How can I become a millionaire on a low income? With these 4 steps it might be easier than you think
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below.
It's easy to assume that wealth and income are deeply intertwined. After all, how does anyone become wealthy without a lifetime of earning a six-figure salary?
But data gathered by Dave Ramsey's team suggests the link between wealth and income may be weaker than most assume.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Only 31% of American millionaires earned an average annual income of $100,000 over the course of their careers, according to The National Study of Millionaires conducted by Ramsey Solutions. Perhaps even more surprising is that one-third of these millionaires never reached that six-figure income milestone during their careers.
It's completely realistic to reach a seven-figure net worth without earning a six-figure salary. However, this modest path to millionaire status does require more effort and discipline.
The key to accumulating wealth is managing expenses. Many ultra-high-income individuals struggle to break into the millionaires club because they let lifestyle inflation consume them.
In fact, 36% of Americans earning more than $200,000 a year said they were living paycheck to paycheck, according to a PYMNTS survey from 2024.
By comparison, someone earning a five-figure income can become a millionaire with both disciplined saving and smart investing. Building real wealth on a mid-level income means starting early, investing wisely and consistently finding creative ways to reduce monthly expenses, like cutting insurance costs.
U.S. homeowners' insurers have hiked premium rates by double digits over the past two years. If you're not paying attention, that could be a major hit to your saving power.
Shopping around is one of the best ways to find better rates, but calling individual providers takes time and effort that many working people just don't have.
OfficialHomeInsurance.com can take the hassle out of shopping for home insurance. In just under 2 minutes, you can explore competitive rates from top insurance providers all in one place.
OfficialHomeInsurance.com can make it easy to find the coverage you need at a price that could fit your budget.
But home insurance premiums aren't the only thing coming out of homeowners' pockets. If you own a car, you have another cost to deal with.
Car insurance rates rose an average of 16.5% in 2024, according to ValuePenguin. Like with home insurance, shopping around can lead to substantial savings.
OfficialCarInsurance.com lets you compare quotes from trusted brands — including Progressive, Allstate and GEICO — to make sure you're getting the best deal. Their matchmaking system takes into account your location, vehicle details and driving history to find the lowest rate possible for you.
Deals can start at just $29 per month, and you can switch over your policy in only a few minutes.
Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market —
Time can be another powerful tool for building your wealth. Given a long enough horizon, even small savings and average investment returns can grow into a substantial nest egg.
For instance, an 18-year-old would need to save only $250 a month and earn a modest 7% annual return on investment to reach $1 million by the age of 66. Put simply, if you want to accumulate exceptional wealth without an exceptional income, starting as early as possible is essential.
The best part? You don't need a lot of money to start saving for your long-term financial goals.
Over the course of a lifetime, a little can go a long way.
Another essential ingredient in your climb from modest to millionaire is reducing your exposure to debt. After all, serving the interest payments on credit cards or high-interest loans can offset the positive impact of a diligent savings and investing strategy.
For most people, avoiding debt — especially the expensive type — is their biggest challenge. As of early 2025, U.S. households collectively had nearly $5 trillion in non-housing debt such as student loans, auto loans and credit card balances, according to the New York Federal Reserve.
Serving this debt could be one of the key reasons why the average personal savings rate in the United States is only 4.9%, based on data from the Federal Reserve.
By limiting or eliminating consumer debt, you can save more. This could be the key to your financial freedom, regardless of your income. A good place to start is by targeting high-interest debt as soon as possible. Doing so can save money in the long run by making fewer interest payments overall, but in exchange for a short-term squeeze.
Keep in mind that not all loans are created equal, and it's important to understand not only your interest rates but also the repayment period and what assets could be used as collateral.
Life can be messy. Even if you follow all the traditional financial advice, your journey to financial freedom could be derailed by health issues, divorce, bankruptcy or emergencies.
If you're approaching retirement without much savings or a high-paying career, your chances of becoming a millionaire are lower. That doesn't mean it's impossible to enter the club.
Creative solutions could help you get there despite the odds. For instance, you could boost your savings rate by temporarily moving to a town or country with a lower cost of living. Working remotely while paying modest rent in Mexico, for example, could help you accumulate wealth faster.
You could also delay retirement. Adding five or even 10 years to your retirement plan could make a difference, especially if you're building your nest egg later in life. A 40-year-old would need to save just $900 a month and earn a 7% return on investment to reach millionaire status at 75.
You can also potentially increase your returns by investing in alternative assets, such as farmland, small businesses, high-growth tech stocks or rental properties.
