 naming four of the complainants, and did not remove the names until March 2025. The complainants then urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter to a Federal Court registrar who could prosecute the two Nine-owned publications for contempt. The contempt case was also brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White. On Friday, Justice Rangiah declined to refer the matter for prosecution. The complainants had brought a "reasonably arguable" case that Nine was in contempt, he acknowledged in his judgment. But Nine had an arguable defence that the court's suppression order only related to the names of nine complainants found in documents tendered during Lattouf's trial against the ABC, he wrote. Nine argued it had sourced the names from other material, more than a year before the trial started. In declining to send the matter onto a registrar, the judge said the complainants could prosecute the case themselves if they wished. "I consider the intervening parties are 'the ones most naturally placed' to conduct proceedings for contempt of court," he wrote. He ordered the lobbyists pay half of Nine's legal costs, saying the network's failure to properly respond to repeated correspondence from their lawyers was "discourteous and unhelpful". However, he did not order all costs be paid because there was no reasonable basis for contempt proceedings to be brought against Mr White and Ms Alick. The in-house lawyers had no control over whether the articles were amended and there was no evidence about the legal advice they had given, the judge said.