If you're looking to get into real estate without big down payments or tying yourself to a mortgage, you could tap into the market through crowdfunding platforms like Arrived.
Backed by world-class investors including Jeff Bezos, Arrived allows you to invest in shares of vacation and rental properties, allowing you to potentially receive passive income without having to manage midnight maintenance calls or burst pipes.
To get started, simply browse through Arrived's selection of vetted properties, each picked for their potential appreciation and income generation. Once you choose a property, you can start investing with as little as $100.
There's always a practical path to the seven-figure club, regardless of your age or income.
JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late)
This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk
This is how American car dealers use the '4-square method' to make big profits off you — and how you can ensure you pay a fair price for all your vehicle costs
Millions of Americans now sit on a stunning $35 trillion in home equity — here's 1 new way to invest in responsible US homeowners
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax
An updated draft of the Senate's megabill text slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy – and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. The initial draft released by Senate Republicans earlier this month cut the credit for any wind and solar projects that did not 'begin construction' by certain dates, while the latest version bases incentives on when projects actually begin producing electricity — a much higher bar to clear. The first draft gave any project that began construction this year full credit, any project that began construction next year 60 percent credit and any project that began construction in 2027 20 percent of the credit, before they were phased out thereafter. The new legislation instead says that the credits will only apply to facilities that begin producing electricity before the end of 2027. In addition, it imposes a new tax on some wind and solar projects that are placed in service after 2027. The projects that will be taxed if a certain percentage of the value of their components come from China. The Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act included hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits for low-carbon energy sources, including renewable energy. These subsidies were expected to massively reduce the U.S.' planet warming emissions. The GOP's cuts to the credits are expected to severely curtail those gains. If they pass, the cuts represent a win for the party's right flank, which has pushed for major cuts to the credits, and a loss for it's more moderate wing which has called for a slower phaseout. The renewables lobby slammed the changes as hampering the sector. 'In what can only be described as 'midnight dumping,' the Senate has proposed a punitive tax hike targeting the fastest-growing sectors of our energy industry. It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households,' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said in a written statement. 'These new taxes will strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments, threaten energy security, and undermine growth in domestic manufacturing and land hardest on rural communities who would have been the greatest beneficiaries of clean energy investment,' he added.
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines
The Washington Post Building at One Franklin Square Building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew ...) I didn't think I'd be back writing about the troubles at The Washington Post so soon, following my last piece from just a few days ago, but here we are. That earlier piece, which you can read here, focused on the Post having lost tens of thousands of subscribers over the last several years, with the paper's current average daily paid subscriptions now at a new low. Despite the financial backing of owner Jeff Bezos, the reality is that Post hasn't been able to convert fleeting interest from readers into long-term loyalty; worse still, internal dysfunction and shifting editorial strategies continue to cloud the Post's identity and future. And, unfortunately, two new developments suggest the challenges aren't letting up anytime soon. Another misstep at The Washington Post Let's start with a newsroom experiment that executive editor Matt Murray detailed in a company memo. It's a new initiative that will allow individuals mentioned in the Post's stories to annotate those articles directly on the site. The movie is being framed as a way to 'deepen the conversation' and keep reader engagement on the Post's platform, rather than that discussion migrating away to X, Reddit, or elsewhere. But, come on: It's an absolute certainty that this is going to end up backfiring in spectacular fashion. This initiative is the kind of idea that looks fantastic on a whiteboard: Start letting some of the sources who are quoted in articles add annotations to the articles they're mentioned in. More engagement = everybody wins. Or something like that. In reality, the idea of real-time rebuttals next to reported journalism opens up an unnecessary Pandora's box. What happens when a powerful figure – or anyone, really – uses the feature in bad faith to undermine verified facts? Or tries to insert spin into the conversation? Will readers trust the original reporting, or will the very presence of a sidebar reply create the illusion of 'two sides' to a matter of fact? Reporters will technically be able to respond, but as I see it this risks adding 'debate monitor' to their job description. That the paper's management decided to embark on such an initiative at all, meanwhile, should also put this next bit of negative news into context. A rebuke of The Washington Post's Bezos era Pamela Alma Weymouth, granddaughter of the late Post publisher Katharine Graham, has written a personal and extremely scathing commentary in The Nation about the situation at the Post — among other things, accusing Bezos of systematically dismantling the institution her grandmother once protected. She lays the blame for much of the Post's woes at the feet of the Amazon founder. 'In the face of a more tyrannical Trump,' she writes, 'Bezos has retreated. He's muzzled his editorial page. Exceptional writers, editors, cartoonists have fled. Eight days before the election, the Post canceled a scheduled endorsement of Kamala Harris — breaking with decades of precedent. Four hundred Post journalists signed a protest letter. Two hundred and fifty thousand readers canceled their subscriptions.' Things got worse earlier this year, she continued, when Bezos dictated that Opinion writers would be expected to align with 'personal liberties and free markets,' leaving little or even no room for dissenting views. Editor David Shipley and others resigned, and another wave of subscription cancellations followed. Weymouth continues: 'If the free press can be manipulated by politicians, if truth is viewed as optional, if The Washington Post goes dark under Bezos, then we lose more than a legend. We lose the very thing that makes America a democracy.' Weymouth's commentary is particularly damning in light of recent revelations about Bezos' companies engaging with Trumpworld while the Post, at the same time, shifted its own editorial voice. It's the kind of rebuke that ought to cut deep, given that it's rooted in the legacy of the family that once owned The Washington Post — their ownership now relegated to a bygone era of journalism. To be sure, none of this means the Post is finished. There are still plenty of talented reporters who fill its newsroom, but decisions from the leadership have nonetheless put the paper in a precarious spot. Legacy isn't a business model. Without a clear editorial mission and a bold plan to rebuild reader loyalty, the fact of the matter is that even a paper as storied as The Washington Post won't be able to successfully right the ship — and avoid the inevitable.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
DOGE Terminates Nearly 3,000 Government Phones
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced on Friday that it has significantly expanded its government phone line elimination program, terminating nearly 3,000 devices across multiple agencies. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email on Saturday for comment. Why It Matters DOGE was established by President Donald Trump upon his return to office in collaboration with tech billionaire Elon Musk, with the stated goal of reducing federal government waste and inefficiency. Musk said he had "done enough" and later stepped down in May after serving less than five months as DOGE's leader. The task force claims to have saved $170 billion overall, with its "wall of receipts" accounting for approximately $71 billion in terminated contracts, grants, and leases. The phone line terminations serve as a testing ground for the task force's approach to cost reduction across federal agencies. If successful, DOGE estimates similar cuts could save the federal government up to $100 million annually when applied across all departments. However, the effectiveness and scope of these cuts remain subjects of debate among policymakers and government efficiency experts. Unused phone line update!@SBAgov has continued its phone audit and has now saved ~$2.84M/year in unnecessary spend. This includes: * Traditional Landlines: 96% (661 of 686) terminated, saving ~$650k/year * Mobile Phone: 55% (2,940 of 5,340) deactivated, saving ~$1.7M/year *… — Department of Government Efficiency (@DOGE) June 27, 2025 What To Know DOGE announced on X, formerly Twitter, on Friday that the Small Business Administration (SBA) had deactivated 2,940 of 5,340 mobile phones (55 percent), eliminated 6,505 of 9,195 VOIP licenses (70 percent), and terminated 661 of 686 traditional landlines (96 percent), resulting in annual savings of approximately $2.84 million. The phone line cuts began in May with a pilot program at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), where 198 "unused" lines were canceled in one hour, saving $100,000 annually, according to a post on X. DOGE extrapolated this data to estimate potential government-wide savings, though critics note that other agencies may not have the same percentage of unused lines. A recent Harvard University/Harris Poll released in May found that cutting the size of government is broadly popular across the nation, with 63 percent of Americans supporting the effort. A majority, 55 percent, said they believe DOGE has been effective at doing so. However, 54 percent of Americans said they believe the task force has "gone about making cuts to government expenses" the "wrong way." The poll surveyed 1,903 registered voters on May 14 and May 15, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points. What People Are Saying Elon Musk, former leader of DOGE, posted on X: "Government is wasting about $100 million per year on unused phone lines!" Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a Republican, posted on X in May: "We identified the same issue last year with our Arkansas Forward initiative. We are now saving state taxpayers $1 million by eliminating unused phone lines." Immigration attorney Curtis Morrison posted on X in May: "Government not answering phone, and DOGE solution is to cancel phone lines." Elon Musk shows off a shirt that says "DOGE" as he walks on the South Lawn of the white House after stepping off Marine One upon arrival to the White House in Washington, DC on... Elon Musk shows off a shirt that says "DOGE" as he walks on the South Lawn of the white House after stepping off Marine One upon arrival to the White House in Washington, DC on March 9, 2025. More OLIVER CONTRERAS/AFP via Getty Images What Happens Next DOGE plans to continue its cost-cutting efforts across federal agencies in the coming months. However, the task force faces ongoing legal challenges regarding transparency.
